The Obama administration is infested with people with ties to Goldman Sachs. Goldman was Obama’s biggest campaign contributor ($994,795) in 2008 and before that as a candidate to the Senate. Rahm took in $80,000 from Goldman Sachs as a Congressman and was on a $3,000 a month retainer from Goldman while he worked as Bill Clinton’s chief fund raiser. So how real is the Obama/Democratic party’s supposed new toughness on big banks?
Michelle Malkin in an excellent article at the New York Post writes that Obama’s administration is so infested with Goldies that:
The White House can no more disown Government Sachs than Obama can disown Chicago politics.
Malkin rightly questions the timing of Obama administration’s supposed new toughness on Goldman Sachs (just months before the November elections). It’s clear that not only the Obama administration but the Gordon Brown government in the U.K. realize that average citizens overwhelmingly are disgusted with big, predatory banks and their practices and that both Brown and now Obama want to steal some of that fire to use it in upcoming elections. The Democrats are even trying to raise money off of their new found toughness as Malkin documents:
Obama is headed to Wall Street tomorrow to demand "financial regulatory reform" — just as the US Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil suit against Goldman Sachs for mortgage-related fraud.
Question the timing? Darn tootin’.
As the New York Post reported Tuesday, the Democratic National Committee immediately bought sponsored Internet ads on Google that direct Web surfers who type in "Goldman Sachs SEC" to Obama’s fund-raising site.
Malkin also lists some of the top people in the Obama administration with deep ties to Goldman Sachs. They include:
*Gary Gensler, a Goldman Sachs partner who is Obama’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head. Gensler is the guy who as a former Treasury official exempted the $58 trillion credit default market from oversight. Those financial instrumentals played a key role in the global economic downturn and led to billions of dollars in profits for banks like Goldman Sachs.
*Rahm Emanuel (see above), Mr. Sleeze personified who made millions as an investment banker.
*Mark Patterson, former lobbyist for Goldman Sachs who serves under Timothy Geithner as his top deputy and overseer of TARP bailout funds, $10 billion of which went to Goldman.
*Larry Summers, Obama’s chief economic adviser and head of the National Economic Counsel. Summers’s boss at Goldman was non other than Robert Rubin, former co-Chairman of Goldman and also former head of Citicorp (and I believe, the real POTUS while Obama is merely his spokesman). Summers has reaped nearly $2.8 million in speaking fees to banks and institutions he is now supposed to be regulating. Goldman Sachs paid him $135,000 for a single speech he gave in April, 2008, a very good investment repaid many times to Goldman.
*Timothy Geithner is also a Robert Rubin protoge. Geithner, of course, headed the New York Fed prior to the crisis and not only saw no storm clouds on the horizon, he also in 2008 ordered the bailed out AIG not to disclose its sweetheart payments to big banks including, you guessed it, Goldman Sachs.
But as good as Malkin’s article is, she doesn’t provide the full details of what has been called "Government Sachs". As of June, 2009, for instance, Goldman had more than 30 ex-government officials working as registered lobbyists including former Democratic House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.) to represent its interests on issues related to TARP, according to Mother Jones.
Here are some other key Goldies in the Obama administration (you readers can help me fill out this list by providing names of others):
*Stephen Friedman, Chairman of Obama’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. According to Wikipedia, Friedman worked for much of his career with Goldman Sachs, holding numerous executive roles. He served as the company’s co-chief operating officer from 1987 to 1990, was the company’s co-chairman from 1990 to 1992, and the sole chairman from 1992 to 1994; he still serves on the company board.
Friedman was involved in controversy, as many of the Goldies have been in government service, involving his former employer. Wikipedia notes:
On May 7, 2009 Friedman resigned as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in response to criticism of his December 2008 purchase of $3 million of stock in Goldman Sachs.Friedman, who remains a member of Goldman Sachs’ board, came into violation of Federal Reserve policy when Goldman was converted to a bank holding company in September 2008, thereby placing it under the regulatory authority of the New York Fed. Friedman requested a waiver from this violation when the conversion occurred, which was granted roughly two and a half months later.
