Health Care for America Now has a new report out today on the insurance industry’s profits and customer base [pdf] and the statistics are shocking:
The five largest U.S. health insurance companies sailed through the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression to set new industry profit records in 2009, a feat accomplished by leaving behind 2.7 million americans who had been inprivate health plans. For customers who kept their benefits, the insurers raised rates and cost-sharing,and cut the share of premiums spent on medical care. Executives and shareholders of the five biggest for-profit health insurers, UnitedHealthGroup inc., WellPoint inc., Aetna Inc., Humana Inc., and Cigna Corp., enjoyed combined profit of $12.2 billion in 2009, up 56 percent from the previous year. It was the best year ever for Big Insurance.
…
The 2009 financial reports from the nation’s five largest insurance companies reveal that:
- The firms made $12.2 billion, an increase of $4.4 billion, or 56 percent, from 2008.
- Four out of the five companies saw earnings increases, with CIGNA’s profits jumping 346 percent.
- The companies provided private insurance coverage to 2.7 million fewer people than the year before.
- Four out of the five companies insured fewer people through private coverage. UnitedHealth alone insured 1.7 million fewer people through employer-based or individual coverage.
- All but one of the five companies increased the number of people they covered through public insurance programs (Medicaid, CHIP and Medicare). UnitedHealth added 680,000 people in public plans.
- The proportion of premium dollars spent on health care expenses went down for three of the five firms, with higher proportions going to administrative expenses and profits.
The numbers may be shocking, but they shouldn’t be surprising. This is how the industry makes money, by charging people more and cutting the unprofitable people from their rolls. In fact, the one company who’s profit margin went down slightly this year – Aetna – was also the only company to add more customers to its rolls in 2009.
But the industry will go to any length to "justify" their profits and their policies of dropping their sick or expensive customers.
First, they’ll claim that the cost of medical care is going up, and so they need to raise prices, but it’s simply not true. As Congresswoman Rose DeLaura (D-CT) pointed out on a call with reporters announcing this report:
They’ll say the increases are justified because medical care is going up, and they’ll hide behind their actuaries to explain their rate increases. But this is coming from the same people who’ve been saying health insurance reform will increase costs. They can’t have it both ways.
She’s absolutely right. Insurance costs are skyrocketing now. Double-digit rate increases like those announced from Anthem in California have been common for years, and will continue to be "commonplace" if we don’t reform our health care system, according to Richard Kirsch, Health Care for America Now’s National Campaign Director. And yet, while raising their rates, insurers claim health reform will increase prices. It seems there’s only one way prices can go in according to the insurance industry – up.
Next, insurers will also claim that these profits aren’t out of the ordinary. As Andrew Kurz, former chief financial officer of Wisconsin Blue Cross-Blue Shield, explained, they are:
Insurers claim profit margins are only a slim 3-5%. But with competition, you have to carefully price products. Insurers don’t have to do that, they just raise rates on their most expensive customers. Even if insurers earn less money one year, they can raise prices the next to make up for it. And they can raise profits in concert with other insurance companies because they have anti-trust exemptions.
Insurance company profit margins put the industry in the top 10% of all industries, up there with cigarette manufacturers. Insurers price their products like a discretionary luxury, not something essential for health and well-being.
Finally, insurers will – perversely – try and blame the economy for their record-breaking fortunes, saying employers have been shedding jobs and therefor dropping insurance coverage, leading to a decrease in customers. And they’re certainly right in the sense that less jobs equals less employer-based health coverage, but that obscures the fact that employers have been steadily dropping health coverage for more employees for 15 years – even during good times – because the insurance industry’s prices keep skyrocketing much faster than inflation.
None of the excuses can explain away the basic reality that insurers make more money when they insure less people. They can pay their CEOs more ("administrative costs" rose this year) when they can charge the healthy exorbitant prices and drop or deny these loyal customers when they become sick and therefore expensive. Until we change that basic incentive structure, these Wall Street-run corporations will continue to operate in exactly the same way.
This is what health care reform is, in part, designed to change. Regulations on how much insurers must spend on medical care as opposed to profits and CEO pay will give consumers fair value for their premium dollars. Rules regarding rate increases will eliminate price gouging. Competition within the exchange (with a public option in the mix) and elimination of the insurance industry’s anti-trust exemption will force these companies to price their products within reach of their customers.
As Congressman DeLauro said this morning, "Despite [the insurance industry's] best efforts, we passed a bill in the House and Senate, and we need to press forward to have health insurance reform to provide economic security to American families."
