My fellow Americans, I’m speaking to you tonight because we are making a mistake. For too long, Democrats and Republicans both have shunned gay Americans. For too long, we’ve taken a moral and decent minority’s rights away based on their orientation. In my own life, I’ve struggled with my feelings over same-sex marriage, just as many of you have. As a Christian, we are taught to believe that homosexuality is wrong and I took those Biblical moral lessons to heart. We’ve allowed conservative forces to shamelessly exploit our moral values to wreck the lives of gay and lesbian Americans.
Everyone remembers the 2004 campaign. Everyone remembers the vicious and discriminatory constitutional amendments Republicans put on ballots in states across the country to take the right to marry away from same-sex couples. The value system which led to those amendments is not my value system and it cannot be sustainable in the world as it is today. Conservatism does not work.
We’ve seen it in the news with people heckling lawmakers at town hall events instead of engaging in a debate. We’ve seen it in the offensive and, frankly, racist signs that always seem to appear at Tea Party events which no one will claim credit for. It is a vicious cycle of hate. This is the United States of America. We don’t hate our neighbors. We don’t shun our brothers and sisters. We are in this together.
That is my value system. We are all in this together. That’s what makes me a proud Democrat. It’s the idea that, as Paul Wellstone said, everyone does better when everyone does better. So I’m here tonight to talk to you about doing better. I’m here to talk to you about lifting up all voices, and guaranteeing equal rights for all Americans regardless of gender, orientation, race, religion or economic status. Our country was founded on that concept and it can’t change. Without those guiding principles we will have truly lost our way as a country. As your President I can’t let that happen.
Last year, I signed the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act to finally punish those who would seek to terrorize gay and lesbian citizens. But this is not enough. It can’t be enough.
Our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters have fought hard battles in the midst of some of the worst anti-gay campaigns. Our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters have faced down attacks and vandalism, they’ve faced witch hunts under the odious Don’t Ask Don’t tell, they’ve faced job discrimination. Straight people have likely faced job discrimination just for a perception that they were gay. And gay and lesbian citizens have pushed for passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and Congress won’t move on it. This bill has 89% support of the American people, and Congress wants to avoid its passage. This is wrong.
I can’t imagine the terror some gays and lesbians face. I’ve received thousands of letters from everyday average gay citizens telling me in stark terms what these bills would do for them. What marriage would do for them. Knowing that our government, the government I’m responsible for right now, has aided this terrorism and has caused untold numbers of suicides amongst gays and lesbians truly sickens me. Knowing that under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, women are often raped and threatened to be outed as gay if they report it makes my blood run cold. It’s truly chilling. We are doing this to these people and for my part, I want it to stop. It is time to reverse course.
Also tonight, I speak to you because I have changed my mind on the issue of marriage for gay and lesbian citizens.
I campaigned on a now outdated and obsolete platform of supporting civil unions for gays. Recent events have led me to conclude that civil unions are not enough. Think about this: if civil unions were just as good as marriage, why not call them marriages? The word marriage has special emotional and societal connotations. Being able to say you’re in a marriage makes you feel whole, as one of the people suing to overturn Prop. 8 said during the District Court trial. I cannot take that away from gays and lesbians anymore. We all deserve the opportunity to feel whole. We deserved to be loved, respected, even valued – not just by our significant other but by society itself.
I don’t know what I would do without my wife Michelle and our kids. I couldn’t be the same person. I’ve been blessed with her love and understanding for years. Her acceptance. Doesn’t everyone deserve this? I remember even now how it felt to get married. How it felt to know that we are going to be together forever. Marriage makes your bond, your relationship even stronger. You feel untouchable. You feel safe.
There is simply no reason to deny these feelings, and especially these legal rights, to gays and lesbians any longer. Our government has a lot of work to do to atone for the horrors it has inflicted upon gays and lesbians and to turn away, finally, from the ineffective and unrealistic government philosophy of conservatism, and I hope my speech tonight is a good first step in advancing that conversation. Tonight I am telling you in unequivocal terms: I support the right to marry for gays and lesbians. Let us act and work together to make that a reality and correct decades of wrongs against our people.
Thank you and God bless everyone.
—–
Scottie Thomaston (indiemcemopants) is a 26-year-old Alabama blogger who has written about politics on various blogs since age seventeen. A disabled, ‘out’ gay man, his principal themes have been LGBT rights, torture, NSA spying and the challenges of disability. His pieces have appeared on Daily Kos (where he also moderates a community series on disability), Firedoglake; and on his own blog, "Ignorance is…" The quality of his writing earned him a 2010 Netroots Nation scholarship from Democracy For America and a citation in the New York Times Opinionator column. He is actively building his career as a professional new media journalist.
You can find him on Twitter: @indiemcemopants



55 Comments




I would like to see and hear that speech as well.
I won’t be holding my breath however.
Don’t hold your breath. You’ll asphyxiate. And just as you did, even if he did make a similar speech, I have no doubt that Obama would also ignore transgendered Americans…
O will make that speech right after he talks about equal rights for, let’s see: women, blacks, Muslims, u-name-it.
O believes in equal rights for his campaign contributors, and no one else.
recommended!!!
I am sure I will never hear such a speech from BO. But dam it would be a dandy…☺ ☺
*sigh* That would be a speech made by a real progressive. Which O is not. Sadly.
You will hear such a speach once our overlords have guaranteed it’s a hollow gesture (due to circumstance, scotus ruling, gop majority, giant asteroid, bubonic plague, etc)
I used to think Healthcare, Same sex mariage, Dodt and all that were my biggest worries.
Reality has now made me fear the unimaginable, that we’re only one or two steps away from facism.
Funny how reaaally really big problems make smaller ones disappear.
Sure, he could make that speech.
And then not follow through.
Same old, same old.
Or do the opposite, which is more common for O.
Oh of course not. I’d just LIKE to hear it. It’s not gonna happen.
Hopefully he wouldn’t ignore transgender Americans in discussing ENDA, since he backed trans-inclusive ENDA, but you never know. That could end up being one of those ridiculous “compromises.”
Well he already did a race speech that was awesome.
They are emotional choice people establish dominance they will respect that once they realize they can’t change it granted not all of them will and it will take years.
But with a stroke of a pen Truman desegregated the Army. Obama could do the same.
I’m telling you I’d turn into an enthusiastic voter so fast!
What was so awesome about his race speech? As one friend of mine put it, if he wanted to start a national dialogue on race, why didn’t he do it?
I have traded worry for apathy. Apathy works much better, especially when combined with lethargic slight shaking of the head while reading “65% against ny mosque” “headless bodies flood arizona desert” etc.
Apathy is the new 3rd way in absence of real political choices.
emptywheel is upstairs!
More Torturers Coming Back to CIA as Contractors
Indie, assuming we ever get a President with the guts to read a speech like this, He/She would be hard pressed to find a better speechwriter. Bill Moyers couldn’t do any better.
Agreed! Focus on what you have already done this forces the GOP to attack the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act before an election. Then we force moderate GOPers to answer the question if they support the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act if they say no they lose Moderate voters if they say yes they lose Tea Baggers.
This could help the *ick* blue dogs but it would also rally our base.
Put differently, I’m in the fifth or sixth stage of grief (which traditionally had 4 stages, but new ones needed to be developed for contemporaneous U.S.).
I don’t know about that. The Republicans coming out in favor of gay marriage are not progressives. It’s becoming a mainstream position and he’s sadly missing the boat on this. I just want him to succeed.
Hell at this point I’d be happy if he did just that.
I can’t be apathetic. I’m a gay cripple in the south. I’m either politically active or suicidal.
Thank you! That’s an awesome compliment!
Yep and they HATE the Matthew Shepard Act. They are calling it the Thought Crimes Act.
To be honest, this just makes me angry because nothing close to this is ever going to happen. Those words would be sweet to hear but for whatever reason: money, influence, poor direction, our president is never going to give a speech like this. You’d think given the direction of the polls, economy, etc. he’d be free to bring a real populist tone to the national conversation but I think that ship has sailed.
You know I used to go back to that Will.I.Am video and it always made me feel good but lately its just makes me sad. I know when it comes to politics that it’s not the best plan to keep it personal but this election and the aftermath bums me out like 1968 all over again.
They must think that they are Martyrs to deflect the guilt of oppressing everyone else. We can drive them insane with a show of strength and use that anger to scare Moderate voters our way. If you don’t control your anger others can control you.
Lets control them.
Well at least rest assured that I’m going to keep pushing him and all Democrats on gay issues until they do something. I’m not giving up on this. It sucks that it seems bleak and it sucks that this speech probably won’t happen but every little bit of pressure has an effect in the long term.
Projection as they force their values on us. Funny JC hung with 12 other guys in the desert never preached against the Gay but he’s their hero.
The speech could help us turn this election around emotional voters respond to shows of strength they respect it. Especially if they can’t do anything to stop it that makes them feel impotent it depresses there voter turnout. Granted it might be to late to help us this election but it would help us later.
I’m even more cynical/paranoid than you on the facism question, Most. That’s the most jaded reason why I think marriage equality will never happen with Obama and his gang of asshats. If we really are goose-stepping down that road then TPTB want a politically disenfranchised minority to use as a wedge issue in controlling the larger population. The Nazis had the Jews, Communists, Homosexuals and Gypsies to focus the hatred of the “good Germans” of the Reich. Those who would be America’s version of Hitler’s SD or Mussolini’s Blackshirts would first spew their hatred on “illegals”, Muslims or Gays.
What Obama says and what Obama does are very different things. Donnie McClurkin Christopathic campaign pep rally. Rick Warren Saddleback inaugural invocation. Obama cannot offend the ignorant undecided Independent voters. So he threw all progressives under the bus.
Just to make sure I was clear: O’s speech on race was geared toward dismissing the topic once & for all in his entire regime. We can see how successful that tactic was.
So perhaps it might be better to ‘hope’ O keeps his mouth shut on all the other agenda items the progressives would like to see. When it comes to O speeches, silence is golden.
The youth vote
would fucking love this.
The pressure and also the vision of doing the moral thing….the gay issue is one part of it, but your challenge is to our better nature, to doing kindness, and enacting those things that represent equality and justice….just the right thing, in other word. Power to you.
If the youth vote would love an O speech, it just shows how gullible the youth are.
the differences between Truman and Obama, TCU, are far too numerous to go into detail here…
I have a feeling that we will see one of Harry’s more famous quotes become prophetic come November, though. Something about voters choosing between Republicans and Democrats pretending to be Republicans, they always choose the real deal.
JC was the first DFH
Yes, and whose words and deeds are utterly ignored by the Fundys. Just not a good fit.
You can tell by the long hair.
Agreed:)
Agreed Obama is no Harry but Harry shows it is possible…if you have a pair.
Once again eCahn nails it… Funny how quickly our corporate media happily cheered the Big O on the “historic significance” of addressing this “emotionally charged” topic. Not so funny how quickly it fell down the memory hole.
I remember how impressed the talking heads were with Obama’s “leadership” on this issue. I also remembered how Jesse Jackson wept like a baby on Election night, that a Black man could get elected to the highest office in the land. I don’t know the good Reverend, and I’ve been less than impressed with him in the past, but I’ve often wondered if he was thinking of Dr. King that night. The sentimentalist in me likes to think so. To see a dream long realized, that “this nation can judge a man not by the color of his skin but by the quality of his character” is truly inspired.
I wonder now if the good Rev. Jackson weeps for other reasons.
most of the Gospel of Luke (IIRC, it’s been decades…) is almost socialist in it’s teachings regarding accumulation of personal wealth and our obligation to the less fortunate
Obama seems only to find his whenever he wants to punch a hippie.
Fundy: “New Testament? What’s that?”
Geez, how I wish election of a black man as prez were a turning point for U.S. Just as I wished that election of the first woman as partner of Goldman Sachs meant anything for women’s rights or advancement.
Go to the next Democratic LGBT fundraiser and he will sell that speech to you all day. Seeing an Obama speech is easy.
I really like the fundie’s interpretation of a “masculine” Christ that will ‘kick ass for God’…that totally cracks me up, and would crack up some of the Jesuits I knew when I was a kid.
I don’t know much about the history of Jesuits, but as I recall, the Jesuits were no slouches at persecuting anyone who didn’t agree with them.
What I know of the Jesuits (I was raised Lutheran) is scholarship and critical thought come before ‘most’ things.
I really think that was something that Obama was counting on. Why else adopt progressive rhetoric and imagery (Yes, We Can!, Change You Can Believe In) if he was going to govern as a Corporate Centrist and make only cosmetic changes to the status quo.
After Bush Jr. had pulled the country so far to the right that moderation no longer made sense, the nation demanded that we change course. And we did, we elected the one man (sorry, Hillary, but you were a girl and the Oval Office is still a boy’s club) who was as different from Bush as could possibly be.
Obama isn’t stupid, and his campaign was a brilliant work of stratagem. It fooled Liberals/Progressives completely, and he will have made history as the first person of color to become President. Being a one-term or two term occupant of the White House after that accomplishment is beside the point.
Eli is upstairs!
Money Makes Democrats Stupid
i think they got their start as missionaries in China and Japan. Clavell’s Shogun gets a lot of that history right. They weren’t above some acts of duplicity, political intrigue and persecution, but the mission in Far East countries with strong social and governmental traditions was persuasion of the population – unlike the Spanish Dominicans and Franciscans who were brutal in their conversion of the Native American populations after the Conquista.
What I always respected about my Jesuit teachers was that they valued logic, reason and truth above all else. I remember around my confirmation a history teacher explaining that he used reason to distill his faith, which brought him closer to the Church and God. If you examined your faith in such manner, and were acting in good conscious, then it was all right if you realized your faith was not consistent with the Church’s teachings, and if you no longer wanted to be part of the Church you didn’t have to be. God still loved you. They helped me tremendously in my decision to leave the Church and find my own spiritual path.
I think that many of them were probably driven from the Church in the 80′s because John Paul II would not tolerate any compromise on his absolutist views against abortion or other reproductive right issues. John Paul used abortion as a litmus test and only promoted Msgr’s and Bishops if they were in lock-step with him. His war on the Vatican II reforms was relentless.
This is probably the reason the Church coddled the pedophiles. They kicked out the liberals (remember the “Liberation Theology” of Latin America?, they were excommunicated) who provided a moderating influence on policy, especially in the American Church, and experienced a severe shortage of priests that exists today. That manpower shortage was so extreme that if one priest started abusing his alter boys they would re-assign him in the hopes that he would not do it again.
Yeah, I’m a lot more interested in the right ideas succeeding, not the man. Once in a great while, a few odd, unteathered R’s join modern times and take a progressive position on a social issue because it is, well, American. GLBT issues are progressive issues.