As debate on health care moves forward in the Senate, it seems like a good time for a reminder: There is no such thing as a good trigger for the public health insurance option. In fact, triggers are nothing but a plan to kill the public option.
Why?
1. The status quo is unacceptable
The logic at the heart of a trigger is that the status quo is ok, as long as it doesn’t get worse.
A trigger says that some condition must be met in the future for a public health insurance option to be created in a state. That condition could be levels of competition or affordability, but whatever it is, the situation on the ground in a state must measurably worsen before the trigger is pulled and a public option created. That’s unacceptable.
People are going bankrupt and dying every day because they are uninsured or underinsured. The House and Senate bills don’t go into effect until 2013 or 2014, and triggers ask people in states to wait even longer to get relief from insurance company abuses.
As Senator Chuck Schumer said, "Any reasonable criteria for triggering a public plan has already been met."
And that’s assuming a trigger is written in such a way that it could actually be triggered.
2. The trigger is a catch-22, designed never to be triggered
We’ve tried triggers before in this country. Medicare Part D has a trigger written into the bill that will allow the government to start negotiating for better drug prices if they start increasing by huge margins. Even though drug prices under the program have skyrocketed, with Medicare Part D paying on average 30% more for drugs than regular Medicaid and costing taxpayers over $60 billion extra over 10 years, the trigger has never been triggered.
That’s what happens when triggers are written by Republicans and their lobbyist friends. Indeed, the trigger proposed by Senator Olympia Snowe, who voted against even debating health care on Saturday, was a catch-22 designed never to trigger.
As I’ve explained:
The trigger amendment isn’t a fig leaf. It isn’t even a co-op. It’s a plan to kill the public health insurance option outright, and give taxpayer money straight to private insurance companies.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The overwhelming majority of Americans support a real public health insurance option. Poll after poll confirms this. And the public option is even popular in places like Arkansas, Louisiana, and Nebraska [pdf]. Nearly all Democrats in the Senate support it. And it’s the right thing to do.
Triggers are not an acceptable substitute no matter how they are written.
(also posted at the NOW! blog)
I’m proud to work for Health Care for America Now



16 Comments







among other things, the trigger idea is driving me crazy. Jason, as you note, “the House and Senate bills don’t go into effect until 2013 or 2014, and triggers ask people in states to wait even longer to get relief from insurance company abuses.” This obviously makes the trigger pretty unattractive–but one thing I can’t figure out is why the bills, even as currently written, won’t go into effect until 2013 or 2014. isn’t this bad policy as well as bad politics?
Politics, sure, policy, less clear. A few years is likely needed to get things set up correctly, and given the bill isn’t going to be signed until 2010, you’re talking 2012. After that, it has to do with the deficit and reducing the CBO number.
I’m amazed that ANY faith is placed here in the House or Senate.
These persons (politically correct) are YOUR fucking enemy.
Jesus. Why do I have to wait any longer for U.S. progressives to see this?
Any reasonably written “trigger” would have been activated ages and ages ago.
And one more thing… “triggers” are most often used to “kill” people or other sentient beings. What a stupid, stupid term even to use in anything related to health care.
. . . and blah blah blah. Jason’s so unhip, he thinks when you’re talkin’ about triggers, you’re talkin’ about Ray Rogers, whoever he is. The man ain’t got no culture.
We lost the robust PO… without a doubt or a hope by the time the Baucus Bill passed committee. What we have had since then is a PO in name only, at best.
Kill these bills now… they just keep finding ways to make a miserable piece of legislation worse.
I just read on Huffington that Obama does not plan to “up” his involvement in health care legislation. Well he and his brain trust are certainly to blame for the state of the legislation and the process so far so suppose thats a blessing. That said he will certainly go down in defeat in November of 2012 if he doesnt salvage the mess but suppose the silver lining there is that he will not have to worry so much about that Mayan calendar thing.
OT
WOW, I agree with C. Matthews, I never thought that would happen. Matthews is discussing Kennedy getting banned from Communion because of his voting record on abortion. Matthews asked him what kind of punishment/law for a woman having an abortion and a Dr performing it and the Bishop wouldn’t answer. Mathews said he thinks the Catholic church can’t get their people to obey the Church’s moral laws and so they are trying to legislate them. The Bishop couldn’t answer on what the punishment should be and Matthews said they get laughed at if they said prison he shouldn’t because try to make abortion against the law because the Bishop had said he didn’t know how to make laws.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/#34116440
However this process comes out, we need to make real healthcare reform an issue for 2010 and use the public support for the public option a wedge issue to change some of the faces in Congress.
But, but,
Sheldon Whitehouse thinks a Snowe-style trigger could actually get us better results! (somehow…)
Grrr. Stupid DLC happy-talk…
FunnyWheelieDiva
You’d think he’d be able to figure it out and see past the double-talk and the snowjobs.
I really wish KO had pushed him for specifics, or hit him with the progressive’s arguments against a trigger…
FWDiva
From the “Let It Pass” album, just before the Filibuster Four broke up . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9jic9Kaf_s
sp
We should all just remember that the Federal Government does not have the authority to pass this legislation and is wasting our tax dollars doing so. I believe that they are directly violating the 9th and 10th amendments. What needs to happen is tort reform, big pharma reform and more community contribution and charity. Government is not the answer we are all just too lazy to demand real change. Not to mention that we are still wasting billions on two illegal conflicts and this bill threatens our privacy as much as the Patriot act does. Return the power to the people, restore the Constitution and end the illegal Federal Reserve.
This is My second Post.
I served in the Pacific Theater..Pearl,Saipan,Tinian,Guam,Ulithi,Eniwetok, Iwo Jima,Japan,Phillipines,back to Pearl and then home after Japanese Surrender. Spent time in the hospital on Guam and Pearl,and then in a New York Veterans hospital. When these right wingers send around pictures of our troops in Iraq and Afganistan, telling us how tough it is…..and it is, they still want to send our young men and women back into those godforesaken places……..for what ??,
Most people will say that they are fighting for our freedom…………….BULLSHIT, they are fighting for a corrupt country that doesn’t want us in the first place and in the real first place they are there because of Morons in Washington who don’t have a clue on what war is and have a “Bring ‘em on” mentality..
I say..let those who say “Bring ‘em on”, put on a full back pack,hand THEM a rifle and send them to Iraq OR Afghanistan where the temperature can be 120 degrees or freezing cold with people shooting at them,and see how THEY like war. It is very easy to send SOMEONE ELSE TO FIGHT AND DIE, OR BECOME DISABLED OR MAIMED AND SAY “WE’LL KICK YOUR ASS”, easy when THEY don’t have to do it.
I have to stop now, I’m getting emotional, I have seen young men DIE in battle….how many MORONS in Washington have.
Joe DeMarco
WW 2 Veteran
Ryan Grim at HuffPost has something new up about the fight over the anti-trust exemption.
My favorite sentence from his post:
[emphasis mine]