With Dennis Kucinich’s stunning announcement that he will now support "health insurance" reform, the bill is now completely on the Democratic Party. Obama, their leader, sold the people out years ago to Goldman Sachs. Now Americans should make the Democrats pay for their actions.
Recall that mid-term elections are less than eight months away. Here are some steps that true Progressives can take:
1) acceptance of reality is the first step in making any true change. The reality is that the Democratic Party is little more than another wing of the corporate party and as Obama has shown, not much different from the Republican party except in tone and public relations. Almost nothing has changed for the better under Obama, who ran as an agent of change but who has turned out to be a Trojan Horse for Goldman Sachs, Wall St., and the insurance companies.
Indeed, Obama has shown that his true enemy is progressivism and he will not stop at any measure to undermine its proponents. Under intense pressure from the White House, Kucinich’s shocking capitulation and volte-face was mirrored weeks earlier in the capitulation of Democrats like Russ Feingold.
Feingold:
(A.) was one of only 12 Democratic Senators who voted against Bernie Sanders one-time bailout ($250) to Social Security recipients, a measure of help offered to the elderly since this year will be the first ever in which no COLA adjustment will be given to them. "Liberals" like Levin, Bennett, Feinstein, and Udall joined Feingold in a vote against the poor and the elderly.
(B.) Feingold also did NOTHING when the Patriot Act was extended without debate and without a formal vote on it. He (or others like Al Franken or Bernie Sanders) could have at least asked for a voice vote. Not a single Senator asked for a voice vote or called for debate. Any Senator who really and truly opposed the extension of some of the worst features of the Patriot Act could have pulled a "Jim Bunning" since the bill’s features would have expired in three days time. Precisely no one in the Senate stood up for the Constitution.
2) the Democratic party should not be supported in any form. No money for them, their candidates and their causes. Don’t work for them, don’t walk precincts for them, don’t telephone for them, don’t lick envelopes for them or their allies.
3) vote against BLUE DOGS and vote against people like Harry Reid. Reid should be our number one target in November because he is the head of the monster that the Senate has turned into. If you live in Nevada, vote against him. If you don’t vote in Nevada, donate money to his opponent, even though that opponent might be a Republican. Getting Reid out will send a message to the Democrats and will at least force a change in Senate leadership.
4) support existing third parties (like the Greens) in preference to the Democrats.
5) court action will be the final place for resistance to ObamaCare. It should be supported by Progressives. Challenges to ObamaCare should be brought in courts: especially the bill’s mandate provisions. I believe there is a high likelihood that ObamaCare will ultimately be found to be unconstitutional.
I’m amending my original diary to add some late-breaking news. The state of Idaho is the first to sign a law requiring the state of Idaho to sue the federal government if residents are forced to buy insurance. Similar measures are pending in 37 other states. While many constitutional law experts will probably say this is a no-go (given the federal preemption doctrine), if there is significant opposition from the states, that will have an influence on the Supreme Court which obviously is also at loggerheads with the Obama administration. What this also does is to further politicize ObamaCare and holds out the opportunity for opponents (from the right AND the left) to use the courts and state governments as a means to counter the increasingly centralized government we see in Washington, D.C. Within 40 minutes of the above story being posted, there are more than 1440 comments on it, most vilifying ObamaCare. People are not going to forget this, ever and the people will vote against ObamaCare.
6) concentrate our actions on the state and local levels. Building alternative parties-structures begins there.
7) long-term thinking should be made to challenge Obama in 2012 by way of primary or other means. If Ron Paul runs as a third party candidate, support him in preference to Obama. If Ralph Nader runs again, support him. Nader is perhaps the only person in America who saw what was coming in America and fought against it. For that, he has been mercilessly vilified, especially by Democrats who without basis in fact, try to pin Gore’s loss to W in 2000 on him.
Obama is an enemy to progressives and progressive causes as he has clearly shown throughout his sellout of single payer and the public option. He cannot be trusted in any fashion. Nor can the party that he leads be trusted. They have sold out the American people.
8) Blue Dogs and their ilk should face primary challenges from progressives. If the progressives lose those challenges, they should then run (as 3rd party candidates) against the Blue Dogs. That the primary route is effective is shown by its embrace by Rahm and the White House as a tool AGAINST progressives (led by, of all groups, Moveon).
