The Kulluk grounding Unified Command released information Saturday morning that all but indicates there will be an attempt to extricate the stranded drilling rig from the beach of Sitkalidak Island sometime today or tonight:
ANCHORAGE, AK – Unified Command (UC) today plans to hook a main tow line to the Kulluk to test capabilities in preparation for recovery operations of the drilling unit. This plan will depend heavily on weather and tidal considerations.
The UC also plans to deploy boom, as a precautionary measure, to Kodiak Island, with special attention being paid to salmon streams connecting to Ocean Bay.
Unified Command has developed a wildlife protection plan to be used in the event that wildlife in the area is impacted during the recovery. They have activated International Bird Rescue to assist in bird rescue programs should their expertise be required. In addition, Protected Species Observers are being deployed on-scene.
As previously stated, all plans rely on weather and tidal conditions.
The Kulluk remains upright and stable with no reports of sheen in the vicinity. Salvage teams conducted an additional survey confirming all fuel tanks remain intact. Throughout all operations the safety of the responders will continue to be the top priority.
The map above is one I created, showing the situation as of 1300 hrs. AKST today. I added the position of the Kulluk, as it does not have an active transponder.
The vessels shown on the map are:
1. The Alert, a state-of-ste art tug, owned by Crowley Maritime, under contract to Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, as a required Prince William Sound (PWS) response vessel for tankers transiting the PWS area. It was the tug that was ordered to release the Kulluk during the storm on New Years Eve. It is equipped with a very high quality and capable winch system.
2. U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Alex Haley, the USCG’s main Alaska asset for ocean emergencies. It is most likely serving as the Unified Command’s local HQ for any attempt to extricate the rig.
3. Pt. Oliktok, is a Seward-based small tug. Built for Crowley in 1981-82, (I helped register its original compass on Elliot Bay in Seattle, in July, 1982). It is shallow draft, with reinforced bottom, and might be helpful near shore.
4. The Warrior, an old tug of Crowley’s 9,000 HP class, built in the late 1970s, mostly for barge towing between Seattle and Whittier, Alaska. Currently based in Seward. A tried and reliable design, but with older towing equipment.
5. The Nanuq, a new oil rig service vessel, with large deck space and towing equipment that was shown to be inadequate last week.
6. The Arctic Responder 2, a small Dutch Harbor-based oil spill response vessel, with very small deck space and no towing capability. Probably to be used as a shuttle, should seas get very calm.
7. The Perseverance, a supply vessel, whose role I’m unsure of.
8. The Aiviq, the new tug built last year specifically for Shell’s Arctic operations, and whose design, performance and towing equipment are coming under increasing scrutiny. Not to mention the political role its builder plays in Alaska oil politics.
You can go to this URL and watch the movements of the vessels named above. In the 50 minutes since I took the screenshot, the Arctic Responder 2 and Nanuq have closed upon the Kulluk.
High tide will be around 6:53 pm local time. At 8.2 feet, it is classified as a “holdup” tide. Under normal circumstances, this would not be quite enough water to pull a wreck off a beach where it had just a few days ago been pounded by 20 to 30-foot seas.
I’ve pulled two valuable books from my library, thinking about how I might do this job: Edward M. Brady’s Tugs, Towboats and Towing; and the same author’s Marine Salvage Operations. I hate to say it, but these guys – today – are breaking more than a few rules.
Questions have arisen over the past few days over the fact that the towing winch on the Aiviq might not have been of a strength and sophistication to meet the specifications of the agreement that Shell had signed on to with the Federal government to proceed with the 2012 season. More on that later. Until then:
Phil –
FYI, I’ve just confirmed from Unified Command that the tug Aiviq does NOT have Best Available Technology (BAT) towing winch, which is a dynamic tensioning Markey Automatic Render & Recovery (AR&R) towing winch. I will attach the PWS RCAC Aug. 2012 towing technology expert report, which discusses the BAT section on p.4 the following:
“The vast majority of operators agree that the electric-driven Markey Render-Recover© winch is the best winch technology on the market today.”
