Chat with Howard Dean about his new book. Hosted by Jason Rosenbaum. Tuesday, 3:00pm ET, over at FDL.
What would real healthcare reform look like? And how can everyday Americans trump big money and put healthcare back on track?
Howard Dean speaks out."The success of healthcare reform legislation rises and falls on whether the American public is allowed to opt into a universally available public healthcare program, like Medicare, or not. If Congress issues a bill that gives Americans a public option, then there will be real healthcare reform. If not, we could be back fighting about it for another 20 years before anybody tries again."–Howard Dean
Americans have pondered how to reform healthcare since the days of Harry Truman. But, for most Americans, little has changed—except that healthcare costs have soared, health insurance companies have grown richer, and, today, even those Americans who pay dearly for health insurance frequently find that their policies don’t adequately cover them when they need their coverage most.
Something has got to give. In his bold, new book, Howard Dean—the physician and former governor widely credited for reviving the Democratic Party after the 2004 elections—tells Americans what needs to be done to successfully reform healthcare. One key, he writes, is to offer Americans the option to participate in a public healthcare program, much like Medicare. “America has had ‘socialized’ medicine since 1964,” says Dean. “It’s called Medicare; it covers every American over 65, and the majority of them are happy with the program. The rest of America deserves a similar option.”
In this straight-talking guide to rising above today’s healthcare crisis, Dean spells out:
* What Obama’s healthcare plan is all about
* How other countries handle healthcare
* Which special interests are standing in the way of progress and why
* How healthcare reform will help American businesses prosper
* Why Americans need choice–between private or public health coverageMillions of Americans lack health insurance; millions more pay for coverage that doesn’t protect them from serious illness; and the status quo leaves Americans at the mercy of corporate interests. In this persuasive argument from a passionate political strategist, Americans learn how to take back the healthcare reins.
Howard Dean—physician and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—served six terms as Governor of Vermont before running for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in the nation’s 2004 election. Dean also founded Democracy for America (DFA), the grassroots organization that organizes activists in local communities, trains campaign staff, and endorses progressive candidates. Recently, Dean launched a DFA healthcare reform campaign—pushing legislators to give Americans a public healthcare option. While he was Vermont’s governor, the state expanded its universal healthcare program for children and pregnant women—and also lowered its public debt, balanced its budget 11 times, and reduced income taxes. (Amazon.com)



5 Comments







Come by everyone!
Jason I will not be able to participate ,
Here is my question.
Dr. Dean at the Netroots nation both you and Jane Hamsher spoke clearly about what many single payer advocates feel “the public option is the compromise”
How can a line drawn in the cement in regard to the public option hurt or help health care reform?
Is it better to make a stand or settle on what we can get incrementally?
Check out the discussion, he may have answered this one in there I believe:
http://firedoglake.com/2009/08…..re-reform/
Also
I have been in shock by the radical behavior of some of the people attending the town hall health care reform meetings. They scream, they interrupt, and refuse to sit back down and wait for the appropriate time and way to voice their opinions. If these were Code Pinkers or hippies and they verbally disrupted these meetings their asses would be hauled out of the halls/
Why do you think there is selective enforcement of laws having to do with interrupting public meetings?
Hi Leen,
I don’t know how Howard Dean would answer this one, but my view is that Republicans prepare for meetings with the possibility of what they think of as “disruption” in mind. Their view of “disruption” is any speech or demonstrative act that is opposed to their view, and they prepare to stop this by using law enforcement, private hired guards, and restrictive entry procedures to manage the situation so that dissent is minimized. Democrats, on the other hand, believe in dissent and free speech and feel uncomfortable about relying on coercive back-ups in public meetings. When real disruptors show up, Democrats are simply unprepared to enforce norms of orderly free speech. What Democrats have to remember is that “the constitution is not a suicide pact,” and that disruptive activity is not free sppech, it is the supression of the free speech of others.
Having said that, we also need to consider that in Town Halls, the politicians holding them often structure the Q & A situation so that the answers they give to people are as superficial as possible and rarely get beyond pre-structured talking points. This an really frustrate people who turn out and give them the feeling that the whole event is just stage-managed, to make the politician look good without really providing the information constituents are looking for. One way to moderate this effect would be for Town Halls to be organized in such a way that people were allowed to meet in caucus groups before town halls occur to develop lines of questioning so that the politician has to work through a series of questions in a dialog with the members of a caucus group. That would allow for multiple follow-ups of key questions and begin to get people beyond talking points to what politicians really think.