President Obama STILL doesn’t get it. He doesn’t understand why voters in the Bay State and elsewhere are disappointed with his administration. Obama blames it on "communication problems".
In an excellent interview with Big Ed over at MSNBC, Arianna Huffington points out the folly of this. Arianna notes that Obama has been communicating non-stop since his election and that it is the SUBSTANCE of what he is doing that has the voters upset.
Howard Dean also is spot on in his analysis of Obama’s woes. Dean, on the Rachel Maddow show, said:
"If you want to win, you actually can’t sort of move to the middle and become a Republican. You’ve got to stand up and stand for the things that you got elected on and that the Democratic Party believes in and we haven’t seen that in the healthcare bill and I think that’s part of the problem."
Exactly right. Here’s what Obama and the Democrats have to do to, in Arianna’s phrase, "course correct":
1. Get rid of Rahm Emanuel. He was a disaster as a strategist for Dems in 1994 and he’s been a disaster thusfar (remember the move to get Jud Gregg, of all people, as the Commerce Secretary?);
2. Get rid of Tim Geithner and Larry Summers. The two guys who were instrumental in creating the financial-economic meltdown are now Obama’s chief economic advisors. Dump them pronto and hire a combination of Paul Volcker, Joe Stiglitz or James Galbraith instead.
3. Dump the fake "insurance reform" Senate bill. It’s a Frankenstein monster and the voters hate it. Instead, extend medicare to the population in phases. First phase, everyone after age 45 gets medicare. Simple, efficient, easy for voters to understand and YES, economical.
4. Dump the Republican Robert Gates over at the Defense Department and replace him with a Democrat willing to cut back (not escalate) wars abroad and reduce the defense department budget. Someone like former 4-star general Wes Clark.
5. Bring Howard Dean back into the fold in a high capacity job. He’d be an excellent choice to replace Rahm. He understands voters and how to win elections AND he understands health care reform.
6. "It’s the economy, stupid." After firing Geithner and Summers, hit the ground running with massive public works projects to create jobs immediately. It’s the only way to do that, FDR understood that.
7. Instead of coddling the banks and Wall St., attack their excesses. We need real financial reform. Appoint Elizabeth Warren to tackle these problems.
This is not a difficult agenda AND the man who ran as an agent of change should have begun implementing it a year ago.
Unfortunately, I have zero faith that Obama will course correct and carry out the above agenda. Obama looks into mirrors to preen himself, not for introspection. He’s a died-in-the-wool DLCer; a true Rockefeller Republican (handouts to Wall St. and banks, nothing for Main Street; expansionist, American empire abroad with lots of money for the military-industrial complex).
Drew Westen, in a hard-hitting article on Obama, notes that Obama never calls himself a Democrat and has never defined what that means:
The President’s steadfast refusal to acknowledge that we have a two-party system, his insistence on making destructive concessions to the same party voters he had sent packing twice in a row in the name of "bipartisanship," and his refusal ever to utter the words "I am a Democrat" and to articulate what that means, are not among his virtues. We have competing ideas in a democracy — and hence competing parties — for a reason. To paper them over and pretend they do not exist, particularly when the ideology of one of the parties has proven so devastating to the lives of everyday Americans, is not a virtue. It is an abdication of responsibility.
…The White House just couldn’t seem to "get" that the American people could see that they were constantly coming down on the side of the same bankers who were foreclosing people’s homes and shutting off the credit to small business owners, when they should have been helping the people whose homes were being foreclosed and the small businesses that were trying to stay afloat because of the recklessness of banks that were now starving them. Americans were tired of hearing Obama "exhort" bankers and speculators to play nice as they collected their record bonuses for a heckuva job in 2009. It took him a year to float the idea of making them pay for a fraction of the damage they had done, and at this point, few Americans have any faith that a tax on big banks will ever become law or that the costs won’t just be passed on to them in new fees.
The White House has squandered the greatest opportunity to change both the country and the political landscape since Ronald Reagan.
/p>
The heading of Westen’s article is telling: "Obama Finally gets his victory for bipartisanship." Yup, the WH dude who keeps calling for bipartisanship actually got a Republican elected. Nice going, Team Obama.
