By: inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/
The Republican Primary race is essentially over. Rick Santorum, having finally hit the end of his rope, has announced a suspension of his campaign. It’s going to be Romney versus Obama in November.
Rick Santorum was never a really strong candidate. For the longest time he polled at 1% in Iowa. Only when all the other non-Romney options were exhausted did Santorum begin to rise. But Santorum’s strength was always more anti-Romney than pro-Santorum. People voted against Romney, not for Santorum.
There was, however, another candidate who didn’t enter the field in 2012. This was Mike Huckabee. Mike Huckabee is a much stronger politician than Rick Santorum. Huckabee would have built the same coalition that Santorum built. And unlike Santorum, the people in Huckabee’s coalition would actually be voting for Huckabee rather than merely against Romney.
This leaves us a very interesting question: Could Huckabee have beaten Romney?
In many ways Huckabee would have been a super-charged version of Santorum. He would have done several considerably better amongst Santorum’s voters. On the other hand, he would have had many of the same weaknesses that eventually doomed Santorum. Given that Santorum never really came close to winning the nomination, that’s not good for Huckabee.
On the positive side, Huckabee would almost certainly have won conservative, evangelical Iowa – and probably by a lot. More likely than not he would have taken the state by double-digits. Huckabee would then have probably lost New Hampshire. But next would be South Carolina. Newt Gingrich, not exactly the strongest politician, won South Carolina with 40% of the vote. Huckabee probably would have broken 50%.
Here things get tricky. After South Carolina would have been Florida. This would have been one of those “must-win” states for Huckabee. At the same time, demographically Florida would have pretty unfriendly territory. Could Huckabee have developed momentum after two big victories in Iowa and South Carolina? Perhaps; Florida did give Gingrich some very good numbers before Romney started spending money.
After Florida the most symbolically important states would have been the Midwestern consortium of Michigan, Ohio, Illinois and Wisconsin. Rick Santorum lost all of these states, which is why he’s not the nominee.
There’s a decent chance that Huckabee would have won Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Add 10% or 20% to Santorum’s score in the rural counties, along with higher turn-out by voters excited to vote for Huckabee rather than merely against Romney, and things start looking pretty bleak for Romney.
So it looks like Huckabee would have won quite a bit more than Santorum.
But that doesn’t mean that he would have won the nomination.
In 2008 Huckabee was quite weak in urban and suburban areas. There’s no reason to think that he would have done much better in 2012. It’s hard to imagine Huckabee winning in big-city states like California, New York, and Illinois. Losing those three states is pretty devastating for a campaign. To this you have to add Romney give-mes like Arizona, Massachusetts, and Utah.
Huckabee would have had to rely on winning the big states Florida and Texas. Both of these are quasi-Southern states, but they’re also home to a lot of non-Southern voters. Winning these states would not have been a cake-in-the-walk for Huckabee.
But more important than this are two structural weaknesses which doomed Santorum – and which Huckabee would also have had.
Firstly, Huckabee would have been heavily outspent. This was a big reason why Romney won: he outspent Santorum by outrageous margins. Unfortunately for Huckabee, the same thing would have happened with him. In 2008 Huckabee’s campaign was consistently on the brink of going bankrupt. There’s no reason to think that anything would have changed in 2012.
Secondly, the Republican establishment would have backed Romney. The establishment went heavily against Huckabee in 2008 (for reasons that are mysterious to me). It would have been firmly in the camp of Romney in 2012. By the end of the campaign, Fox News was pretending that Rick Santorum didn’t exist. Something similar might have happened with Huckabee.
All in all, it’s a roll of the dice whether Huckabee could have won. The best case scenario: Huckabee pounds Romney in Iowa, runs a close second in New Hampshire, breaks 50% in South Carolina, and then Mitt Romney says that he doesn’t care about poor people. It’s an open question whether momentum for Huckabee would have started setting in at this point, but let’s say it does and Huckabee takes a double-digit national lead. Huckabee wins Florida and then Michigan at the end of February. On Super Tuesday, Romney’s final stand, Huckabee breaks 65% in the South and wins Ohio by double-digits. Romney drops out and endorses Huckabee.
All in all, it’s fun to guess what would have happened in this alternate scenario. I personally would have preferred the Republican nominee to be Mike Huckabee rather than Mitt Romney. In the end, Huckabee stayed out because he thought that Barack Obama would win. That was probably the right reasoning.




10 Comments

If you want to write alternate history, why not do something really interesting like what the world would look like if the English had won the Battle of Hastings or the Moors had won near Tours?
Or if Carter’s rescue attempt of the Iranian hostages had succeeded in 1980?
Far more interesting than this. At least to me.
