
Photo: Ron Almog / Flickr
The response to the October 5th letter to Congress from fifteen mainline, somewhat liberal, and very large Christian denominations or groups, by various Zionist Jewish organizations, is rapidly escalating into something serious. In an article at the Jewish Telegraph Agency, posted an hour ago, Ethan Felson,vice president and general counsel of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, appears to be threatening to have Congress investigate the Churches, or the signatories of the letter:
Felson said JCPA is considering as a response asking Congress to investigate delegitimizers of Israel and to issue a resolution against their efforts. He said he has not yet decided if he will attend the roundtable.
“We feel strongly that if you want the parties to reconcile, we should model reconciliation,” Felson said. “But that’s difficult to do when we’re up against this brand of antipathy.”
Suggesting that American Jewish groups could retaliate by advocating against U.S. aid to the Palestinians, Felson said the signers of the letter are “opening up a Pandora’s box.” [emphases added]
In an op-ed, posted an hour ago in the Jerusalem Post, commentator Isi Leibler invokes some pretty serious imagery:
The signatories include leaders of the Lutheran, Presbyterian, Methodist and National Council of Churches. Although many of the rank-and-file members of these churches are supporters of Israel and unaware of these activities, their radical anti-Israel leaders were obviously not inhibited from taking such action despite being aware of the role of their churches in demonizing, persecuting and murdering Jews over the past 2,000 years.
One is tempted to suggest that some of the current Lutheran leaders have inherited the anti-Semitic poison of their 16th-century founder, Martin Luther, who after failing to convert the Jews called on his followers to murder these “poisonous envenomed worms” and set fire to their synagogues and schools. [emphasis added]
They have simply redirected his anti-Semitic obsessions toward the Jewish state in lieu of individual Jews.
Leibler is referring to this 1543 pamphlet by Luther: Von den Juden und ihren Lügen
In the JTA article, there is no reference to this morning’s action by the Rabbinical Council of Jewish Voice for Peace (disclaimer – my wife is a member of JVP), in support of the stance of the Christian leaders who wrote to Congress:
The undersigned members of the Jewish Voice for Peace Rabbinical Council stand with our American Christian colleagues in their recent call to “make U.S. military aid to Israel contingent upon its government’s “compliance with applicable US laws and policies.”
We are as troubled as our Christian colleagues by the human rights violations Israel commits against Palestinian civilians, many of which involve the misuse of US – supplied weapons. It is altogether appropriate – and in fact essential – for Congress to ensure that Israel is not in violation of any US laws or policies that regulate the use of US supplied weapons.
JTA is usually very good at keeping up with all developments on a topic when they publish, so I’m not quite sure why the article fails to mention the action by the JVP Rabbinical Council.
Leibler, in her JPost op-ed adds:
The recent initiative by a group of Protestant leaders calling on the US Congress to reevaluate military aid to Israel is a nauseating example of applying double standards against Jews and Israel under the cloak of piety and hypocritical sanctimoniousness.
And later, in her op-ed, she writes:
They act as though Israel represents the obstacle to peace talks. Yet Palestinian Authority head Mahmoud Abbas refused to deal with the Israelis even after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu had implemented an unprecedented 10-month freeze on settlements in a futile effort to bring them to the negotiating table.
The church leaders complained bitterly about the settlements, which beyond the major blocs, amount to a minute proportion of the West Bank. They conveniently overlook the fact that two Israeli prime ministers offered the PA virtually the entire West Bank but were rebuffed without even a counter proposal.
Most of which is untrue, or to borrow Leibler’s own terms, “a nauseating example of applying double standards under the cloak of piety and hypocritical sanctimoniousness.” Israel has never offered “virtually the entire West Bank” to any Palestinian entity. Rather, these Christian leaders seem to understand that the thrust of settlement dynamics is pushing more toward large expansion of Jewish control over Palestinian lands.
I predict an effort will be made between now and the “Oct. 22 annual Christian-Jewish roundtable involving representatives from 12 Jewish and 12 Christian groups in New York,” to reconcile some differences, but Abe Foxman Executive Director of the Anti-Defamation League seems ready to go for even harder hardball:
“We’re not going to sit around the table and say kumbaya,” said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which pulled out of the program and urged other Jewish groups to follow suit. “This is the clearest message I know to say, ‘You don’t get it. Maybe think about what you don’t get and at a later date we’ll sit down and talk.’ ”
The interfaith group was set up in 2004:
The Christian-Jewish roundtable, as it is known informally, was developed in 2004 when the divestment issue rose in prominence in Protestant circles.