*Neel Kashkari, former Vice President of Goldman Sachs in San Francisco where he where he led Goldman’s Information Technology Security Investment Banking practice. Kashkari served under Treasury Secretary Paulson and was kept on by Obama after his inauguration for a limited period to work on TARP oversight.
*Diana Farrell, Diana Farrell is a Deputy Director of the National Economic Council in the administration of President Barack Obama. She formerly worked for Goldman Sachs in New York.
*Karen Kornbluh, sometimes called "Obama’s brain" is Obama’s Ambassador to the OECD. Kornbluh was Deputy Chief of Staff to Mr. Goldman Sachs, Robert Rubin.
*Adam Storch, who worked for Goldman Sachs for 5 years reaching the position of Vice President in the Business Intelligence Group , is Obama’s Managing Executive of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement.
*Robert Hormats, the top economics official at Obama’s State Department, who spent the prior 27 years at Goldman Sachs, including as the Vice Chairman of Goldman’s international arm.
*Gene Sperling, prior to advising Timothy Geithner on bailouts, Sperling was paid the paltry sum of $887,727 by Goldman Sachs for one year of consulting work. Sperling, another acolyte of Robert Rubin’s raked in even more that year, according to William Grieder at the Nation:
[he was paid in addition] $480,051 as a director of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, plus $250,000 for his quarterly briefings to two hedge funds, plus the speaking gigs [$158,000] (including an appearance before the Stanford Group in Houston subsequently charged with running a Ponzi scheme). Meantime, his day job at the Council on Foreign Relations paid $116,653. A busy, busy wonk.
*Peter Orszag, Obama’s Budget Director was the founding director of the Hamilton Project, funded by Goldman Sachs and Robert Rubin. Wikipedia indicates that Robert Rubin, Goldman’s ex-head, was one of Orszag’s mentors.
*Jason Furman served as the second Director of the Hamilton Project after Peter Orszag’s departure for the Obama administration and he in turn left the Hamilton Project in June 2008 to direct economic policy for the Obama Presidential Campaign.
*Douglas Elmendorf replaced Furman as Director of the Hamilton Project and he in turn became Obama’s Director of the Congressional Budget Office in January 2009.
Note that the first 3 Directors of the Hamilton Project ALL serve in the Obama administration–while other journalists/writers have explored the links between Goldman Sachs and Obama, few have looked at this connection. Note again that the Hamilton Project was funded by Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs. Note too that the current director of the Hamilton Project, its 4th since its founding in 2006, is Michael Greenstone. How long will it be before Greenstone goes to the Obama administration, making it a perfect 4 for 4 for Directors of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project?
*Barack Obama. Obama really owes his career to Goldman Sachs which was not only his biggest financial contributor when he ran for the presidency but also his biggest contributor when he ran for the Senate. Obama was essentially bought out by Goldman Sachs former head Robert Rubin as early as 2006. You can witness then Senator Obama paying lavish tribute to "my friend Bob [Rubin]" when the Rubin-Goldman Sachs sponsored Hamilton Project opened its doors as an embedded neoliberal think tank within the Brookings Institution. A video clip of Obama’s speech along with an excellent discussion of his ties to Goldman Sachs can be found at this FDL diary.
There is considerable evidence (including the above video clip of Obama himself speaking) to indicate that Rubin-Goldman Sachs hand selected Obama as a kind of spokesman for its unpopular causes and funded him as both a Senatorial and presidential candidate. See, for instance, Paul Street’s brilliant "Obama, As Predicted" essay. And David Sirota’s article on the founding of the Hamilton Project here. Another helpful FDL diary on Obama and the Hamilton Project (and links to Goldman) can be found here.
Obama, then, was a kind of "stealth candidate" or Trojan Horse, if you will: posing as a liberal-progressive, but in reality ready to advance Goldman’s financial and commercial interests which are anything but progressive. For more on Obama’s ties to the Hamilton Project and Robert Rubin/Goldman Sachs see this diary.
With all of these connections between Goldman Sachs and the Obama administration, including Obama himself, is there any doubt that the civil suit (note: the Obama administration has failed to bring a criminal case against the Goldman despite the urgings of Cong. Marcia Kaptur and 17 other Congresspeople) is anything but window dressing before the November election designed to fool the American people once again into thinking that Obama is some kind of populist-progressive?
