Nuke pushers to Vermont: "Drop Dead"
March 17, 2010
The nuclear power industry is sending a clear and forceful message to the citizens of Vermont: "Drop Dead."
The greeting applies to Ohio, New York, California and a nation under assault from a "renaissance" so far hyped with more than $640 million in corporate cash.
The Vermont attack includes:
1) A direct threat to ignore the state Senate’s 26-4 February vote against renewing the Yankee reactor’s operating license. As a condition of buying Yankee, Entergy long-ago ceded to the legislature approval of any extension of an operating license, which expires in 2012. But Entergy now says it will spend all the corporate cash it needs to evict the current Senate and install one more to its liking.
2) Vermont’s pro-nuclear Republican Governor Jim Douglas says the Senate’s vote is "meaningless." Douglas is not running for re-election but is certain to become a high-priced Yankee arm-twister when he leaves office.
3) Entergy has also implied that if it fails to buy itself a pro-nuke legislature in 2010, it will sue over any denial of the license extension.
4) Entergy is trying to shift ownership of Yankee into a shell corporation called Enexus which would allow it to avoid financial exposure. The scheme has been attacked by regulators and analysts in New York (Entergy also owns Indian Point) and elsewhere. "With its leaks and lies," says Yankee activist Deb Katz, VY "is a liability for Entergy and a black eye" which some observers think the industry may want to jettison.
5) Entergy’s decommissioning fund has been radically drained by stock market losses and mis-management. It retains nowhere near enough money for safe dismantlement, so Entergy says Yankee must operate for decades more to recoup the losses.
6) Under oath and in public, Entergy officials have denied the existence of underground piping at Vermont Yankee which does exist and is leaking radioactive tritium as well as other deadly isotopes.
7) A probe (nicknamed "Rover") sent into the piping system to locate the leak has become stuck in radioactive muck.
8) State regulators and others warn that Yankee’s radioactive offal may already be pouring into the Connecticut River.
As angry citizens in Vermont and downwind New Hampshire and Massachusetts are told their worries have no place in a reactor renaissance, the message to "drop dead" has spread.
In Ohio, the infamous Davis-Besse reactor has turned up—again— with potentially catastrophic defects. In 2002 Davis-Besse came within a fraction of an inch of a catastrophic melt-down when boric acid ate nearly all the way through the reactor pressure vessel. Now assemblies that guide rods into the reactor core are again cracking. Davis-Besse’s owner, First Energy, is ignoring demands from terrified downwinders that the nuke be permanently shut.
In New York, Entergy’s Indian Point is leaking inside and out. Entergy continues to resist public demands for shut-down or a definitive clean-up.
In California, Pacific Gas & Electric is pushing hard to extend the operating license for its Diablo Canyon reactor, ignoring public demands for a three-year project to map earthquake faults that run within three miles of the plant.
Federal agents have confirmed that a suspected al Qaeda operative worked at 6 US nukes sites. Former CIA official Charles F. Faddis warns that America’s 104 operating reactors are dangerously vulnerable to terror attack.
None of which seems to phase an industry and administration that want the public to pay for still more.
Politically, economically, ecologically and in terms of the public health, the message from the "nuclear renaissance" to the American people is perfectly clear: "Drop Dead."



10 Comments







Sure, but we’ll all have private health insurance to cover the costs for our treatment when we all get nuked by our own people. Of course, since the charges are likely to get higher than the deductibles, I’m sure the insurance companies will bring up all this evidence that we were inevitably screwed long ago in their case to rescind our insurance for fraudulently failing to disclose our inevitable radioactive state.
Thanks very much.
I recommend this book:
http://www.carolegallagher.info/american_ground_zero__the_secret_nuclear_war_90028.htm
After reading about the lying, brutality, and complete disregard for peoples lives, by the nuclear industry,
their conduct described by Wasserman is not surprising.
Nuclear energy is insane.
I think if you go against it they try to kill you too. We should check into that, because at this point time it sounds foil hat, but if it is true, it would be very telling. It also would make a terrific criminal case.
