The marine weather forecast seemed good enough for mid or late December, when the oceangoing tug Aiviq began towing the cumbersome giant oil drilling platform Kulluk out of Dutch Harbor on the eve of the Winter Solstice:
The Kulluk left Dutch Harbor, a staging port for Shell, the afternoon of Dec. 21 under tow by the Aiviq, headed to the Seattle area for off-season maintenance. The weather forecast for the next few days was typical, even a bit tame, for winter along the Aleutian chain and into the Gulf of Alaska: Winds of 17 to 35 mph, seas of 7 to 15 feet.
“Toward Kodiak Island, there was nothing of real significance,” said Sam Albanese, a warning coordination meteorologist for the National Weather Service. “It was a pretty benign forecast.”
But by the afternoon of Dec. 25, the outlook had shifted from a prediction of more gale-force winds to a near storm at sea with winds topping 50 mph, he said.
And that’s what hit the Kulluk and the Aiviq last week.
By Saturday night, the winds were near hurricane force, the Coast Guard said.
As the Kulluk headed to the Lower 48 on Thursday, the tow shackle failed between the drilling rig and its tug — Shell’s Aiviq. A second towline was attached, but later the engines on the Aiviq failed, leaving the two vessels adrift at sea. The 266-foot diameter Kulluk has no propulsion system of its own.
Another ship, the Coast Guard’s 282-foot cutter Alex Haley, was dispatched to reconnect the towline. However, 35-foot seas and 40-mph winds, coupled with the size of the vessels, caused the towline to disconnect, and the Haley retreated to Kodiak for repairs. On Sunday, the Kulluk’s 18-person crew was evacuated.
Then, after dispatching yet another ship — the Prince William Sound-based Alert tug — the Kulluk was reconnected to its tow vessels early Monday. Later Monday morning, the Aiviq tug also re-established its connection to the Kulluk about 19 miles southeast of Kodiak Island, but lost its link later in the day.
By Monday evening, the Coast Guard was planning to tow the Kulluk to safe harbor at Port Hobron on the southeast side of Kodiak Island, as well as deploy several technicians on board the Kulluk to inspect the tow lines on the rig.
As the weather worsened, the Alert tug’s crew, which was struggling to tow the Kulluk on its own, was order to separate from the rig. By 9 p.m., the Kulluk was sitting in the surf at rocky Ocean Bay, its draft having run aground.
Over night, Monday-Tuesday, the worst of the present storm seemed to play out, but there is still a large swell coming onshore at the place of the stranding.
Within two hours of the grounding, the so-called Unified Command, comprising Shell Alaska, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation and Noble Drilling, held a press notification event at the expanded response headquarters, in Anchorage’s Marriot Hotel. About 250 people are involved in the Anchorage-based efforts. In a conference convened Tuesday at 2:00 local time, again at the Anchorage Marriott, it was claimed that over 500 people are currently involved in facets of the response.
As events have unfolded and been made public Tuesday, there have been several responses from the Alaska environmental community, from the head of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee, Rep. Ed Markey, but nothing substantive from Alaska’s U.S. Congressional delegation, who have been totally supportive of Shell’s Arctic drilling venture.
This morning Markey said “the accident revealed that ‘drilling expansion could prove disastrous for this sensitive environment.’”
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, praised “the heroism displayed by the U.S. Coast Guard, Shell personnel and other responders.”
“The focus now needs to be on securing the Kulluk and protecting local residents and the environment from potential fuel spills,” Murkowski said.
Alaska Senator Mark Begich hasn’t made a statement yet that I’m aware of, but last summer, he toured the rig before it left Seattle for the far North:
U.S. Sen. Mark Begich today got a first-hand look at the Kulluk Conical Drilling Unit as it is getting ready for work this summer in the Beaufort Sea.
The Kulluk is owned by Shell and is one of the few ice-class drilling rigs in the world. Last July it was moved from Dutch Harbor, Alaska to the VIGOR shipyard in Seattle for maintenance and modifications to get ready of the 2012 offshore drilling season in Alaska’s Arctic.
“It’s impressive to see this rig first-hand and know it will be hard at work in the Beaufort this summer,” Begich said. “The focus this season is on safety. I am confident Shell will do this right, and it’s clear they have tools to do just that.”
We’ll see soon what this incident does to Sen. Begich’s perception of Shell Alaska’s toolkit.
Alaska environmental activist and retired University of Alaska professor, Rick Steiner, noted that a number of errors were made by Shell Alaska’s agents when weather worsened last week:
Rick Steiner, a former professor with the University of Alaska who is now an environmental consultant through Oasis Earth, has been raising questions for weeks about the lack of emergency towing resources along Shell’s route, including corresponding directly with the Coast Guard on the matter.
