Crossposted at The Grievance Project.
Bad Prosecutors, published by the Bennett Law Firm, of Houston, Texas, has compiled its annual list – of the ten worst prosecutors – who will each receive a Certificate of Under Achievment [sic]. This year marks Mrs. Canary’s debut to the List, but Mr. Gonzales is now a deserving 2-time honoree. See the Certificates here.
In its press release, the Bennett Law Firm explained that the release of the list was delayed due to the election so the firm "would not be accused of being "political[,]" adding that "[w]e plan not to wait as long to release the Top 10 nominees coming in 2009. Therefore, continue to send in your nominations to bbennett@bennettlawfirm.com." (My emphasis) (Thanks to SH for this link.)



2 Comments

I received this comment from Ms. Simpson at The Grievance Project:
I also received word that Glynn Wilson and Scott Horton are working on a reply to the list to address the errors.
It’s important to note that the point of the list is to highlight the conduct of the prosecutors and not Ms. Simpson’s conduct. Ms. Simpson’s actions have been anything but improper unethical. To the contrary, her conduct relating to the Siegelman prosecution has been an example of how an attorney is supposed to reply to the conduct of prosecutors like Leura Canary. The Preamble to the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct clearly states that it is up to each attorney in Alabama to be involved in protecting the integrity of the legal profession: