The tea party Republicans have drawn a line in the sand. The debt ceiling was raised five times during the administration of President George W. Bush. Yet, it is only now, with tea party Republicans holding the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives, that America is placed in the position of defaulting on our commitments, for the first time since the founding of our country.
Their irresponsible position is that corporations and billionaires should not have to share the sacrifices needed to keep our economy on track for recovery. That is why they vehemently oppose efforts to cut corporate welfare and to eliminate subsidies for the oil companies. Unlike most Americans, who believe we should pull together to find real solutions, these politicians are intent on dividing Americans by destroying programs that have broad public support. At the same time, they have done all in their power to create instability in the economy and put more Americans out of work.
With more than 14 million Americans out of the job market, it is appalling for these politicians to play games with our nation’s economy. Creating jobs and keeping Americans working have to be top priorities. But for the tea party Republicans controlling the House of Representatives, those are far from the top of their “to-do” list. Instead, they have repeatedly passed bills that would put more Americans out of work. A harsh conclusion, perhaps, but just look at the facts:
Since the tea party took over the U.S. House of Representatives in January 2011, they have pushed legislation which, if enacted, would have added more than 6.5 million additional workers to the unemployment rolls:
• The Economic Policy Institute estimates that nearly 1 million jobs would have been lost if their 2011 appropriations bill had been enacted.
• Their bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act would have cut as many as 400,000 jobs annually, according to the Center for American Progress.
• And the Ryan Budget they passed, which destroys Medicare and Medicaid, student loan programs and health care research, would put as many as 3 million more workers out of their jobs during the next five years.
Thankfully, President Obama and cooler heads in the Senate have kept these job-killing bills from becoming law. But they all passed the tea party-controlled U.S. House of Representatives.
Tea party politicians have been ramming through similar misguided bills at the state and local level. Scott Walker in Wisconsin, John Kasich in Ohio, Chris Christie in New Jersey and Rick Scott in Florida are just a few of the elected officials who have pushed policies to put people out of work. All of them turned down federal funding for transportation projects that could have produced hundreds of thousands of jobs. And they have ruthlessly cut budgets rather than ask billionaires in their states to pay their fair share of taxes. Their actions are hurting job creation, even in the private sector. As economist Adam Hirsch noted on the website Think Progress last month: “States that cut spending are seeing significantly more job losses in the private sector than states maintaining or increasing spending levels.”
In the last Congress, tea party Republicans consistently voted to increase unemployment. In August of 2010, for example, every tea party-backed politician in Congress voted against legislation to provide assistance to the states to pay for teachers, firefighters and vital public services. If they had their way, 300,000 additional jobs would have been lost, adding to the more than 500,000 state and local jobs that have been lost in recent years. The next time a tea party politician tells you that jobs are what they care about, remind them that if it had been up to them, every auto worker at General Motors would be out of work today. And what about the jobs saved or created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act? They opposed the bill kicking and screaming, yet every thinking economist in the country agrees that it saved or created anywhere from to 2 to 4 million jobs.
While they consistently pay lip service to “reducing the debt,” that is not their real goal. Their tax cuts for corporate CEOs and hedge fund managers actually increase our debt. As FactCheck.org, under Ryan’s plan “the public debt would increase from $10 trillion in 2011 to $16 trillion in 2021,” even while decimating essential programs for Main Street Americans. That’s because Ryan adds to his Draconian cuts with even larger tax giveaways to his friends on Wall Street. (Ryan wasn’t drinking tea with his Wall Street pals last week. He and two companions spent $700 on two bottles of wine at a Capitol Hill restaurant.)
One is tempted to conclude that the tea party Republicans see political benefit from increasing unemployment while President Obama is at the helm. Michelle Bachmann, in an unguarded moment last week, admitted as much. Whatever their motivation, their policy choices do not reflect the Main Street values shared by most Americans.
It is clear, however, that many of them are willing to tip the country into a double-dip recession and put the world economy into a tailspin. They are, as Warren Buffett said last week, “playing Russian roulette.” And if that leads to more unemployment, apparently the tea party Republicans really don’t care.




40 Comments

What I find “appalling” is labor leaders who refuse to acknowledge that Obama’s wars are killing jobs just like they kill people. Just as “appalling” are the excuses labor leaders make for this rotten capitalist system that is sliding into a massive economic depression with no one knowing how to get out of it.
