‘Tis the season for the bloated defense authorization bill to begin its journey towards passage, and as usual if you look hard enough, the legislation is stuffed full of all kinds of goodies. Since defense authorization will always pass, it has become an omnibus wish-list bill for anyone who wants anything out of our government, and this year is no different. Considering the size of this legislation, I will focus in on a particularly egregious section that will most likely pass under the radar of most members of Congress unless action is taken.
Section 815 for S. 3454, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, has the innocuous title of “Reduction of Supply Chain Risk in the Acquisition of National Security Systems.” This section could essentially create “de facto” debarments of small businesses across DoD federal contracting programs, with potential for these “de facto” debarments to touch every corner of federal government contracting, thus creating a blacklist where businesses would be debarred from working with the government. The proponents of Section 815 have justified this blacklist as necessary to ensure national security and mitigate supply chain risk.
The beauty of Section 815 is that any firm placed on this blacklist is done so in secret; so much so that DoD officials are not required to notify the blacklisted parties. This gets even better based on the language which specifically states that only two Department of Defense (DoD) officials will get to determine if any contractor is a “national security threat” worthy of being blacklisted. This falls on the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Networks and Information Integration (ASD-NII) to make the recommendation to debar a company from contracting with DoD. Small business advocates are concerned that DoD’s decision may flood every government-purchasing agency with a negative impression of blacklisted companies, and thus lead to “de facto” debarments across the federal government. . . .
The absolute best part about Section 815 is that it would protect the details of DoD’s decision from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), or an action brought in the federal court system, thus leaving no recourse for any firm that finds itself on the secret Pentagon blacklist.
So let us sum up here. Section 815 in the defense authorization bill is currently awaiting passage in the Senate and will allow two Pentagon officials to secretly blacklist any company from contracting with the government because of national security concerns, but the reasons why do not have to be made public, the blacklisted company does not have to be notified, and it expressly prohibits any action being taken in recourse through FOIA, the GAO or in the federal courts.
What Section 815 amounts to is nothing more than a consolidation of power within a small office in the Pentagon along with reduced transparency, diminished oversight and zero accountability.
Organizations like the American Small Business League (ASBL) are alarmed by this section because of the potential for abuse against small federal contractors. Ninety-eight percent of all firms have fewer than 100 employees, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Small businesses comprise a vast majority of all federal contractors. Considering the poor track record DoD has in working with small businesses and in trying to circumvent small business contracting goals, it is most likely that small businesses will comprise the bulk of DoD’s secret blacklist.
One of the ironies of this situation is that, considering the current and ongoing state of the economy, the government should be doing more business with small businesses. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, small businesses create over 90 percent of all net new jobs, provide over 50 percent of the nation’s private sector workforce, create half of the country’s GDP and provide over 90 percent of new innovations.
At a time when the U.S. is facing record unemployment and stagnant economic growth, small businesses remain the one vibrant economic sector of the American economy. Section 815 in the defense authorization bill will afford two individuals, within the anti-small business Pentagon, the unchecked power to secretly blacklist as many small businesses at their will, mainly for the only reason that I can think of, which is to get rid of competition for the big defense contractors.
The ASBL has launched a nationwide campaign to remove Section 815 from the Senate defense authorization bill, and this is how you can help. Call, write or email your Senators today and demand they remove this potentially abusive language from the bill. The ASBL has a draft email letter and senate contact information at http://www.asbl.com/showmedia.php?id=1776. This aggression will not stand and silence is acquiescence.




21 Comments

Dick Cheney wants all the Pentagon business without you knowing about it? The Department of War will really be able to steer the contracts now with this secret “no-fly” list.
it is a way for those who comprise the military-industrial complex, those large contractors at the top, to keep and consolidate power…no more transparency, no more oversight, no more means of redress…what ever happened to the most transparent government promise?
Who’s the sponsor?
the bill was introduced by Senator Levin, who is chair of the armed services committee and there are no cosponsors. It is my understanding that some people within the Pentagon, in particular DoD’s CIO office who wanted this particular language included. While I understand the need to mitigate risk management within the supply chain, this language is so broad that the potential for abuse is unprecedented.
Pogo released said the following about the language in Section 815 today, “There is certainly a need to protect supply chains, but Sec. 815 works against small businesses, competition, transparency, and accountability in federal contracting.” (http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2010/12/defense-authorization-bill-places-subjective-security-concerns-before-competition.html)
This legislation is receiving opposition from a wide swath of the business community.
Excuse my typo…
that’s ok Chris…you still came in with the POGO assist…
Nice catch. I didn’t know about this awful provision.
“Secret Blacklist Provision in Defense Authorization Bill Signals Death Knell for Small Businesses and Transparency in Contracting”
Think that headline is a little late to the party. Seems like that horse left the stable (or insert your fave cliche here) a long time ago.
Yeah, we can’t have DOD business going to small firms. They can’t write the large campaign checks. Gotta give the business to the big corps who can recycle millions back into the campaign tills of the whores in DC.
To the particular point, my late friend who owned a high-tech manufacturer in VT (around 100 employees), tried to get USG contracts for better bullet proof vests (something about high-tech ceramic sandwiches, which I don’t have the tech expertise to understand), couldn’t get to square one with DOD. He died 3 years ago. About 6-12 months ago, I tried, unsuccessfully, to revive my contacts with his successors to get details, but they, not unreasonably, had better things to do with their time. In any event, his message to me was that the fix was in. Ditto contracts on some other products for NYS, where payola was all the rage. I knew him well, and thought his read was prolly accurate, but sorry I can’t provide backup for my anecdote.
you must pay to play madear
the mafia has taught them well
Each day more depressing realism comes our way and no one seems to be able to do anything about it but complain on the interwebs.
My friend (ask Marion in Savannah) was an interesting character. He was conservative politically, and we had heated arguments on many subjects, which included nearby restaurant patrons telling me to pipe down (he was soft spoken). He was outraged by a lot of the same matters that bother libruls so much. I miss him.
If there is such concern about protecting the supply chain, why is Blackwater, er, Xe still doing business with the government? Haven’t they provided tainted water to the troops?
But then, isn’t the Armed Services Committee notoriously corrupt?
im sorry…keep on reaching out to newbies,life is not a bowl of cherries,more like krackerjack puzzles…new meanings everyday
unfortunately I would say most congressional committees are corrupt…at least to the degree that bribes, I mean campaign contributions rule the roost, and to that end, small businesses just do not seem to have the same deep pockets as firms like Xe, Lockheed Martin or Northrup Grumman who give money to everyone regardless of party or political ideology…
You know, in Eisenhower’s original draft of his speech about the military-industrial complex, he was going to refer to it as the military-industrial-congressional complex, but his speech writer removed the congressional part at the last minute…
The set aside for small business did not last long.
For the last year the gov has been pushing “partnering with large contractor” rather than giving out the set aside small business contracts.
This just make it official.
When Obama won, the left – and America – lost. He could have stopped this by simply saying he did not want it to happen. But he sees his role not as the leader, but as the fellow who blesses what others have decided.
sadly you are quite accurate…there have been numerous opportunities for Obama to take some very simple steps to make contracting better and easier for small businesses and he has chosen to not act…while I will not concede to the corporatocracy in power and continue to fight, they are winning…
Could be having these ever potential loose cannons on board has a value to TPTB. Who better to unleash on the, “Homeland,” should gated communities need a bit more protection.