Michael Steele Starts a New Lie: Obama took 10 Days to Respond to Failed Terror Attack |
|
| By: Elliott Wednesday January 6, 2010 10:42 am | |
Michael Steele: "Why did it take 10 days to respond to something that everyone in Washington knew… ahh… the dots weren’t connected to?"
Andrea Mitchell: "Whoa, whoa, whoa… He responded in, within three days, and far faster than George W. Bush."
Michael Steele: "But I’m talking more specifically… but I’m, but I’m talking… If you want to compare it that way, that’s fine."
Michael Steele Starts a New Lie: Obama took 10 Days to Respond to Failed Terror Attack
About MyFDL
MyFDL is the community site of progressive political blog Firedoglake. Anyone can participate by writing a diary, commenting on others’ diaries, or joining groups to find other people in your area. Content posted to MyFDL is the opinion of the author alone, and should not be attributed to Firedoglake.
News. Community. Activism.
Firedoglake is a member-supported organization.
Help us continue our work for as little as $45/year.
Tweet
7 Comments
Anything to sell a book.
Letting this guy talk, and giving Him a venue should be considered treason to humanity.
Caring what He says should also be considered criminal.
It’s alot like asking the opinion of a rabid wolerine.
yes, I heard this 10 days bunk from another repug on tv today–they change the facts all the time and repeat them over and over. a slimy bunch
Well, good on Andrea to smack that one down. Kind of out of character.
How about giving Obama a little support:
I supported Obama but never cheered him as a miracle worker, but expected him to be torn to pieces the way Jimmy Carter another fine President was,
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/22672
Yah, yah, baby, I will *see* your Bush 6 and *raise* you my Obama 4 ….
Jack of Asses.