Anonymous and Wikileaks appear to have teamed up in a move to release a helluva a lot of stuff hacked from STRATFOR:
Wikileaks dropped a bomb on Texas-based “global intelligence company” Stratfor late Sunday with “The Global Intelligence Files,” a dump of over 5 million hacked emails containing confidential information about Stratfor’s informers, psych ops, pay-offs and the methods they use to make the payments. Anonymous has proudly taken credit for the hack via @YourAnonNews.
Between Wikileaks and anonymous, twitter is getting swamped this evening, even as much of the twittersphere has been focused on the American Academy Awards, by little tweets linking to stuff that is getting flung out there in Monday’s big dump.
This is going to be very big. Here’s STRATFOR’s statement, released just minutes ago:
In December, thieves compromised Stratfor’s data systems and stole a large number of company emails, along with other private information of Stratfor readers, subscribers and employees. Those stolen emails apparently will be published by Wikileaks. This is a deplorable, unfortunate — and illegal — breach of privacy.
Some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic. We will not validate either. Nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them.
For subscribers and friends of Stratfor, we stress that the disclosure of these emails does not mean that there has been another hack of Stratfor’s computer and data systems. Stratfor’s data systems, which we have worked hard to rebuild since the December hack, remain secure and protected.
As with last year’s hack, the release of these emails is a direct attack on Stratfor. This is another attempt to silence and intimidate the company, and one we reject. Under the continued leadership of founder and Chief Executive Officer George Friedman, Stratfor will not be silenced and will continue to publish the geopolitical analysis our friends and subscribers have come to rely upon.
As we have said before, Stratfor has worked to build good sources in many countries around the world, as any publisher of global geopolitical analysis would do. We have done so in a straightforward manner and we are committed to meeting the highest standards of professional conduct.
Stratfor is not a government organization, nor is it affiliated with any government. The emails are private property. Like all private emails, they were written casually, with no expectation anyone other than the sender and recipient would ever see them. They should be read as such.
Stratfor understands that this hack and the fallout from it, including the disclosures by Wikileaks, have created serious difficulties for our subscribers, friends and employees. We again apologize for any problems this incident has created, and we deeply appreciate the loyalty that has been shown to Stratfor since last year’s hack.
We want to assure everyone that Stratfor is committed to recovering from the hack and rebuilding trust with the public, and will continue to do what we do best: produce and publish industry-leading analysis of international affairs.
Good luck keeping your machine going, Stratfor. You’re going to need it. Here are the google entries for STRATFOR in the past hour.
I’ve been following the progress of hacking since 1971, when I participated in a radio interview with John T. Draper, then known as Cap’n Crunch. He was one of the early hackers, previously known as “phone freax.” I predict Monday’s dump will be one of the greatest accomplishments in the history of the “Hacker ethic.”
Here’s the hacker ethic, as described in 1984 by Steven Levy:
- Access to computers—and anything which might teach you something about the way the world works—should be unlimited and total. Always yield to the Hands-on Imperative!
- All information should be free.
- Mistrust authority—promote decentralization.
- Hackers should be judged by their hacking, not bogus criteria such as degrees, age, race or position.
- You can create art and beauty on a computer.
- Computers can change your life for the better.
That was 28 years ago. We’ll see Monday how computers change life for the better for a fairly high number of powerful people.



11 Comments




From a quote:
The material contains privileged information about the US government’s attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor’s own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks. There are more than 4,000 emails mentioning WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.
From your first link:
The email dump apparently reveals Stratfor-paid moles in the press. Describing Israeli journalist Yossi Melman, employed by the newspaper Haaretz, as “an information mule,” Wikileaks states that Mr. Melman “conspired with Guardian journalist David Leigh to secretly, and in violation of WikiLeaks’ contract with the Guardian, move WikiLeaks US diplomatic cables to Israel.”
“This is a deplorable, unfortunate — and illegal — breach of privacy.”
Got a good laugh. Thanks Anonymous and Wikileaks.
Looks like a violation of insider trading laws too:
Formation of a market entity called STRATCAP:
http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/49613_labor-day-review-of-where-we-are-.html
Seems all too familiar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5ED63A_hcd0#!
We learned much from Colby who had an interesting ending:
“The Unexplained Tow Rope – In their haste the killers left their tow rope attached to the front of Colby’s canoe. No one had ever seen a tow rope on Colby’s canoe. Why would he need it? Again, that was a point people talked about but nobody wanted to connect it to possible foul play.”–ZALIN GRANT (served as an Army Intelligence Officer in Vietnam. A former journalist for Time and The New Republic, he is the author of six books, including FACING THE PHOENIX: The CIA and the Political Defeat of the United States in Vietnam)
http://www.pythiapress.com/wartales/colby.htm
More, on this “window” to their world:
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3244cheney_olson_case.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WANNqr-vcx0
But wait! Wasn’t WikiLeaks irreparably crippled when legend in his own mind Daniel Dumbshit — erm, Daniel Domscheit-Berg — left the group because he said he was the only one who knew how to code in the whole outfit and everyone else there, Assange included, was allegedly just a script kiddie?
Oh, and where is that “ethical” whistleblowing organization, OpenLeaks, that Dumbshit had promised to have up and running by now? Is it more than just a website?
Looks like the “experts” in global intelligence ain’t all they’re cracked up to be, LOL.
This is a great post ET, much appreciated.
The only thing I can think of that would add to the entertainment value of this story, would be some kind of disjointed, pretzel-logic comment from Adrian Lamo regarding the event.
rec’d
Forbes: “On the other hand, a partnership with Anonymous could revive WikiLeaks’ relevance to the public. Since September of 2010, the group hasn’t had a functioning dropbox for leakers, and doesn’t seem to have one in the works any time soon. With no public, secure conduit for whistleblowers, a massive collective of nameless hackers might be WikiLeaks’ most prolific new source.”
very true.
As to Stratfor they are the experts Congress was referred to by GW Bush as going into Iraq, and Stratfor told their subscribers it would be a walk in the park, in and out in a few months with costs paid via stealing a bit of oil.
Sigh – they are not that reliable!
some of the news organizations they are feeding the documents to:
No Bill Keller and the NYT. Wonder why?
Rolling Stone is the other American partner. Matt Taibbi is the perfect person to research the Goldman Sachs portion of the leaks.
Re: your last line: lol.