Yesterday the Senate ended debate on H.R. 5297, the highly touted Small Business Jobs Act, which is being sold as a magic elixir cure-all for small businesses by the White House and most Democratic members of Congress. The problem is that this bill will not help small businesses or create jobs, in fact, language included the bill will actually be harmful for small businesses. I know, I know, it just seems so weird that a bill literally called the Small Business Jobs Act will actually do the opposite of what we are being told.
The Small Business Jobs Act, as it will be passed in the Senate this week, is going to create a $30 billion lending fund and offer $12 billion in tax breaks to small businesses. Surveys and research being conducted by real small business organizations, such as the American Small Business League (ASBL), and faux small business organizations, such as the Business Roundtable or US Chamber of Commerce, agree on one point: small businesses do not need loans, they need an increase in sales. Small businesses must have more customers walking in the door seeking goods and services.
Over the past two years, the focus on helping small businesses has been on increasing loans and access to capital. There are some small businesses that do need loans, but when it comes to job creation…loans and tax breaks are not going to work. The only way to create jobs and economic growth is by an increase in demand.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, “The theory of tax cuts as economic stimulus has been put to the test – and failed – twice in the past six years alone.” Alan Blinder, professor and co-director of Princeton University’s Center for Economic Policy Studies, has stated that for every budgetary dollar spent by the government, on things like unemployment insurance or on infrastructure, the real economic growth to the GDP is the equivalent of $1.60 to $1.70. Whereas he stated that every dollar in tax cuts only creates $0.35 in GDP growth. So why does our government keep insisting that tax cuts for small businesses is the best way to create jobs and stimulate the economy?
The best part about this Small Business Jobs Act is a little tiny paragraph snuck into the section on small business contracting. On the face of it, Section 1341 of the bill will help provide greater protection and oversight of small business contracting programs, which have been rife with fraud and abuse for years. Then you get to paragraph 4, which states,
The problem with this language is that it creates a giant loophole to allow large firms to defraud the government by claiming to be a small business, and then be immune from any prosecution for doing so. This language legalizes fraud while removing accountability. It allows the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to create regulations to protect individuals or firms from liability. The catch is that the SBA has been claiming for years that large firms receive small business contracts because of “miscoding” or “simple human errors.”
Since 2003, there have been over a dozen federal investigations, which have found Fortune 500 firms and thousands of large companies around the world as the actual recipients of federal small business contracts. The SBA’s Inspector General has listed this problem as the number one management challenge facing the agency for the past five consecutive years and referred to this problem as, “One of the most important challenges facing the Small Business Administration and the entire Federal government today.”
Report 5-16 from the SBA Inspector General referred to these misrepresentations as, “false certifications” and “improper certifications.” Other federal investigations described the blatant fraud as “vendor deception.”
So this legislation will allow the SBA Administrator, who claims that over $100 billion a year in small business contracts go to corporate giants due to innocent mistakes, to create a loophole to allow firms that defraud the government in order to win small business contracts to avoid any punishment for fraud because of “unintentional errors, technical malfunctions, and other similar situations.”
President Obama and the Congress should be focused on legislation that will actually help small businesses and create jobs. Legislation like H.R. 2568, the Fairness and Transparency in Contracting Act, a bill that will actually do what it says, and end fraud in small business contracting programs. Cleaning up the rampant fraud and abuse in small business contracting programs would be a huge first step when it comes to driving over $100 billion a year in demand back into the hands of small businesses, who create over 90 percent of all net new jobs.
But, I guess this has become the norm in Washington, DC, where down is up, left is right, and the Small Business Jobs Act will help small businesses and create jobs.



21 Comments




Excellent analysis, but it is really no secret that everyone talks about helping small business but does little or nothing in acutality to help these hardworking entrepreneurs progress. This is a depressingly, sad, sign-of-the-times betrayal. Thanks to the ASBL for getting the word out in a meaningful way on these important issues!
“President Obama and the Congress should be focused on legislation that will actually help small businesses and create jobs.” And you’re surprised that they’re not why, exactly? I’m not being sarcastic, just honestly curious.
It’s almost as if some staffer or corporate minion had been reading your posts and then slipped that little gem in the legislation just to make sure the status quo would not be interrupted by the creeping masses demanding fairness.
I wish your posts got more traffic around here. They are really good.
Geez, I don’t know since I don’t own a small business but the NYT and a CPA site have quite a list of things this bill does. You know it may just be impossible to please everyone.