I believe Shell was required to have BAT in all its operations, and one would think that it would have outfitted its new $200 million purpose-built tug with the best towing winch possible. This may have contributed to the repeated loss of tow.
Meanwhile, let’s hope the pressure from Shell on the USCG and the various parties contracted to pull this removal off this evening doesn’t get anyone killed.
Update – 2:45 pm AKST: During Unified Command Press Conference, now winding down, Shell Alaska posted this youtube of their plan for what they will do if they get it off the beach:




31 Comments

Rick Steiner’s Friday email to Sens. Mark Begich an Lisa Murkowski:
Thank you for your continued excellent reporting and investigation on this, Phil. You provide extraordinary service here, and I only wish more people were paying attention!
Thanks, Teddy.
Unified Command holding press conference right now. Not letting me in anymore. Wonder why, eh?
from Kulluk tow response twitter:
The course of the Nanuq indicates it may be paying out the line attached earlier to the Kulluk.
Let’s hope for the safety of all involved in this. Thanks, ET, for the info.
Thanks for this!
ET,
Living in the midwest we are getting a few reports but you are the one that advised us first on what was happening.
I would like to ask a few questions that have come up if you do not mind.
1. Was Shell towing this rig from it’s exploration spot in order to
avoid paying a lot of taxes due the State of Alaska?
2. Earlier reports said that it was aground on rocks that were
breaking it apart. Is this true?
3. This latest post says that the rig and it’s oil cargo has not been
compromised…yet. One of the papers today said that there was a
reported oil sheen in the vacinity. Is a cover-up going on?
Edward, thank you for your reporting. We all know what happened in the Gulf of Mexico with the under reporting of actual amount of oil being emitted at the time of that disaster.
I too hope that none of the rescuers of this rig are put in harm’s way.
Unified Command refusing to release any public information on what kind of winch system the Aiviq has been using. I smell coverup for the politically well-connected company that owns it.
1. Was Shell towing this rig from it’s exploration spot in order to
avoid paying a lot of taxes due the State of Alaska?
Absolutely!
2. Earlier reports said that it was aground on rocks that were
breaking it apart. Is this true?
It is a robust hull. The storm that beached it died out a day later. The hull is seriously damaged, and the outer of its two hulls has probably been breeched, but not enough to destroy it – it is compartmentalized. If they don’t get it off soon, it won’t last the winter, though.
3. This latest post says that the rig and it’s oil cargo has not been
compromised…yet. One of the papers today said that there was a
reported oil sheen in the vacinity. Is a cover-up going on?
I don’t believe it has leaked much if any oil. The tanks are well within the hull – partly to insulate them from cold.
ET,
Thank you. As you just stated at #9, there will probably be a cover-up because of the well connected company. Money talks as we all know…sadly.
Mahalo, ET, for this excellent reporting…! Do you think the subsequent investigations will force Big Oil to actually, you know spend money on their misbegotten, ill-designed schemata…?
Of course not. Thanks, BTW!
watching with intere3st.
Thanks for the report. Living in the Puget Sound area, I’m concerned about a cover-up like the Gulf disaster.
The Seattle Times’ reports are pretty skimpy.
Unified Command Late Afternoon update:
Actually, since summer, Seattle Times has given some decent overall coverage on Shell’s overall 2012 Arctic drilling season. KUOW went so far as to file an FIOA to find out what happened in the Arctic Challenger clusterfuck in early September.
…At Shell, we will continue to deploy the necessary resources to fully support this recovery effort…
Utter bovine excrement…! 8-(
A press conference/statement like this should come with a spew warning.
I’m shocked. Shocked, I tell you . . .
Tonight’s SeaTimes online report not only mentions that the weather forecast they used differed from other models, but that Shell would be subject to million$ in Alaska State taxes if the Kulluk was moored in AK State waters on Jan 1.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020061999_oilrig05m.html
thanks for your reports ET.
If someone knows Mary Mac’s email can they tell her that her twitter account (@firebagger) has been hacked and is DMing me phishing links .