The roundtable was set up to stave off Christian support of Global BDS. In the years since, BDS has gained enormous traction, Israel was seriously bloodied by Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon, Israel egregiously invaded Gaza, killing thousands, Israel absurdly boarded the Mavi Marmara, killing several innocents, when they could have easily disabled the vessel and endangered nobody, and has expanded Jewish settlements on or near lands in the West Bank held sacred to Christians. Acts of violence by militant Zionists against Christians in Jerusalem and the West Bank seem to be multiplying.
How many members of the US Congress Ethan Felson is contemplating asking to investigate these Christian leaders might be members of the faiths the clerics represent?
This is only going to get worse. Perhaps rapidly.
Pandora’s box, indeed:



29 Comments

Thank you for keeping us up to date. Obviously an important story.
Are there any “adults” in the room? We must hope.
I’m thinking the action of the clerics asking Congress for action is “adult.”
I wonder if Israeli husbands and wives when they get into fights accuse each other of being anti-semitic out of habit? Because they sure seem to play that card for everything else whenever they are too lazy to reason or discuss substantively or simply hold indefensible positions.
The range of religions that signed the letter is very impressive. I hope this issue doesn’t disappear into a black hole.
Thanks ET.
–Miko Peled, author of The General’s Son about his father, Israeli Gen. Matti Peled and their family’s coming to terms with the human costs of Zionism
http://mikopeled.com/2012/08/22/can-sparta-be-stopped-by-miko-peled/
I saw Miko Peled recently at one of those liberal Methodist Churches that hosted him in Seattle.
http://mikopeled.com/
One commenter at Nina Paley’s posting of the Youtube at the bottom of the diary, in response to its title, “This Land is Mine,” wrote “”This is Land Mine.”
Yes, that is what discussing this set of millenia-deep problems is – a land mine.
I view the I/P conflict’s ramifications to be the third worst intractable problem humankind faces, after 1) nuclear waste, particularly in spent fuel pools at reactor sites, and 2) ocean acidification.
I saw Miko Peled too at a Methodist Church in the South Sound. He’s a very powerful and articulate speaker. JVP hosted the event and his remarks were well-received.
I looked on the JVP website and there’s no mention of the Rabbinical Council’s letter of support.
I looked there too, but it was posted at the blog I linked to in the diary. The blog site is called “The Palestinian Talmud, Blog of the Jewish Voice for Peace Rabbinical Council”
It also indicated there might be more signatories. We’ll see. There is a lot going on behind the scenes by people who aren’t underestimating how important the clerics’ letter to Congress is.
Actually not.
More than likely they are discussing Edited by Moderator like you.
of course an honest debate in the american media regarding israel and zionism is not going to happen.
and they sure as hell dont want that!
thanks for proving kurts point.
I agree as well; hope someone else is listening. Thanks.
The black hole you speak of is already here in the form of censorship of Israeli-Palestinian issues in the mainstream media, but also in the left wing blogosphere, in the largest liberal sites like Daily Kos and Huffington Post. We hear that international BDS is expanding wildly, but we just aren’t hearing about it except in a few smaller places like FDL, and from only a few writers like Teller and Tuttle. When important developments, as the one we are reading about today, surface, they are immediately sucked into the black hole and pretty kept from notice.
Edited by Moderator. Do not insult other commenters
I’ve watched the evolution of web discussion on issues having to do with Israel and Palestine since before the WWW existed – back in the days of discussion groups and so on. Firedoglake has matured, and offers a fairly open forum, though some commenters and diarists who had written on these issues here no longer do. Likewise, some critical commenters who could get quite nasty here to anyone writing a diary sympathetic to Palestinian aspirations have moved on.
Public perception of what is happening in the occupied territories is subject to what information actually gets published. But as Israeli society gets more overtly racist and the far right dynamics and attitudes of the Israeli colonists in the West Bank gain prominence politically in Israel itself, it is harder to whitewash what is going on.
It is one thing for CT or me or MarkfromIreland or Siun to write about I/P here, or at our own blogs. It is quite another for clerics representing tens of millions of people to request a congressional investigation. The recent dueling bus ads and billboards expressing pro- or anti-Zionist viewpoints are another development showing growing traction.
And the public seems to be acutely aware that Israel is the driving force behind the push to go to war against Iran, and the public is sharply against such a war.
Consider the humble chickpea … (Cicer arietinum) or even its “wild” version, (Cicer reticulatum) long cultivated and then domesticated, in certain places in the world.
Suppose one might go to Jerusalem and take a stand between “East” and “West”, and there, hold up a sign which read: “Who like hummus?”
What would be the result?
One could then, all too easily, destroy the unanimity of the moment by asking, “Who invented it?”
Thank you, ET, for your consistent efforts to inject, reason, understanding, and humanity … into a situation which those with the most power must find the courage, and the appetite, to dare to change … beginning from within … from their own souls … and humanity, their own history, their own roots, and everyone’s common past, present, and … future … if there is to be one.