Once again, Michelle Malkin gets it right in her revealing article, "All the President’s Goldman Men":
As Obama harangues Wall Street to clean up its house, all the president’s Goldman Sachs men have their feet on the coffee table at his.
NOTES:
1. If you know of other Goldies in the Obama adminstration, I would very much apreciate it if you would please provide their names/positions in your comments. Thanks in advance since I’m trying to compile a list! I have not found a complete/thorough one anywhere.
2. Michael Moore reports the following Congressman as behind Cong. Kaptur’s request for a criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs:
The following House Democrats have signed on to Kaptur’s letter: Jim McDermott (Wash.), Diane Watson (Calif.), Chris Carney (Pa.), Raul Grijalva (Ariz.), Keith Ellison (Minn.), John Lewis (Ga.), Charlie Melancon (La.), Tom Perriello (Va.), Betty Sutton (Ohio), Jay Inslee (Wash.), Pete Stark (Calif.), Mike Honda (Calif.), John Salazar (Colo.), Niki Tsongas (Mass.), Alan Grayson (Fla.), David Loebsack (Iowa) and Bob Filner (Calif.).
3. Since this diary was written, McClatchy Newspapers has an excellent article up written by Greg Gordon called "Goldman’s White House Connections Raise Eyebrows". It is the lead story over at the Huffingtonpost.
Gordon writes this on Rahm Emanuel and his lucrative work that included cooperating with Goldman Sachs on one multimillion dollar deal:
One White House insider who knows something about how Wall Street does business is chief of staff Emanuel, who earned millions of dollars in investment banking after he left the Clinton White House. His work for the Chicago-based financial services firm Wasserstein Perella & Co. intersected with Goldman in at least one deal.
In 1999, Emanuel was a key player representing Unicom Corp., the parent of Commonwealth Edison, in forging its merger with Peco Energy Co. to create utility giant Exelon Corp. Goldman was also advising Unicom.
The White House declined immediate comment on that connection.
The same article reports repeated and continuous contact between the head of Goldman Sachs, Lloyd Blankfein, and Obama and key figures in his administration:
According to White House visitor logs, Blankfein was among the business leaders who attended an Obama speech on Feb. 13, 2009, and he also joined more than a dozen bank CEOs in a meeting with Obama on March 27, 2009.
Blankfein also was supposed be among the CEOs who met with Obama in December, but he and two others phoned in from New York, blaming inclement weather.
He and his wife, Laura, were listed on the logs among 438 presidential guests at the Kennedy Center Honors the previous week.
The logs also indicate that Blankfein met twice in 2009, on Feb. 4 and Sept. 30, with Summers, who was undersecretary of the Treasury Department during the Clinton administration when it was headed by Robert Rubin, a former Goldman CEO.
University of Minnesota political scientist Lawrence Jacobs in the same article described the incestuous relationship between Goldman Sachs and the Obama administration:
"almost everything that the White House has done has been haunted by the personnel and the money of Goldman . . . as well as the suspicion that the White House, particularly early on, was pulling its punches out of deference to Goldman and its war chest.
The McClatchy newspaper article is well worth reading in its entirety even though it does not begin to mention all of the people from Goldman Sachs embedded in Obama’s administration.



23 Comments




Here are some further links between the Obama administration and the Goldman funded Hamilton Project:
1) Mark Gallogly, who sits on the Hamilton Project’s advisory council is also, according to Wikipedia, currently a member of President Barack Obama’s President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.
2) Steve Rattner the shady billionaire financier who Obama appointed as his “car czar” and who resigned after it was revealed that his company, the Quadrangle Group, was apparently involved in “pay to play” for a billion dollars or so of New York State pension funds, and was under possible indictment by the New York AG and the SEC, also sits on the Advisory Council of the Goldman funded Hamilton Project.
3) Eric Mindichwhile not officially serving in the Obama administration, a Ben Smith/Politico article mentions him as a strong Obama supporter. Mindich is a hedge fund manager and sits on the Advisory Council of the Hamilton Project. According to Wikipedia:
Another website, Operational Due Diligence, indicates the following about Mindich:
Mindich at 27 was the youngest person ever to be named a partner at Goldman.