That Obama sees his problems as communication-based and is unwilling and apparently unable to stand up for core Democratic pary values is telling. Real Democrats have to work around Obama and dump him in 2012. Elders in the Democratic Party will have to start pushing for an agenda like the one above against Obama’s wishes.
Here’s how Howard Dean put it:
People who blame others are losers. If you want to win elections you stop blaming and you get to work. And that’s what’s going to have to be done after this election…. I think the message has been sent that if we plan to do better than this in 2010, we’d better do better for the American people between now and next November.
Who better to lead true Democrats forward than Howard Dean?
That’s necessary because unfortunately, the Obama White House still doesn’t get it and the man sitting in the White House isn’t a Democrat from the Democratic side of the Democratic party.
So, we have to work around the poseur Democrat, implement a true progressive agenda, and dump Obama in 2012. He’s already proven he’s a liability not a leader.



67 Comments

Brilliant. Right on the money.
Obama is right, there is a communication problem.
If people would just stop communicating with each other fewer would realize how bad he sucks.
Good post fflambeau.
Ha, you made me laugh.
dear mr. president, please stop talking and start listening.
fflambeau, terrific short piece. I agreed with everything except:
I’d say hire both Joe Stieglitz and James Galbraith replacing Geither and Summers, and hire Elizabeth Warren as a ramrod for the economic initiatives to get things done.
I agree that Obama is unlikely to do these things, but, on the other hand, I just can’t believe that he won’t begin to see failure coming and figure he has to change course.
Agree with you Letsgetitdone and I have Elizabeth Warren in point #7.
I’ve added some commentary from an excellent article by Drew Westen who really nails Obama. His entire article is a must read.
In reality, I don’t think Obama’s in charge, I think Bob Rubin is with Obama being the front man, the salesman for Rubin’s unpopular desires. That means, real Democrats including not only leaders in the party but people like ourselves have to reshape this administration, pull Obama by his lapels and shake him to bring the changes outlined above. This is not the agenda he (and Bob Rubin, his boss) want. He needs to be pushed hard, and then dumped in 2012 and replaced with a progressive Democrat (Howard Dean, Russ Feingold?).
Haiku version:
Obama now knows
Communication confirms
How badly he sucks
When Howard Dean takes over the WH in 2012, he should hire you in communications. You have a way with words and better on his side than against him!
My version Ratfood:
Obama ducks,
tells us Coakley’s communication sucks,
but The People know who are the real smucks!
When I apply will you give me a good reference? :-)
Dean in ’12
With a little work you could probably turn that into a limerick.
Thanks for another great diary, fflambeau.
You’re right, ratfood, and I forgot the seasonal reference. Let me try again:
Winds of winter change,
unheeded,
a house neglected.
Communication is a two way street. The White House has been talking, but refusing to listen to anything they don’t already know. And then there’s the disconnect between “talking” and “walking.”
A Squid, Eating Dough
In a Polyethylene Bag
Is Fast and Bulbous
Got Me?
- Captain Beefheart
You’re the wordsmith, so you write the reference up and I’ll sign it. I’m for Dean in 2012 running on the promise of appointing Elizabeth Warren to Treasury.
The drew weston link doesn’t work.
It’s amazing to me how few dems and progressives realized how mediocre Obama was from the get-go. A great campaigner, a great speech-giver, and a historic candidate. But his platform was always nothing to write home about. I can’t figure why people are so disappointed. This is the guy your campaigned for.
Thanks for pointing the faulty link out Dameocrat.
Unfortunately, the time to edit the diary has elapsed (why so quick, people at FDL?) but here is the link from the Huffingtonpost:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/obama-finally-gets-his-vi_b_429232.html
Its a great read and his articles are in the same league as Frank Rich’s.
Obama is only partly right. He identified it as a communication problem but misdiagnosed it. He has broken earpiece but thinks he needs a louder microphone.
i don’t agree with the second portion of your post about Party Politics. That;s the bane of our society. I don’t want to hear anyone declare fealty to them.
