By Samuel Metz, MD
Many Europeans use private health insurance companies, a few of them for-profit. These Europeans enjoy better care for more people at lower cost than we do. But the European business model differs radically from that in the US. In fact, American insurance companies find the European model not only alien, but intolerable. Imagine American insurance companies playing by these European rules:
- You can set any price on your policy, but you must sell it at the same price to everyone, regardless of health.
- You must sell a policy to anyone who applies, no exceptions.
- No policy can be cancelled for any reason, not even failure to pay (the government will step in). Patients, however, can change companies without notice.
- Every policy must cover all treatable diseases. No matter what policy they purchase, patients will never risk destitution (or death) if they suffer a treatable condition.
- Your company must pay every claim from every licensed provider within 30 days. You can protest the payment, but only after you pay the bill.
- Every provider receives the same payment for the same service, regardless of patient or their insurance.
- Your records are an open book. Every dollar (or Euro) that passes through your hands is open to the public. There are no proprietary secrets.
- If you still manage to cherry pick healthier patients, the government will impose a premium to subsidize other companies with sicker patients.
With this model, European companies compete with lower prices, extra benefits, and better customer service. Isn’t that a refreshing change?
The American business model has no such rules. How do American insurance companies compete?
- They avoid sick patients. Highly paid underwriters detect potentially expensive patients before policies are offered. And the best way to avoid sick patients is with high policy prices.
- They slash benefits. Reduced benefits both discourage sick patients from buying a policy and reduce provider payments if they do.
- They pass costs to patients with increased deductibles and co-pays. Healthy patients (the ones companies want to keep) won’t notice because they don’t need health care. At least until they get sick.
- They delay or deny provider payments. If the payment process is frustrating enough, many providers simply give up trying to collect. That’s money they keep.
Profit? No difference. To succeed, both for-profit and not-for-profit companies follow the same rules. If not, your company is toast.
It is not profits but the business model that places the financial interests of our health insurance industry in opposition to the medical interests of its clients. Neither removing profits, nor enhancing competition, nor deregulation will increase health care quality or make health care more accessible.
Our American insurance business model is the source, not the solution, of our health care problems. We must run – not walk – away from letting private insurance companies determine our health care.
Samuel Metz is a Portland anesthesiologist active in health care reform. He is also a member of two organizations advocating publicly funded universal health care: Mad As Hell Doctors and Physicians for a National Health Plan. He is the local chapter representative of Health Care for All Oregon, an umbrella organization of over 50 groups working for better health care in Oregon.
Photo by Mattes under Creative Commons license.




33 Comments

Wrong. We don’t have national health because the medical profession does not want it. The AMA and hospitals do not want it.
They do just fine charging exorbitant fees. The hospitals, doctors, surgeons, anesthesiologist, radiologists and other specialists can charge what ever they damn well feel under the current system. Why would they want to change this.
The statistics I’ve seen indicate that medical professionals in the U.S. are near the top of the income/GDP chart but certainly not particularly out of line with other industrialized nations.
We pay 17% of our (very high) GDP for healthcare as opposed to roughly 10% for the other industrialized nations. That extra 7% amounts to roughly a trillion dollars per year. So where does it go? We pay a couple hundred billion more than other countries would for the same drugs. Another couple hundred billion in excess insurance overhead. And we pay about 31% of our healthcare costs in paperwork, which is excessive compared to other countries.
Also, the uninsured cost a lot when they postpone medical care until it becomes an emergency. EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) is the most cruel and inefficient medical care on this planet.
The incentive structure in the U.S. insurance model is absolutely perverse. Insurers are incentivized to deny their service (paying medical costs) and especially to deny it to those who need it most. Duh!
please include big Pharam and Medical Devices companies in the cost model..their costs are much cheaper in Europe and they have to compete…
The principal focus of the ACA is protecting the ever-expanding profits of the health insurance industry as opposed to the health of the American people.
Other countries, to a greater or lessor extent, are focused on delivering healthcare to their people.
The difference couldn’t be more stark.
its the OUTRAGEOUS profit in all things healthcare related.my family ran one of the biggest medLabs in Fl. for 49 years,we charged doc 7$ for a 20 test panel and made a tidy profit,the docs charged their patients 250$ o read them….ridiculous….the greed is killing peeps without the $$$ to pay for medicine and care,my dogs eye drops i paid 2 euros for in France cost 80$ here,ridiculous….
read this and weep
http://www.kmov.com/news/health/Ranbaxy-stops-generic-Lipitor-production-amid-recall-for-tiny-glass-particles-181873341.html
It’s the profit motive throughout the entire health care system.
Just another theater of conflict in the war against “Socialism”.
It permeates the whole of our society at this point.
Energy systems, health care, food production, water supplies, cripes if they could privatize air, they would..
Medicare has proved it delivers the highest percentage of payment for actual health care, and the Privateers just can’t stand it. So the “fixers” of our economic problems are gonna butcher it and eat the profits.
watch how thy do it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9CyZ31TFbM&feature=player_embedded
We know we’re being gouged, so what can we do about it? Congress and the Pres. are owned by the people doing it to us.
The air has been privatized by the Energy companies who use it as their personal dump.
Pharmaceutical companies and their sales staff can’t be prosecuted for promoting drugs for “lawful,” unapproved uses, a federal appeals court said, reversing a conviction of a salesman.
Alfred Caronia, a sales representative for Orphan Medical Inc., was convicted in 2008 of conspiracy to introduce a misbranded drug into commerce by promoting the narcolepsy medication Xyrem for unapproved uses. Under the U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, doctors are allowed to prescribe drugs for unapproved uses while drugmakers and their sales representatives are barred from promoting such prescriptions.
