
Nogent-sur-Seine Nuclear Plant (Photo: flo21, flickr)
You Just Can’t Find Good Help These Days.
Not only were members of Greenpeace able to get past the security guarding at least one, and possibly three, nuclear facilities in France, they were able to plan and execute this operation less than a month after the plant operator, French energy giant EDF, was fined 1.5 million Euros ($2 million) for hacking into Greenpeace computers.
So, how bad is security at France’s 58 nuclear power plants? You be the judge:
Activists from environmental group Greenpeace managed to sneak into a nuclear power plant near Paris Monday in a move they said highlighted the dangers posed by France’s reliance on atomic energy.
. . . .
In a statement, Greenpeace said some members had entered the nuclear site at Nogent-sur-Seine, 95 kilometers southeast of Paris, to “spread the message that there is no such thing as safe nuclear power.”
“A group of militants managed to climb on to the dome of one of the reactors, where they unfurled a banner saying ‘Safe Nuclear Power Doesn’t Exist,’” said Greenpeace spokesman Axel Renaudin.
“The aim is to show the vulnerability of French nuclear installations, and how easy it is to get to the heart of a reactor,” said Sophia Majnoni, a Greenpeace nuclear expert.
Greenpeace activists also hung banners at two other EDF plants (EDF–or Electricite de France SA–runs all of France’s nuclear power stations), but as of this writing it is not yet clear whether those banners were unfurled in- or outside of security gates.
The government of Nicolas Sarkozy has demonstrated a full-throated commitment to nuclear energy–despite popular calls in the wake of the Fukushima crisis for a reexamination of the dominant role nuclear plays in generating France’s electricity. Just last month, thousands of French protestors delayed a convoy of nuclear waste from being transported to Germany (the hazardous waste has since made it across the border). Germany’s Prime Minister Angela Merkel has signaled her country will phase out nuclear power in the next ten years.



23 Comments

Bwahahaha!
How much does EDF contribute to Sark’s campaign.
“to show the depth of their serious intentions, one of the “Occupy Nukes” group shat on a security vehicle while two others got high and then raped a female janitor”.
Link?
Sorry, got that mixed up with the folks at Zuccotti Park.
So are you claiming ZP rape? If so link for that plz.
Why all the wrath from you, Cahn? But here you go – I think this is Spock-on
http://abcnews.go.com/US/sexual-assaults-occupy-wall-street-camps/t/story?id=14873014
Anything else? Buehler? Buehler?
JohnHenry,
There is no evidence, no names, nothing to indicate that these events actually occurred.
JH what does this have to do with Greenpeace showing up the travesty that is nuclear security? Are you trying to say that the problems OWS has experienced from a few of the many people who have anonymously joined the camps are the same as the vetting Greenpeace does on the participants for it’s direct actions? Are you nuts?
By the way, Iran’s president used pretty much the same reasoning to say the Holocaust did not happen, Cahn.
trollllll.
Nope, I was actually trying to add a little levity to the post. But Cahn failed to see the joke and has a stick up her you know what. Guess she has not been able to kick any Jews lately.
What a trip. They got right in.
Pretty creepy. Rec’d.
John Henry,
Her name is eCAHNomics. What world do you inhabit?
I’m sorry do not feed.
EDF’s spying on Greenpeace is another dying gasp of the corrupt, despotic corporate energy model. There has been pretty much no news on the spying and hacking in American media. Thanks, once again to FDL, for bringing it out to peoples attention.
Then again, we have the same authoritarian corporate spies here too. But the media wants you to get angry about Android rather than GE, ExxonMobil, Goldman Sachs, the NYPD, and LAPD spying on us for attempting to protect our land from nuclear and petrochemical contamination and to take back our rights.
Probably his future employer.
See, the difference is that he was lying because there is evidence and names for what happened. Whereas eCAHNonmics is not lying because there are no names or evidence for your rapes.
See what I did there?
I agree that nuclear power is unsafe and Greenpeace is doing a service to all of us, however, I can’t help but see that fossil fuel processors would benefit if we halted nuclear power production. So… I was wondering if fossil fuel processors were allowed to contribute to or assist with this demonstration.
One errs by failing to consider the complex web of interdependence that operates in the universe.
JH comment towards eCHONomics crossed the line, flag him then skip him.
I place of an edit eCHANomics
RRRRRRRR
2007
“JOHANNESBURG, Nov. 14 — This much is known: Just after midnight on Nov. 8, Anton Gerber was sitting with his fiancée in the control room of South Africa’s most secretive nuclear facility, the site at which this nation’s apartheid government conceived and delivered six atomic bombs, when four gunmen burst into the room. Mr. Gerber pushed his fiancée under a desk. The attackers shot him in the chest, grabbed a computer and fled, but abandoned their booty as they came under assault by guards.
Now, one week after the assault, the most serious on a nuclear installation in recent memory, the government is largely mum about who was behind it, how they broke in or why.”
and
“Pelindaba is vital to the government’s efforts to build a high-tech infrastructure. It researches advanced scientific issues, and, some experts say, holds bomb-grade enriched uranium. It was at Pelindaba that the apartheid government devised and built as many as seven atomic bombs in the 1970s and 1980s.”
New York Times.
kekekekeke rape jokes are always funny!