Excuse me while I channel my inner Paul Harvey. . .
So, it was weekend before the North Carolina primary–a ballot that includes the searingly homophobic Amendment 1, a measure that takes the state’s already-on-the-books “preservation of marriage” law and tattoos it on the North Carolina Constitution–and everyone knew what was about to happen. Both polling and precedent said Amendment 1 was on its way to a solid victory–what’s a White House to do?
Conveniently, the Obama Administration has this guy on staff; his name is Biden. Joe Biden.
Appearing on Sunday with NBC’s David Gregory, Vice President Biden let it out that he is “absolutely comfortable” with same-sex marriage, and the predictable media tempest followed. “There goes Joe,” or something like that ran through the reportage across the political spectrum, and “boy, does this put the President in a tough place.” It was classic bright, shiny-thing journalism–underlying issues and other big news of the weekend be damned, we have mouth-runner Joe and a contentious social issue; win-win!
Then comes Tuesday, and once again, putting minority rights up to majority vote proves a lesson on the reason we have Constitutional rights in the first place. North Carolina voters still hate “teh gay.”
Wait, what’s that you say? The Democratic National Convention is scheduled for North Carolina later this summer? Dems had already pissed off labor unions by choosing a “right to work” state for President Obama’s re-nomination party–but the unions, doing what they seem to do these days, made a little noise, then mostly fell back in line and pledged to support the Democrats in the fall. Gay rights organizations, however, have proven a little more savvy and played a little more hardball with their support–and most notably, their financial support–during Obama’s first term.
It was not a surprise, then, that those on left-leaning email lists awoke today to find petitions in their mailboxes calling for the Democrats to pull their convention from Charlotte in protest (I think the Variety hed would read: “D R&F to DNC: Pull DNC from NC, ASAP”). This was probably extra irritating for some in the White House–uh, make that in Chicago, where Obama’s reelection team is based–because there is a big fundraising gala scheduled this week in New York City, hosted by Ricky Martin and put on by the LGBT Leadership Council, Obama for America, and the Futuro Fund.
Then came the political bombshell–OK, maybe a firecracker: in a “hastily arranged” (so the story goes) interview with ABC news, President Barack Obama, famous till now for his position on marriage equality not having evolved enough to endorse it, tells a waiting nation that he now personally believes in the right of same-sex couples to marry. He had wanted to take more time before announcing this, we are told, but events–named Joe–had sped up the timetable.
Yeah, that’s what happened.
Now, it should be noted that Obama made the distinction between personally supporting marriage equality, while still saying individual states should make decisions for their populations–hardly a crusading vanguard position in the civil rights community–but it is not without some meaning for the President of the United States to speak up on this issue. (And on a personal note, I consider marriage to be such low-hanging fruit in the battle for universal equality that it is practically a potato. But, that said, what is called a “right” for some should obviously be extended to all.) But to report on the president’s “change of heart” without explaining the politics–the actual politics–at play is lazy and actually does a disservice to the LGBTQ community and to the larger debate.
Perhaps it is with that sort of gimlet eye that Slate/CBS reporter John Dickerson tweeted:
Joe Biden has such an impact on evolution you’d think if you put a amoeba next to him it would be a horse in a day.
The truth, of course, is that Gay money has such an impact on evolution that when you put a plasmodial mass of jelly next to it, it becomes a spine.
That is not an insult–it’s a lesson. Hats off to the LGBTQ groups that have worked so hard over the years–they have now twice demonstrated (with marriage equality and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”) that they understand how to move the Obama administration. They should keep this in mind moving forward (and push for something tangible, like an executive order on discrimination, and not just fall in love with the president’s personal evolution)–and other parts of the president’s purported coalition should take this to heart.
And now you know. . . the rest of the story.
Good day!




45 Comments

Cash plus a call to move the Dem Convention O could not risk Gays outside protesting his convention being beaten by police.
Cash plus public Embarrassment is the key to move O.
“The truth, of course, is that Gay money has such an impact on evolution that when you put a plasmodial mass of jelly next to it, it becomes a spine.”
ROFLMAO. Lordy lordy lordy. Recc’ed for that sentence alone :-)
Well, almost a spine; maybe just some fibrous cartilage. Thanks, Greg. ;o)
The Democrats spinal problem: http://www.themudflats.net/wp-content/uploads/donkeyspine2.jpg
Between BOFA and the DNC convention, Charlotte is in lock down. Move on, no civil rights to be seen here. The convention should never have been scheduled there in the first place! Sorry, O but I don’t give a rat’s ass what you say–it’s what you DO that matters to me. Now, if you should get your feckless ass on the other side of a pen and start writing progressive executive orders, then maybe I’d re-evolve my decision not to vote for you.
Gee, another perfect example of Obama the gutless and the easily satisfied Stepford Dems who support him no matter what.
