Republican strategists often refer to the African-American community with a tone of hopelessness. Blacks are just so, so amazingly Democratic. No matter what the Republican Party does, these people think, the black vote inevitably ends up giving Democrats more than 85% of the vote. Even when the Republican candidate himself or herself is African-American, the black community still votes around 80% Democratic. This hopelessness is especially pronounced in the age of Obama, an individual to whom the black vote is uniquely loyal (as the first black president).
It is true that blacks vote very, very Democratic. In other ways, however, they behave quite like other groups of voters.
Take the 2010 midterm elections. These were a disaster for the Democratic Party, which took a pounding and lost the House of Representatives. The Democratic share of the vote plummeted, hurt by a weak economy and unpopular policies:
| Democratic | Republican | Margin | |
| 2010 House Elections | 44.8 | 51.6 | 6.8 |
| 2008 House Elections | 53.2 | 42.5 | 10.7 |
| 2008 Presidential Election | 52.87 | 45.6 | 7.27 |
In this rightward shift, everybody voted more Republican than in 2008. Every region of the country was redder. Women voted more Republican. Men did. Republicans did. Independents did, especially so. Democrats did too. With regards to ethnicity, Americans of every race and nationality voted more Republican. Hispanics did. Asians did. Native Americans and Pacific Islanders did. Whites did, very much so.
So did blacks:
| Democratic | Republican | Margin | |
| Black Vote: 2010 House Elections | 89 | 9 | 80 |
| Black Vote: 2008 House Elections | 93 | 5 | 88 |
| Black Vote: 2008 Presidential Election | 95 | 4 | 91 |
Now, this table obviously shows that blacks still voted very Democratic in 2010. The point, however, is that – like everybody else – blacks also shifted Republican in 2010. The presence of President Barack Obama did not magically prevent Republicans from gaining black votes in 2010.
It is true that Republicans gained less amongst blacks:
| 2010 Republican Improvement From… | ||
| 2008 House Elections | 2008 Presidential Election | |
| Overall | 17.5 | 14.1 |
| Blacks | 8 | 11 |
Partly this is because blacks are a highly Democratic constituency. When the nation as a whole shifts Republican, highly loyal Democrats move less rightwards than the average. Partly this is due to Mr. Obama’s popularity amongst blacks.
Without this rightward shift in the black vote, however Republican victories in Illinois or Pennsylvania’s senate races would have been a lot closer – or turned into losses altogether. The same holds true for close Republican victories in the Ohio and Florida gubernatorial elections. Democrats would probably hold a handful more House seats, from North Carolina’s 2nd congressional district to Alabama’s 2nd congressional district.
If Republicans had done the same amongst blacks as they did in 2008, Democrats would have won a number of races they lost. The Republican gain amongst blacks played an important part of their overall national victory.
–Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/



8 Comments

Thanks again Obama
Your post leaves off the most important fact about the 2010 elections. It wasn’t so much that more people voted Republican, they didn’t, it was that so many Democrats, including blacks, stayed home because they were disgusted by the performance or lack thereof by Barack Obama and the Democrats, especially those in the Senate.
Throwing percentages around without reference to turnout is misleading.
Absolutely true. You beat me to it, OhioGringo. The real story of 2010 is that vote totals for Democrats dropped by about forty per cent compared to 2008. Republican totals stayed roughly the same.
And let’s not forget voter suppression (targeted mostly at blacks) and voter tampering that went in hand with the huge stay at homes.
Thanks OH and MTC . . . I’m mildly curious as to the ACTUAL percentage of blacks who actually voted GOP instead of DIM.
Totally. There are a lot of smart, informed black folks out there who feel lost (or are soothing their pain by just participating in super-hyper-local politics) in this post-Obama dystopia.
Comparing mid-terms to presidential year elections – isn’t it apples to oranges? Mid-terms don’t have the turn-out as much as a presidential election year. 2006 vs 2010 might be a better one perhaps?
funkygal:
Exactly! that is it in a nut shell. Generally midterm turn out is low; the Black vote was suppress in what has become “business as usual” (let us not forget those Diebold voting machines that are still out there); and as B.B. King might put it, “the thrill is gone” when it comes to Obama.
What the others side did was pull an ACORN on our rear-ends (curbed my language, don’t want to scare the women folk)! By extracting the 2 million votes that Acorn delivered to Obama in the election before (snuffing ACORN with a “B” movie White pimp) and at the same time beefing up their get-out-the vote mega church drives they pulled a fast one on us.
Yeah, lack of turn-out hurt tremendously.
This problem will be alleviated in 2012.