The darling of the DLCers might be on the road back. The model Harold Ford jalopy, which performed like an Edsel in the Tennessee Senate race in 2006, could see fresh life as a New Yorker.
According to The New York Times:
Encouraged by a group of influential New York Democrats, Harold Ford Jr., the former congressman from Tennessee, is weighing a bid to unseat Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand in this fall’s Democratic primary, according to three people who have spoken with him.
Mr. Ford, 39, who moved to New York three years ago, has told friends that he will decide whether to run in the next 45 days. The discussions between Mr. Ford and top Democratic donors reflect the dissatisfaction of some prominent party members with Ms. Gillibrand, who has yet to win over key constituencies, especially in New York City.
The same article cites about a dozen prominent (read people with boatloads of bucks) people who are supporting Ford. They include Steven Rattner, who with his wife, Maureen White, is a prominent fund raiser for the Democratic party. Others include the head of HBO, Richard Plepler; James Tisch, CEO of Loews Corp.; and perhaps even Michael Blomberg who the article notes "has tangled with Gillibrand."
Interesting to see how easily Ford, Chairman of the Centrist-Corporate Democratic Leadership Council, who lost an election in Tennessee, could become a Vice President of Merrill Lynch. The Times article notes Ford’s ties to Wall St.:
In New York, Mr. Ford took a job as vice chairman of Merrill Lynch, where he cultivated close ties to many of the Wall Street executives who are now encouraging him to run. A telegenic politician, he has also maintained a high profile through NBC and MSNBC, which feature him as a regular political commentator.
And why not? Merrill Lynch and NBC know how Harold Ford will vote on interests affecting them: he’ll always take the side of big corporations just like Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama, two other DLCers. The Times notes that Ford might have to retool himself on some issues like his opposition to gay marriage, but isn’t that essentially what Obama did too, the guy who sold himself as a "fierce defender" of the gay community only to turn into a toothless terrier? If Ford decides to challenge Gillibrand, and if he were to prevail (not really a sure thing given his poor showing in Tennessee in a Democratic year like 2006) one can only wonder what position Harold Ford would eventually take on DADT, DOMA and other such issues. Ford is another one of those Blue Dog types that Rahm and Obama are so fond of.
The Steven Rattner-Harold Ford-Obama-Rahm-Tim Geithner-Larry Summers connection is an especially interesting one (and one that might find itself the subject of a corruption investigation should the Republicans take over the House). Rattner comes from Wall St. and he’s the same guy Obama appointed in February as 2009 as lead adviser to the Treasury Department on the auto industry bailout although he had no expertise in car manufacturing. Then, a major scandal intervened, as reported in a separate New York Times article:
Named a lead adviser to the Treasury Department on the auto industry bailout… Mr. Rattner is leaving the post at a time when an investigation into his former Wall Street firm’s role in a scandal involving public pension funds has intensified. …
Mr. Rattner counseled Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Lawrence H. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, on reorganization efforts by General Motors and Chrysler, two carmakers receiving federal bailout money.
…
In April, Mr. Rattner, although unnamed, was described in Securities and Exchange Commission documents as having arranged for his investment firm, the Quadrangle Group, to pay more than $1 million to obtain New York State pension business. The S.E.C. complaint, filed as part of an expansive state and federal investigation into corruption at the state pension fund, details the efforts of Quadrangle to gain business from the pension fund beginning in 2004.
Edward Jay Epstein over at the Daily Beast provides more information how this scamming of retirement funds benefited certain people and groups:
New York state investigators may yet unravel one of the more intriguing mysteries of new financial order: why officials in charge of pension funds and endowment funds outsourced more than $100 billion of other people’s money to buyout partnerships. These institutions, in fact, provided about three-quarters of all the investment equity used by the top 100 private-equity firms to fuel the leveraged buyout craze of 2004-2008. In 2006 alone, the 10 largest, led by Calpers, the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and the Washington State Investment Board, sunk over $101 billion into private-equity partnerships. These groups, after borrowing another 60 to 70 percent for leverage, would then buy entire businesses with the aim of re-organizing and re-selling them.