9) We need to "out" allies of the Democrats like Kos and Nate Silver and Moveon. These people/groups are little more than fronts for the party (and in Kos’s case, an agency). Don’t support them, don’t visit their websites (you give them money if you do). If you are a fan of polls, give "30 pieces of Silver" up for www.pollster.com which is professional, nonpartisan and nonprofit. Get your news from www.democracynow.org a source that tells it like it is. Read Glenn Greenwald on a daily basis.
10) elections and election law must be changed, especially the way candidates receive money. It is obvious now that almost all of our politicians are corporate whores, bought and paid for by big business. We need public financing for all candidates. Recall that it was Obama who turned down public funding.
11) we need to get people involved in the political process who are currently not. We especially need to change the type of people we have running for office. Out with the professional politicians. In with the likes of Michael Moore and Jane Hamsher. They in turn must show the courage of conviction to step forward and run for office. Otherwise, real change will never occur.
None of the above will be easy. It will take lots of time and effort. There will be many setbacks and losses. But if we continue to look only to the Democrats for change, we will be disappointed as we have been in health care reform.



44 Comments







The Democrats will end up paying for it….bigtime, if what happened here in the Bay State as a consequence of that disastrous “Obamacare” healthcare “reform” bill is any indication. Scott Brown rode on the coattails of people’s anger and frustrations over that bill and managed to get himself elected…by a huge landslide, to take the late Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat. The fact that Martha Coakley ran a poor campaign and arrogantly and lazily failed to do any work or campaigning on her own behalf because she thought she had the electorate in her back pocket didn’t help matters either. The Democrats got their butts handed to them in this last election and will continue to do so for years to come, and it’ll be their own damned fault, not the Republicans’ (not that I like the Republicans either, btw).
I agree fflambeau. Thanks for making this statement.
Thanks Letsgetitdone and Mplo. I’ve amended the diary to reflect the news that the State of Idaho has just passed legislation requiring its Attorney General to sue the federal government if the feds attempt to mandate insurance. From an AP article on this (linked in my diary):
What this means is that opponents of ObamaCare can use legislation (and attempted legislation) as a stick to beat the Democrats with. I believe the Democrats will rue the day they lined up to support ObamaCare. It will mean an end to that party.
Thanks, fflambeau. You’ve made a good point, but the Democrats have such a long history of self-destructing (over the past several decades) that I think that the Democratic Party made itself irrelevent years ago. You’re right, though, about the “Obamacare” healthcare “reform” bill being a dangerous disaster.
This diary and this site are whack – you all must be about 18 years old – Now MoveOn is a trader too. You all are marginalizing yourselves into irrelevancy. Wilhelm Reich said that political philosophies run in a circle – if you go far enough either to the left or the right you end up on the extreme of the other side. Jane Hamsher already embraced Grover Norquist – next you will have Cheney doing articles.
obviously, you have no sight. I left moveon months ago when I realized they are just like the republicans were with Bush. They will support Obama no matter what he does. Do you really want to be responsible for all the innocent people being killed in Afganistan, Iraq and probably Iran and the 180,000 of your fellow citizens dead between now and when this health care debacle kicks in 2014. As if it will even change after it kicks in. This is funding the insurance companies. What? do you have stocks with them?
So your choice is to give in to the Republican fear mongers – in fact join with them and their corporate masters – wonderful. Didn’t you read the CBO or are they also part of the conspiracy. Cynicism is the sanctuary of the intellectually lazy. We can fix what needs to be fixed if we stay involved. Obama has taken on the presidency at the toughest time ever – additionally he is Black and has to deal with all of the unconscious racism coming from the left as well as the right. We are blessed to have someone of his emotional and intellectual stature.
The Republicans are the party of in your face fascism. The Democrats are the smiley faced weasel version. There is no longer any remnants of the party that put together the New Deal and The Great Society. None left. Time to move on and move on from move on.
Also give examples of Obama’s “emotional and intellectual” stature. Saying ” I feel your pain” or “my mother died of cancer” doesn’t cut it. Yes, he’s a cagey politician, but I never saw him as particularly smart in an intellectual way. I have never heard an interesting new idea from him or a particularly great turn of phrase. I find him incapable of explaining a problem or displaying any passion or conviction. I have always found him emotionally cold. So we disagree about being “blessed” by this guy.
Your wrong moonie. Obama is part of the problem. He’s the one that traded away the REAL deal he didn’t have to do that. Instead, he goes around talking a good game while making deals with our lives and fortunes. What he’s counting on is that the rest of us will continue to act like we have battered wife syndrome. he’s a laying sack of shit so u go right ahead and continue to support these folks if u like. I’ve waster 40+ yrs. doing it and I’ve had enough.
