Early Monday morning, Shell Oil announced that its plan of drilling all the way into oil, inside the crust of the bottom of the Arctic Ocean off the shores of Alaska, were crushed. Their own technology, the vaunted containment dome, said to incorporate all the lessons learned from capping the Deepwater Horizon spill, was severely damaged in perfect late summer weather, while being tested on Puget Sound:
Shell is giving up for the year on drilling for oil in Arctic waters off Alaska after another setback to its troubled oil spill containment barge.
The company announced the decision Monday after testing of the Arctic Challenger, the oil spill containment barge the company has been unable to get ready and certified to support its Arctic Alaska exploration. Shell said that, while it will abandon its effort to drill into oil-bearing zones this year, it will drill “top holes” to get ready for next year.
“During a final test, the containment dome aboard the Arctic Challenger barge was damaged. It is clear that some days will be required to repair and fully assess dome readiness,” the company said in a written statement.
Environmental activists from Greenpeace, and being represented by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, have been pushing for the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement to conduct more rigorous tests on the equipment Shell has vaunted as being the best in the world for winter conditions in the Arctic. That the key spill containment feature failed in lake-like conditions near Bellingham Bay on Puget Sound is an indicator that the concerns of activists such as ex-Prof. Rick Steiner (hounded from his post at the University of Alaska by the Bush and Obama administrations, at the behest of Shell), and Subhankar Banerjee (who was a guest Sunday at firedoglake’s Book Salon) have legitimacy, and that Shell may be setting us up for as bad a record in the Arctic as they have on the Niger Delta.
I’ve been concerned about the package represented by the Arctic Challenger since I found out in late July that Shell was refitting the barge I had worked exactly thirty years ago into a role I knew it was not suited for:
Although the Arctic Challenger was not needed as an icebreaker in 1982, it had been tried in that role earlier, and was found to be poorly designed. It didn’t draw a lot of water – 4.1 feet empty – so, after having been broken by the bows, ice would creep along underneath the hull and ultimately foul the props and rudders of the propelling tugs. Not good when you’re 3,000 miles from Seattle.
Crew members of towing tugs had been injured over the five years since the barge’s completion, and it was not considered to be a “good luck” barge in fleet scuttlebutt. It never really found a niche after the Sealifts were over. It languished, being shuttled from Seattle to the Gulf of Mexico to Coos Bay, Oregon, where it stayed for a long time.
On August 8th, I attempted to take a close look at the work being done in Bellingham Bay on the Arctic Challenger. I was thwarted and followed by Shell rent-a-cops out of town:
I’m on my way back from Bellingham. I visited the Port of Bellingham Dock this morning, where the barge Arctic Challenger is being modified by contractors for Shell Oil, to be used as their oil spill containment vessel for offshore drilling operations in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.
I managed to get through two levels of security, being escorted the entire time. At the third level, as I was explaining I hoped to get definitive information on the nature and extent of the stern modifications, bells and whistles started going off in the heads of the contractor’s people at hand. I was sequestered away in the office of a fairly anal firewall type guy, until several security people and what appeared to be the project manager came in.
I was told the stern notch is being decked over and compartmentalized permanently. It will never be pushed again as an icebreaker. Instead, he stated, an icebreaking tug, similar to the Swedish tug Tor Viking II, will be assigned to the Arctic Challenger from the time it leaves Puget Sound until its duties in the Arctic are over. He stated that, summer or winter, when the vessel is deployed in the drilling areas, it will not be moored or anchored, but will be moving or drifting.
I thanked him for the best information anyone has yet given me, and requested a tour of the project. He flatly told me “No,” and I was not allowed to take any photographs of the vessel. He assured me that Shell Oil will be contacting me soon with more information.
The ambience of the work place there reminded me very much of projects in the past where I have worked that are seriously behind schedule and nervous of potential outcomes.
I was followed by private police until I left Bellingham.
Bad luck barge? A project long nervous about potential outcomes? Incapable of passing dumbed down tests in flat calm weather? Is this what we will have next year, after Shell cobbles together something that can somehow get certified as adequate?
I hope not!
Look at the image at the top, of the barge, being towed into Bellingham Bay. It is supposed to have a crew of scores of people, when deployed. Would you like to be on that thing in an 80-knot blow anywhere, let alone the Arctic Ocean?
Meanwhile, Shell hopes to continue drilling into the crust, to a distance short of where the oil is supposed to be:
Shell is required to finish any drilling operations in advance of the arrival of sea ice that could pose a problem for containing spills. The company had hoped for an extension of its Sept. 24 deadline for drilling in the Chukchi Sea. But Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said he wouldn’t consider the request until the spill containment barge was ready and certified.
