Jonathan Gruber of MIT is out with a new report today, proving once again that health reform – this time the Senate version in particular – would save people money. And once again, he’s relying on CBO numbers to prove the point. Here’s the argument:
In a letter to Senator Reid on November 20, the Congressional Budget Office (the official government scoring agency) reported that they estimated the cost of an individual low-cost plan in the exchange to be $5200 in 2016. This is a plan with an "actuarial value" (roughly, the share of expenses for a given population covered by insurance) of 70%. In their most recent communication with Congress, CBO also projected that, absent reform, the cost of an individual policy in the non-group market would be $5500 for a plan with an actuarial value of 60%. This implies that the same plan that cost $5500 without reform would cost $4460 with reform, or almost 20% less.
Gruber goes on to chart some of the savings for people:
It’s worth noting that the premium savings – calculated between $200 and $400 – are before the subsidies are applied. When the subsidies are factored in, you can see how significant the savings are, especially at lower incomes.
The Senate bill – with exchanges, a public health insurance option, and generous subsidies for lower incomes – would indeed save people a good chunk of change. Of course, there are parts that can and should be improved – better affordability standards for all Americans, for example – but critics who take the insurance industry line and say reform will increase costs are dead wrong.
(also posted at the NOW! blog)
I’m proud to work for Health Care for America Now