However you spin it, Obama didn’t “come out” in defense of gay rights here, he “came out” in defense of individual state’s rights to decide the issue for themselves and so if a state like NC decimates those rights (including civil unions and domestic partnerships), well then, he’s okay with that even though he really, REALLY wishes they’d do otherwise.
Wish in one hand, shit in the other, see which fills faster…
He’s still a coward and the most disastrous Democratic president in modern history, and this gay man still will not vote for him.
Personally, I don’t believe that Obama’s believes in anything other than money, catering to those with money, and distaining (the 99%) without money.
Good on you. The man’s an inveterate coward.
Say what you will, I just read a tweet that wondered how many young lives were saved by his words.
I saw a tweet from the UK Daily Mail this morning claiming Obama raised $1 million for his campaign in a single 90 minute period yesterday after the statement was released.
LOL! “HORRORS! What is it?”
Thanks, Bill Perdue. ;o)
Haven’t read you diary yet; will soon.
If Obama starts seeing numbers from seniors, the most reliable voting bloc there is, that they aren’t happy with his newly evolved stance on gay marriage he will set a land-speed record betraying you.
But hey, Hope and Change.
Yesterday’s was a good move if not entirely genuine. A pre-election EO should still be at least on the table.
But next, the notion of pulling the convention from Charlotte, aside from the logistical impossibility, would be a very bad move. Ten seconds of cocksure satisfaction would be followed by invigorating the wrong and unpleasant base among some 30 states (or at least some seven of the swing states) in the wrong way. There are better ways to go about all of this.
Oh do tell.
Everybody here owes the presididn’t oodles of gratitude. By doing nothing, he roused us from our apathy, causing us to then fight heroically in an epic battle for equality in a primitive land against a draconian law put forth by an ignorant population. Losing this battle in turn, forced our great leader to then stand up and offer an opinion.
See? Doing nothing prompts others to do something that you can then point to as an example of moral courage.
So actually, he deserves all the credit for this great accomplishment of TALKING about the equal rights that he never really talked about before and doesn’t plan to do anything about with the power he actually has.
We should vote for him to show our gratitude. /s
He doesn’t need our votes hotdog. Just our cash.
More disasterous than the Democratic president that oversaw the passage of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and DOMA?
Obama’s “evolution” is the opposite of that of Lincoln during the Civil War. Lincoln made seemingly minor, incremental proclamations (notably the Emancipation Proclamation, which only applied to Southern state territory then under the control of Union armies) as an opening wedge to earthshaking historical change. Obama issues his various proclamations–on gay rights, civil rights, worker rights, what have you) as a way of deflecting his base and averting true change.
Typical politics from O.
Talk: makes announcement, looking and sounding oh so liberal and progressive.
Walk: still refuses to sign EO ending discrimination.
Bottom line: he made statement for three reasons – money, money, and money.
Highly rec’d.
Sorry, no more loan extensions are being granted at this time, and the White House is in foreclosure for being about 3 1/2 years in arears.
As we all learned in 2008, talk is cheap. Obama is as sincere in his support for same gender marriage as he is in his support for the constitution.
Oh, wait…
This has to be about the most cognizant comment chain I’ve had the pleasure of reading here…it’s reassuring to know there still exist those who are not “Stepford Dems” forever hopeful for the outcome of eleventy dimensional chess…
evolution??
used to call it, “political pandering”
Who coulda seen THAT coming?
Come on, you guys; you’re being too hard on O’Bomba. I got this letter from David Plouffe yesterday linking to his candidate’s To Do List. Now, there’s at least one that’s not cynically hypocritical pandering. Sheesh.
I’m not L,G,B, or T. At 61 this really doesn’t effect me one way or the other. Well, maybe my cousin Peter. But, we’re stil bnto sure about him.
Still do.
Wendy, I don’t think this was cynical or hypocritical. I think this was genuine pandering.
“this doesn’t really affect me”
Man, I hate saying this because it’s not really the issue and it’s pandering to even mention it, but I’m heterosexual. This affects me, and all of us, because homosexual people are our family and our friends.
The number of close friends (people I love, besides my blood family) I have are exactly 10 individuals. Out of all those, 6 are gay, one is my kids’ godfather.
You mess with my friends or family, you mess with me. The presididn’t is a nothing more than a pandering distraction.
Tries to have it both ways. Yes he supports it but also supports each state to decide for themselves. What courage. Always figured he was a strict “states-righter.”
This pertains the original basis of demonization for the sake of associating foes with the demonized and use of division for
the sake of ulterior motives.
It’s indistinguishable, where g are a capital status crime, from the calls to exterminate J’s.
http://pages.citebite.com/g2a2d0expuk
That those who engage in the demonization have been likeliest carriers of the gy gene is proof,
on top of this, of the genetic, apart from the developmental, incidence.