Wilhelm Reich. Is that your hero? The man who gave power over to Hitler? I think you’ve been breathing ink or something.
Riech escaped Hitler – learn some history – he was demonized by fear mongers in the U.S. – people who didn’t learn history and operated out of fear – kind of like you. He is not me hero – but a person who wrote and thought many interesting ideas. Don’t be afraid of ideas – like HCR.
don’t feed the trolls.
God forbid anyone disagree with the orthodoxy here – you won’t want different ideas that spoil you pity party.
How is mentioning Reich trollish?
Since you cannot tell the difference between a “trader” and a “traitor”, who should take anything you say to be worthwhile? Go have a drink at TraitorVics, Moonwood. Your post is a real hoot!
I guess you are right – making a typo means you can’t think – Your judgment of me says more about yourself
I think we should keep our ears open to Progressives in the various states about “down ticket” candidates.
I recall that prior to the Texas primary — which is an “open” one [Dems can cross over & vote for Republicans, and vice versa] — some were advocating not voting in the Dem primary, but going to cast a vote for Kay Baily Hutchinson, to force a run-off with Perry [and thus eat up Republican $$$$].
Several Blue Texans said they couldn’t follow that strategy, since there were down-ticket candidates on the Dem ballot they wanted to support.
These good down-ticket Democrats [I'm making an assumption here] deserve to be supported in November, even if the “top” of the ticket [US Senators and Representatives] do not.
I propose that, instead of “staying home” as Dems did in Mass, we go to the polls, but vote ONLY for the down-ticket folks. As to whether to vote 3rd party or not at all for the top of the ticket — I’m undecided.
I’m searching for a strategy that will demonstrate that we are out here, that we do vote, we just don’t vote for Lesser Evils.
In my experience a lot of “down ticket” Democrats become toadies for the state party and are not allowed to buck the party bosses. Better to go third party. Unfortunately for us, money from big multi national corps will be used to even elect the local dog catcher. We will never have enough money.
nice diary, ff.
the Kuchinich capitulation is an important signpost – his role was to provide the last slender illusion that any (D)’s were worth supporting, but it is obvious his loyalty is still to the Donk, not to his vaunted principles.
Please get over the idea that you will support “progressive” Democrats in primaries. You cannot trust ANY Democrat. Do not vote for ANY Democrat or Republican. If you think Obama Care sux. If you think the Patriot Act is bad law. If you think endless war is wrong. If you think a woman has a right to choose. If you think we should end the war on drugs. If you think elected politicians should be public servants and not corporate whores. Then you should never vote for a Democrat.
Well, workingclass, here’s a little surprise for you; Since I agree with everything you say, I’m not going to vote for a Democrat any longer. I’ll do some research on Third Parties, and vote for the one that appeals most to me.
To quote the following quote (the name of the writer escapes me at the moment):
BRAVO mplo.
Thanks, workingclass.
The quote I’m familiar with is this one by Eugene V. Debs: “I’d rather vote for what I want and not get it, than to vote for what I don’t want and get it.”
Just to complete your last sentence: You should never vote for a Democrat or a Republican. Even if they are on 3rd party lines.
What does that mean?
6) concentrate our actions on the state and local levels.
This is a census year, to be followed shortly by redistricting. This enhances the importance of state legislative races. Do not think that state and national party leaders will not notice a significant discrepency between total votes cast for local offices versus national ones.
A difference of as little as five percent can be the difference between winning and losing a state in the electoral college in a presidential year.
Great post… thank you. It is nice to know that others know what is going on and there is some possibility of hope. I am with you. No more money or support for any democrats. I think if things get worse because of it, maybe that is what it will take for people in this country to wake up. And in the mean time, my grand children will be encouraged to leave this country.
I’m with you on some, not on others. There’s little to be gained by voting green or helping Republicans challenge health care in court. But voting against Blue Dogs? Yes please.
Edit: And primary challenges, like those too!
Bravo for the excellent post – progressives are waking up! :)
Get active with the Green Party if you want to help build a sustainable progressive alternative to the corporatist-militarist duopoly.
Greens share a commitment to grassroots democracy, social justice, nonviolence, and ecology, as well as fierce determination to get corporate money out of politics.
Be part of the solution – go Green today!