Lol, if you’re not interested don’t read.
Could Idi Amin have beaten Papa Doc Duvalier in a game of eight-ball?
Could Pol Pot have dunked on Anastasio Somoza?
Could Golda Meir have struck out Maggie Thatcher on 3 straight pitches?
Nobody knows, and nobody goddamn cares.
Very good: recommend.
Huckabee is very interesting, a southern populist, who isn’t a racist. Socially conservative black people like him a lot. The Club for Growth and the Cato crowd hate his guts…. interesting politician… neanderthal on abortion, progressive on not putting drug users in jail and progressive on spending on public education and infrastructure.
Interesting.
I think he just didn’t want to run against Barack Obama
Recommended, interesting post.
Huckabee, even though I disagree with him mightily on almost everything (I imagine we might agree that the sky is blue)seems more likeable than his fellow GOP candidates.
That likeability factor might swing more than a few Independents his way.
But maybe that means he’s not crazy enough for the base.
Heh! Kinda like the drivers I used to encounter in rural Michigan. They’d take over the right lane and drive 75 MPH, making slower traffic move into the left lane, rather than go into the left lane themselves where the fast traffic was supposed to go anyway.
Could Mike Huckabee have beaten Mitt Romney? Good question.
Both men are considered suspect by the GOP base precisely for doing things that weren’t totally greed-driven, mean-spirited, or insane. In Huckabee’s case, it was raising taxes in Arkansas rather than letting the state collapse into utter ruination. Yet I think that, had Huckabee a touch more money, and the Republican establishment not so intent on protecting Romney (one wonders if they cut a deal with Mitt in 2008: “Hey, we gotta let McCain run this time — but you got next”?) he could have used his far more powerful speaking skills and charisma to wax Romney like a surfboard.
No. Huckabee could not have beat Romney. Nobody could have. The existence of the “Not Romneys” appear to be tactical and served two important purposes for the establishment GOP (e.g. Romney).
First, it’s important to realize that the electoral flux doesn’t represent a “Not Romney” vote … it’s a “We’re pissed at the GOP establishment” vote. Romney just happens to be the establishment candidate. There is no specific strong aversion to him within the wider GOP electorate beyond his position as “establishment” choice.
The most important role the “Not Romneys” played was to provide an establishment-controlled “alternative” to dilute the protest vote that would otherwise have gone to Ron Paul …. who has no intent of falling in line and playing by their establishment rules. It’s why the media would ignore Paul’s performance no matter how well he did and provide the next in line of the third-tier unprecedented media coverage and financial resources to create a “surge” on their behalf.
The second role the “Not Romneys” played was to sideline Obama and prevent the Democratic machine from cranking up and trying to define Romney. So long as there was a “plausible” challenger to Romney, Obama jumping in on the attack would appear to be him meddling in a partisan primary. As it is … Obama pretty much had to sit on his hands for months. Only now can he actually launch his campaign …. after the better part of a year with the GOP getting their message out almost unchallenged.
The point is that this was a controlled dynamic. There was never a chance that the nominee would be anyone but Romney. Huckabee really only has one more shot at it left … he was far better off leaving the placeholder spot to Santorum this cycle (who actually needs to make a name for himself in order to move up in the party and be viable going forward).
You do bring up an interesting thought though. I imagine we’re going to see Huck and Santorum battle it out in 2016. That should be depressingly obnoxious.
I agree closely enough with what your wrote to be lazy and just say: quite agree.
Plus Huckabee has his quite lucrative tv show (I believe), which keeps the coins coming in until the next go-round.
I’m with you in that I think the “fix” was in for Rmoney this time (for whatever reason? Did Mitt buy his way into it? Do Rmoney’s 1% pals “owe” Willard? Who knows? who cares?) around. While I see Santorum as a “serious candidate,” in that Santorum personally wants to be POTUS, I think Gingrich & the Pizza guy were just in it for shitz ‘n grinz & the money and bc the PTB wanted the Kabuki Show “race” to look like something was happening besides Willard being annointed, plus didn’t want loathsome Ron Paul to be the only real contender.
I can certainly see a Huckabee v Santorum race in 2016, but it still remains to be seen whether the Booosh’s'll pull JEB out for a hat trick.
Mike is actually funny at times and has that compassionate conservative thing going on that does not scare away Moderate Voters this of course scares bankers so Mike would likely have had less corporate cash than Rick.
But he also makes much less crazy statements than any GOPer now running for President that means he would easily have been the last anti Mitt standing.
Mike I think would still be fighting Mitt for President today if he had run. If Mike had decided to run on government should create jobs and help homeowners he very well might be winning.
But that might have been a bridge too far for any GOPer to walk.