SurveyUSA did NBC/WSJ’s work for them after they failed to poll people on what Obama’s health care plan actually said.
Contrary to the tepid support the biased NBC/WSJ poll found, SurveyUSA, when they polled with the original question NBC/WSJ used – a question that asked folks whether they want a choice of a public health insurance option as the legislation on the table provides – they found overwhelming support.
Here was the question NBC/WSJ asked in June, when they found 76% supported:
In any health care proposal, how important do you feel it is to give people a choice of both a public plan administered by the federal government and a private plan for their health insurance–extremely important, quite important, not that important, or not at all important?
SurveyUSA asked that same question yesterday, with as close to the same sample population as possible, and they found 77% support, with the number of people feeling this element of health reform is "extremely important" rising to 58%.
The conclusion here is pretty clear. When you ask people if they support the President’s plan – a choice of a public health insurance option – they support it. When you leave out that critical element of choice, an element that accurately reflects the President’s plan, there is less support. Choice isn’t a biased word, as Chuck Todd contends. It’s an accurate reflection of the policy, and people like it.
Maybe that’s why NBC/WSJ changed their tune completely yesterday and will use this accurate poll question in their next poll.
(also posted at the NOW! blog)
I’m proud to work for Health Care for America Now



6 Comments







Now we just need those 77% to speak out and get noticed. I am pissed at a lot of my friends who want a public option but are keeping quiet because they’d rather not offend anyone.
Tell them to get together with more folks in their community. Strength in numbers.
Jason, That’s just great. Todd looks like an idiot, and not for the first time either.
Won’t be the last, I’m sure.
On the surface, Chuck Todd seemed to be a pretty good numbers guy during the Presidential Campaign-a bean counter of sorts. As WH correspondent, he is transparently championing anything and anyone opposed to this Administration and left leaning aspirations. Did David Gregory leave his instruction manual in Todd’s new locker in the Press Room? Two peas in a pod. Neither worth very much. Neither ever look beneath the surface on any issue. Rachel is ten times better than both these guys on their best day.
The “crucial element of choice” does not “accurately reflect the President’s plan,” any more than it does the “real bill,” as I’ve already pointed out. Do I really have to repeatedly interrupt my vacation to be the one to call out HCAN on this disingenuous bullshit?