Introduction
There is ample evidence that the Obama Presidency has pulled the US political spectrum further to the Right. On most domestic and foreign policy issues Obama has embraced extremist positions surpassing his Republican predecessor and in the process devastating what remained of the peace and social movements of the past decade. Moreover, the Obama Presidency has laid the groundwork for the immediate future promising a further extension of regressive policies following the presidential elections: cuts in Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare. Incumbents and their opposition compete over hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign funding from wealthy donors, which they will have to repay in the post-election period in billion dollar handouts, subsidies, tax abatements, anti-labor and environmental policies. Not a single positive proposal was put forth by the Obama campaign but numerous militarist and regressive social policies were articulated. The Obama campaign ran a fear campaign, playing off of the reactionary proposals of the Romney-Tea Party alliance: a cover for his own record of unprecedented military spending, sequential wars, immigrant expulsions, mortgage foreclosures and Wall Street bailouts.
In the process, critical liberals have crossed the line, surrendering their integrity by deflecting attention from Obama’s militarist-socially regressive policies to focus on “opposing Romney” as a “greater evil”: progressives and critical liberals have multiplied and magnified the duplicity of the Obama political apparatus. In the name of opposing the current ‘greater evil’ (Romney) they dare not enumerate and specify the wanton political crimes and monumental socio-economic injustice perpetrated by their “lesser evil” candidate (Obama). Will the “progressives” ever play honest and publically state: we back Obama in “swing states” because he has “only” murdered 10,000 Afghans, 5,000 Iraqis, is starving 75 million Iranian’s via sanctions, gives $3 billion for Israeli displacement of millions of Palestinians, personally oversees the arbitrary executions of US citizens and promises an extended kill list … because Romney promises to be worse … Expecting honesty from the proponents of ‘lesser eviles’ is as farfetched as taking serious their criticisms between elections.
The political damage incurred by the social movements and US working class under the Obama presidency is unprecedented and has laid the groundwork for further social regression and greater imperial bellicosity.
Political Consequences of the Obama Presidency: Past, Present and Future
The Obama Presidency and the run-up to his past and present electoral campaigns have had a devastating impact on popular social movements, engaged in issues of peace, labor, immigrant and constitutional rights and environmental regulation.
The peace movement virtually disappeared as its leaders urged its supporters to turn their activities to supporting Obama’s election. He rewarded them by escalating military spending, and engaging in sequential wars, directly or by proxy, in seven countries, wreaking havoc and destruction. He faced minimum opposition as ex-peace activists, in dismay, turned away or grabbed a post and apologized for war. By 2012 the follower- less peace leaders repeat the same mantra to support Obama; but dare not repeat the past lie (in the name of ‘peace’) rather they claim in order ‘to defeat Romney’.
The immigrant rights movements prior to the 2008 election of Obama mobilized several million…. till it was infiltrated and taken over by Mexican-American political hacks from the Democratic Party ad turned into an electoral machine to secure elected posts for themselves and Obama. He rewarded the immigrants by setting a record: seizing, jailing and expelling 1.5 million immigrants over his tenure in office. The immigrant rights mass movement has been largely dismantled and now Democratic political hustlers hire canvassers to round up and register, highly disillusioned immigrant voters.
Afro-Americans were the most neglected sector of the US working class under Obama: they experienced the highest levels of unemployment and home foreclosures and the longest period of joblessness. They became politically invisible as Obama bent over front ways to appease rabid White racists seeking to label him a ‘black president’. The established black leadership-political and religious – and the media celebrities went all out to block any expression of grass-roots opposition, claiming it would only “help the racists” – ignoring Obama’s embrace and bail out of White Wall Street and showing his backside to millions of black households under water. Without movement or leadership, fearful of the problem (economic racism) and the solution (4 more years of invisibility under Obama) most black workers are left to abstain or hold their nose and vote for ‘Oreo’ Obama.
The Occupy Wall Street Movement, precisely because it was independent of the Democratic Party and fed up with Obama’s total subservience to Wall Street, provided a temporary voice for the vast majority of Americans opposed to both political parties. The local and state Democratic officials applauded “the cause” and then repressed the movement.
A spontaneous movement without political direction, and lacking an alternative political leadership, was incapable of confronting the Obama regime: the movement declined and disintegrated, many sympathizers sucked up by the Obama ‘lesser evil’ propaganda campaign. The mass popular animus to Wall Street was defused by Obama’s claim to have saved “the economy” from catastrophe by channeling $4.5 trillion dollars into the bankers’ pockets.