I wish I could be more sanguine about the Green Party, but my own experience at local, state, and national levels leaves me less so. They had their opportunities, and have blown them repeatedly. Numbers are dramatically down in key states like California, and they have failed to generate critical mass in any location beyond a few small towns or such.
I finally gave up my party membership after New York couldn’t even scare up 50K votes for reasonably well-known governor candidate Malachy McCourt in 2006, thus losing the second chance to win back ballot status since Al “Grandpa Munster” Lewis secured it in 1998, as numbers dwindled and credibility never grew.
Even though I was the first Green in New York state to win RE-election to municipal office, and served as a county, state, and national rep, I became increasingly disenchanted with self-promoting “leaders” at all levels who rarely if ever lived up to the principles they mouthed, who were more vindictive, back-stabbing, and nasty than comparable persons in any other group I’ve ever been part of, and who, for the most part, I wouldn’t trust to serve as dog-catcher, much less higher office.
We certainly need a viable alternative, but unless the Green Party makes massive changes in their methods, out-reach, and leadership, they have shot their wad, screwed the pooch, and lost their chance to be that third party everyone wished would be the next force in American politics. Often, by losing focus on the most critical concerns, and becoming mired in internecine warfare among themselves, they have become increasingly untrustworthy and irrelevant.
Even globally, where Greens have been more effective at getting elected and even junior partners in real governments, compromise and public perceptions have kept them from being taken as seriously as they should be.
Totally agree.
Till last elections I had illusion of Democratic party led by likes of FDR & LBJ to be a progressive party but in-fact it is now compromised itself so much that it is worse than Republican party who would have never dared to put this individual mandate stuff in any bill they would have concocted. This congress reforms (scams) are more brazen in size and scope than ever tried in the history of our country.
GREEN party whose party charter does not allow the corporate donations and whose goals are more progressive than we can imagine is the way to go for all of us progressives. Lets be realistic on approach. Focus on one senator(small blue state) and five represenatives (deep blue districts). No amount of TV advertising beats door to door campaigning by dedicated individuals. Let these two corporatist parties run themselves into ground by mercenaries funded by corporate donations. Once people will see the actions of this clean green party it will grow by leaps and bounds at the grass roots level to the national level and then we can think of having a real progressive president.
YESSS!!! Did anybody see Nader and Kucinich on Amy Goodman this morning? While Kucinich basically mumbled his regrets, Nader,- without hesitation, with power and precision, delivered a tour de force against this horrific corporate giveaway called Health Care Reform. Every single point that Firedoglakers have ever railed against corporate ObamaCare was trumpeted by Ralph. There, ladies and gentlemen. THERE is – your – candidate.
Great post flam and a pretty sharp roadmap. Keep at it.
My thoughts exactly while watching Democracy Now this morning! Kucinich was visibly deflated, a broken, humbled, drained man.
I can only imagine the pressure put on him, the internal struggle, the bitter pill he had to swallow; to put party before principle, as Nader himself had pointed out long before, would be DK’s Achilles Heel when push came to shove.
Sure, Nader doesn’t have to LIVE with the consequences of an actual vote, and having to work with the real corporatist sellouts, and try to maintain any position of (limited) power in Congress, so Nader can remain pure in his convictions, but the difference was so obvious in their posture and vocal dynamics as to be night and day.
The irony would be if the vote loses and DK will have sacrificed his principled position for naught. But even if the “Insurance Industry Protection Bill” wins, it will be hard to ever take DK as seriously when he trumpets the reasons for a stance, says he’ll stick with it, and not suspect he’ll cave again when they pull the old “Do it for your Party” guilt-trip on him. Sad, but if Dennis doesn’t realize by now that he’s just a useful tool of the Dems, to provide “progressive” illusion to keep progressives from leaving the party, even as they throw him under the bus each primary season (“Well, see, there’s not enough support for a progressive nominee, so just stick with us and our gutless, centrist, corporatist hack candidate… what are you going to do, vote for the Republicans? Ha, ha, ha! Or, dear lord, the GREENS? Ho, ho, ho!”), then he’s the most deluded one of all.
Nader is too old. Whatever political skills he had were gone by his 2nd run for President.
Now he’s just a another older guy past his prime who won’t give up the spotlight.
Well, I pretty much thought that too (about being too old, not about spotlight grabbing.) But then I saw an interview with nader on the CBC in December 2009 and I couldn’t believe it. He was sharp, enthusiastic, humorous, genuinely interesting and fully in charge of his faculties. And I thought on Amy Goodman he performed with full competence and then some.