It’s all kabuki. The Bullshit Ballet.
There was no transition of power when Obama was elected. Unless you call Paulson to Geithner a transition. Obama is a stooge.
Michelle Malkin, investigative journalist, who could have guessed. But here is some great video. Alex Jones, right-wing radio host, birther and truther and anti-environmentalist did confront Michelle at the DNC convention. Jones thinks Michelle is a neo-con.
just asking the question shows an embarrassing lack of insight
It’s an ironic rhetorical question, which served its purpose in getting you to reply. Don’t be so literal, you might laugh more.
Great idea, fflambeau. Thanks for the effort. Much obliged. I’ll find this very useful. BTW, also liked your December 7, 2009 diary on the “smoking gun” video, showing Obama at the founding meeting of the effing Hamilton Project.
That said, I have semantic quibble with saying the OA is “infested” with Goldies. Now, my favorite thing about Max Keiser’s reportage is his scorching criticism of GS. He calls them “financial terrorists,” as you might know. And I totally agree. They’re Perkinsian economic hit men, IMO.
Still, no matter how great our repugnance at the actions of our fellow citizens, to say “infested” is to hit an Eliminationist note (for a great backgrounder, I recommend Dave Neiwert’s 10-part series, Eliminationism in America), which of course I don’t at all think you meant. But that word, when used to refer to political opponents, has very nasty overtones.
How ’bout a verb that puts it in the context of economic war or criminal enterprise: the Goldies have infiltrated, compromised, even invaded and occupied, the White House. But they haven’t infested it. That’s what rats and cockroaches and other things we eliminate would do. Whether we like them or not, whether they attack us or not, they’re still our neighbors and fellow citizens.
Looking forward to learning a lot from this list.
In the spirit of minding the consequences of our definitions of The Other, esp. the political Other, your friendly local (and probably annoying) Zen poet. IBIYVD (I bow in your virtual direction).
How real? About as real as their “attack” on the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries…
HA! Well said, my superbly monikered friend. I’ll bet you’re pegged a lot these days (/s to an ironic degree).
You sure it shouldn’t be ‘infected’ not ‘infested’?
I’d go with infested myself. Think of it as things like fleas and other types of nasty insect infestations…
The Government not just Obama is convinced we couldn’t live without those Banks.
Why do You think they bailed them out?
It wasn’t to get credit moving because they won’t loan money a 1% interest.
What better time to have broken up the Banks and fixed the problems with them than when they were on their death beds.
No! Prop them up, let them regain their power, and then say now we want to fix You.
The ignorance abounds in this Country. Yet people wonder why we are in such a mess.
Ahem. DId you skip the part where I argue that “infested” strikes an eliminationist note? IOW, a big fat fart in our shared narrative?
(And of course, I’m not at all suggesting no one else has ever hit a sour note in a narrative. Some of my own efforts feature notes at least as pungent, I must admit. But I digress.)
What’s the history of this process of dehumanization-by-epithet? A very long, tragic, unhappy, vicious cycle.
Imagine if a right wing site spoke of us as rats, fleas, vermin, and the litany of correlated epithets? It’s well known that dehumanizing one’s opponent is among the first tasks of war-mongering propagandists. Let’s not go there, shall we? That way lies the slippery slope of rapid semantic shift toward physical violence.
No matter how repugnant the actions of our fellow citizens, by the power of the principle of universal common descent (all living organisms of earth are realted to each other, bar none), they’re still our kin.
Conceiving and speaking of each other as vermin, to be eliminated ASAP by any and all means necessary, leads to what? Civil wars, final solutions, etc.
With great respect for the many posts of yours I’ve enjoyed, dakine01, we simply can’t adopt the very means of our oppression as a method of overturning it. Not that I’m implying that’s what you had in mind, my friend: sincerely because doing so only propels the wheel of rotating despots.
So instead of infestation, you prefer infection, as if they are some disease that can be treated?
This is one we’re going to have to agree to disagree on.