There is a lot to learn about this cascade of failures that put the Kulluk on the rocks,” Steiner said in an e-mail early Tuesday. It appears “the rig was not adequately equipped for heavy weather towing, they should have called the Alert sooner, and tried to shelter sooner. Clearly Shell should have thought through contingencies for a loss of tow in heavy weather, and they didn’t. The weather encountered is not extreme and unexpected in the Gulf of Alaska in the winter – it’s just winter. This doesn’t inspire confidence in their safety and contingency planning capability.”
The 2:00AKST press briefing has just concluded, with the Shell Alaska representative at the conference hastily shutting off questions from local and national media. They pointedly took only one question from those of us who attended telephonically – from a CNN reporter. He wondered how different the Coast Guard response might have been to a major emergency in the area Shell hopes to exploit, rather than off Kodiak, where the largest Coast Guard base in Alaska is situated. Predictably, there was no answer.
Here are links to both Shell Alaska and Kulluk Tow Response twitter pages. You can read their sanitized version of events, which I am not going recount here.
Once the Holiday period is over, there will be more interest drawn to this grounding by local, national and global environmental groups. Greenpeace, which has been the most vocal, demonstrative and confrontative international environmental group, regarding Shell’s Arctic drilling, hasn’t yet made a statement.
As an interesting aside, in the first of my growing set of articles for Firedoglake on Shell’s Arctic drilling fiasco, back in July, it is strange that the vessel I wrote about then wasn’t the Kulluk, but another one of their ill-starred fleet – “it was not considered to be a “good luck” barge in fleet scuttlebutt.”
Meanwhile, the Kulluk may be hit by another storm by Friday or Saturday:
A WEATHER FRONT ALONG THE NORTH GULF COAST WILL DISSIPATE THIS EVENING. ANOTHER WEATHER FRONT WILL MOVE INTO THE WESTERN GULF WED AFTERNOON AND STALL OVER THE CENTRAL GULF THROUGH THU AFTERNOON.
Shell claimed at the start of the aborted 2012 drill season to have spent about $4.5 billion on its Alaska Arctic offshore drilling project. This season was quite expensive too, perhaps costing over a billion dollars before this catastrophe. Cleaning up its mess is going to be very expensive. And fighting renewed efforts to keep Shell out of Alaska waters may cost more scores of millions.




54 Comments

Anything likely to be discovered by the Media at the 5:00 Live Q&A?
Gale-force winds, eh. Why does the word “self-inflicted” come to mind?
How about the “bad fuel” contribution to this catastrophe? Where did the Aiviq obtain this bad fuel – Dutch Harbor, I assume? When you take on tens of thousands of gallons of fuel it’s standard operating procedure for mariners to QA/QC it – who did the checks? What are the implications from the bad fuel as in contribution to the entire debacle? Who is investigating it and what initial findings can be reported? Does the USCG suspect Eco-terrorism? What preparations are underway to repair damage to the Kulluk? What savage and repair assets are underway to the scene? Where are the senior Shell executives hiding – they’ve been silent near as I can tell. Why? Lastly – Shell has a temporary (not permanently) abandon well in the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea – 1 each. Their approved exploration plans call for the Kulluk to remedy this situation. What are the implications to this situation? Will Shell re-enter into the mutual aid agreement with ConocoPhillips to remedy the loss of the Kulluk should it become unavailable as a result of this incident?
Kulluk = Scrap.
Your statement is nonsense. Please explain how one “QA/QC” tons of fuel. It is standard operating procedure to trust the bunking company (Possibly KhemOil).
I’ve been in a meeting since the minute I posted this diary until right now. Planning the Alaska premiere of John Luther Adams’ Inuksuit for summer solstice.
So – just found out about the meeting. 30 minutes, eh? After 20 minutes of bullshit, it won’t leave much time for questions.
I have no definitive answer to any of the problems related to possibly contaminated fuel on the Alviq, or as to why there is so much fuel on the Kulluk. The first I heard about the Alviq’s engines shutting down, was that it was soon after they had taken a 50 degree or so roll, while taking waves abeam as they sought to get a new line on the rig.
Everything you said. Absolutely. The “bad fuel” meme has been bothering me from the first–it does happen, but it is so unlikely from a commercial fueling point that I–just don’t believe it.
Thanks ET but everything looks normal in corp. world to destory Mother Earth do to Greed.
I love the comment but everyting looked good to move during this time. WTF its winter and the little blue sphere doesn’t really care about computer models.
Then agsin it’s prefectly clear USCG is all about protecting corp. interest and this isn’t a suprise to me. Please remember the Gulf.
Might add that back when I crewed in Alaska waters on tugs in winter, the engineer or engineers knew very well that you ALWAYS purge any contamination from your fuel filtration, no matter what the filter design, often, and before you encounter any severe rolling.
