Originally posted at The Grievance Project.
Though hardly a novel tactic, the Myanmar government systematically shut down access to the internet in order to prevent news and pictures of the brutal military crackdown of the 2007 Buddhist monk protests from reaching the outside world. Currently, both Iran and China are doing the same to prevent the publication of news and pictures of the Iranian government’s response to the election protests and the Chinese government’s response to the protests by Uighers, a Muslim ethnic group that periodically attempts to form an independent nation.
In addition to its work on issues like warrantless wiretapping, state secrets and abuse of national security letters, the Electronic Frontier Foundation produces the Tor anonymising software, which I’ve been using, with (apparent) success, in order to blog anonymously. As much as I appreciate the Tor software, EFF doesn’t produce it so an irritated attorney can write cathartic missives. Richard Esguerra of EFF explains how Tor is helping the Iranian protesters:
As turmoil over the disputed election in Iran continues, many techs are trying to find ways to help Iranian citizens safely communicate and receive information despite the barriers being established by Iranian authorities. One tactic that even moderately tech-savvy Internet users can employ is to set up a Tor relay or a Tor bridge.
More sophisticated users can skip this paragraph, but for the rest, here’s the basic outline. Tor (an acronym of "The Onion Router") is free and open source software that helps users remain anonymous on the Internet. Normally, when accessing websites, your computer asks for and receives a webpage out in the open, a process that exposes your IP address, the URL of the website, and the contents of the site, among other information to third parties. When accessing websites while using Tor, your computer essentially whispers its requests for a website, to another computer, which passes the request on to another computer, which passes it on to another computer, which passes it onto the computer where the website is hosted; the reply returns in the same, chain-message manner. The whispers are encrypted, so that neither outside authorities, nor the computers in the middle of the chain, can tell what is being said, and to whom. And the website itself does not have your IP address either.
Internet users in Iran are using Tor to both (a) circumvent censorship systems and (b) remain anonymous while reading and writing on the Internet. Both are critically important to the safety of protesters, many of whom fear retaliation from the government. Preliminary reports indicate that use of the Tor client in Iran has increased in the days after the contested election.
Mr. Esguerra then explains how you can help Tor help the protesters:
However, Tor’s design relies on a robust network of "volunteer computers" (a.k.a. relays) to pass messages back and forth. This means that the speed and quality of a Tor users’ browsing experience relies extensively on the number of volunteer computers there are to pass messages along. This is where volunteers can make a difference — setting up additional relays improves access for dissident Iranians and other users of the Tor network. The more people who help out, the better and more quickly the network runs. If you’re interested in helping out, find and follow instructions for configuring a Tor relay on the Tor website.
Those looking to help fight censorship should also consider providing a Tor bridge. Bridges come into play when an ISP decides to try blocking users’ access to the Tor network. (For now, there seems to only be anecdotal evidence of Iran attempting to block the use of Tor. However, Iran has recntly [sic] been practicing reactive and centralized blocking, which makes any effective block of Tor far more likely.) The Tor bridge configuration differs from a relay in that your computer does not appear in the public Tor network. Instead, users looking for access to the Internet through Tor can receive your Tor routing information through more private channels, then configure their Tor client to transmit requests through your computer. By not appearing in the public Tor network, your Tor routing information is less likely to end up on an ISP filter and can provide help for a longer period of time — but recognize that the network needs both relays and bridges.
The remainder of Mr. Esquerra’s post addresses some of the technical aspects of the Tor software, which can downloaded here.



10 Comments

Recommended. Thank you for this timely and important message; it may be more critical than most realize.
For about 3 months now, I see ads which target my specific town appear on the right side of text on many websites, including this one. [i.e., gross before-and-after pics: “Name of (my town) lost 100 pounds…]
If our internet is so secure, how do the owners of these ads know where my computer is located? I’ve been wondering what to do about this. You may have given me the answer (lots more study required – I’m no computer geek).
I use earthlink provided by Time Warner. My MS programmer son insists that it is the best. These ads may originate at the local level in the chain ($$$$). Am wondering if earthlink is aware of this practice. duh, contact them.
Give it a shot.
I’ve got more of a response to your comment but I’m off to a hearing for most of the rest of the day.
Considering your experience, I’m asking you to read and analyze this article published today. I lack the necessary skills to treat it properly. …another good man with a GP.
Further on the subject of my #3, Amy Goodman interviews former FBI Agent Mike German on 06/13/2005. Good interview. Apparently, the specifics detailed in the article linked @3 are alluded to in Amy’s interview.
…Thomas Tam, Sybel Edmonds, Ms. Rowley, and so many other members of GP really fighting for our country – thwarted and victimized by criminals in command; and so much that we do not know.
Important disclaimer: I’m an attorney, not an IT professional.
There’s so many ways that your computer and others ‘talk’ to each other that can identify you and your location, such as cookies, referrers and IP addresses. What Tor does, as I understand it, is to reroute both the information that you send, such as the links you click, as well as the information you receive, such as bank account information (or dirty pictures?) through a series of computers – the volunteer Tor servers – instead of having your computer talk ‘directly’ to the source computer.
In addition, the information you send and receive is further broken down into small bundles that are each sent separately through the Tor servers and then reassembled before being sent to the final destination. Someone would have to hijack all the packets of info coming to/from a Tor server, identify which packets are yours and then reassemble them, in order to track your net usage.
Tor also blocks cookies and the sending of referrer information (which I think is how the ‘location-specific’ ads are generated).
As a practical matter, when I have my Tor software enabled, sites I visit only ’see’ the last of the intermeidary Tor servers.
Tor’s not foolproof. There are ways to reveal your identity that Tor can’t prevent, like if I give out personal information, such as areas of practice, location, age, marital status, or statements like ‘I have a hearing this afternoon.’ The more information like this that is revealed, the more likely it is that you can be identified.
Article? More like a novella.
First of all, I had to determine that the author, Mark Levine, was not the radio host/pundit, Mark Levin, before I could even read it.
Although it wouldn’t shock or surprise me in the least if everything in that article turned out to be 100% correct, I find it disgusting that the article the article itself neither shocked nor surprised me.
Thanks for all the clarifying info. I have to chew over such complex things – sometimes that helps and sometimes not. heh,heh
Just finished watching Judgment at Nuremberg; kinds somber right now. In 1948 I was a freshman in high school.
There are several really sharp attorneys here at FDL. Some go by rather funny names: looseheadprops; blub; labdancer; mad dog; bmaz; oh and “Mary”; I think Christy; others I can’t recall right now. With them you’re in good company, as you may already know.
The name of the author is really what gave me a bad feeling. Felt better after watching the Amy Goodman interview.
This same kind of skullduggery is what Dr. Aafia Saddiqui is up against now. FBI must persuade enough people in control that she is the female Ossama BL, whatever it takes. The oldest CIA rule: every operation must be plausibly deniable and have a scapegoat. [I have no idea whether there is any merit to FBI’s original terrorist charges against her. She has been so tormented and tortured for 6 years they can never bring a case against her so now it’s insanity they’re tormenting her with.]
Your time is too valuable to spend on my rambling.
Judgment at Nuremberg’s a great movie. Every member of Congress should be required to watch that movie.
I didn’t see the Amy Goodman interview. Maybe later. FYI, I’ve wasted lots of time before and in ways less productive than by engaging in political rambligs.