The first thing to know is that, if you’re a Republican legislator in California, you are always, always losing. The Democratic Party always sets the agenda. Then a Democratic Assemblyman will introduce a bill. Sometimes the bill is uncontroversial – something like National Mitochrondria Day. Other times the bill is heatedly partisan.
When the bill is partisan, the Republicans will stand up and argue against it. They will be heated. They will be angry – indeed, Republican legislators generally have a much angrier tone than their Democratic counterparts. They will talk about how the Constitution is being violated, how America’s Founding Fathers would look aghast at the bill, how America is a country of liberty, and how the bill is infringing upon America’s freedoms.
And then, when voting time comes, the Republicans lose. The bill they so hate inevitably passes. This is because California is a Democratic state, and the Democrats therefore have a majority. The result is that day in, day out Republicans are losing. They lose every single time. They spend every single minute in the legislature losing.
Except on one issue. California, you see, requires a two-thirds majority to raise taxes (and, until recently, to pass the budget). There are barely enough Republicans in the chamber to deny Democrats the two-thirds majority.
So here, on this one issue, a Republican legislator can win. And what an important issue! Taxes and budgets, after all, are the most important priority for any state.
The California Republican Party blankly refuses to allow tax increases of any kind. Not a dollar, not a dime, not a cent. It never, ever cooperates with the Democratic Party.
It probably feels very good, too, for Republican legislators so tired of losing all the time. How immensely satisfying it must feel for a California Republican legislator to win a victory. Republicans can even tell themselves that they’re doing the state good, since high taxes are of course what’s ruining California.
What’s really hurting California, however, is the legislative gridlock that results from the Republican Party’s refusal to compromise. The party knows that California is a Democratic stronghold, so it will never hold power. But because California requires a two-thirds majority to raise taxes (and, until recently, pass a budget), Republicans can be hostage-takers. That is essentially the only role that California’s Republican Party has.
Eventually the Democratic Party will gain the necessary two-thirds majority. They are already very close, and California is trending left. Then Republicans will truly have no power. One hopes that will provide them enough incentive to change their ideology and politicians in a way that garners more support from California’s diverse population. Otherwise, the party will wither away into nothingness.
–Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/




17 Comments

The Dems would have achieved an overwhelming majority, well past 2/3, in both houses of the legislature years ago if they would simply give on trying to ratfuck the populace by repealing Prop 13. Single dumbest strategy move ever in the Golden State.
Prop 13 is ratfucking the populace.
It’s unfair and stupid.
The only ones to really benefit from Prop 13 are corporations who just don’t die often enough ( like living breathing people) so their property taxes never get raised to true values except for a 2% per year… Most of them are paying at the same evaluations as when prop 13 was passed…. No fucking wonder the state is starving for revenue… And has plummeted in the school funding causing unbelievable decline in the education of the future citizen’s
That takes a 2/3 majority also. Good luck with that….
Prop 13 is the problem, not the solution.
“Eventually the Democratic Party will gain the necessary two-thirds majority. They are already very close, and California is trending left.”
Cali dims won’t get that 2/3 majority if the “fierce advocate” can prevent it.
Insightful, but I think it also misses an aspect, as to the Prop 13 comments that precede me. Another and difficult component to California is the ballot measure process itself.
This was used in Washington ~10 years ago to similarly trash any future possibility of property tax hikes.
Dems can get the 2/3ds, and there is still a proven vector for hostage-taking.
The idea might be theoretically noble, but it seems that every piece of legislation and/or constitution modification that comes out of this has been complete and utter crap on a fucking stick. A century of it in California seems to have shown us that ballot measures are the “text-in-your-vote-now!” lever in a democracy, and should be trashed.
I will admit I haven’t read them all yet, but I do know that most of them can be found here, for starters: http://library.uchastings.edu/library/california-research/ca-ballot-measures.html
There must be Lefty ballot measures that could be done that would drive Republicans nuts.
Ok, when Arnold was gov he vetoed 2!!! CA single payer bills that passed the legislature.
So why not do it now???
Why won’t the D legislatures and Brown do it???
Good question: the answer always is, “Nothing in the budget to fund it.”
Doesn’t make any sense to me either, and I could use it desperately.
Although I could only wish our mostly powerless Republicans could be replicated in the nation as a whole — without the ability to take the budget, and taxation hostage, of course.
I guess I must be one of the few here that remember the horrid property tax rates from the sixties where taxes were as much as ten percent of the market value of a home. (actual $12,000 taxed annually on market value of $125,000 property)
This, among other abuses, led to Prop. 13. BTW, the schools were just as bad then as they are now – ask anyone who remembers the “White Elephant Club”.
A major problem is the grandfathered tax rates enjoyed by corporations and one poster is correct, corporations don’t die in CA for that very reason. Ask Warren Buffett.
There is a lot of grandfathering going on in CA. Time to clear out the trash and let market forces rebuild.
True dat. I used to teach in the Silicon Valley 5-10 years ago. It was terrible: all those people with 6 and 7-digit salaries, while I had to buy toilet paper for my classroom just so the kids would have something to wipe with when they went to the bathroom! I’d buy a case of paper at the beginning of the year because copy paper at our school was more valuable than cigarettes in prison. I got some of the things I needed for my science classroom by bribing other teachers with a ream or two.
I finally gave up and moved to WA to find a better place to teach. Most of the teachers up here can’t believe it when I tell them about the crap CA teachers have to put up with. About how we ran out of money every year around December, and how I had to hide my supplies because other teachers would steal from you in desperation…..
Honestly, as a California resident I haven’t seen how those attempts have affected legislative elections in California.
Yes; the proposition system in California certainly deserves to be reformed.
Who is the “fierce advocate?” Why doesn’t it/they want a 2/3 majority for California Democrats?
Sounds like those single payer bills were partisan play; that is, Democrats only passed it because they knew Arnold would veto it. They would never have passed the bills if they actually thought it could become law, which is why those bills aren’t going through this time.