I feel like adapting a joke from Thom Lehrer, who once remarked that a debate over the MLF (look it up) happened during the baseball season, so readers of the Chronicle might not have heard about it. The incident I want to talk about happened during MSNBC’s Morning Joe, so if you have no stomach for that show (or morning television in general)—like me—or if you only watched MSNBC the rest of the day, you might have missed it. . . but plenty of others are talking about it: MSNBC’s “senior political analyst” Mark Halperin was suspended indefinitely on Thursday after calling President Obama “Kind of a dick” on Morning Joe. (You want a laugh—another laugh? Check out how the Washington Post wrote this up: “kind of a [vulgarism for male organ].”)
If you want, take a look at an unedited version of the exchange, it is really pathetic for about a dozen reasons, but let me focus on what might be (as it usually is) the most pathetic part, which is the sizzle becomes the story, and not the steak—the real meaty part being what is actually going on in Washington.
Mark Halperin (whose father, Morton, yes, did defend US bombing during the Vietnam War, but later went on to champion civil liberties and open government, and has always been articulate and exhibited a real gravitas—so who knows what happened with his son?) said the president was all genital-like because Obama, in his Wednesday presser, dared to get the slightest bit snarky about corporate jet-users and their GOP guardians. . . and that, in my considered opinion, was wrong. It was wrong because getting annoyed (or, more likely, “acting” annoyed) with the greedy and their handmaidens is the very least we should demand in this ravaged economy, and it was wrong because, even if that behavior was somehow beyond the pale, it wouldn’t make Obama a dick, and certainly wouldn’t make it intelligent commentary to have some lightweight “analyst” call him one.
One of the first rules of civil debate (and child-rearing—perhaps that is where Mort went wrong) is that you criticize the action, and not the actor. Ad hominem attacks do nothing to advance an argument, and they are certainly not analysis.
The president is not a dick—but, that said, the president did make a dick move. No, not the one that got Halperin to put in for a few extra weeks of summer vacation—that, as I said, was sub-minimal—the dick move was cutting the legs out from under congressional Democrats in an effort to prove his worth to whomever it is Obama looks to for approval (still trying to sort that one out), and improve his standing for his 2012 run.
Obama’s dick move actually comes in two thrusts (did I just write that?): First, the White House undermined the negotiating posture of Democratic members of Congress by a) continuing to move to the right on budget cuts in an effort to forge something the president can call a “compromise,” and b) offering up some sort of “trade” of cuts to what, for lack of a better word, are called “entitlements” in exchange for what (and not for lack of a better word but for lack of a spine) are called “revenue enhancements.” And, second, Obama kneecapped congressional Dems’ election strategy by setting in motion a process that will likely tie Democrats to a vote that will inoculate Republicans from the charge that only the GOP wants to cut Medicare.
Democratic leadership in Congress wants to send a clear message that they are the protectors of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security—and increasingly, as Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY) indicated this week, Democrats also want voters to know that Republicans are looking to benefit politically from an economic crisis and so, are not negotiating in good faith. The White House muddied that message with the specifics outlined above, and with the general posture that it is in some sort of negotiation with GOP leaders.
Will anybody be talking about any of that heading into the holiday weekend? (Present company excluded, of course.) Doubtful. But will tongues be wagging about Lil’ Mark and, perhaps, how his “analysis” was stifled by the “librul media?” Yeah, that feels like it has legs. . . maybe three of them.



24 Comments

Gregg, have I told you lately how great your video commentaries are?
LOL! I know of no other blog site where the Editor sits in front of the camera and commentates on issues and makes the site readers feel part of a bigger community by putting face to words! FDL uses the technological tools and WOW! No comparison can be found elsewhere.
Coat-tails Indeed!
“Democratic leadership in Congress wants to send a clear message that they are the protectors of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security—and increasingly, as Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY) indicated this week, Democrats also want voters to know that Republicans are looking to benefit politically from an economic crisis and so, are not negotiating in good faith. The White House muddied that message with the specifics outlined above, and with the general posture that it is in some sort of negotiation with GOP leaders.”
You know, I still haven’t figured out why he does that to the Dem congress and to his DFH, Purist, Sanctimonius, Professional Left supports from the Campaign trail. For all the smarts he and his advisors think they have, both should realize by now that cutting off your feet so you can stand up doesn’t work.
“Kind of a Dick” Let’s imagine that a Lefty said that about Bush on cable news. Imagine right after the public viewed that codpiece Mission Accomplished stage set up, a Lefty political pundit said about his speech–”I think he is kind of a dick”.
Would the world ever see or hear of that person again after every major network killed him with words and admonitions?
Thank you, Gregg.
I wonder when the folks that took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution are going to wake up and figure out that the bankstas have no allegiances to anyone let alone their own mother.
They don’t care. It is the immediate they are more interested in.
David Axelrod should have been all over this from the beginning, but as you can see he created a brand from thin air. No real person, no real meaning, just a nice sales pitch.
Thank you for the kind words. Yes, if Marky H had called Bush a dick (perish the thought) it would be an example for all time on the incivility of the left. (Not to imply here that MH is of the left–again, perish the thought.)
And sure enough, confirmation today that negotiators are offering up “chained CPI“. . . which is, make no mistake, a benefit cut for Social Security.
“Obama’s dick move actually comes in two thrusts”
Is that why my ass hurts!
Is there still any time or will to get the talks un-derailed? Surely someone can communicate that Pres O mis-spoke, again. I like to think there may be a trump card after his grand, but misguided, gesture.
