“Jobs” is a Four Letter Word
We all carry within us our places of exile, our crimes, and our ravages. But our task is not to unleash them on the world; it is to fight them in ourselves and in others.
Albert Camus
School has begun again and I, a 47 year-old law student, am quickly falling behind in my readings. I am, apparently, easily distracted, (perhaps I have ADD, or ADHD,) and somewhat lazy, or even “slow,” or dimwitted, and am therefore feeling a bit of stress about finishing my final year of law school. Also, I suffer from poor health, and insomnia, and I am somewhat self-destructive. So, bearing all of this in mind, you can imagine my morning as I awake on the couch at 4 AM, with the television blaring some infomercial, and I rise and make coffee, and start chain smoking cigarettes, and begin stressing about what I must accomplish this weekend, yet I browse the Internet and stumble across a few interesting articles.
Over at the BBC I read an article, “Vietnam workers kept like slaves at factory in Russia” (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19197095) and I think how closely that resembles the state of the US workers. Most of us work everyday to create profits for the owners of our “factories” and in return are given our bowl of rice as a reward.
I recall back in a torts class, as we had covered employer liability, and “control-theory,” and the “master/servant” relationship, that the professor took the time to interject her personal view. “I wish we could use a different phrase for that, but that is the phrase that is used in all the books, and cases, and so …” Yes, I could see how that could raise personal feelings, how just the phrasing could offend a person’s sensibilities, even a well-paid law professor (whose actual role in life is to create a profit for her corporate masters.) But I, personally, appreciate the honesty of the phrase master/servant relationship.
I don’t care if you are a law professor, or a Vietnamese worker in a factory in Russia, you are a servant creating a profit for your corporate master. That is the purpose of a “job,” to create a profit for the “rentier” owner. The story about the factory in Russia lingers in the back of my mind as I browse through other articles …
“Getting Beyond Red Herring Politics, Jill Stein and the 99 Percent,” (http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/24/jill-stein-and-the-99-percent/) catches my eye as I recognize the name of the author, who occasionally posts at MyFiredoglake, where I occasionally ‘hang out’. First off, CounterPunch is running an advertisement above the article, “Exclusively in the new print issue of CounterPunch: THE PATH TO FULL EMPLOYMENT.” I try to ignore that and read the article, which basically is a rant against President Obama, and attempts to convince the reader that both Obama and Romney serve the interests of the 1% and therefore a citizen should vote for neither. The article suggests that a citizen should vote for Jill Stein instead.
The purpose of a “job” is to create profits for the owner of the business, be it a corporation or a sole-proprietorship or a partnership or whatever. There is no partnership between capital and labor. Marx was entirely correct, the basis of capitalism is the exploitation of labor. Meanwhile, Nucor Steel (http://www.nucor.com/) is the most ethical corporation I know of currently in operation. Nucor practices profit-sharing, and has never laid off an employee due to lack of work (http://www.nucor.com/careers/benefits/). Nucor is one of the best steel companies in the world, and Nucor creates a profit and the stock appreciates and they pay a dividend:
In June, Nucor’s board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.365 per share payable on August 10, 2012 to stockholders of record on June 29, 2012. This dividend is Nucor’s 157th consecutive quarterly cash dividend, a record we expect to continue. (http://www.nucor.com/investor/news/releases/?rid=1716407)
I can’t find it now, but I recall reading that Nucor also paid over 60% of profits to their employees. Beyond profit-sharing, I am also a supporter of employee-owned businesses, especially corporate ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans). A whole ‘nother story that I won’t get into here and now (SEE http://www.nceo.org/articles/employee-ownership-100 ) … but you can see my angle — if the employee’s are owners and they get equity ownership, they participate in reaping the profits that the workers create for the corporation; instead of just receiving their bowl of rice.
Over 50% of corporate stock is owned by the 1%. I’m not gonna’ take the time to hunt down evidence of that right this second, you can do that if you care. But the bottom line is that a job creates profits for a corporation that usually go solely to the owners, unless the corporation has the etics of Nucor and shares the profit. As the profits go to the owners they are able to reinvest in owning more corporations and employing more servants. Therefore, a normal job will continue the mal-distribution of profits and shore up the wealth disparity.
Again, whether you get a big, steaming, bowl of rice, like a law professor, or a meager bowl of rice, like a Vietnamese worker in a factory in Russia, you are a servant creating a profit for your corporate master. And if you start a small business without profit sharing you are just attempting to exploit a small pool of workers. So, when Mr. Gruzalski begins his article with, “Dr. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate for President of the United States, promises a Manhattan-project jobs program …” you can imagine what I am thinking: “Jill Stein, advocating more servants to create more profits for the 1%!”
And don’t even give me no shit about claiming that I am asserting that Mr. Gruzalski is evil, or I am against Jill Stien, or even CounterPunch, or even that I shouldn’t be using no double negatives in no damn sentence. I’m as pissed and as sick and tired of this shit as anybody, and I’m in pain and slow-witted and I can’t even figure out how to explain to the masses, or get them to actually comprehend, the simple fact that jobs is a four letter word. And I’m only on my third cup of coffee …
X-posted at http://GreyWolf.newsvine.com/_news/2012/08/25/13473812-jobs-is-a-four-letter-word



9 Comments

Sorry, I may not have been clear…
My point is that Mr. Gruzalski is stating that Jill Stein “promises a Manhattan-project jobs program that would ignite our economy” and create jobs at companies such as Koch industries, therefor creating more profits for the owners of Koch industries. It seems beyond obvious that such a course of action would create more profits for Koch Industries and allow Koch Industries to inject more money into advertising campaigns supporting their candidates, who will also promise to create jobs that would ignite our economy: seeing beyond this superficial mudslinging and actually acknowledging that there are ethical corporations and exploitive corporations would be a beginning for an “adult conversation.”