How do you define what is a “real” Democrat? Is a Bart Stupak or a Paul Wellstone that defines the Democrat ideology?
Also, I am unwilling to accept that Brown is the enemy because he ran on the republican party ticket. In his acceptance speech he said this seat does’t belong to any party, it belongs to the people. It was a very populist message, and he acknowledged Independents in his acceptance speech, not republicans.
This is a class problem, just as it always has been. We are the plebeians, politicians are whores, and the rich are their aristocratic patricians,
The largest obstacle we have that divides us from libertarians and republican/ conservative base is the language we use to describe the same thing. In one of Glen Greenwald columns he addressed how republicans don’t want government taking over businesses, but we don’t want businesses taking over our government, and it’s really the same thing. They are colluding at the top.
We need to develop some new frames as a way seeing how we really do have common values and language is the key. This left right crap is hurting us.
It’s really difficult to have meaningful discussions with each other because the rapport devolves to name calling and stereotyping so quickly.
Deciphering the deregulation/lower tax language.
When we talk about regulation/deregulation, the disconnect comes from the failure to distinguish between monopoly corporations, their harmful production practices vs. regulatory stifling of tiny entrepreneurs of the non propertied. The positives get co-opted by the big corps, and the negatives are applied to the little guy. Naturally. We have to redefine exactly what is a personal/small/medium business.
Obama has already done the stimulus once and they backed off their PR campaign to tell us how wonderfully it worked. It’s going to take creative ideas and not doubling down for more of the same when the results have already been poor. We know that these neoliberals aren’t going to develop a Federally run roads/transportation Dept. program. They will contract it out to private companies which won’t result in a a discernible increase in jobs, and we’ll probably end up with the equivalent of a Katrina redeux, The roads will end up as private toll roads if they get built at all.
I paid a visit to Bill Clinton’s Third Way site, and their ideas are of planned economies, government programs for big business, providing trained workers that are educated by the state for the company. Its very fascistic. I started to see that maybe these nutbaggers are on to something that we, or I have overlooked. Reconsidered, the term “jobs programs” creeps me out.
If we were to build off of libertarian social principles, and by cutting out out the Neoliberal vampires, I think there is more room for agreement that we could find to improve the situation for all of us on the lower rungs in this class war.
Unemployment could be helped if we eased the requirements on individuals to help or encourage them to start their own micro-business. I’m sure you’ve heard of recent cases of the kids that were harrassed by police for setting up lemonade stands without licenses.
Did you know you can’t run a catering business out of your own home, because it’s illegal to cook in your own kitchen?
Rather than the way they did the stimulus, I think money could be better spent setting up almost free community marketplaces, or by issuing small land plot ease/claims (land reform). How many homeless people could start their own organic farms? They could pitch their tents there or park a small trailer instead of congregating in urban areas and sleeping on sidewalks.
Of course, the regulations concerning trailers, or small shed building and animals would have to be relaxed.
The End.
Thanks for the diary fflambeau!
Actually Shredeverything, Obama ran on a pretty progressive (if vague) platform. He flip-flopped on a lot of his promises: FISA, DADT, renegotiating NAFTA, DOMA, taxing more those who make more than $250k a year–usually taking the opposite stand of what he had promised.
So I don’t think you can blame the electorate for his lies.
The only area that I can recall him telling the truth was the part about escalating the fight in Afghanistan, which he has done twice. A lot of people, though, saw that as a way to insulate himself from McCain’s aggressive stance on foreign policy and were actually surprised that it has been one of the few promises he carried through on.
Recall too that in the campaign he called for health care reform but as soon as he got elected he started to talk about “insurance reform”: not exactly the same thing, is it?
Here’s some evidence to support Arianna Huffington’s position that the loss in Mass. might be a blessing in disguise, if handled properly.
A Democratic Congressman, Steve Kagan, who is also a medical doctor and has pretty enlightened views on health care reform, says he will vote AGAINST the Senate health care version:
Kagan’s approach might be the best one. Forget the Senate bill, and simply outlaw some of the worst practices of the insurers.