He goes on to describe how New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating the matter and Rattner’s involvement in it:
One part of this investigation involves the activities of the Quadrangle Group, a private-equity firm co-founded by Steven Rattner, the veteran dealmaker and Democratic Party fundraiser, who is now serving at the Treasury Department as President Obama’s auto-industry czar. What has brought it into focus is a Securities and Exchange Commission report describing how in late 2004, just prior to getting $100 million from New York’s pension fund, a “senior executive” at Quadrangle made an arrangement with a politically connected “consultant” acting as a placement agent. The executive was then identified as Rattner and the consultant as Henry “Hank” Morris, a top adviser to then-New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi. Afterward, Quadrangle paid a $1.1 million placement fee to a small firm, Searle & Co., with which Morris was affiliated. In addition, Quadrangle had one of its subsidiaries pay $88,841 for the DVD rights to Chooch, a low-budget movie that had been co-produced in 2004 by David Loglisci, New York’s deputy comptroller, who was the top investment officer of its pension fund. (In March 2009, both Morris and Loglisci were charged in a 123-count criminal indictment with “enterprise corruption” in regard to selling access to New York’s pension fund. Both men, through their lawyers, deny the charge.)
So Rattner essentially is close to hoods duded up in Wall St. clothes, who appear to have been attempting to suck the life blood out of New York pensions. Quadrangle faced potential civil charges and was "eager to settle" according to the Times. I wonder why?
He and his wife, Ms. White, says the Times:
together have been referred to by New York magazine as the "D.N.C.’s A.T.M.," have been the hosts of many Democratic fund-raisers at their lavish apartment on Fifth Avenue.
Doesn’t this all give you confidence in Harold Ford Jr. and his ability and willingness to fight for average Americans? It would be almost worth the price of admission to see what Obama’s skillful and manipulative public relations team could re-make Harold Ford Jr. into. Maybe: "Put a Ford to Work for You". Or, "Step up for Change to a Ford"! Or even, "Harold=Hope"? Any team that could gussy up the pig of a bill that is being sold as "insurance reform" should have no trouble with the good looking Ford, even as it had no trouble passing off the inexperienced junior senator from Illinois as an agent of change and reform.
Another article, in NYMag, calls Rattner "the saddest little billionaire on fifth avenue." Why? Because this ambitious man, who once worked for Morgan Stanley, only achieved number two status at investment bank, Lazard Freres, and he didn’t get the Treasury Secretaryship he wanted. But I guess owning and manipulating Harold Ford as a Senator would be a trophy for this slime ball. As shown in the Godfather, having a top politician like a Senator on the payroll also tends to discourage investigations. Note too that Rattner has a connection to Mayor Bloomberg because Rattner manages Bloomberg’s vast fortune.
So what would be good for Bloomberg would be good for Rattner would be good for Harold Ford. Too bad that what is good for Harold Ford and company would not be good for average New Yorkers or the American population at large.
It’s the Obama-Rahm-Tim Geithner story written all over again: billions for Wall St. and especially banks, billions for bailouts, billions for wars and expansion of American Empire and bread and circuses for the masses.
New York state doesn’t need another Edsel Ford, especially one with a carpet bagger interior.



15 Comments

Just what New York needs is another carpet bagger.
Rahm’s relationship to the DLC going back to the ’90s and Harold’s relationship to the DLC after 2006 are obvious, but what’s Obama’s connection to the DLC?
Neoptolemos, I don’t claim to have all the answers but here are some things I have discovered.
Obama’s connection to the DLC and the people who support it (like Rattner and Bob Rubin) came about as soon as he became a senator. Ken Silverstein wrote a good essay on this kind of stuff called, as I remember Barack Obama, Inc. that you should be able to find on Google. Silverstein shows how quickly Obama became enmeshed in a a network of ties between the banks, the DLC, Wall St. and lobbyists.