Constitutional rights were savaged by Obama’s defense of military trials, Bush era tortures, expansion of arbitration executive power including the assumption of Presidential power to assassinate US citizens without a trial. While legal organizations fought the good fight for civil liberties, the vast majority of liberals were notable by their absence from any sustained democratic movement upholding the rights of 40 million Americans under police surveillance, especially Muslim citizens and immigrants. They chose not to embarrass their Democratic President: they placed the re-election of a police-state Democrat over and above their putative defense of constitutional rights. No mass marches for civil liberties; no protests against Home Land Security; no campus-wide free speech movements against the abrogation of the right to criticize Israel.
For decades, the trade union confederation and senior citizen movements defended Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. With Obama in office, openly declaring and preparing major reductions and regressive clauses on coverage (raising age qualification) and indexing, there is no significant protest movement. Programs which for the better part of a century (social security) or half century (Medicare, Medicaid) were considered untouchable are now, according to Obama, “on the table” to be gutted (“reformed”, “adjusted”). The trade union millionaire bosses hire a small army of campaign workers and raise over a $150 million to re-elect a President who promises to make huge cuts in medical programs for pensioners and the poor. Obama has legitimated the regressive social positions of the far-right while the Democratic Party neutralized any trade union opposition or mobilization.
Last but not least, the Obama regime has co-opted progressive liberal social critics via backdoor support. In the name of “opposing Romney” the progressive pundits, like Chomsky and Ellsberg, end up in alliance with Wall Street and Silicon Valley billionaires, Pentagon militarists, Homeland Security boosters and Zionist ideologues (Dennis Ross) to elect Obama. Of course, the support of the progressives will be accepted -but hardly acknowledged- but they will have no influence on future Obama policy after the election: they will be discarded like used condoms.
The Future: Post-Election Consequences
With or without the re-election of Obama, his regime and policies have laid the groundwork for an ever more regressive and reactionary social agenda: living standards including health, welfare, social security will be cut drastically. Afro-Americans will remain invisible except to the police and racist judicial system. Immigrants will be hunted down and driven out of homes and jobs: immigrant student dreams will become nightmares of fear and trepidation. Death squads, proxy and drone wars will multiply to prop up a bankrupt US empire. Unaccountable and hypocritical progressives will shift gears and criticize the president they elected; or if it’s Romney they will attack the same vices they overlooked during Obama’s electoral campaign: more cuts in public spending and climate change will result in greater deterioration in everyday life and basic infrastructure; more floods, fires, plagues and blackouts. New Yorkers will learn to detox their toilet water; they might be drinking and bathing in it.
Photo by sashafatcat licensed under Creative Commons




30 Comments

Superb analysis of our common plight by James Petras, GREYDOG.
My sincere appreciation to both of you.
Recommended to my further appreciation of those who understand and those who might come to understand … in the days and the necessary struggle ahead.
To the heart and the conscience of understanding and courage …
DW
Thank you DW.
James Petras is a lifelong activist and a prolific writer. He is a regular contributor on my blog and has given me permission to share his work. His analysis is always spot on.
It’s nice to see Petras’ name here. His analysis of American politics appears as appropriate as ever.
This begs the question: “Who is organizing union rank and file to act in their own interests, even if doing so means opposing union leadership and the Democratic Party?”.
Why is it that (at least American) lefties can write and read comments like this, and most of them never lift a finger to organize the very resistance that their writings and readings suggest are needed?
South American lefties have achieved great electoral success. I don’t know exactly how they did it, but it surely involved more than reading and writing diaries and comments.
What would Hugo Chavez do, if he were an American citizen, and a union member? Would he have said, “yea, it’s just terrible about those union millionaire bosses! Makes me want to cry! Well, back to TV.”??
Barack Obama will set the progressive movement back 20 years if he is reelected. Ironic isnt it? America’s first black democratic president was the weapon used to defeat liberalism in this country. Romney would have a war on his hands if he attempted to cut the social safety nets, progressives grateful to be in his presence will hand Obama the scissors. You have to hand it to those who selected him in 2007, they knew progressives better than we knew ourselves. Getting a black democrat to move the country to the right and attack the social safety nets was a brilliant move by the right wing. He will do more damage than a republican ever could. I cant help but think of Emmanuel Rahm’s statement about liberals being fckng retards! Boy did he hit it on the head.
