This is part of a two-part series evaluating absentee ballots, which are being used more and more often. The first part will focus on their advantages. The second part will focus on their disadvantages.
Absentee ballots are increasingly being used throughout the United States. They are especially popular in the West Coast; elections are entirely absentee-ballot in Oregon and Washington, for instance.
The general reasoning behind absentee ballots are that they increase voter turn-out. The theory goes that voters too busy on election day can vote before the election. Absentee ballots make voting simpler, people say. If it is true that absentee ballots increase voter turn-out, then this would be a substantial advantage. At least one study, on the other hand, casts doubt on whether this is really true.
There is another great advantage to absentee ballots, however.
In the state of California, at least, voter ballots go on for pages and pages. Voters are asked to vote on a huge array of things which they almost certainly haven’t heard of. Everyone has heard of the presidential race. But very few people know about candidates for the local school board or local bond measures. What if one of the candidates is a convicted felon? What if that local ballot proposal is actually the pet project of a big corporation? Often a voter in the booth will only see four names he or she’s never seen before, or a paragraph-long description of a proposed measure. There’s no way for him or her to know how to vote.
Voters who receive absentee ballots don’t face this problem. They can research the candidates or the proposed local measure. They can look online to see whether the candidate for the local school board has an extremely controversial background. They can look at what the newspapers have to say about that local bond measure.
Absentee ballots enable voters to make informed decisions, especially about local elections and measures which nobody has heard of.
They certainly helped me when I voted. I remember voting for the board members on the local fire protection district. Unsurprisingly, I had no idea who any of the candidates were. The voter information pamphlet seemed to be helpful, and I settled on three candidates who seemed to have the best-written candidate statements.
Then I researched who these people actually were. It was fairly simple: I merely typed the candidates’ names and the word “controversy” in Google.
It turned out that all three candidates I’d picked were close relatives of firefighters! Since the fire protection board must bargain with firefighters about their pay, this was obviously a huge conflict of interest. I immediately changed who I was going to vote for. I’d never have known about this if I hadn’t had the time to research the candidates before filling out my absentee ballot.
This is why absentee ballots are great. But they also have some big disadvantages (actually one big disadvantage). That’s the subject of part two.
–inoljt
Photo by micala under Creative Commons license.




11 Comments

In Washington State (except for Pierce County) ballots are mailed three weeks before the election. There is a brief paragraph on the ballot (one large two-sided page) describing measures referenda and initiatives. Plenty of time is left to read newspapers, check your mail and discuss it all. A study showed a slight increase in turnout. It beats trudging through a snowstorm on a work-day.
Voters in California are mailed information on what is on the ballot a few weeks in advance of the elections. These information booklets include arguments for and against ballot propositions and an impact analysis by a nonpartisan government analyst. Voters also receive a sample ballot that they can take with them to the polls to expedite voting their choices.
There are no disadvantages regarding voting by mail. Every state should do it.
the only disadvantage is the for-profit corp that pays the computer programer who sets the machines to talley the votes in the mail room. some interesting numbers here in floriduh: 49.39-50.02%, 49.69-50.31%, 48.89-51.11%, 49.8-50.2% and 51.97-48.03% in 5 of 10 local races. machine recounts are at option of loser IF within .25%.
Palm Beach SOE demonstrated programing error on machines used in primaries that flipped a couple race results. sec of state and corp shrugged it off.
When I was canvassing mail-in voters just before the deadline, I found a number of households where the person who answered the door would say they already voted– “My husband already filled ours out”
Overall, I find mail-in ballots to be great and a big advantage for increasing turnout. Personally, I can never remember to mail the damned thing in and there are the edge cases of subtle voter intimidation that we’re never going to be able to stop.
Yep, I got that too.
“My husband already filled ours out”.
Yeah…that sounds like voter intimidation to me.
I guess I should wait for part two, but a person from a voter watchdog group said on C-SPAN this week that absentee ballots are more than twice as likely to be tampered with.
I agree. It seems danged easy to me.
Corporations spy on each other and plant their people in jobs with their competitors because a lot is at stake.
What’s to prevent someone paying me well to work in the office where these ballots are returned? And what’s to prevent any employee from dumping them?
I am sure there are surveillance cameras, but motivated people find ways to get around that, a brief power outtage, for just one example. (Sorry, I am low tech and not very devious and I have zero to gain by spending more time thinking about methods. I am sure someone devious, high tech and paid for their thoughts on the matter could do better.)
Also, it’s my understanding that absentee ballots often don’t even get counted at all, unless an election is close and/or contested.
Besides, I think showing up with your fellow citizens at a polling place every couple of years is a good experience. As long as my body allows me to do that, I will.
That said, I get an absentee ballot every year, just in case I cannot make it to the polls. Where I live, as long as an absentee ballot gets to the right place by 5 pm the day of the election, it will be counted.
If things were close and I were physically unable, I’d pay someone to hand carry it, if I had to. So far, no need, though.
To clarify, I don’t mean dumping all of them.
There isn’t any amount of “research” a voter is able to do because of vote by mail that the voter couldn’t have done in any voting environment. All you are really saying is that receiving the ballot in the mail “prompted” you to do the research. Sample ballots including all candidates and issues are available to all citizens whether they live in a vote by mail location or not. All the research you did could have been done before going to your polling place to vote in person.