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
Hitler was famously feminine, JFK’s killers substantially gay fascists, many / most religious right
gay bashers ultimately proved gay themselves, or, their kid(s) come out. The ultimate gradient and
proof: virtually all murderers of gays and persons wrongly presumed gay have proven being gay.
What’s this guy?
http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/us_congresswoman_shot_final_hours/
So a history, a genetic science, and a morality prove each other simultaneously, and it is mathematical across event streams and meta-experimental where the East is identical but for the
transference. And all manner of indicia identify this “Government by Transference” as the operative proof.
It’s been a source of not simply the transference defining monopoly protected by fear and pacification (including those standing in as the American basij in the Tea Party,) but of the arrogance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zPSO4REesc
How sad.
It’s division that has bought student sharecropper-hood and monopolies and war.
It’s division that murdered Ghandi.
It’s transference-tainted families, not married gays, that are a world’s evil. One can easily imagine the hypocrites being the ones thought by many foreseen. I’m guessing they really want understanding,
forgiveness and love now instead.
But if transference, fear mastered and transferred, then it’s the person in the street fearing the person resembling the obnoxious prior, is proposed ended by one who would today otherwise make this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UephHvStdWw
(Is Ronnie Kovic being demonized as a “communist” and Nixon co-opting “divide and conquer.”)
illegal, is the purpose to end transference, or is it to see its triumph?
I really have no choice, in view of stuff people might contemplate, but to add this singular freakasauris item. Though I’m not at all one of those who think aliens walk our sidewalks, I do think the above is no human’s fault.
Maybe BLAME it on him:
http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/gaddis/hst210/sept9/Akhenaten%20bust.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=blame+it+on+the+bossa+nova+eydie&oq=blame+it+on+the+bossa+nova+eydie&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&gs_l=youtube-psuggest.3..0l2.215.8083.0.8354.39.22.0.11.11.2.578.2891.11j7j3j5-1.22.0…0.0.
“Well, almost a spine…”
That’s it. Did he say a whole lot more than he’d said before?
Wasn’t it Dave that said he was stuck on:
“Whatever. It’s okay for bigoted peckerheads in their respective states to decide this.”
Of course, having that extorted from him by threats from the Gay community is enough to thrill the “We suck less!” mousketeers.
I hope you understand I was merely kidding. I DID mention Peter….
Going ga-ga over that hurry-up-damage-control interview is like praising him for trying to walk back the firing of Sherrod, after a progressive shitstorm broke on his head.
It’s a depressing yardstick for how low some of us are willing to lower the bar to cover his ass.
Incidentally, as we saw in the mid-terms, it’s probably going to add to the likelihood of another big loss, in November.
Did I mention that Gregg Levine deserves one hell of shout-out for writing a thread that nails the sorry, PR-driven bullshit, right to the wall.
I do so now. Good ON you, Gregg! :o)
Newcarguy, you wrote:
What a regrettable conclusion. Irrespective of your personal profile, are you not in any way affected by the fact of others being denied the full spectrum of civil rights?
Consider this as a point of comparison:
President Obama was born in 1961 — at that point in time, his parents could not have lawfully wed had they resided in any one of 16 states that still had anti-miscegenation laws on the books.
I wonder if the President has ever been publicly queried as to whether he sees any point of comparison between the states’ prior history of enacting laws that banned interracial marriage and the states’ present enactment of legislation banning same-sex marriage.
You’re right; I REPENT, newcarguy. It was as genuine as the self-satisfied smirk on his face.
Too many simple chordates with notochords, not spines.
Down with notochords!
If only the president knew someone Fierce and Historic who could help him do something about this human rights abuse — I’m sure he could sweet-talk him into some kind of action. The president is a great talker, after all. Seems like a natural fit for him. We all have to do our part.
Yep. It’s real disappointing how many are falling for this latest permutation of the “say things people want to hear but do nothing” scam.
Thanks, tanbark–and thanks all for a pithy, on-topic thread.
As the resounding grace note to my cynicism, see Dday’s post on EO:
http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/05/10/despite-marriage-equality-shift-obama-still-wont-sign-lgbt-anti-discrimination-executive-order/
Seeing as how those with the two-party blinders on are going to decide between the guy who forced all his constituents to buy health insurance and the guy who forced all his constituents to buy health insurance, there has to be some contrast. So what can Obama do?
(a) regulate big business
(b) create jobs (anyone remember shovel-ready?)
(c) prosecute the Wallstreeters responsible for the mess we’re in
(d) support and/or enact social liberal reform that cannot harm the 1%
Obama and the democrats will choose (d) because they are all beholden to big business.
So while it’s good that over the past few years, gays and lesbians are being discriminated against in one less way through state based reform allowing gay marriage or civil unions, I believe it’s ultimately being done and supported because the democrats don’t want to offend their 1% lords and this is the only possible thing they can do to motivate their base.
Clap louder, please.
Oilbomber is leaving it to the States. Oilbomber left Medical Marijuana to the States, then Federally Raids the States.