Let’s see some acceptable four letter words buzzing around during this current campaign season (it’s like Christmas, only Santa Claus is stealing the presents).
Ovum, baby, love, hate, pain, Geld (German for money), poor, need, et al.
But jobs?
Ain’t heard hide nor hair of that critter during the current political ‘Schlange’ fest (German for snake, but it does have other meanings, if you catch my drift).
Keep the public distracted works like a charm every time.
“If ‘god’ didn’t want them fleeced, he wouldn’t have made them sheep.” Calvera The Magnificent Seven
Thanks and recommended
thanx.
“Mitt Romney Extols Chinese Women Working For ‘A Pittance’ Behind Barbed Wire Fences”
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/mitt-romney-extols-virtues-chinese-women-wo
Well done. What we need to figure out is how to connect up folks who can do stuff with the stuff that really needs to be done. This “job market” patronage bullcrap just is not doing that.
And the “go create your own job” entrepreneurial bullcrap hits the rocks of “80% of business startups go under because they are undercapitalized”.
In short, you need an income to either “get a job” or “start a business”.
And what they don’t tell you about the immigrant who arrived with the equivalent of $5 in his pocket and made himself a millionaire (in the period from 1930 to 1960) is that he had an ethnic community (or relatives) who supported him and got him started. And a network of friends who all got rich together by helping each other out. And exploiting cheap labor by moving their operations to employ first Southern Appalachian white women and then after the equal employment act employing black women.
The American dream of owning a business: getting just wealthy enough to exploit someone.
Exactly.
Kinda’ what I’m working on … All around I see empty stores, and I know of job training programs, and I can find investors — but I just want to have the investors get paid off (with a reasonable return) and in the end the workers own the biz in perpetuity (rather than the investors owning the biz and the workers profits in perpetuity.) (Sounds simple ;~)
Nice piece.
But following your adult conversation meme, I see a few issues.
1. As you stated, one of the problems I also see is that the whole system is corrupt and that attempting to “fix” it is not a possibility. They literally own the place and they’re not going to give it up. Unless significant numbers rise up, nothing will change. Ie. nothing will change.
They will mock them with the corporate media, like they did with Occupy. Then they will attack them if they get too uppity, like they did with Occupy (start with restricting rights or just eliminating them all together, or jail, imprison, impoverish … heck there are stories of cops groping women, I mean WTF?). When even more rise up, then the guns, LRAD, and other weapons come into play. They will literally slaughter thousands if they have to. And their pawns, the just-following-orders police and soldiers will do it. Kent State? Occupy? The list goes on. They will just call them terrorists or socialists or anti-capitalists. And the slaughter will continue.
2. The idea of worker-owned businesses/co-ops is interesting, but in this country I fear (and maybe I’m wrong), that this will just lead to new 1%ers. American Exceptionalism means greed and selfishness. The propaganda has programmed people, over decades, to want money and personal benefit only. And then will these new 1%ers join with their own kind to oppress new workers?
3. IMHO, any business, worker-owned or not, should be have strict rules in place that
a) Require strict regulations and everything about it should be available to anyone immediately, maybe via website. Of course one of the problems, ie. the SEC, is complete regulatory capture and corruption. All these regulators and inspectors are corrupt and bought off. See MMS (those “regulating” BP). So problems abound.
b) Require a living wage to be paid to all those that work. Including guaranteed paid-vacation, paid-healthcare, maternity leave (for men and women), a guaranteed pension (not a 401k), and other basic stuff. This should be the baseline.
c) 90% of profits after the b) has been taken care off (and no loopholes in the taxing structure) should go to providing community services, such as feeding the poor and homeless and improving the community. In fact a list of basic improvements must be done. This would un-concenetrate the wealth so that everyone is lifted. The profit should never be fed back into the company or even the workers as that sets up a situation to create more 1%ers.
d) I have no problem with certain jobs making more money that others (within a certain amount of course). Teachers should be paid a good salary. As should doctors. And those that help the homeless or poor. But once again within limits. No doctor should ever make more than 250k. Any job that is essential to the benefit of the society should be paid a decent salary as long as there are limits. Go over the limit, and that extra will be taxed and then put back into helping the people.
e) Everyone gets a living wage. And prices for things need to be changed. Fuck the free-market BS. Grow or produce as much as possible locally to encourage self-sufficiency. Bread should not cost more than a dollar, and ideally 50 cents.
f) Also, certain things must never be private or anything close to private. Energy, banking, … or anything for the public benefit.
This is just some ideas and certainly not all of them. They’re not perfect and need to be tweaked. But we don’t have to reinvent the wheel. Why not look to other countries that have good systems that serve their people and modify as needed.
Thanks Grey Wolf,
I think we need to revisit the policies of FDR for clues as to how to get out of the current depression.
That said, I see no hope in Romney and Obama…. they might as well be running mates.
Nice to see ya’ captain,
I agree that I see no hope in Romney and Obama …
What is dismaying is I see little acknowledgement from the far left either. Let me cut and paste a couple of comments from the other website this was posted at:
Loozerio:
Grey Wolf:
If Jill Stein wants to be the adult in the room, then she needs to distinguish between “rape” and “making love,” and not just talk about f*cking, to me there’s a huge difference.