Thank you GD for posting this James Petras piece at myFDL. It was/is a worthy read.
Recommended.
Simply brilliant; thank you for posting.
The more I hear the term “lesser evil”, the more I think the corruption of the English language has led to the corruption of our politics. Surely, originally, the term was hyperbolic; the choice was between imperfect choices, not two actual evils.
So now, when we are faced with an actual, evil, murderous serial-assassinator of American citizens in the White House, and the brain-dead O-bots defend him by creaking “Romney would be worse! Promise! Would we lie to you?”, we are asked to support actual evil: the handing over of the economy whole hog to Wall Street, the gutting of what is already the worst “safety net” in the First World (I remember Herblock’s definition of “Safety Net” from when Reagan first ran the term up the flagpole: “a collection of holes”), death by drone around the world and so forth…now the term “evil” has lost all meaning. Because people are so used to hearing “lesser of two evils”, they convince themselves that “evil” is merely metaphorical, and dismiss the actual “help BP cover-up the oil spill/accelerate fracking/kill anti-global warming measures/torture Bradley Manning” evil that Obama has been.
Evil is evil. “Greater” or “lesser” doesn’t enter into it. Obama is evil. Romney talks as though he might be evil. Neither of them is worth voting for, or accepting as the head of a legitimate government. JMO.
Indeed!
And it’s far too easy to dismiss the possibility of an emergent third party – it’s the modus operandi of so many LOTE lovers. Isn’t the suggestion by some here, including FDL’s owner, that changing our “political culture” is the only answer, a far more daunting task than destroying one of the existing legacy parties by refusing to vote for it?
It’s my opinion that the Democratic Party must be destroyed, that the Democrats, over the 30 years of my adulthood, are far more to blame for the critical condition we’ve arrived at as a society than the GOP. I hear the GOP rhetoric and it’s the same old same old. The GOP has been railing against the New Deal, against abortion, indeed, against the Bill of Rights (and the Constitution itself) for as long as I can remember. Yet each election, using the fear tactic so ably described by Dr. Petras, partisan Democrats have acted as if it’s a new beast to fight against even as they effectively legislate, once elected, the GOP agenda they pretend to be aghast at.
The last time our political culture changed essentially was when the Whigs went down. And it’s way past time for the modern Democratic party to whig-out.
Emma Goldman famously said that if elections mattered they’d be illegal. That was true when she said it but we are way past that point now. The Rights of Man have been made illegal and the Obama has driven the final nail into the coffin that they’ve been slowly building since Truman’s National Security State and therein lies the corpse of the rule of law that once mattered.
Jane Hamsher and others can pat themselves on the back for being arrested, for going to gitmo etc and suggest their actions, if replicated by others, is the way out of the dark. But one of these days they’ll find themselves in jail forever, like Bradley Manning, and discover exactly how ineffective is a refusal to take a stand at election time against the Democratic murderers and thieves they tacitly support.
The fine work of Kevin G. and a few others here is a good place to find and express like minded outrage but as an instrument for change FDL fails completely. It’s status quo all the way and self-important suggestions to the contrary by the front-pagers and editors manifests as cowardice and hubris at once, the ultimate ego trip, and damnably lacking in conscience or principal. Which is why I won’t “join” the community or support it financially.
All is not lost on the issues most important to voters the majority of voters are to the Left of Obama. Also Congress is at record disapproval records and has been staying there for months or is it years?
We have the basis for forming a successful third party now thanks to Obama and if we win getting real change. If we lose we revolt.
But the funny thing is if Obama had only done what he promised to do his half measures would have satisfied us and saved the economy.
Now his half measure approach is causing America to go more Left than we dreamed 4 years ago.
Lets look at how many votes third party candidates get this election particularly in safe Obama states those numbers should be interesting.
Oh it goes without saying but here it is a again choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil.
Obama’s plans for the economy are a slow death like smoking as opposed to Mitt’s quick drain cleaner cocktail but its still death.
Obama on human rights is worse than Bush Mitt would be worse than Obama but Obama is for torture, unlimited spying on Americans and killing innocent civilians.
We are now at the point where the lesser evil is beyond what any moral person can overlook.
Recc’d and shared.