We are already being nuked “by our own people.”
I have nuclear radiation burns on my own body. I can see them on my skin. Little red specks. My mother says her doctor says he never saw them on people until they started exploding the nuclear weapons. Now everybody has at least a few.
I recently looked it up because it was listed as a result of nuclear poisoning in one of the articles I read about a town where a lot of people were being poisoned. Apparently they burned scrap uranium at night to get rid of it for years. A lot of people who live around there are sick and this was listed as something these people get.
I don’t remember the name of these things, but since my mom had mentioned it about a million times, I looked it up. I realized when checking my own body, most of them would be covered by a T shirt. At first I thought I got it from my husband with direct body contact, but then I realized it was much more likely from a T shirt. He even gave me a bunch of his old shirts.
I haven’t seen him for a while, but three years ago he was showing an alarming amount of these things. I mention all this because he does field work out where they explode ‘depleted’ uranium ordinance, and has had other symptoms of uranium poisoning too, like headaches, terrible, terrible headaches.
When I realized he was at risk for uranium poisoning, I confronted him about it as a job hazard. He was very defensive about it and told me the Navy would not let him go to places if it was dangerous.
I wish.
Keeping people safe is not a demonstrated value in the Navy that I have ever seen.
“When I realized he was at risk for uranium poisoning, I confronted him about it as a job hazard. He was very defensive about it and told me the Navy would not let him go to places if it was dangerous.” ; believe it or not, such also exists in private industry.
I once worked for a company that specialized in computer communications and they had a product that very clearly warned of the radiation effects of putting two of the concentrators in the same box. But it was done repeatedly to match the ‘bid price’ the company where such was being installed. And when I pointed it out to the guy whose job it was to go into the closets where the concentrators were, all he had to say to me was (he was a mormon) “well, I already have six children”.
You should read the book that I mentioned above. There are a number of people interviewed in the book that agree with your statement.
When the armed forces/nuclear establishment were testing nuclear weapons above ground in Nevada, thousands of soldiers were placed within a half mile of the site of the nuclear blast, without protection of any kind.
The soldiers were told it was completely safe.
When they got sick, they were denied any help by the military.
Do yourself and your husband a favour. Please find the book and read it.
Actually, I think he is well aware they kill people, probably better than me. I think he knew full well his life was threatened.
Every time I had any political success, he would get really, really angry with me. He also begged me to stop and “to think of my family.” Since he agreed with me in the first place, that is pretty hard to explain if he wasn’t being threatened somehow.
On the other hand, whoever it was, he wasn’t telling me a word about it. He eventually told me the people at work were “all telling him to get a divorce” so I emailed a demand letter the next day to know who they were. His answer to that was complete denial.
He also stopped speaking to me. It was (is) horrible.
I have been reading about it a lot on line, doing research is one of my strengths.
The scariest thing with nuclear power plants is their potential for ‘accidents’. The damage done by a nuclear bomb is minimal compared to the fallout from blowing up say, 25 years of stored wastes. It is so serious we are probably not even allowed to talk about the risk.
I thought you might like this,
America Ground Zero the Secret Nuclear War
Alibris is just awesome for finding hard to find books. Thanks for the recommendation.
according to the book American ground zero, one of the reasons that the tests were conducted in Nevada, was that the residents of Utah,
(where the immediate, heaviest fallout went)
being Mormons, were unlikely to question authority, complain, or take action as a result of the massive increase in cancers that they experienced because of the tests.
and, they attempted to conduct the tests when the prevailing winds assured that the radioactivity would go in that direction.
In selecting that area, the scientists agreed apparently that there were no people there worth considering. They even said that in their submissions.
Neighbors of Vt Yankee have been pointing out problems with this plant for years. In January, over 100 of them participated in the 125 mile walk through the coldest winter weather, to bring attention to the issue at the Vermont State House. A 3 minute audio slide show captures their arrival in the Capital City and can be viewed at http://bit.ly/cxs96N