No, my friend, not infection, as you might’ve learned from what I say above. I’d say, infiltrated, compromised, even invaded and occupied–all of which, I should point out, are human actions, however wrong or harmful. You’re making a my-group supremacist argument.
The proper place for this debate is in the context of economic war and/or criminal enterprise. They’ve injured our body politic. We have a claim against their ill-gotten gains.
Nevertheless, we cannot disclaim our inescapable relationship even with the most repugnant of actors among us. (How’s GTMO or Bagram working out for us? has tagging The Other with pejorative labels–note how quickly “detainee” shifts to “terrorist” in news reports–quieted our fears of nuclear terrorism? or, conversely, who could possibly object to exterminating vermin?)
Eliminationist rhetoric, no matter who preaches it, leads to the kinds of efforts that have been tried and found guilty of propelling wars of aggression, whether they be within or between nations. Let’s not abandon our humanity out of anger with our neighbors. Wars of words soon lead to wars with weapons.
Well, if you’ll notice, my initial response was to ubetchaiam.
So again, I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree
Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. Concede, or refute my argument, my obstinately atavistic friend.
You weren’t replying to me, that’s true. As if having spoken dehumanizing fighting words against our neighbors to someone else on the same thread will, in any way, placate the Right, when they start trumpeting how FDL, leading political site of the Left, condones eliminationist rhetoric. Nice own goal, dakine01.
I can hear Bill O and Glenn Beck already: ‘They want to exterminate us like vermin! See how totalitarian the Left is: they dehumanize anyone they disagree with!’ If you insist on conceiving our fellow citizens as shovel-ready vermin, it will be too true.
How does thinking and speaking of them as vermin help solve a single problem?
You are dealing in personalities, I’m dealing with facts. Malkin’s article is very factual and lists names; that’s good coming from the mainstream media. Nor is Malkin the sole source in my diary.
Good point on “infested”. Of course, I had not meant the sinister things that it could imply but will follow your sage advice and choose another word next time around. Thanks!
Here’s another Goldie that I missed:
*Bill Dudley. Joined Goldman in 1986; partner and managing director until 2007. Federal Reserve Bank of New York President since January 2009 (replacing none other than Timothy Geithner, his Goldman compadre). This all from the Wall Street Journal.
Source: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-enlargePic07.html?project=imageShell07&bigImage=NA-BF558A_GoldPol.gif&h=779&w=663&title=WSJ.COM&thePubDate=20100419
If you have trouble with the above link to the WSJ try this one for their article, “Paulson Gave to Both Parties” that has a separate part entitled “Goldman in High Places” (with photos) and a brief history of Goldman Sachs:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703757504575194502882068296.html
Some more Goldies affiliated with Obama and his administration:
1. *Michael Froman, Robert Rubin’s Chief of Staff while Rubin served as Secretary of the Treasury and an Obama “head hunter” according to “Rubin Proteges Change Their Tune as They Join Obama’s Team” in the New York Times
2. *James Rubin, Robert Rubin’s son and a headhunter for Obama per the same article.
3. *Robert Rubin, according to the above article, and adviser to Obama. Rubin, of course, once headed Goldman, and later Citigroup. According to a recent Politico article:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35515.html#ixzz0ltInyDcx
Rubin also, along with Goldman Sachs, funded the Hamilton Project at the Brookings Institution. From the linked Politico article above:
He’s [Rubin] also vice chairman of Mount Sinai Hospital, sits on Harvard’s governing board and oversees the Hamilton Project, an economic initiative of the Brookings Institution.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35515_Page3.html#ixzz0ltJQhpJ4
Bagged another Goldie with Obama ties:
*Thomas Donilon is Deputy National Security Adviser to Barack Obama (despite having a career that is mostly involved with domestic politics). Donilon was a lawyer at O’Melveny and Myers and made almost $4 million representing meltdown clients including Penny Pritzker (of Chicago) and Goldman. This from Michelle Malkin’s article over at RealClearPolitics at http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:MEmVI1HoSiYJ:www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/21/all_the_presidents_goldman_sachs_men_105251.html+%22penny+pritzker%22+%22goldman+sachs%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk
For more on Donilon: http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Thomas_Donilon