The Democrats keep telling me how much they need me in November. I’ve needed a job for going on two years, where the hell were they?
How unsurprising. Congress & Potus yammer away about small businesses, as if they thought of no one else ever. They speak the truth when they state that small business employ more citizens than large corporations these days.
That said, this reminds me of the BP oil volcano when a boatload of libertarians here and elsewhere whined & moaned about how unfaaaaair it was to “harm” precious BP by “making” it pay for clean up, and esp for reimbursing small business owners across the gulf. The concern trolls were only concerned about poor, pitiful BP, including the concern trolls in the gov’t.
In other words: the gov’t is only “concerned” about “small business” as a political talking point. When it comes to putting money where their mouth is, the money only goes to the corporate oligarchs.
Small businesses are run by the “small” people, and whether they are “capitalists” actually “making money” by “working hard,” matters little in today’s USA. Our wealthy overlords are interested solely in how much they can rip off, and if it screws small businesses, so be it.
The only way to create jobs and economic growth is by an increase in demand.
That says it all, the people I know that have small business are hang on but not by much and will lay off people this winter. This only adds to the problem but the beltway doesn’t care or close down before they burn through capital.
Most democrats, including Obama, and the entire GOP haven’t learned a damn thing in the last 30 years. Reagan sold the entire country on the idea that tax cuts are the way to prosperity and happiness for all. Unfortunately tax cut aren’t the elixir the majority of Americans seem to think they are.
When someone can’t afford to put food on the table, they sure as hell aren’t going to go buy a new anything. Americans need jobs that pay a living wage and they need them damn quick. But they’re not going to get them with this current system of government.
Have you checked out this website?
http://www.myskillsmyfuture.org/
It does not, however, seriously address the thing most small businesses need the most: more customers. Loans and tax cuts don’t mean shit if there are few or no customers. The contracting portion is too damn full of holes.
I agree with you that increasing demand is the way to go, but how does increasing the share of government contracts that go to small business increase demand? I suppose you could say that they are more labor-intensive than larger firms on average, but the labor-intensity of a particular service the government is purchasing probably wouldn’t vary too much firm to firm.
unfortunately I am really not surprised…there has been several really good bills introduced in Congress over the past 20 months, by several members of Congress who are actually trying to help, the problem is that these bills which can make a difference are dying a slow death in committee…generally has something to do with leadership not being interested, mainly due to bribes, I mean, campaign contributions
thank you, by the way, it is kind of funny that you mention the whole thing about this language being slipped in there…to not give away too much, the ASBL has been working on a series of lawsuits that we plan to file over the next year based on a lot of fraudulent activity in these contracting programs. This loophole will essentially give any fraudulent company a free pass from prosecution…perhaps you are right on the money…
I don’t disagree, usually the sign of good legislation is that it kind of pisses off everyone, and I will say that there are some good parts of this bill. We are pushing right now to simply remove this one paragraph, as the language here will do more damage to small businesses trying to work with the government than the rest of the bill does good…
make sure you negotiate salary first, and ask for full benefits…
sadly you are so correct…I have said this before on FDL, a really good friend of mine who is a small business owner and has been working with the government for a really long time is fond of this saying about small businesses and politicians- “In public they hug you, in private they f*ck you.”
amen
what has been proven over and over is that when small businesses win federal contracts, they hire new employees to cover the workload, which allows then to grow and expand in the local community, thus creating jobs and economic growth from the ground up which has a much large multiplier effect.
The other point, is that when I mention small business losing out on contracts…the current data shows that on average, small businesses lose out on a minimum of $100 billion in federal contracts every year that, by law, are supposed to go to small firms. The government can utilize this money, as it will be deficit neutral since the money has already been budgeted, to drive demand into the hands of small businesses, thus creating the job and economic growth that is needed, as opposed to contracts or tax cuts for giant companies (don’t get me wrong, some of them do employ a lot of Americans) that either sit on the tax cuts instead of reinvesting it, or they offshore the jobs that the contracts create…
That makes sense, thanks for the response.
Big business can claim small business and that fraud can cause small business harm exists already. Hard to see how the regulations section makes this worse – unless one presumes Obama only writes pro-big business regulations – which I admit is not that much of a stretch
it makes it much more difficult to prove intentional fraud when the SBA claims it was simple miscoding or data entry errors, however, I think you are overall correct in your assessment, and besides, there is overwhelming evidence on our side…