Shell Oil has finally gone public with the story first carried anywhere back in January by firedoglake, that their conical drill rig, Kulluk, will be taken from Kiliuda Bay in Kodiak to Asia for major repairs. Additionally, their powered drill rig, Noble Discoverer, berthed in Seward, Alaska since being impounded by the U.S. Coast Guard in November, will be “dry towed” across the North Pacific to a shipyard in Asia. Their destination is almost certainly South Korea:
Both the much maligned Noble Discoverer and Kulluk, who have faced serious mechanical difficulties since completing Arctic drilling operations off of Alaska’s Arctic Continental Shelf last summer, will be headed to Asia soon according to a statement from Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith.
The Kulluk, which has remained anchored off of Kodiak Island since its New Year’s Eve grounding, will be towed from there to the international Port of Dutch Harbor pending a tow plan approval. From Dutch Harbor, the 266-foot diameter conical drilling unit will then be dry-towed to a ship yard in Asia with a suitable dry dock.
The Discoverer’s operator, Noble Drilling Corp., will also dry-tow the Discoverer from its current location in Seward to South Korea.
“The outcome of further inspections for both rigs will determine the shipyard schedule and timing of their return to service,” Smith said in the statement.
When exactly the rigs will leave Alaska is unclear. A representative from Unified Command, the joint operation involving Shell, U.S. Coast Guard and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, could not say whether the vessel remained in Kiliuda Bay Monday. They noted that the latest information on the vessel was on the command’s website — which hasn’t been updated since Jan. 30.
A “dry tow” or “dry-tow” is movement of a vessel on the deck of a large, semi-submersible ship, or powered, floating drydock.
For some reason, the transponders of all the vessels in and around the Kulluk in Kiliuda Bay, were turned off on January 30th and 31st, two days after I announced the contemplated Asia decision, and the same day Dan Joling from the Associated Press picked up the story, so it is difficult to know where the tug Aiviq is right now, for instance.
Lisa Demer, writing on the new development early this morning for the Anchorage Daily News, notes:
It has big vessels for the dry tows lined up, and the Noble Discoverer will leave Seward in three to six weeks for a trip across the Pacific Ocean that should take two to four weeks, Smith said.
In a dry tow, a large vessel submerges through added ballast below the draft of the rig to be towed, Smith explained. That allows the drilling rig to float over the vessel’s deck, and the tow vessel is raised up, with the drill rig on its deck for the tow. It’s a faster method than towing on the water.
There are rumors that Shell is searching the world for replacement vessels, as it appears neither the Kulluk nor the Noble Discoverer will even be reaching a yard before mid to late April.
Investigations into the grounding and Shell’s 2013 Alaska Arctic drilling season by the U.S. Coast Guard; the U.S. Department of the Interior; the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard; and possibly the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources, will begin within a few weeks. No precise information on any of these has yet been released, although the Interior Department’s 60-day review period of Shell’s Alaska operations ends on March 7th.
This story may be updated later Tuesday.




20 Comments

Rumor has it that both vessels will be acquired by Carnival Cruise Lines.
Or Barnum and Bailey…
Sadly Shell is still more transparent than the most transparent Administration in history.
Thanks for the superb coverage of this fiasco, ET. As a former mariner, I am fascinated by this saga. As a conservationist, I am appalled, as it appears that our worst fears are being validated. I would like to believe that these events would result in a close reexamination of Arctic Offshore Drilling. As a realist, I am sadly all too aware that to our petroleum crazed culture, coupled with enormous potential oil industry profits, there is no environmental price too steep for the present and succeeding generations, to pay.
Shell has shareholders who demand answers.
thanks, ET, for keeping us posted on “the circus.” thankfully an Arctic tradgedy and an Alaskan environmental disaster has not occured despite Shell corps’ pursuit of oil this time.
If corps really were people, they’d be dissolved for reckless endangerment of humans and their environment. i sincerely hope the costs of this fiasco make a dent in corps’ hide tho it is more likely that the corp will just raise prices.
They turned off the transponders, eh? (Of course, they’ll say that there’s no need for the transponders to be operating if the vessels are in dry tow.)
Sorry, I missed being top of the front page – teaching class on Dominants with substituted 6ths, dominants and secondary dominants with raised 5ths, 9th, 11th nd 13th chords – college music theory. Fun stuff!
Looking around the world for sign Shell is signing on any new Arctic capable rig. No feedback yet.
OT: Hagel vote @ 5:00 DC time.
live feed
I’ll add my thanks to the above. You must be driving Shell crazy.
Boxturtle (Msg to Shell: You wouldn’t look quite as stupid if you’d stop being stupid)
I suppose it’s less expensive to tow them across the Pacific than down to a US port, to be fixed.
Thanks :)))))))))))))))
Thanks for the update ET
Phil, is the use of transponders required by law or optional?
Good question. The transponders I track are not required for what they are doing. They are more an aid to people tracking vessels for commercial and logistical purposes. Other forms of communication are.
Hmmmm . . . from the FAQ of the marine traffic site to which you linked in the post:
Sounds to me as if several captains may have been violating the law when they turned off their transponders. I’m just guessing here, but it strikes me that actions like that would place their license to pilot a vessel at risk.
Of course, if they were ordered to do so, then someone else is at risk of sanction.
It would really kill Shell to have the work done in the United States? After all they were trying to avoid taxes in AK when the Killuk went aground. I guess unless you’re a shareholder of Shell (and at this point they must be wondering why they are invested in such an incompentent company) paying pennies to get them fixed beats having your neighbors get work.
They didn’t turn the transponders off for the USCG, just for Marine Traffic dot com. Sorry that the way I described it misled. For $1,000 a month, I can subscribe to a service that they are still transponding to.
There are people in Seattle, who had been counting on the work on both vessels, who are pissed.
MT doesn’t use the same frequency as the USCG? Seems to me that would defeat the purpose of having a transponder. The whole point of having mandatory transponders on large vessels is that people are SUPPOSED to know where you are. And it shouldn’t cost $1K a month for that privilege.
If I was a shareholder in Shell, I’d be livid and demand the firing (minus golden parachutes) of the CEO and anyone else associated with this fiasco. Consider the cost of repair, transport, lost revenue (it will be at least a year before they can drill – YAY!). The loss is at least several hundreds of millions if not approaching a $billion. I wonder what the annual financial report will say next year.