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Crews aboard two aircraft flew over an oil drilling ship Tuesday that went aground in a severe Alaska storm and saw no sign that the vessel was leaking fuel or that its hull had been breached. . .The rig ran aground Monday on a sand and gravel shore off an uninhabited island in the Gulf of Alaska.
Just a thought do they use the fuel as ballast?
Thanks again
You pull a gallon before fueling, and you pull it from the bottom of the tank. It’s not rocket science. That said, bad fuel still happens, but if bad diesel was loaded onto the tug, there are other ships floating out there that have bad fuel, too. Another possibility is that the tug has contaminated tanks, possibly algae growth, and that the bunkers were loaded with good fuel and then contaminated by the tug.
Thanks, I remembered you earlier mention of the music meeting and I’m beginning to think that you and your brother Phil and your other brother Phil share ddayen genetics.
I listened to the audio of the last presser. Predictable in a situation like this. NPR has finally just mentioned the incident.
The temporary permit that Shell got for working in the Arctic required low sulfur diesel for the drilling rigs and for the machinery on the Arctic Challenger, because of air quality complaints from Alaska Natives in places like Pt. Hope and Wainwright. They got a waiver for the icebreaking and other tugs – probably shortly after making some hefty, well-hidden contributions to Obama 2012.
They obtained the low sulfur diesel in Seattle before embarking northward in the summer, as it is hard to get and very, very expensive in Alaska. The Kulluk had a shorter season than the had hoped, so had a lot more fuel on bard than they had expected. At least that’s what I think.
I suspect the Aiviq topped off their main tanks in Dutch Harbor before leaving on the 21st, as topped off tanks keep you low in the water, and don’t slosh in a seaway.
“The marine weather forecast seemed good enough for mid or late December”
I almost laughed out loud at that. A North Pacific Winter forecast is good for maybe two days, and that’s stretching it.
getting busy signal trying to get into Q&A…..
So you just stay in Dutch all winter?
like this one from the UC’s twitter feed:
Back in 2007, Rick Steiner (quoted in my diary), the most persistent critic of Shell’s drilling and of this failed move of the drill rig, was billed over $500,000 by the state for a thin stack of emails on Polar bear correspondence between AK and the Feds. Using the methodology they applied, the State can charge Shell something like $3 trillion for cleanup efforts on this.
I just commented via twitter to the UC series of tweets:
tweeted and recommended with thanks et. today was the first coverage about this on the local portland stations.
i appreciate your reporting on this. muc more reliable than corporate media.
That proves nothing. Sampling is standard. This form of sampling will not detect if there is water pumped in with the fuel. Because fuel is drawn from the bottom of a fuel tank, water contamination can stop an engine.
Presuming one tank was contaminated, and other not which enabled the tug to get out to sea..
More likely is water (high waves, and maneuvering broadside to the weather) coming into the air intakes of the tug’s engines in heavy weather.
WTF is “bad diesel”? Contaminated diesel yes,.
link to the audio of the 2:00 pm Alaska time PC.
They changed the injectors on all four main engines on Saturday, IIRC. They had to be flown aboard by helicopter, which shows poor planning re spares.
Yeah, really. As long as they can save the people out there and prevent an environmental disaster, let the bastard sink.
Their “drilling season” was maybe two weeks in September, if I remember rightly.
A Popular Mechanics writer who has been aboard the Kulluk has this to say (emphases mine):
they deleted my tweet already……
Thanks. Same questions a lot of us are asking. Good to see PMech asking ‘em. They tend to be gatekeepers.
A North Atlantic weather forecast is always accurate for the future, if it include very heavy weather.
I used to listed to the BBC’s weather forecasts for the sea areas off the UK.
“Tyne, Dogger, Fisher, German Bight, Humber, expect wind force 7 to Gale force 8 winds gusting to storm 9 for the next 48 hours, varying with occasionally poor visibality” was common in winter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufort_scale for those who don;t know the numbers.
This is a possibility: Heavy weather stirred up sediment at the bottom of the fuel tanks. I doubt the fuel was impure.
Although most engines have fuel filters, because of possible sediment agitation. I’ve worked on them in a past life.
Or water. I don’t know if water screws up injectors. Crap (water and flotsam) getting into the cylinders can screw up injectors.
Many ocean going ships carry spares. Mine did. Generally not a complete replacement set for all engines though.
No, but you know that there are definitely rough seas between there and Seattle in December. I have no idea what the towing characteristics of a drilling rig are–but the pictures give me the impression that it pulls like a pig, which is a real problem in 30-foot-plus seas. Pitching makes lines go slack, and the snap-back breaks the tow-line. Bet a buck that is exactly what happened, and more than once. I’m thinking they rolled the dice and lost, which makes me think that there is a serious leadership problem somewhere in the chain of command. Shell executives are making really bad decisions, in spite of what the Coasties are saying.