Why the excuses for Obama and the system when Obama needs to be defeated, a labor-based people’s party created and capitalism needs to be replaced with a cooperative socialist system?
Apparently Obama is your “Wall Street pal.”
The AFL-CIO had a “swords into plowshares commission” at the insistence of William Winpinsinger. What happened to this peace commission?
As a labor leader you should be calling for an end to militarism and these wars with the accompanying peace dividend used to finance the creation of a National Public Health Care System and a National Public Child Care System which would create up to 15-million new public-sector jobs your own members would appreciate.
I agree with you that the Tea Party backed politicians are ramming through misguided legislation at the federal and state levels; but, your labor-backed Democrats, starting with Obama, are doing just as much dirty work as the Tea Baggers.
Being a Wall Street stooge, Barack Obama also favors high unemployment as a way to keep all wages down and as a means to enforce his austerity measures. High unemployment is a club held over the heads of all workers.
Ending the wars, not increasing the deficit, is the way to save and create jobs but don’t come telling the rest of us we need to suffer further erosion of our living standards to pay the wages of public employees because you are too cowardly to take on Obama over his dirty wars.
Unemployment is good for them because it keeps inflation down and inflation is then enemy of those who live off of interest and dividends.
Haven’t you noticed that every time a big company announces a layoff or “reorganization” that the stock market goes up?
How did this guy get to post a blog here/
Agree with poster above. A lot of people have woken up to the fact that the left/right paradigm is BS. We do not buy into your tea party is killing jobs, obama is trying to save and create jobs. Both parties have destroyed the middle class. Both parties pander to bankers and the oligarchs. the revolving door between govt and corps is non stop.
You don’t solve the debt problem by adding more debt. How stupid is that. I wish we would default, restructure and start again. I hope we kick them all out of DC and elsewhere. While i was restructuring the debt i would cancel all odious debt. That is debt created by former govt that was not in the people interest.. Think we would find our debt significantly reduced
WTF?
The Tea Party Republicans are assholes. ALL Republicans (the pols, not necessarily the voters that vote for them) are assholes. Nothing they say or do should be shocking.
Yet this story reads like they’re the ONLY assholes. It even has a line it it about “President Obama and cooler heads in the Senate” saving us from those mean old TEA-GOOPERS. WTF??
If you’ve just figured that the Tea Party Republicans are assholes, great. Good for you. But you’ve only figured out HALF the problem in Washington. Because while the House GOP did in fact propose ending Medicare as we know it, PRESIDENT OBAMA proposed CUTTING social security benefits, cutting Medicare and raising the eligibility age of Medicare.
Good luck picking the lesser of two evils on that one. Let’s see, do we want to end Medicare as we know it, or raise it’s eligibility, cut it’s benefits, and as an added bonus cut Social Security too. Oh yeah, and Medicaid too.
Good luck with that choice.
I don’t know who this writer is, but IMO you’d be better off telling the whole story instead of just half of it.
After watching the Democrats do precious damn little when they controlled all three branches of government, I’m afraid I can’t share your enthusiasm for Obama and the cooler heads in the Senate. imho bluedog Democrats, or moderates as they’re called now aren’t a hell of a lot better than the tea/gop party.
Obama raised 86 milion dollars. It sure as hell didn’t come from the unemployed, the underemployed, or minimum wage workers.
I happened to catch a bit of (you’ll pardon the expression) Grover Norquist on WJ this morning. Beside the fact that he was (and is) incredibly and sneeringly condescending, he specifically used the term “post Tea-Party Republicans.” Maybe I was overthinking it, but what I got out of the term was that the regular GOP is trying to corral the obviously out-of-control TP wing. I’m sure the party brass understand that an unconstrained TP can do plenty of damage to lots of 2012 races, including both the Executive and Legislative branches.
Not advocating for any of them. Merely making an observation.
Heh, the poster appears to live in some alternate reality where this President isn’t signing trade deals that essentially guarantee more poor people for the plutocrats to exploit. Or an alternate reality where the middle class Americans didn’t see an increase in their health care premiums because THIS president signed an agreement with big interests to create a captive consumer. Or this President isn’t spending beaucoup bucks on war while cutting WIC and food stamp programs.
With “friends” like the President who needs enemies.
Hmmm, apparently this same diary had been available on the Huffingtonpost, but Huffingtonpost now posts it as no longer available….
If they win the wh I’m sure jobs will come back to Amerika, only they pay $1.00 per day. Pretty hateful group for sure.
I’ve read in another post on this that under little Bushie they raised the debt ceiling nineteen times…
Everyone should just relax. It’s not like the entire global economy and the future of America as a global power is resting on the shoulders of the 87 Tea Party freshmen, including the guy who was on the Real World.
Hmm. Maybe we should stock up some canned goods in the basement.
gefiltebacon.blogspot.com
I did read somewhere that 98% of the money Obama raised came from donations under $250 and that the average donation was $69 bucks. Can anyone else confirm?
Don’t know why this post is here? Perhaps to give “another side” a chance at airing what seems to me to be a very slanted viewpoint.
Yeah, sure, right, “Teaparty Republicans” – whatever that really means anyway – are jerks who are out to *redstribute taxes* upwards from the middle/working class to the upper class. It’s called *corporate welfare,* among other terminologies. I’m sick & tired of corporate socialism, too.
But knock knock yoo hoo!! Just a tiny little clue that it’s NOT “just” the Tea Partier or all the GOP, in general, who’s up for doing the rapine, plunder & pillaging of the erstwhile middle & rapiding growing working class, along with the “unmentionable” poverty class…. I hold so-called “Democratic” politicians, ESPECIALLY POTUS Obama, at least *equally* if not more responsible for this USG rip off of the “small people.”
Lose your blinders. The truth shall set you free.
I gave up the ginned up phoney left v. right paradigm some time ago. Other “small people,” who happen not to vote the way I do are NOT my “enemy.” Nor are putative “Democratic” politicians my “friend.”
Forget about phone Dem v. T-GOPer paradigms. What we have going on is Class Warfare, and it’s about the upper 2% v. the lower 98%. And all those millionaire$$ in Congress are BFF behind closed doors. I don’t “buy” the phoney Kabuki show in Congress, and I don’t “buy” your line of goods that I should be ever so “upset” with the Tea Party but give “Democrats” a pass. PHOOEY on that baloney.
When “Democrats” start really representing their true voter “base,” and not the super rich, then I’ll see what they have to say.
Otherwise, that sandwich you’re selling contains a load of sh*t in it, imo.
Unemployment is not good for the tea party, but they are so clueless they think so. Unemployment IS good for employers because it gives them total control over labor. Both parties are at fault. We now have extreme far right Republicans, and merely far right Democrats. Wall Street is ecstatic for now. However, the party will end when Wall Street realizes that consumption will not recover without a laboring class that is willing and able to buy stuff. Until that happens, the pain will continue. It might be a long wait; that’s the scary part. If progressives don’t want to wait it out, then they need to get out in the streets and make a hell of a lot of noise. One thing to make noise about is $750 bottles of wine by Rethugs in charge. How many $150 haircuts does that buy? It should also produce a larger outcry. Where is the outraged Democrat in Congress as such hypocritical indulgence??
Good point bacon. And how does Obama justify wanting to raise the debt limit now when he was against it while in Congress?
This won’t be the first time that we have defaulted on our obligations. The most recent time was the collapse of Bretton Woods. Just like then, the government hides it’s default through more printing press money, while causing inflation, and blaming rising prices on private sector “greed”.
Many good points.
However, the piece does not address the title’s question.
The Tea Party do NOT want high unemployment. Their masters do.
But the if you ask a regular Tea Party person, they will say their ideas will lead to greater employment.
Yes, they are deluded, but unemployment does not make them happy. Since it probably affects them in some way or another, as it does most Americans, either directly or indirectly.
The regular Tea Party folks are in a delusional daze. They see a world spinning out of control and they don’t understand it. So they cling to whatever they can in this maelstrom. No matter what useless piece of plywood floats by, they grab it. It’s irrational behavior in an irrational world.
They honestly believe in what they are doing. Thus the reason they are so dangerous, to themselves and others. Most don’t even know they are funded by the the Koch’s and Armey’s of this country. They honestly think they are a grass-roots movement. That is how delusional they are. They’re fanaticism and delusional thinking is exactly why they are the perfect pawns of the rich.
I could go on with details about how their “ideas” are actually destroying the country and yet they vehemently believe this is the path to salvation, but that’s a separate post.
Delusional thinking.
“However, the party will end when Wall Street realizes that consumption will not recover without a laboring class that is willing and able to buy stuff.”
Perhaps that is what the people of India and China are for?
Bingo.
The debt limit should be a no-brainer. It doesn’t require the expenditure of a single dime.
Raising the debt limit does not commit the United States to any debt it has not already incurred.
The only crisis here is the one the Republicans are making. They WANT this, they WANT Obama to fail. That is their goal, so they can regain power, and make things even worse.
It’s funny that Washington says that “everything is on the table.”
The only thing Republicans will not even think about, the only option so odious they’ll walk out of the room rather than talk about it, is precisely the only thing that would actually help.
If we allow the Bush tax cuts to expire as scheduled — all of the cuts—the deficit will dry up and the nation will return to sound fiscal standing in short order.
Only returning taxes to viable levels (especially for the rich) will help.
Indeed. I shall hate the bigoted Tea Party simpletons and they shall hate my naïve, liberal candy ass. We shall both identify with our oppressors, participate in their good cop-bad cop con, and with the authoritarian, thoughtless, impotent weapons of received ideology we will scream at each other, “It was you, slave, who brought down the master’s lash!” while the Obamas, the Bushs and the Kochs of the world realize they don’t even need to bother with the Vaseline anymore, laughing all the way to the bank.
Obama is an angry white man, in one word, a Republican. Obama is trying to trim Social Security and Medicare. Would any real Democrat even consider doing that? Obama, a lying Republican war criminal, refuse to investigate other lying Republican war criminals such as Cheney and Bush. Obama is continuing our expensive, stupid occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. We are seemingly stuck with two corporate imperial fascistic political parties in the 21st century.
Nothing personal, but I find that very hard to believe.
Maybe the first time around in 2007?
“they don’t even need to bother with the Vaseline anymore”
Wait, you got Vaseline? Bloody SOBs. They certainly do NOT bother with Vaseline anymore. They don’t even bother with the kabuki. Maybe it’s another “cost” the peons don’t deserve?
yup.
But let’s be clear, it ain’t about black or white.
It about the money, and those without any.
The rich vs. the non-rich. All the middle class content with their lives can just sit back and enjoy the show. At least that’s what they think.
Who has the money??? It ain’t the poor. All their programs are gone, gutted to the point of uselessness, or will be.
So where’s the money? The middle class!!!
They’re coming for the middle class. They come for everyone, eventually.
Not true–finally found the link debunking the $86 million under $69 myth:
Alternet.org
Once I got Vaseline. But there was sand in it. :)
I don’t understand why all of US bother with the kabuki. If the Tea Party is dependent on being funded by corporate interests like the Koch brothers, and therefore hardly qualifies as a grassroots organization, we are looking at merely a TV commercial, a shadow cast on the wall and pretending it has substance.
Obama has already failed of his own volition.
FYI it was under Bushs’ watch that deregulated Wall Street and sold America down the drain; him all those greedy representatives we now have. I want to know how on earth do you believe that bring home our troops is going to create jobs? These young brave men and women are coming home to unemployment and a government that is destroying the country they risked everything to protect.
Their coming home is going to bring higher unemployment, more foreclosures, and the rest of the destruction of the American way of life. They don’t deserve this future our Government has created; neither do the rest of us that have worked for 40 years, paid our own way, supported the Social Services, and now were invisible, unemployable, and completely out of the loop. We were the talent that made the corporations rich, we worked hard to have them take our pensions, kick us to the curb and then turn around and blame us for their financial problems.
Are you saying that you would take away SSI from those that worked a life time, was forced to contribute and now find that their Government may default on them? It’s impossible to get a job at 70 and next to impossible at 62. How do you expect us to live or is it your intentions to move us to a “home” and stuff our butts with drugs and wrap our heads in plastic?
