George McGovern, the South Dakota Democrat who ran for president in 1972 as a staunch opponent of the Vietnam War and a strong advocate of economic equality, died early Sunday in Sioux Falls. He was 90.
In the fall of 1972, I was only 10, but even as a 5th-grader, I was moved by McGovern’s anti-war, pro-social-justice message. I had a “Come Home America” pin that I would wear everyday to school, and after school, I would go to the local campaign office to stuff envelopes and lick stamps.
At the crack of dawn on Election Day, I went with my father to hand out flyers to arriving workers at Litton Industries. I remember the flyers explained that you were allowed time off at the beginning or end of work to vote, and then, inside, made the pitch to working Americans with the headline “How in the Hell Can You Vote for Nixon?”
History, of course, shows that many found a way. There are a lot of books and essays on all the reasons why, and though there is much to be learned from McGovern’s struggles in ’72, this is not the time to despair over that loss, but to recall with warmth and amazement that a candidate like George McGovern was once the presidential nominee of a major national party.
The speech I have included here–McGovern’s acceptance speech at the 1972 Democratic National Convention–was considered by those that saw it as one of the greatest of the Senator’s career, and perhaps one of the greatest by any modern presidential candidate.
I say “by those that saw it” because so few did. Conventions then were not the carefully scripted infomercials they are today. Incessant wrangling by old-guard Democrats and McGovern’s main challenger for the nomination, Hubert H. Humphrey, slowed the floor vote for McGovern’s running mate and delayed this acceptance speech till the wee hours of the morning. To this day, it amazes me that convention organizers let this happen.
You may not have been awake back then–hell, you may not have even been alive–but do the Senator from South Dakota the honor listening to him today. Then imagine, maybe even dare to hope, that someday you might hear a national candidate speak like this again.
I lost my “Come Home America” button at school at some point on election day. I remember how much that upset me and my mother, but of course, by the end of the evening, there was something that upset us all so much more. Maybe George McGovern was not a great campaigner, and neither was he a wholly perfect politician (as I grew older, there were certainly issues where he and I would have had to disagree), but I cannot think of a presidential candidate who has moved me as much since.
Senator McGovern, you will be missed.
Update: My mother just sent this along:

(A version of this post appears at capitoilette.com)



26 Comments

The Democratic Party gave McGovern only grudging support and has since worked all but openly, and sometimes openly, to try to purge the Party of liberals.
Looks as though their work is just about done. How’s that “success” been working for them?
Part of the problem is that the coalition FDR managed to hammer together — that of the economic liberals (represented by the unions) and the social-issues liberals (represented by people like McGovern) was fraying at the seams, and the 1972 election was when it finally was torn apart.
McGovern never forgot how the AFL-CIO’s George Meany backed the Vietnam War and Richard Nixon — and conservative operatives like Rick Berman played upon his grudges quite effectively.
I do not agree that McGovern was only a social issue liberal. Also, his opposition from within the Democratic Party came from conservatives, not any kind of liberal.
Gregg Levine, I forgot to say thank you for this post.
He wasn’t the first candidate I worked for, but he was the first candidate I was old enough to vote for and did vote for in 1972.
Wish we had someone like McGovern now. He would really set the teabaggers hair on fire. He is gone but his spirit is with us all who despair of the present.
The last liberal who tried. And a great man.
RIP
I even voted for him. As I recall his main issue was the Vietnam Nam war. The dem party was in disarray at the time. It was the beginning of the end for whatever passed as the FDR coalition. I recall him standing on a street corner In Queens NY with around twenty or thirty supporters. I knew he would lose then.
Much as I liked him I doubt that. He lost with under forty percent of the vote, I think. After Mondale, another liberal, lost to Reagan, the DLC was formed since the dems felt they could not win with a left wing agenda.
Well that’s nice.
Here’s what y’all thought of him in 2008.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/11/wal-mart-lover-george-mcgovern-throws-unions-under-the-bus-for-his-lobbyist-friend-rick-berman/
was 13; whole familoy was VERY political (Democrats);I was the only one who stayed up for this, though
Yeah we’ll, there was no love lost between the unions and McGovern in 1972 either as I recall. Maybe a case of what goes around……..
He had the grace and good sense to be open and honest when he grew in wisdom and changed his thinking about some of the left’s most notorious shibboleths. And he suffered for it from erstwhile admirers. But this is what integrity looks like.
my first vote…RIP
Worked on his campaign going door to door in downriver working class Detroit suburbs. It was then I realized how fucked up the working class in America really was and how the working class was willing to let themselves be made nothing more than marionettes.
Thanks to the terminal ignorance of the U.S. public.
Cast my first vote ever for him 40 years ago, one of the few occasions that I actually voted for somebody. He will be missed.
I haven’t heard that thought voiced here very often if at all. i worked in a factory. And that place was certainly not a bastion of liberalism. In fact they hated liberals. You learn to just shut up after awhile.
Thoughts on an Inspiring Man in a Different Time
Most white working-class males have always tended to be social conservatives, but they can become economic liberals and eventually social liberals as well — that was the whole point behind Saul Alinsky’s successfully organizing Chicago’s Back of the Yards neighborhood.
It is possible, if the organizers are patient, smart, thick-skinned, and doesn’t show open contempt for the people they’re trying to organize.
Yes, and like I mentioned, the fortysomething me had differences with the eightysomething McGovern that were not apparent to the 10-year-old me looking at the 50-year-old McGovern. You are not the first person to show me this post from Ian (just before I got to FDL), and I felt similarly then. But this is specifically a post about how that ’72 campaign affected my political life.
Thanks to everyone for the kind words and remembrances.
You are sooo cute
Lookit that wavy hair of his!
That could be. But the skin has gotta be thick. Have you ever met some of the rednecks running around in factories? I wanted to put more than one of them on the floor. But I got out of factories many years ago. So maybe everything is just fine today.
I wonder if he swiped it from another poster? (Taking care to pretend that McGovern had somehow a change of heart as he got older, when what really happened is that Rick Berman took advantage of his longstanding beef with the AFL-CIO?)
Rest in peace, George. I didn’t agree with you on everything, but you were a damned sight better than the guy who beat you in ’72.
And that was when I was still brushing it out. It was actually curlier. A couple of years later, I let it go full-on jew-fro.
I think I owe that choice more to rock n roll than George McGovern, though.