Caronia appealed, contending that the conviction violated his First Amendment right of freedom of speech. The U.S. Court of Appeals in New York yesterday found that the government “clearly prosecuted Caronia for his words” and reversed the conviction.
“The government cannot prosecute pharmaceutical manufacturers and their representatives under the FDCA for speech promoting the lawful, off-label use of an FDA-approved drug,” U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin said in a 2-1 decision.
i am thinking a guillotine,just a plastic replica,a reminder of bygone days
Saw this today . . . possibly the only thing dumber is the Supreme Court set to hear patentability (and exclusivity) of a human gene!
If we all have free speech, and cannot be prosecuted (or fired by an employer???) for exercising same, are we not on the threshold of everyone being able to scream FIRE! in a crowded building? Surely current judiciary would rethink former constraint vs. public safety. The ruling in the Caronia matter is an abomination, much like Citizens United. If not overturned, we will face a decade-long battle to (possibly) correct this example of judicial activism.
They HAVE privatized air. At least pressurized air for your tires. I remember when that was always free. Now it’s 75 cents if you’re lucky.
x2. And not only do they charge exorbitant fees so they can pay for their tropical vacations, photos of which are often proudly displayed in their treatment rooms(I’ve even seen them on the ceiling), but many prescribe the most expensive treatment they can find so they can rake in even more.
Our medical profession, and I mean doctors, are not in the business of providing health care, but in personal profits for themselves. Many of them are incompetent to boot. I know this from both my own personal experiences and a whole phalanx of relatives, friends, and coworkers.
Nationalize the bastards.
the stupidity is rampant,
Nationalize the bastards
now your talking…OUR oil etc
Seeking profit in medicine is morally repugnant.
x2 For sure !
Facebooked. Excellent.
During the healthcare battle in 2009, multiple polls found that a strong majority of US doctors supported a public option, and either a slight majority or a plurality supported single-payer.
On the anecdotal level, most doctors I’ve met hate hate hate insurance companies with a fiery passion.
And speaking as someone who has worked with hospital billers, um, no … hospitals don’t charge whatever they feel like charging. I’ve run into this idea before, and I can’t imagine why people think it. It’s beyond bizarre.
This. Thank you. Doctors and hospitals aren’t the problem, insurance companies and Big Pharma are.
As the revolving door turns:
Wellpoint to Baucus’s office to Johnson and Johnson.
So what happens now? We know there is corruption and cronyism in health care, with or without the insurance companies involved. Is it even remotely possible to put the kind of rules and regs in place noted in this post? Can anyone work to reduce the cost of health care as noted by wigwam @2? sometimes I despair at the ability of this country to ever get a good health care system given the lobbied interests at play.
The title to this post suggests that profit is not the problem. I think it is bc too many in the system (not just insurance companies)seek it.
Change the political culture and you change the outcomes. That’s what the Occupy movement is still about; that’s what the 1%-99% formulation is about; what the opposition to ALEC is about. There are any number of things going on that are moving us closer to a good health care system. The pressure on Congress is not that great yet, but it is coming. And the more people working on it the faster it will come.
There is no *the* problem… they’re all part of the problem for the same reason… GREED.
of course,and doctors are a huge part of the problem
Improve your own health. Use home remedies you can find for free at earthclinic.com.
I haves used many of their remedies with success.
Also google the water cure. Read the book. Many common ailments are from dehydration. My allergies for which I used to take Zyrtec daily have been cured. Dr batman is on to something and the establishment does not want you to know. They call him a quack, but you can’t argue with success. Histamine helps control and regulate the water in your body. The drug companies no doubt know all about this and are doing their darndest to suppress this information.
Just read about the Dutchess of Cambridge and her morning sickness. So dr batman says morning sickness is dehydration. So what according to the article treats morning sickness in the extreme? Antihistamine and steroids…. If you have read any of batmans books you know this is dehydration.
Chris Rock: ” the money is not in the cure, it is in the disease. ” Prevention is the cure, but the money is in the treatment. Guess who wins? Follow the money. In this case it leads right back to Wall Street, of course.
If the Supreme Court lets companies take out patents on the Human genome, then patent your own (plus all of the Republican politicians you can get genome samples of). Wouldn’t it be grand if they had to pay YOU royalties for treatments for their cancer?
probably the persistent vomiting caused the dehydration, rather than the reverse. Electrolyte imbalance from freq vomiting needs to be treated with more than water. And yes, drinking an adequate amount of water/wholesome fluids a day is important.
I would say for profit hospitals and doctors are part of the problem. Basically, doctors make too much money and there are probably too many specialists, and not enough doctors generally. The number of doctors is
kept too low. There needs to be more competition in that area. Medical school is too expensive. Malpractice insurance is too expensive. Pharmaceutical companies make too much money. Medical school tuition is too high. They all need a haircut. Badly.
What I say is that profit is the problem, in this instance. From what I’ve read about Europe, for profit medical insurance plays a much smaller role. It’s basically for people who can afford to buy it to pay for some extra coverage.
What the poster outlines is indeed anti-profit. For example, why would a for profit insurance company insure a person they know is sick? A sick person isn’t going to make them a profit, it’s going to cost them money. It’s like saying, why would a lawyer defend a person who can’t afford to pay? They wouldn’t except as an act of charity. That’s why you have public defenders. The private sector, for profit medical system is failing, but they have a grip on the system that has/is making so many people extremely wealthy. They aren’t going to give that up willingly.