Follow the money. Ben’ski, and Rahm etc those bankers know who their leveling America for.
Applies to that thomas guy as well as o , both presents from the bush syndicate .
It’s a stellar piece in so many ways, but I disagree with this:
“A spontaneous movement without political direction, and lacking an alternative political leadership, was incapable of confronting the Obama regime: the movement declined and disintegrated, many sympathizers sucked up by the Obama ‘lesser evil’ propaganda campaign…”
Funneling social movements into politics is a sure way to kill them. The beauty of OWS is that without doing that, it stays open to everyone of any political stripe that cares about the class war, fair/unfair two-tiered system we have now. And it isn’t underground for any other reason but massive oppression by the militarized security state.
Members are still out there creating alternatives to The Machine, and will be ready to pop into the public sphere when the next huge need arises, and more wake up to what’s really at stake, and which oligarchical masters they’re actually serving, imo.
Oh, and I’d meant to say how great the comments here are; thanks, everyone.
Hello wendydavis, agreed on your account.
Working with the WI recall from the start, last year, the local D, “leaders,” and gatekeepers were very quick to come out with the OFA or DNC supplied (non-union printed) window decals claiming that they were the 99% and handing them out to, “D,” membership. I explained the problem with that BS at the next two general (open-to-the-public) meetings that had great monthly attendance which was strong during the recall. Neither the party chair nor the gatekeepers were pleased at being politely called hypocrites and then told why.
Yes, dear nonquixote; one lesson I’d thought about: ‘how to kill a movement by electoralizing it’. Sigh plus sigh.
Solidarity, and do stay strong! On the 7th, the work for those of us conscience who wish to reclaim or nation begins, no matter who ‘wins’ (or steals) the Presidency. We will prevail…because we must, and because we must believe that we can. All my best to you; seriously. I consider you a valuable comrade in the struggle.
Happy to recommend.
p.s. I have the magic touch on front-paging.(hint, hint)
After all I am fire dog 1111:)
Yes,indeed
“
Wow, between this and Ian Welsh’s post I’m pretty depressed. All true, of course, but I’m feeling like asking the Universe to just go ahead and expand us out of existence right now.
The Democrats who find themselves in the position of defending Obama by being hostile and refusing to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done have no one but themselves to blame. If they’re that committed to the president’s cult of personality, let ‘em continue to stew in their own juices. There’s no convincing them that they’re wrong; to paraphrase Wordsworth, we should not entertain the hope of reasoning them into agreeing with us.
Jon73,If I’m a Democratic Congressman, what am I supposed to do if I disagree with Obama? Don’t forget, I got a job to protect just like everybody else.
No, I’m not a Congressman, but I can empathize with their predicament. What do you suggest they do?
Get their priorities straight. Theoretically, at least, our elected representatives are supposed to work for us and that’s where their loyalty should lie: not with the party apparatus or corporate lobbyists. I have no use for a representative who won’t fight for due process and the preservation of Social Security.
Would you be a Blue Dog Democrat, a “New Democrat”, or perhaps a Democrat who holds traditional “Democratic” values?
I’m thinking of a Democrat who holds traditional Democratic values. He’s been trying to get results out of the Obama Administration in regard to “unlawful things” that occurred under the Bush Administration, that should be dealt with by the Department of Justice, without success.
While I know what he’s been doing privately, I don’t see anyway he can be publicly against the Obama Administration, especially now.
When faced with these kinds of ethical (maybe “moral”) dilemmas, we might have to look inside at our own sense of integrity and see if speaking out could be a worthy effort. If we don’t speak out, even at the risk of losing one’s position, was the position really worth it? Do we capitulate and stay silent, without the courage to tell our truth? When else have we seen that in history, and how did that work out? Do we have more or less trust in someone when they lack the integrity to tell their truth?
You have encapsulated the dilemma we’re in.
so.. for me, most “Democrats” are without integrity. My own Congressperson campaigns like Obama, quasi-liberal/progressive, and then joins the New Democrat Coalition. He refuses to criticize Obama and follows Obama in his votes like a puppy dog. I don’t vote for those kinds of Democrats. That only moves the “D” party to the right. For me, neither Obama nor this guy have any integrity. And Jill Stein is a far better candidate anyhow!
I hope you have the energy to consider leading us out of this mess. I’m tired, very tired; I’ve fought since 04 without any tangible results.