What a headline. From the UK Telegraph:
Israel refuses to tell US its Iran intentions
Israel has refused to reassure President Barack Obama that it would warn him in advance of any pre-emptive strike on Iran’s nuclear capabilities, raising fears that it may be planning a go-it-alone attack as early as next summer. The US leader was rebuffed last month when he demanded private guarantees that no strike would go ahead without White House notification, suggesting Israel no longer plans to “seek Washington’s permission”, sources said. The disclosure, made by insiders briefed on a top-secret meeting between America’s most senior defence chief and Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s hawkish prime minister, comes amid concerns that Iran’s continuing progress towards nuclear weapons capability means the Jewish state has all but lost hope for a diplomatic solution.
Let me see if I can get this right. It was a group of people inspired by a White Paper some of them created in the late 1990s for Netanyahu, then in his first term as Israeli Prime Minister, who then regrouped to form the Project for the New American Century, that kept on pushing for a war against Iraq, largely to help protect Israel. They got what they wanted, much to our country’s detriment.
Now they’re pushing for war against Iran, even though such a conflict would not only seriously over-stretch our defense establishment, it would endanger our military forces in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait and throughout the Persian Gulf area.
Tens of thousands of Americans.
A lone Israeli attack on Iran would probably result in attacks upon all our naval vessels within reach of Iranian missiles. It would result in Shia attacks on US forces in Iraq. It would seriously endanger US forces in central and western Afghanistan. It would certainly result in attacks on shipping in the Persian Gulf, Straits of Hormuz and approaches to those areas.
Don’t get me started on the ramifications for several country’s economies, including our own.
We give these assholes billions a year for weapons. Our president serially abases himself on their behalf. If Israeli agents gave our congress and senate a bill to pass, saying “Benjamin Netanyahu is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life,” it would be passed by overwhelming majorities in both chambers, even if the line’s provenance was discovered during the rushes to co-sponsor and to be the first to vote.
If Alaskans look down upon some more than we do mooches, it is ingrates. One Israeli government after another seems to want to outdo its predecessors in being both.
Allies? My ass!




21 Comments

It seem their so-called democracy have been taken over by looms ,ass wipes ,weasels ,career liars, warmonger,truth benders and plain out of the closet crazies. Forgive me if I got their so-called democracy mixed up with ours bought and paid stooges.
Meanwhile, the UK media is itself so terrified of angering the neocons that they refuse to publish a new piece of news from Craig Murray:
In the comments section, Murray states that if no paper or other media outlet will publish his piece, he’s going to post it Monday:
The main reason Iraq didn’t descend into total and ungovernable blood-drenched chaos in the wake of the invasion is because of the truce imposed and kept by Moqtada al-Sadr, a key Shia leader in Baghdad. Even as the Sunnis made attack after attack, Sadr held his people back from providing the retaliation that the Sunnis wanted in order to blow the lid totally off the situation.
If Israel attacks Iran, Sadr lets loose the dogs of war and then US troops will be stuck in what will be the 21st-century version of what happened to the British at Khartoum.
The Monetarist Empire leads with the official narrative, of course. Where’s David Kelley when you need him?
The Oligarchs are using these stories for “plausible deniability” purposes, though, really who believes that the City of London’s / Wall Streets puppet governments aren’t maneuvering us to war via one of their great stooges, Netanyahu?
However, our actions belie this ploy for plausible deniability:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204358004577030392418491690.html
At least there are leading establishment forces within Israel who’ve come out against an attack:
“‘Iran far from posing existential threat’”
“Ex-Mossad Chief Ephraim Halevy warns strike on Iran could have devastating effect for region. ‘Ultra-Orthodox radicalization poses bigger threat than Ahmadinejad,’ he says”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4143909,00.html
The last Republican “debate” in Spartanburg, S.C. saw question after question by CBS’ Scott Pelley clearly signaling that a War against Iran was clearly on the table and being dished up to the American people for credulous consumption.
The argument is made that the oligarchy is using a triggering event for WW III to basically try to save their position of dominance that is now being threatened by the masses.
Time to overturn the chessboard:
“This morning Lyndon LaRouche discussed the imminent potential for a British-sponsored World War III. The Middle East is the new Balkans in this context, where that trigger point has been carefully set up, and as the fuse is burning down on the financial resources to carry out that operation, the time for that operation to be launched, or defeated, is now.”
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/20070
Thanks for covering this Edward. It’s kind of important.
recc’d
Not difficult to surmise there is a “leash” between TelAviv and WashingtonDC — based on what ET describes above the more difficult thing to determine is on what end of leash is the collar?
One need not take long to puzzle out how above story would have been exploited by IranHaterClub Americans and Israelis were Iran and Israel roles in this story reversed. The propaganda catapulting that would have ensued then out of WashingtonDC and TelAviv? — it would have been seamless.
Seeing how Israel has atomic weapons illegally first gained from France in 1960′s perhaps that episode of illegal atomic weapons proliferation should be better illuminated before Americans team up with the French to do conquest war on Libya or decry what Tehran is doing legally under treaty and under a tightly imposed UN regime. Unlike Israel and the illegal since 1960′s out of treaty Israeli atomic weapons acquisition(s) effort and deployment .
So what end of the leash is WashingtonDC on?
In view of what the Americans have inflicted since 1980′s on Iraq,Afghanistan,Pakistan and now on Libya too it does not require much imagination to surmise what happens to Tehran and Iran and the Iranians should WashingtonDC or TelAviv attack,seek and do “regime change” in Tehran. With atomic weapons or without.