I’ll take a stab at this and say Dennis Kucinich and other unapologetic liberals, who actually know how to win elections in their own districts and who actually, you know, govern like unapologetic liberals. Dean has a tendency to lie when confronted by facts that don’t fit in with his rhetoric, like when he said that the weak public option Obama let die was the same thing as single-payer (according to Doctor David Himmelstein).
Great post, fflambeau! I’d love to see the admin make better use of Dean, too, but I seriously doubt that it will happen.
If Obama thinks his main problem is “communication,” then we are not likely to see a course correction. No big surprise, I guess. I never really thought he was very “left” or “liberal” or “progressive.”
My litmus test? When men, especially politicians, don’t really get women’s reproductive health issues, then they probably don’t get a lot of other progressive or liberal issues, as well.
It would be great if Dean were to primary Obama in 2012, but I don’t think that will happen, either. The Powers That Be (the corporatists) would never allow it.
He flipped on FISA BEFORE he was elected. Whenever I tried to bring that up during the election, Obama supporters brushed it off and said I “didn’t understand the political realities.” I think we can and should blame the electorate for treating Obama like a savior and not a politician.
Howard Dean in ‘12!
fflambeau,
Excellent diary.
If Obama wants to say the Democrats have had a “communications problem,” that’s fine with me. So long as they don’t believe that their bullshit thus far has been the right way to go and actually correct course, I don’t care what they say to put the loss of a Senate seat behind them.
Great post & many good comments. Agree with nearly everything said here.
Rahmbama DOES have a very big “communication problem.” That problem is that he’s solely “communicating” with his corporate overlords and refusing to “communicate” with we, the people. IF BHO doubles-down on his present strategy and keeps moving to the right (as I fear), then he’s toast, and I say: good riddance to bad rubbish.
As opposed to most all of the Republics that I know (speaking strictly about the ones I know), I am very willing to call out crapulous Democrats and seek to replace them asap. I owe no fealty anyone, no matter what party affiliation.
IF Rahmbama doesn’t get the message, then so be it. This past year has mostly been a ridiculous exercise in stupidity, and although I’m no fan of Brown, his win sends out a big, fat old message. ARE YOU LISTENING, MR. PRESIDENT??????? THIS is the COMMUNICATION that VOTERS are sending to you.
I worked for Dr. Dean in ’04 down in Atlanta. Most Democrats I knew were reluctant to back him feeling he was too ‘dynamic’ or ‘too much too soon’. Ah, timid creatures are we democrats (small case d intended). It is Dr. Dean who put together the winning strategy for Demos in ’06 and ’08 and more than a few beltway Demos predicted terrible consequences when he put his plans in motion. James The Ragin’ Cajun said it would never work and that Dr. Dean would hurt the party badly. I think a lot of these beltway types are still miffed that they were wrong and rather than listening to Dean they’d rather marginalize him out of spite.
He is definitely a liability and there were too many dems and progressives willing to look the other way while he broke one promise after the other. I for one dont think he has it in him to do what is necessary to course correct. The question is will the democrats make the other nite the ghost of christmas yet to come by going along with Obama and Rahm or will THEY make Obama course correct. If the dems and Obama think talking tough and doing nothing about job creation will work they are in for a big surprise. They shld come up with an aggressive jobs program and DARE the republicans and blue dogs to vote against it. If the people see Obama working for the people the people will support him but if he is viewed as the president of Wall Street he and the dems are toast in November. Another good place to start is confronting the recent supreme court decision allowing corporations to spend more influencing our campaigns, the president can increase the size of the court and if this court insist on voting on straight party lines he needs more people on his side in the court. It is time to be a tough SOB Obama.
Very good post, fflambeau.
As you and others have noted, IMO it’s really the disconnect between what Obama has been saying versus what he has been doing that has voters upset.
Sums everything up beautifully. Thanks.
t
Recommended and tweeted, too!
Obama sounds like the sheriff in Cool Hand Luke.