I mean, we all say we want a candidate who espouses these viewpoints and won’t sell out. Ralph is proven on both these fronts and, after all, we went with this dynamic young guy Obama and look where that got us. I don’t disqualify someone just because they are old.
They cant make us vote for them, I say we sit out the next two elections and watch them try to win without us. Until we are ready to watch the dems get their asses kick they will always betray us.
The problem is, it’s beyond that Robbep. If we just sit out for 2 elections and “then come home” to vote for them, that’s a strategy they like. That’s the strategy they’ve relied on for decades and the reason we have a two party system. It’s Tweedledee vs. Tweedledum. The real solution lies outside the two party system. I believe it can be done but will require organized labor as one of the mainstays of any viable 3rd party. Just as happened in the U.K. a century ago with the Labour Party.
Nader was never a particularly dynamic campaigner, though I saw him improve through the 2000 campaign; he used to constantly step on his lines, or his jokes fell flat, but his timing and vocal range improved towards the end. His Madison Square Garden speech, though long, was as good as he ever got at whipping up a crowd. But frankly, I heard so much of his stuff, I was able to do a better “Nader speech” than Nader!
Nader still makes more sense, and has more energy than most potential candidates half his age. But a “new and improved Nader,” a younger version, or “Nader 2.0,” would be nice IF someone of his stature existed, knew all he knew, but could present it in a more polished way. The Greens simply couldn’t find or grow from their ranks anyone to take his place, as the last two presidential cycles proved (“Cobb who?” “McKinney? That whacko?”) and they suffered accordingly. There’s no doubt that their greatest growth was directly the result of Nader’s 2000 run, and when Nader found them too dysfunctional in 2004 to stick with them (he was never a MEMBER of the Green Party, remember), many, such as me, abandoned the GP candidate for the independent Nader, who, in 2004 and 2008 was still light-years ahead of anyone else running in terms of smarts, integrity, courage, vision, and experience.
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with the Greens. That’s pretty dispiriting.
I agree that if a young Nader came on to the scene the Progressive Left would swoon. But alas. I don’t think they make ‘em like that anymore.
By the way did you hear the scuttlebutt that Warren Beatty is trying to produce a movie of Nader’s recent novel “Only the Super Rich Can Save Us Now.”? Beatty wants Nader to be in the film. Probably as the evil head of some conglomerate of corporations! What a hoot!
Wow, didn’t know that info about Feingold. I wonder if Cenk on the Young Turks will bring those points up.
I agree with the spirit of your diary wholeheartedly, and rather than blog my rage, I have been having some fun writing caustic comments on all the fund raising junk mail from the DSCC, DCCC, etc. Today’s returned letter was lined with black duct tape and on the back I wrote “In Memoriam: The Democratic party”. I also emailed the Flip-Flopper in Chief and told him how much I was looking forward to having his ass thrown out of office three years hence.
I heard Nader and Kucinich on Democracy Now today, and that was kind of sobering. Dennis kept saying he was going to keep fighting for single payer, and I kept thinking “What is he, crazy? Nobody is going to touch health care for twenty years after this year of madness!” Nader was fiery as usual, but yeah, I agree with kryolux that he’s a lousy campaigner. I did a pubic access TV show to support Nader’s candidacy in 1996, so I guess I have a soft spot for the old bugger regardless.
Thanks GregD. Yes, on Feingold and his vote against Bernie Sanders $250 payout to senior seniors, what is especially shocking is this. Feingold had just days before his vote taken part in one of his famous “listening sessions” with voters in Wisconsin. He visited tiny Park Falls, Wisconsin, (population under 3,000) and heard an earful from citizens there about how their costs had risen but they were not getting a COLA adjustment. He said something like, “that’s terrible” and “something should be done about it”. Then 3 days later, he voted exactly opposite to what he told the citizens of Park Falls.
The Patriot Act extension, of course, isn’t just on Feingold. It’s on all the senators AND Obama, who didn’t have to sign the extension either. Al Franken should have at least asked for a vote on it. So should Feingold. No one did ANYTHING.
OMG!! I can’t believe what I’m reading here!!! Is this the left wing tea party? The repugs had this idea of only backing REAL conservatives and now Dems are going over the edge!!! Are you sure these bloggers are really Dems and not some Repug conspiracy infiltrating this blog??? I’m outta here!!!……..
If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.
You’re joking right?