It is about Black, the Republicans, Tea Party, and Democrats want the White house to say White. I never thought I would ever say such an ugly thing but it’s true. Republicans have made it very clear, they want President Obama out, and if they have to destroy the economy and the US citizens in the process; so be it. The Democrats have not made such a bold statement yet their actions have spoken volumes, when they had control of the House and the Senate what did they do? Nothing they let the Republicans call all the shots, we are suffering and the middle class is all but gone just so those power hungry bigots can keep the White House White. I do understand it’s more complicated that simply keeping the White House White, but that’s’ in the mix. We the people need to stage a sit in; those that have jobs need to have a sick out, until all have jobs, all of us need to stop buying goods until they are made in America by American workers. We do have the power us simply need to use it.
Yep…It ain’t about the money but who gets the money.
Agreed. THe teaparty wing is controlled by christian reconstructionists. These zealots want a crisis in order to impose their narrow view of governance upon us. The corporate masters do not really care who governs as long as they can buy the elections and have elected members of the government do their will. This is how these christian fascists have gotten this far and have gained control of the GOP and is also why Obama is so far to the right that even Nixon looks liberal in comparison.
well said. thank you
As I pointed out the money going for wars and militarism could be used to finance two massive job creating programs.
When the wealth of our Nation is being squandered on wars we can’t finance the universal social programs people are entitled to like a National Public Health Care System and a National Public Child Care System.
For your information, plenty of the Wall Street deregulation took place under Bill Clinton.
Both the Democrats and Republicans serve the same Wall Street master.
Also, for your information; Bush couldn’t have started these dirty imperialist wars for the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan without the solid support from Democrats.
I don’t see anything “brave” about killing little kids in these wars.
Every bullet fired and every bomb dropped in these wars ends up destroying our own country. Perhaps you haven’t noticed the federal and state budget problems.
There is no need for troops coming home to exacerbate the unemployment problem if we have a government that puts human needs before Wall Street profits.
When a government finances and funds wars and militarism it is like taking the wealth of the Nation and dumping it into the deepest depths of the ocean.
When you get paid do you make your way to the nearest bridge and toss 60% of your pay-check into the river? Well, this is what our government is doing with our hard-earned money and here we have Gerald McEntee, the national President of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)talking about raising the debt limit and our country incurring more debt— from which Wall Street bankers (those great guys we bailed out)make fabulous profits from the interest.
Haven’t you heard that it is debt that impoverishes a nation?
We are now paying for all these wars since 1948 and these wars are what is making us all poor.
Someone should try to tally up what all these wars (and the occupations) are costing us.
And, what are “we” fighting these wars for? To protect Wall Street’s interests— cheap resources and cheap labor. We are fighting these wars against working people who don’t want to be exploited and want their resources used to improve their lives and their countries.
Haven’t you figured it out yet that these wars are being fought to force people in other countries to take our jobs at lower pay?
I would suggest that Mr. McEntee should be asking his members the all-important question:
How is Barack Obama’s Wall Street war economy working for you?
Chances are that if he were to ask this question he wouldn’t like the answers he would get back seeing as how it is his members, more than anyone else, getting stuck holding the shitty end of the stick because Obama continues to spend on these immoral and senseless wars instead of the social programs maintained by members of AFSCME— public workers are the first to be subjected to the austerity measures required to pay for these wars.
You may not agree with me but I hope you will give what I have to say some thought.
I would appreciate a response from Mr. McEntee.
We live in the wealthiest nation in the world. All Social Security programs should be significantly improved not cut. With a full-employment economy everyone would pay into Social Security and everyone would get out of all the Social Security programs that to which they are entitled.
Common sense should tell us we can’t have an economy with fifteen million people unemployed and another 60 million people employed at poverty-wage jobs and still expect Social Security to survive.
We need a full-employment economy with everyone being paid real living wages for the jobs they do.
I do think you have a good idea about what we should be doing with these Dumb Donkeys like Obama who put Social Security on the bargaining table: move them to a “home” and stuff their butts with drugs and wrap their heads in plastic.
Job destruction by the Big 0 and Democrats is cool, right? K, thanks, bye.
They aren’t ‘Obama’s wars’
The wars should go, right. yes. military spending is a problem.
But see if you can get ANYONE in the Congress to talk about that. It’s the Sacred Cow.
So that’s off the table, just as it seems, talking about TAXING THE RICH for their use of Our infrastructure to make THEIR profits.
If Republicans are so concerned about the debt ceiling, WHY was it raised five times under Bush?
Now that a Democrat is in office it is nearly a crime?
Of course there is no motive to make Obama look bad (not that he helps himself…)