I agree with the post in general. Specifically, get rid of the entire economic team including Christina Romer. Do not include Paul Volcker. William Greider’s book “Secrets of the Temple” is a brilliant indictment of the Fed under Volcker. He is a monetarist and he is NOT friendly to labor and working people’s concerns. He will put fighting inflation in front of jobs. Galbraith is a common sense Keynesian with great ideas and focus on inequality in pay. Read his brilliant “Predator State”. Stiglitz is a reformed free marketer. Galbraith never bought into the bunk. Check out economist Michael Hudson who advises Kucinich.
Howard Dean is honest. But even he says he’s still a free marketer. But at least we would get a caring, smart, honest individual to lead the Dems instead of the hustlers and con men we have now. All they think they have to do is have a great “brand”. Read Naomi Klein’s latest on brand Obama and how corporate branding has taken over America.
Branding America and Obama
I would still like to see a strong labor secretary, but that won’t happen with president who never mentions labor or what’s her name.
It is an incomplete list at best but I would include:
Jamie Galbraith
Robert Johnson
Bill Black
Dean Baker
Joseph Stiglitz
Elizabeth Warren
Simon Johnson
Randall Wray
William Mosler
Sheila Bair
Brooksley Born
Paul Krugman
and bloggers like
Yves Smith
Nomi Prins
Karl Denninger (nutty on unions but great on other analysis)
as well as the guy who does Calculated Risk
many others whose names escape me at the moment
“Abdication of responsibility”
It goes much further. The Obama administration has been in active collaboration with the corporatists who have actively worked to destroy every premise of democratic government.
Obama APPOINTED Geithner.
Obama APPOINTED Bernacke.
He wants them reappointed.
He CHOOSE Rahm.
He choose to meet privately with the pharmaceutical companies and negotiate sell out deals behind closed doors. He failed to ever advocate for meaningful reform that challenged the mafiaoso profiteering of the health care industry. He collaborated with it.
It is inaccurate to describe Obama’s deeds as mere acquiesence. It minimizes his responsibility and the damage he has caused to a true people’s movement. He ran on a populist theme of change, tapping into the desperation of the populace for representation, and then choose to govern in exact opposition to his stated intent.
Obama has ACTIVELY betrayed us.
Don’t forget Nouriel Roubini. The way Krugman has been parroting the WH line and defending Gruber of late, I’d drop him from this list.
You know who be another nice addition to the administration, and conveniently is retiring from his current long-time gig?
Bill Moyers
“Obama blames it on “communication problems”.
That’s correct. He does not want to listen.
[Edited by Mod. We really don't need to go down this path, 'kay?]. It refers to a black person who is subservient to
whitesthe powerful, ready to please even if it means turning their back on his “people.”I’ve been thinking about doing a diary on the White House’s Magical Thinking
I think I “get” what you mean, but I would respectfully disagree (in advance without seeing your blog, so forgive me). I don’t think that the WH is engaging in “magical thinking,” themselves. I would argue that they want us, the voters, to engage in “magical thinking” about the WH, BHO, the Admin & Congress, and what they are lying & spinning about.
I think the WH knows exactly what it’s doing. I’ve argued elsewhere that Rahmbama ain’t stupid, just arrogant and duplicitous.
Get rid of Government Propaganda Czar Cass Sunstein. Fascist Sunstein wants the government to conspire to secretly take away the freedoms of those who think the government is conspiring to secretly take away our freedoms.
Sunstein is so stupid, we have had the NSA spying on the people for 8 years, while spinning false narratives about war and torture.
What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.
We need a President as smart, energetic and caffeine-fueled as Howard Dean sounded this morning on the Bill Press (?) show.
If the cap fits.
Primary Obama
It’s the only chance we have. He won’t course correct, he needs to go.
#8 Move to Venezuela! What a bunch of freaks you leftist libs are. Is this what was meant by “all wee weed up?” This country is C O N S E R V A T I V E. Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) proved it! Great web site for a good laugh, though. Thanks for playing!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG9tuuznL1Y
Not so much, .