The Israelis are brazen for thinking and seeking to do anything to Tehran in view of TelAviv’s knowable/known murky atomic weapons history. Or the many attacks TelAviv has done to Lebanon and then also to the WestBank and Gaza since 1980. In view of the often truly brutal and ruthlessly inhumane Israeli Occupation of East Jerusalem,WestBank and Gaza.
Israelis do not qualify to be Grand Inquisitors Of Anything Atomic.
As for the Americans? Shameless,Bastards and Liars are three words that cover much of post WW2 ME/American history — from 1980 on two more words — duplicity and hypocrisy — fit so very well and often.
Tehran is well within it’s rights to not trust the Americans in WashingtonDC very much or simply not at all.
Who left fingerprints on Shah being put in power in Iran in 1953?
Who openly backed/supported Saddam during 1980′s Iraq/Iran War?
Who then sought/imposed inhumane,cruel sanctions on Iraq during 1990′s?
Who lied and laid Iraq open to death dealing and ruin from 2003 on?
WashingtonDC did.
Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton? Two Americans who should take a long look in a mirror and then proceed to either put TelAviv on steep notice as to what end of the leash WashingtonDC is on or adjust the collars they wear and stand Israel’s flag up in Oval Office and wait for what follows. The honesty of it would astound.
This will be the war to end all wars because the atomic winter will be upon us and there will be no more us anywhere.
Obama Sold Israel Bunker-Buster Bombs
Sep 23, 2011
“In an exclusive story to be published Monday on growing military cooperation between the two allies, U.S. and Israeli officials tell Newsweek that the GBU-28 Hard Target Penetrators—potentially useful in any future military strike against Iranian nuclear sites—were delivered to Israel in 2009, just several months after Obama took office.
The military sale was arranged behind the scenes as Obama’s demands for Israel to stop building settlements in disputed territories were fraying political relations between the two countries in public.
The Israelis first requested the bunker busters in 2005, only to be rebuffed by the Bush administration. At the time, the Pentagon had frozen almost all U.S.-Israeli joint defense projects out of concern that Israel was transferring advanced military technology to China.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/23/president-obama-secretly-approved-transfer-of-bunker-buster-bombs-to-israel.html
I realize that ads are random and each reader sees a different ad (so I am told); but I still can’t help but notice that whenever “any” post critical of Israel or or policy concerning the this religious state appear so do these ads? It kinda cries out as to the moral weakness of their position that they feel all opposing voices must be drowned out.
Instead of the leash I think it’s more like the snake eating itself it’s intertwined as one.
And here it is:
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/11/matthew-gould-and-the-plot-to-attack-iran/
Yeah this really is the problem from hell. AIPAC and the other pro-ethnic-cleansing forces supporting illegal Israeli expansionism have so sewn up the discourse that it is almost impossible to discuss the matter without being accused–loudly–of being “anti-Semitic”. The charge is preposterous; after all, Arabs are “semites” too, and a large percentage of Jews are anti-Zionist. But any statement at all which, however timidly, suggests that Israel would be better off living within its legal borders and stopping the ethnic cleansing is met with calumny and accusations of wanting the Holocaust to return.
As with most ills, it comes down to the corporatist media and their spinning of the Matrix (or “the Spectacle”, if you’re a deBord fan). The corporatist media are tools of these imperialists, so don’t expect the discourse to become sane anytime soon.
As long as we have an unimpeded intertoobz, we can see the truth. Once the connection is broken, we will essentially be isolated and only able to be suspicious of msm (1%) and aipac propaganda. At least we have had some fog lifted that can never be brought back in the current and following couple of generations.
Or, as in the case of a comment at my blog, of being anti-Semitic, and in need of psychiatric counseling:
Thanks! Unsettling in the extreme.
Israel doesn’t care what we in the US think. I cannot understand their desire to start a ME war because there are a lot more Arabs than Israelis and Israel doesn’t have the ability to kill them all. What are they thinking? There’s no way that Americans – at least sane ones – will stand for troops being sent to protect Israel. This is madness.
English translation: “I can’t really attack you on the facts, so I won’t even bother. Instead, I’ll just call you a name and see if I can lure you into playing my silly Game of Constant and Futile Denial.”
David Kelley was obviously murdered to shut him up. The ptb apparently had to stop him from continuing to talk and to be a symbol. With the nonsense suicide story, he just disappeared from the conversation. There was another look at his death, but nothing came of it. I’ll try to get links, but right now I’m busy.
It doesn’t matter what sane Americans think because there isn’t one making any foreign policy, or any other policy, for that matter. The ones in charge are tied to israel so tightly that there lies their primary allegience, and the ‘leash’ alluded to earlier has the collar around the neck of the US ‘leadership.’ The collar is a choke chain so there is no independent action by American ‘leaders.’
Justin Raimondo takes up this issue:
Textbook example of Cognitive Dissonance…!
Mahalo, ET, another great post…!
Indeed, why should the Israelis?
Did they bother to determine whether the USS Liberty was a naval vessel of America and
not an Egyptian ship before they blew it out of the water with over 40 American sailors killed?
They knew the Liberty was an American ship. They did not want an American surveillance ship eavesdropping on them. So they asked the U.S. Naval High Command to move it and it was not moved.
So the Israelis blew a ship of their greatest ally out of the water.
And who was the Chief of General Staff who ordered such an attack?
Why the sainted and later assassinated Yitzhak Rabin, that’s who.