Those of us who have seen oil company BS in Alaska for generations now have developed an immunity, but each new incident has its sadnesses. Just found out a close friend who I thought might be on the Alert crew is on another Valdez-based tug, enjoying the snowstorm there, tied up to a buoy.
I’ve been getting weird shit from that thingie since this morning.
Yea, it is happening to tons of us. Ignore it!
Over at some close friends’ house for dinner and movies. The fleet looks like they’ve pulled off for the night. It is dark, and the tide is ebbing.
Appreciate your reports and updates on this, ET. It never ends.
Thanks ET. If the hull is damaged the repair will entail a period in dry dock. Last time I was in Bellingham, there was nothing that would accommodate a semi-submersible drilling rig, even one as small as the Kulluck. I’m guessing repair and inspection will require a heavy lift trip South or West…
I think there’s a double wide dry dock on Harbor Island at the old Lockheed yard. It was empty when I ferried across from Seattle to Bainbridge Island on the 16th of December.
The Coho? If there is a drydock that will accommodate the rig, then that’s a logical place to start the repairs. What you are describing is a low budget operation, using outdated equipment. The tow vessels are DP but the rig is not…
The bottom line is that as long as the US and other industrialized countries and their bloated militaries continue to depend upon fossil fuels, drilling will continue. Obviously the risks will never be completely eliminated but the Scandinavians and Canadians have proven that with the right people in charge and emphasis placed primarily on safety instead of cost saving, risks can be minimized in harsh environment drilling operations.
A Scandinavian company recently built a huge dual hull, Harsh Environment Dynamically Positioned Drillship in South Korea and there are plans for more. These behemoths can safely secure the wells, disconnect and ride out the storm you described with relative ease. I have been on one in 25 meter seas and 100 knot winds and there was no problem maintaining position. Drilling activities were suspended temporarily and well in advance of the storm to reduce risk to the environment.
Greenland, hoping for the next Texas sized find of crude and accompanying gas, hosted two deepwater dynamically positioned rigs in consecutive summers in 2010 and 2011, but the dismal findings didn’t justify the costs. (Two rigs because Greenland’s Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum regulations require that one rig must be ready at all times to abandon its well and mobilize to the other’s site to drill a relief well in the event that either loses control of its well – Deepwater Horizon…) Gas is the best and cheapest way to lift the oil, but the primary source of the risk to personnel and equipment. In the near future the regulations will likely change to require only one rig for exploratory drilling because the new design deepwater drillships can and will carry two Subsea Blowout Preventers, providing the capability to leave one BOP closed on the bottom and move a short distance, spud in, run the second Subsea BOP and drill its own relief well.
Greenpeace filmed a boarding of one of the Cairn Energy Greenland campaign vessels
(a semi-submersible) on an emergency escape ladder attached to the leg under a standard box girder tank seawater overflow in 2011 and sacrificed their credibility when they edited the film and falsely claimed the crews tried to repel them with fire hoses. Take a look at the video Greenpeace posted on Youtube and tell me if you see anyone on the rig attempting to wash unauthorized personnel off the leg with a fire hose. A layman’s definition of unauthorized boarding of a vessel at sea is piracy and pirates can legally be repelled using deadly force if necessary. (Insider knowledge… I can assure you everyone onboard was aware that Greenpeace would attempt to board the vessel again, (The Leiv Eiriksson was boarded by Greenpeace in Turkey earlier in the same year. Standing orders were in place to ensure there was absolutely no attempt of any kind to prevent them boarding.)
Current rumors have Shell and several other major oil companies interested in contracting new, state of the art drilling and production vessels capable of working in the Arctic, although the primary focus is on the Atlantic side for now. Hence the Scandinavians and other exploratory drilling companies willingness to invest more than a billion dollars in a single vessel capable of staying on location and moving under its own power to avoid dangerous weather or ice. The water is too shallow for these monsters to work in and around the Aleutians so Alaska is out of the picture for now.
Bully for Greenpeace! Tell me again, who exactly were the pirates in that scenario? (I’m an old lady and I get confused.)