And I think you already know all this 8)
The lines are inch-thick or thicker steel cables. Rigging for a pig like that (you got it right) calls for suspension of chain from the line, or other snap-back mitigating measures that even the whole process out. One of the reports indicated the tie-on shackle to the bridle at the rig end was the initial problem. After that, everything was jury-rigged.
Meant “yes”, typed “no”.
Heroism to save Shell’s property? Risking lives doesn’t seem warranted.
And that is one of the reasons that the sample is taken from the bottom of the tank! And “bad diesel” is just that–it can be water contaminated, contain sediment/rust/dirt, or it can have gone bad due to algae growth. Yes, algae will grow in diesel fuel.
Yes, water will screw up injectors. Water coming in the exhaust or on top of the pistons is much worse. Water isn’t compressible–a big shot of water will bend rods and even break cranks.
Dutch Harbor has better fuel than some places in Alaska, but it can be uneven, particularly in the winter.
And, I doubt the fuel loaded from the commercial tank was bad, so I agree with you. I’ve guessed that the tug’s own tanks weren’t clean and my first guess is algae growth. Algae can bloom in a clean tank, and when it does it is very bad news, requiring a complete cleaning of the system–filters, lines, pumps and tanks. It doesn’t bloom in fresh fuel, but if the fuel had been in the tank for an extended period, and was subject to some radical changes in temperature and humidity……
The Unified Command has posted the audio of the 5:00 pm Q&A with media here. You have to download it to listen to it.
I asked them on twitter if they are going to provide transcripts of these events, and they deleted my tweet.
My new post on this at my place:
Comparing the Exxon Valdez Grounding to the Kulluk’s
one-minute USCG video of an overflight of the wreck early Tuesday afternoon.
It looks to me like there will be multiple punctures of the outer hull, some already. Hard to say how many bigger rocks like the ones showing up in the background in wave troughs are hooked under the Kulluk.
Not quite as sure as I was before viewing this that the vessel will be totaled.
Come on, guys — algae are strictly photsynthetic — they cannot possible grow in a dark diesel fuel tank. You have this totally confused with asphaltene particulates and fungal/cyanobacterial growth. Maybe spend 5 seconds googling bad diesel before rushing off a stupid post? http://www.dieselcraft.com/FuelFacts.php
You haven’t been around diesel much. Google diesel algae, i guarantee you pages of hits.
Sorry, Tomemerald, I was too hard on you in my previous comment. Diesel algae is called that because it is a dark brown, slimy growth with the exact look and texture of algae growths we see around fumaroles and in hot springs. Makes no difference to mechanics whether it is actually a fungus, it is referred to as “diesel algae” (I’ve also heard “slimey sh1t” and “diesel diarrhea”).
If another storm hits before the rig is cleared from the rocks the damage will increase.
It the rig is thoroughly holed now and is sunk onto the rocks, it’s scrap now.
On looking at the video it seems to be a working platform, and there are no visible crew quarters. It must be accompanied by a dormitory platform when in operation.
What’s the bottom there? Rocks (sharp pointy ones), flat rocks or sand?
Read my #11 — no “razor blades” yet.
the nearest bottom entry on the chart is “Rcky”. There’s an image of the nautical chart here. The *s are pinnacles or areas of big rocks. The Kulluk appears to be much closer to shore than the 2048 dot on the chart.
My fellow Alaska blogger, Steve Aufrecht, looks into PIER, the private company handling all communication for the Unified Command during the Kulluk crisis.
i don’t know jack about shyte when it comes to fuel, engines or oil rigs.
i do know, from personal experience, that when a slack jawed yokel of a morAn who worked at my grandfather’s farm put the wrong stuff into a diesel engine of one of the machines there, it died. forever. there was no fixing it and it had to be replaced.
water, dirt, etc + fuel = machines that don’t function, is my guess.
Greenpeace has issued a brief statement on the grounding:
I get chills (the bad kind) reading about this bit of mayhem, that is threatening yet another eco-system.
And I got thrills and chills (the good kind) while listening to the music piece you mentioned, the percussion symphony. Awesome.
I’ll keep us posted. Inuksuit is a special masterpiece.
They are using Smit to head up the salvage operation. If Smit is famous for one thing it’s removing fuel from vessels floundering on the rocks. Seeing as the last report including no mention of the seaworthiness of the Kulluk and the announcement that Smit is leading the salvage effort should we just assume that Shell is prepared to sacrifice the Kulluk to the sea? Why would you tell the public that an inspection of the vessel was conducted and not tell us what the inspection revealed? The USCG needs to start running the public affairs associated with this effort – not Shell.