DW
Is it too much to hope for that they will peacefully destroy each other?
ET, I’m not sure that this is a
Muslims (ruled by Muslim Turks) took in the Jews of the Iberian peninsula and they all lived relatively peacefully for hundreds of years, even intermarrying. Problems arose with the crusader invasions and then when the zionists came saying that this was a “land without people for a people without a land.” Had the zionists come and integrated peacefully by buying land, etc. I doubt that we would have the troubles that we see now. The zionists decided to replicate the take over of the area as it was done in the Hebrew Bible.
What bothered me most (low bar) in the JCPA piece was the phrase ‘delegitimizers of Israel’. That’s how so many objections are cast.
So what; you mean Felson will ask Congress to investigate Lutheran, Presbyterians (sounds like some P’s pushed back there), etc.?
“I wonder if Israeli husbands and wives when they get into fights accuse each other of being anti-Semitic out of habit?”
Dear moderator:
Perchance are you unaware of how bitterly offensive a person or persons of a Jewish persuasion finds this remark?
If so, allow me to expand your knowledge of the Jewish side of this offense: such remarks are extremely offense to anyone who identifies with the Jewish religion, culture, or history.
Thus, if you moderated my most appropriate responses through ignorance, that is one thing. But, if you were aware of the sensitivity of the Jewish identity to this type of religious smear, and still allowed it to stand, well res ipsa loguitur (it speaks for itself).
As the comments now stand, your apparent prejudicial sensitivity only to those attacking Jews and complete insensitivity to the sensitivities of the Jewish People is not only manifest, but tarnishes the reputation of FDL as an honest, balanced platform for a discussion of the issues of our times.
Choose to be a mensch and either reinstate my comments or remove or moderate comment #3.
To do any less would be to put the mark of Cain on further discussions of this topic.
The ball is in your court.
Ed, just out of curiosity, I looked up latest polls on the attack of Iran by Israel or the US. You might be surprised at these results.
Reuters/Ipsos Poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs. March 8-11, 2012. N=1,084 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.1.
“Do you support or oppose the United States taking military action against Iran if there is evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons?”
Support 56% Oppose 39% Neither/Unsure 5%
“Do you support or oppose Israel taking military action against Iran if there is evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons?”
Support 62% Oppose 30% Neither/Unsure 8%
Other statistics concerning US support of Israel are overwhelmingly positive.
If censorship about what is happening in Israel and the Palestinian territories to the Palestinians were not so censored, I’m certain that proIsrael sentiments would not be so strong.
Still, I totally respect people who are continuing their advocacy efforts on behalf of the Palestinian people, who continue to be ethnically cleansed from their homeland, deprived of freedom, deprived of self-determination. It was depressing to see the left wing blogosphere slowly join the censorship, for which reason it is also gratifying that FDL, and people like yourself are keeping up the fight, so to speak. Israel certainly fears BDS and bad publicity such as seen on NY subways, and eventually it may make a difference. Still, the colonization and ethnic cleansing continues and I sometimes see it all as a race against time. Let’s hope that the Palestinians win in the end, even if two-states is a concept beyond possibility. I heard Tom Friedman the other night describe the default position: binationalism. Well, let’s wait and see.
Thanks for this article and all of the others you have contributed. It makes a difference.
Don’t have a cow, man.
Not much time to respond to comments today. I teach three upper level college classes, play French horn in one ensemble, and conduct another one, plus have office hours with students.
I don’t believe Iran is trying to achieve any more nuclear capability than Brazil, Argentina, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Canada and Japan have.
Interesting that this topic seems to bring out some of the “worst” within us…Can we not even discuss with courtesy? Yikes.
Well-written article. Thanks. Interesting video.
Really? Goyim is considered unambiguously derogatory? I thought it was a neutral term in Yiddish. I certainly have no objection to being referred to as a ‘goy’. It is what I am.
I sympathize actually. Not that I think my comment merited great offense, but that you should absolutely be allowed to vigorously rebut it. One of the things that makes honest debate on I/P so fraught is the frequent cynical use of ostentatious displays of offense and outrage as a tool to provoke censorship and prevent frank discussion. Which, really however poorly it was enunciated, was my point in the original post.
I think the frequent hysterical rhetoric and calls for the silencing of opposing viewpoints used in support of Israel in discussion advances my view about the irrationality and appeals to emotion of the pro-Israel side better than I could. I say let the spittle flecked invective speak for itself. It tells a truth, at least to the objective observer– just not the intended one.
Shots fired! Churches are the only groups that have the following to represent a threat to the establishment because they speak about values deeper than money and they could potentially lead blocks of constituencies.
hmmm … blood libel.. guilt tripping has long passed it’s sell-by date.
here ya go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4lJ9vsZjMU