Early on too, Obama hired a top assistant from Rubin who became known as ‘Obama’s brain’ (I recall here name as Kornbluh; she’s now Obama’s Ambassador to the OECD. In 2006, Bob Rubin, Goldman Sachs and other tied into the DLC funded Hamilton project which is a free trade think tank within the Brookings Institution. In April 2006, Obama was invited by Rubin to give the opening speech for the Hamilton Project. He waxed eloquent about his “friend Bob [Rubin]” about free trade and the need for more NAFTA like agreements, and about the need for cuts in entitlements (like social security and medicare). Note that there is a substantial cut in funds to medicare under the Senate “insurance reform” bill.
Rahm too is a connector between the banks (he also worked at Lazard), Wall St., the DLC, and Obama. They’ve known each other early from their Illinois days. As I remember, Rahm took over Rod Blagovich’s house seat and he, Blago and Obama were buddies. That’s just one of the reasons why Obmama chose Rahm as his Chief of Staff. The connections between the Obama administration and Goldman Sachs have been gone into at length by different people, especially Matt Taibbi.
Note too that there is an almost open, revolving door between all of these people and the big banks and Wall St. Note too that Larry Summers while at Harvard has been criticized for not taking good care of that big endowment: over $25 billion. They lost lots of money because of Larry.
Actually, you present a lot of answers! It makes sense that an insiders-DLCers-Obama connection would emerge the moment he got the nomination. I suppose it seemed odd to me because Hillary would have been far more connected to the DLC than Obama prior to Obama getting the nomination.
In the same way, I think Ford only got connected to the DLC after he lost to Corker. Insiders saw Ford as an asset and took him in. Looks like now they’re ready to put their asset to use. Too bad. I met Ford in 2006 and believe him to be a decent guy. It seems like establishment types know how to corrupt just about anyone.
Re “Barack Obama, Inc,” I recall an article with that title written by Cenk Uygur. Are you thinking of Cenk’s article? If you did mean Silverstein, might it be a different title?
Thanks Neoptolemos. Yes, I think the DLC had at least 2 candidates, Hillary and Obama but over time, it occurred to the power elite that Obama was preferable. Paul Street, in a brillian essay, “Obama, as predicte” over at Znet, captures the essence of Obama and shows many of his ties with the power elite. It’s a must read at http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/23196
Although Hillary was also coopted to the DLC (but less so than Bill) I think she would have been more of a fighter for average Amerians, for gays and perhaps oddly enough at first sight, for Black Americans, than Obama has been.
Steven Rattner is clearly another huge link between the DLC and Obama. Remember Obama chose this guy with a shady past and who had no experience in the automotive industry as his car czar! The possible union busting reasons for this are explored by an article by John R. MacArthur over at Harper’s. He also goes into the DLC a bit: http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/04/hbc-90004778
I believe that by April 2006, Obama was clearly on the Bob Rubin-Goldman Sachs team (as shown by his speech at the Hamilton Project, which I have written two diaries on here. I think that was pivotal. Bob Rubin is the DLC. He’s also the real president of the United States, Obama is a salesman and Rahm is Obama’s keeper for both the DLC-Rubin-Goldman group and in Rahm’s case, Israel.
Neoptolemus, here’s an article I wrote here about Rahm that also covers some of these things: http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/19362
And 2 on the Hamilton project:
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/17984
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/17981
“Barack Obama: Inc.” was written by Ken Silverstein in 2006 (maybe the other person picked up his title?):
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/11/0081275
It has excellent background iformation on Obama (his early career really seems to be a black hole by design).
Regards and keep those comments coming.
In doing some more research on Steven Rattner, I came up with this fascinating tidbit. Banker Rattner (prominently featured in the story above) serves on the Hamilton Project’s Advisory Committee, according to a Politco article at http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:bqwmDRVdV5IJ:www.politico.com/news/stories/0407/3407.html+%22steven+rattner%22+obama+hamilton+project&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk
So once again, the Hamilton Project appears to be central not only to understanding Obama, it is the focus of where the power elite is really pulling strings and through which it channels money.