“Voters strongly disapprove of the job being done by congressional Republicans (26 percent approve and 58 percent disapprove), a much lower rating than they give to congressional Democrats (37 percent approve and 51 percent disapprove).”
http://firedoglake.com/2010/01/21/ma-voters-seek-more-and-faster-change-economy-jobs-top-concern-taxing-health-insurance-very-unpopular-poll-says/
Obama’s “communication problem” with the left:
We talk, Obama sticks his fingers in his ears and goes “la la la la la…”
It does seem to be rather similar to how BushCo would claim they just had to change their message or advertising rather than change the actual policies that piss’d folks off.
it’s like, maybe Obama has moderators around him who censor inconvenient or disapproved points of view, preventing them from being heard, preventing debate on their merits!
what an Orwellian job that must be, but for certain authoritarian follower, True Believer types, it must be very pleasing, the ability to simply delete inconvenient thoughts.
It’s like I said in this diary over at Orange — “left” and “right” may signify real ideological differences to us plebes. But to the political class, “left” and “right” are mere public relations stances. Obama is a public relations pro and a social climber.
Communication problem? When one empties words of their meaning like a good PR rep, communication becomes just another conduit for power, and right now the owning class has the power.
For the political class, politics IS above all a public relations effort.
It’s terribly corporate, too; all but the best companies prefer to believe that their sales problems are simply due to inadequate or ineffective advertising; they never admit that the problem is a bad product that nobody wants. It’s classic.
I’ve been trying to be hopeful that Obama’s going to correct course, but I’m not so confident anymore after what I heard Gibbs say on MSNBC’s The Ed Show tonight.
He said that Obama’s going to reconnect with the people by speaking at them in order to protect them from the spin of special interests.
Rather than speak with the American people and listen to them, he’s going to try to do a better job spinning bs on behalf of special interests.
They seriously seem to think that their not having sold the non-progressive agenda well enough is where they went wrong.
Maybe O’s not “catapulting the propaganda” enuff? Is THAT his problem.
Well, with the SC ruling he can catapult away now.
Sporkovat @50:
Do you suppose…? Is it possible… that he’s taken to watching and listening to Fox News?
Yes! And look how that story turned out! Lobotomies all ’round.
It saddens me to have to agree. He had it laid out on a platter in front of eat and he did nothing. Bipartisanship is a fantasy on the order of the Force in Star Wars.
Not any more, thanks to the supremes. Bend over and kiss you corporate assets.
It’s the policy, stupid!
The country wants liberal policy right now.
The country doesn’t want rightist policy right now.
The country is being given rightist policy.
And the country is… reacting negatively to it.
HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE MR. PRESIDENT!?
I don’t think they even focus grouped the hallowed term bipartisanship… who in the hell wakes up in the morning saying, “You know what would make this a perfect day? Bipartisanship!”
Don’t let the people be the enemy of the kleptocracy! ;)
And don’t let the real be the enemy of the imaginary! (Excise tax, individual mandate, free market capitalism, corporate freedom good for America, etc)
It’s funny how often the phrase ‘we must not let the perfect be the enemy of the good’ has been tossed around WHEN NO ONE EVER MENTIONED WHAT THE PERFECT WAS OR WHY WE WEREN’T GOING TO TRY FOR IT.
God, Democrats are either incredibly dumb or wonderfully clever, depending on what you see their genuine agenda as.
This I strongly agree with, but to see it through we probably need nothing less than a mass popular movement. Nominating these people would mean opposing the extremely powerful financial sector, and that’s a sector that played a major role in getting the Democrats elected, so they’re quite beholden to them.
I certainly agree that Dean would be a better choice than Emanuel, but let’s not idealize Dean. He has told lies about the public option and has written that politicians who passed Medicare for All would “pay an enormous price at the polls” because “You can’t take choices away from Americans.”
Count me in on that–unless he is forced to do so.
Brilliant post and very well articulated…nice list starting with Emanuel. Cheers.
This is a test. Just a test.
Drew Westen’s piece is dead-on and well worth reading. The fetishism of bipartisanship is one of placing the means above the ends. Yes, it would be “nice” in a kumbayah sense. But because we have Congressional elections every 2 years and voters base their decisions on results, rather than the niceties of the process used, with 15 percent unemployment the luxury of a bipartisan fetish carries the cost of being thrown out of power, which is the spiral BHO and Congress are now twirling in.