Shell is now abandoning for this year the effort to drill into oil-bearing zones. But the company plans to drill as many “top holes” as possible this drilling season in hopes of making progress toward next year.
“The top portion of the wells drilled in the days and weeks ahead will be safely capped and temporarily abandoned this year, in accordance with regulatory requirements,” the company said in its written statement.
Shell has had problems with even such preliminary drilling.
The company last week had to halt the effort the day after it began when sea ice started moving toward the drill ship.
Shell said the drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, is expected to resume its position in the Chukchi Sea and start work again in the coming days. Shell said it also plans to start operations in the Beaufort Sea soon following the fall Inupiat whaling season.
image: The Arctic Challenger, being towed to its berth in Bellingham Bay, by a Tug (possibly the Garth Foss), after the failure of its spill containment system in a test on Puget Sound. Photo by Todd Guiton, published by the Bellingham Herald




21 Comments

And what if the “top holes” unexpectedly strike oil?
I doubt they will. The geology where they are drilling has been studied for a generation.
The LA Times has more information on the equipment failure:
Sounds like a clusterfuck to me…
Thanks, Edward, for the update. At least they’re stalled for now, thank the gods.
You likely know how activist the First Americans have been on the issue, but this is great work.
Rec’d.
Alistair Osborne, a financial commentator for the UK Telegraph, sees this as high comedy:
snip…
I’m working with some of these folks on another issue – coal mines.
Thank you…what an amazing follow-up to yesterday’s salon. I doubt that Shell et al were watching/reading, but maybe the fates were well-informed. So glad you could get so close….
It had already happened, but thanks, RevBev.
I’ve got more information from a tugboat skipper who was there, but he doesn’t want me to print it. He’s the one, based on being able to listen to the encrypted radio chatter when they were all tangled up, that called it a “clusterfuck.”
He assured me that this crew isn’t ready for a water park, let alone the Chukchi or Beaufort Seas.
I think I saw that “thing” being towed back into port across Bellingham Bay this morning.
The energy companies are built on a pyramid of employees with room temperature IQs if personal experience means anything.
Philip I presume you’ve seen this?
mark
Arctic expert predicts final collapse of sea ice within four years
In what he calls a "global disaster" now unfolding in northern latitudes as the sea area that freezes and melts each year shrinks to its lowest extent ever recorded, Prof Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University calls for "urgent" consideration of new ideas to reduce global temperatures.
[snip]
Wadhams has spent many years collecting ice thickness data from submarines passing below the arctic ocean. He predicted the imminent break-up of sea ice in summer months in 2007, when the previous lowest extent of 4.17 million square kilometres was set. This year, it has unexpectedly plunged a further 500,000 sq km to less than 3.5m sq km. "I have been predicting [the collapse of sea ice in summer months] for many years. The main cause is simply global warming: as the climate has warmed there has been less ice growth during the winter and more ice melt during the summer.
Read in full: Arctic expert predicts final collapse of sea ice within four years | Environment | guardian.co.uk
mfi,
I HAD seen that, and I don’t think there is anything we can now do to prevent such a total sea ice collapse.
If that happens, Greenland’s ice cap will soon follow — which means the Gulf Stream that’s kept the British Isles habitable will shift. Which means London will look like Moscow.
I’d be interest to see what WeatherDem’s latest post on arctic ice might be. He usually has something every month.
Being on that barge in 80 kts of wind?! Holy smoke – No way.
Imagine that puny little barge and the logistics nightmare of trying to contain a spill even 1/10th the size of DeepWater Horizon. Ain’t no way.
great reporting ET
Any word on the Pebble Mine disaster-to-be. Has it been approved?
Pebble Mine will never be approved.
That being said, we have other problems bearing down on us.
oh – that’s so sad. Worse because it didn’t have to be that way.
I’m glad you don’t think Pebble Mine will get any approval -
Just off the phone with another anonymous informant who was there. It could have been worse. One diver came close to becoming entangled. Trying to find out more.
Recc’d and thanks for the update. I don’t always post, but I ALWAYS read whatever you write on this subject.
Boxturtle (Don’t blink. Shell will be back. With more lawyers and lobbyists)
They’re writing this off as a very, very expensive “training year.”
Can’t give name, but after working on this project you would think with this much at stake Shell would’nt want to impact the enviroment in any way nor have any issues at sea like the gulf.. However after running simulated tests on computer it capsized 9 out of ten tests in a 10′ sea with 30 mph winds…..My facts may be incorrect as it was a passed along information at greenberry meetings, the real numbers of course arent ever stated… it may be 20′ sea with 30 or 40mph winds but either way this things gonna go under like the titanic hitting an iceberg…