For those unfamiliar with the Hamilton Project it is a free trade think tank financed by Robert Rubin, Goldman Sachs and set up within the Brookings Institution in 2006. In April 2006, Sen. Obama made the ceremonial opening speech at the Hamilton Project. In it, Obama commended “my friend Bob [Rubin former CEO of Goldman and also Citigroup], talked about the need for more NAFTA type pacts, and the need for cuts in entitlements. Part of Obama’s health “insurance reform” bill calls for millions of dollars of cuts in medicare, it should be noted.
If you look to some of my other comments above, you’ll find links to two diaries I have written on the Hamilton Project.
Is it coincidence that Rattner (and through him the DLC and the Hamilton Project) are again focusing on moulding the career of a young, attractive and minority candidate (but one who has the same biracial look as Obama and the same lack of fight for core racial issues)? Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot both agreed on one thing: there is no such thing as coincidence. They were right.
Could Harold Ford be the next chosen one, Obama’s replacement in the wings (at least 4 and perhaps 8 years down the road)?
Here’s Ken Silverstein’s follow-up to his original article on Obama:
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2006/10/sb-a-little-bit-more-on-obama-1161881683
Maybe this is a case where our libertarian friends can help us. I don’t think they want another corporate Dem that the party machine likes taking the seat and we have a progressive candidate who isn’t beholden to Wall Street who is running. Help us with our primary and then vote your conscience in the general. I don’t know if there are any non-corporate Republicans or third party candidates.
Thanks PaulaT I wish I could provide some answers for the questions you pose but I’m not really an expert on NY politics and am analyzing from afar deeper socil and politial questions that happen to be showing up in NY with Ford.
Maybe some of the readers who are from New York can help us out.
Also, I think that if Ford challenges Gullibrand it will really be divisive for the party and it will be a clear sign that yet again Rahm and Obama are playing their hand. Gullibrand has lots of things going for her and she’s a terrific fund raiser so in the end, I’d be really surprised if Ford goes for the Senate seat. It would seem that the governorship might be his for the taking and that could also lead to national office later on.
New York hasn’t been carrying its weight when it comes to putting progressives in the Senate lately, and it looks like the Democratic establishment aims to keep it that way. Not sure what game Obama and Emanuel are playing, but to push someone like Ford in that state is the sort of thing they’d try.
I’m not even sure I like Gillibrand, but she’s at least to the left of Ford. A little.
Eh, I think it’s a lot of smoke and no fire. That said, as a New Yorker, I’d be happy to vote against Ford…
As a New Yorker it makes no difference to me. Just one more reason to stay away from the polls this November. One faux Democrat is no different from another faux Democrat as far as I’m concerned.
The person who should be concerned is Chuckie Schumer because Harold likes his face time and Chuckie will have to fight to get in front of those TV cameras now.
I don’t know if Ford will be able to get the Kiryas Joel/Borough Park moneybags in the Hasidic community to go for a black senator although if the experience of Obama is any clue Ford won’t shy away from voting like just another white guy.
Sorry if this sounds anti-semitic or racist, I’m just sick and tired of all this nonsense and tired of getting fucked over at the hands of Democrats, whether DLCers or agents of “change.”
Rahm and Obama support Gillibrand.
Jason, sorry I made the mistake about Gillibrand’s name. Any reason in particular why the “edit” function goes off so early here?
Do you really believe nrafter530 that? Obama-Rahm’s track record has been if they say one thing, they’re usually doing another. The same bankers who supported Obama, especially the infamous Rattner, appear to be lining up behind DLCer Ford. Rahm and Obama are also DLCers so guess where their support will really go if Ford opts in. I suspect, though, that he realizes Gillibrand is no pushover and that he will instead run for the governship.