Obama shows the least bit of spine, probably for the vid, and he’s critiqued by a nine-year-old. With columnists like Alter and Halperin, let alone Krauthammer, the weeklies fail at analysis. Pure pap. Time and Newsweek-the slick paper isn’t even good for lining bird cages.
Hey, did you call Durbin a dick?
Mark Haleprin, douche bag. Barak Obasma, Trojan Mouse.
Forgot the analysis. Haleprin is on the payroll of the corporate media and Obama is on the payroll of the corporations. “Don’t expect anyone to know something when their paycheck is dependent on them not knowing.”
What does it take to get you to stop supporting the corporate media?
Why are you still watching their shows and their advertising?
“To whomever it is Obama looks to for approval (still trying to sort that one out), and improve* his standing for his 2012 run.” : That’s sabotage* with a Poppy Bush dive for JEB ( Just like the Other Dicks, Cheney and NixOn)!
“A dick” is being too kind. He’s more like a “peter”.
Obama’s not a dick, he’s a trojan – an RNC trojan horse.
I once had a slight tussle with Halperin Senior over his dickish son. Sonny Boy isn’t worthy enough to carry his dad’s jockstrap.
Those Democrats need to cut loose from Traitor Obama.
Better f-ing not be. SS belongs to us- not Bob Dole, Tip O’Neill or Barack Obama. Democrats need to call out the lack of care and concern in this administration. No damn policy for people- just Obama suck-ups and corporate whoring. Enough of this crap. Where is leadership? Hands off and if Dems mean it, then stand up and challenge him. Dump him if he won’t represent the platform and the policies- don’t vote for him- don’t give him, or any Democrat who can’t stand tall a dime. Culprits walk, whistleblowers pay, old and sick are traumatized. Not a dime. NO HOPE? NO VOTE!
People here need to get mad. Its way too polite, snarky- when real lives are continually degraded and demoralized. Looking for help, justice and truth.. This is supposed to be a Democrat President who works hard placing policy for the betterment of our people- like Gov. Mark Dayton who is making the corporations pay. Obama is a phony and a Republican and why not just call him out for it? Aren’t you freaking sick to your stomachs? The Dick is turning another trick. Who can even recognize what we have become, what we have done to our world? Who are these low-life yappers in our Capitol?
“Obama kneecapped congressional Dems’ election strategy by setting in motion a process that will likely tie Democrats to a vote that will inoculate Republicans from the charge that only the GOP wants to cut Medicare..”
They can object, or protest. They can walk out. They can refuse his policy dumb-down.
Re: “The White House muddied that message with the specifics outlined above, and with the general posture that it is in some sort of negotiation with GOP leaders. Will anybody be talking about any of that heading into the holiday weekend?”
Well, what I heard last night was that Obama is once again doing a con-job in his public statements – he is not fighting for tax increases and he is not defending Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. There is no plan to get a backbone and point to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, telling the Tea Party to go pound sand because their debt limit crisis is un-Constitutional. There is a plan to cave again – just as the House GOP expects.
Indeed I am told via email that the “best spending cuts to tax increase ratio” to expect is around 7 to 1 – – and if that happens it will be because of the House GOP – not Obama – Boehner wants minimal tax increases so as to get Democratic blue dog votes to replace tea party votes they expect to lose.
Just how exactly is Obama better than a GOP president? On black talk radio last night they were saying that Obama needs money plus the black vote at 80% and turnout at 2008 levels, plus the unions, plus college kids – and if he gets that he need not worry about the professional left (like FDL I assume). Well I guess it is a plan.
“Imagine a MoveOn That Doesn’t Answer to Democrats” (By David Swanson, posted on 02 July 2011)
Halperin only said what a lot of us believe and should not have been suspended for saying it. His own party and others in Washington have probably said a lot worse except not on national television. Big difference. Besides, Mr Obama is a dick and worse and will prove that the huffing and puffing going on with him now will need a dose of spinal Viagra he’s not used before.
When Simpson and Bowles failed to produce a majority Catfood Commission report disembowling social security, Medicare, and Medicaid, Obama turned to Plan B, which consisted of pouring gasoline on the smoking deficit by irresponsibly extending the Bush taxcuts for the rich and undermining social security with the payroll tax holiday.
Now he’s relying on the fake problem posed by the apparent necessity of raising the debt limit to avoid defaulting on the nation’s creditors. I say “fake” problem because the Fourteenth Amendment expressly prohibits the nation from defaulting on the nation’s creditors and pensions, which includes social security. As our nation is sovereign in its own currency and can pay its creditors with a few keystrokes on a computer, it constitutionally must and necessarily will pay its creditors when their debts come due, whether or not Congress raises the debt limit.
Yes, indeed. The debt limit is just another bright shiny object and we are witness to our scumbag president using it as an excuse to create an apparent crisis to justify disemboweling social security, Medicare, and Medicaid. He believes he can get away with it without suffering adverse political consequences so long as both parties agree to do it. Hence the need for a crisis to provide cover for the shameful deed.
You are dead right about the “What” of what happened; I am still wrestling with the “Why.” Is it purely sinister, or partly dumb? Is he doing it just to please some corporate fatcats? is he seeking approval from daddy-figure MOTUs? is he doing what he thinks is best for his political chances in 2012? is he trying to cement a place in history as a “post-partisan” visionary? etc.
Of course, whatever the reason, it is the “What” that hurts everyday Americans, uh, every day. So, what fights the “What?”