(also posted at the NOW! blog)
I’m proud to work for Health Care for America Now



54 Comments




Thank you Jason. So disgusting. Record breaking profits…but them the fuck up all ready
In TX, the unconscionable rise in insurance premiums was attributed by companies raising them to the weather. The Dallas Morning News studied that claim, and some of their findings are here -
” While bad weather and high premiums do tend to go together, the newspaper found that, among all states, Texas’ premiums were higher than expected given weather damage over the years. Texas has more tornadoes and hailstorms than any other state, federal weather data shows, but when the state’s land area is taken into account, its ranking drops. Texas ranked fifth in total damage from 1990 to 2007, according to the weather data. The insurance industry says Texas premiums have either dropped or held steady in the last two years and that Florida has surpassed Texas in average premiums.
In its analysis, The News used a statistical tool called linear regression, which can control for factors such as weather damage. It is a statistical way to level the playing field across all states for a fairer comparison. The newspaper’s analysis found that, even after controlling for weather damage, the average 2005 homeowners premium in Texas was about 50 percent higher than what it statistically should have been. ”
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/longterm/stories/021509dnproson4method.125b1f94.html
The highest amount of hiking in rates occurred after the high-tech meltdown, when investors generally lost on stocks in the glamor industry. The bottom was reached in 2002, and in that and subsequent years the insurance industry claimed huge losses from ‘black mold’ damage that ‘forced’ them to increase rates exponentially.
In one of many suits brought subsequently;
“In 2004, a state district court found that State Farm overcharged customers $100 million and ordered it to refund the money.”
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/longterm/stories/021509dnproson4insurancemain.12599daf.html
That payment is still tied up in appeals.
Insurance companies put your premiums into their choice of investments, and when the market drops you are supposed to make up the difference. The industry is desperately in need of regulation.
I think the profit motive is overrated in a lot of areas, but in some areas it should be obvious that is has no place. Health care is one of them. I guess it doesn’t necessarily matter all that much if for-profit companies hawk breakfast cereals and toys (though the profit motive can have bad consequences in those areas too–obesity, unsafe toys etc.) but it is simply absurd to say that companies giving people access to health care may be for-profit entities. When profit comes first, people come last–that’s how it should be, in fact. If you’re running a for-profit publicly traded business, you have a duty to your shareholders to make as much money as possible, even if that means reducing access to health care for the people you insure. The situation is further complicated by the fact that some of the supposed checks fail–most people don’t really choose health insurance, they take what their employer offers. Jason’s post is a case in point–health insurance companies increased profits as they cut the share of premiums spent on actual health care. what’s next, for profit police and fire departments?
bizarro world
Exactly. When I found out that Hospice Care is profit based business, I decided just not to get old, thank you.
As Elliott says, bizarro world… immoral as well.
That profits as outrageous as those enjoyed by the health insurance-pharma-hospital & health systems industries are made off illness and suffering is a clear signal of ethical fail of outrageous proportions.
Real Health Reform????
We will never see such a thing until Senator Wyden’s proposal is recognized for its true merits. For the life of me I cant understand why big business is not clamoring for its passage.
Moving away from employer based coverage would: limit company costs for insuring workers … they could simply offer employees a flat fee voucher towards an individual plan. Employers would not be consumed by increasing health premiums.
Moving away from employer based coverage would mean our insurers would actually have to keep the insured happy. It is no wonder that insurers are so out of touch with the people they cover. We are not their customers. Our employers are.
Insurers will tell us rates will increase without the employer modeled risk pool. Hogwash! A risk pool can be based on zip code, geographical region, prior history of claims, and countless other mechanisms. If in doubt of this, just think about your auto insurance for a minute.
Why is auto insurance not based on employer models? For one, if you lose your job you wouldn’t be able to drive to find another.
Employment based coverage assumes one’s health is solely based on occupation. This theory is now how many decades old? Employer interests are far from employee interests and thus our choice of insurer should not legally be at the discretion of our employer.
Please consider this post as a suggestion box submission and pass it to all who have a stake in the topic. I have suggested it to President Obama last year but have had no reply whatsoever. Senator Wyden’s proposal for “Choice” is change we can believe in. It is the change we need.
I am with you!
Fully eliminating the employer based system is good in theory, but Wyden’s proposal would mean less benefits because the payouts don’t keep up with inflation. And besides, the employer-based system is what our health care system is based on. It’s probably not going anywhere.
And Obama wants to give these guys a Captive Market so that they can jack up rates even more and have the IRS go after you if you don’t pay them. This is called the protection racket where you aren’t paying someone to actually protect you, but rather paying someone not to hurt your worse.
Sounds Like an Unbiased Website with an unbaised Poll to me.
We voted for change in 2008. For more than a year we’ve mobilized to reform health care, rein in Wall Street, create good jobs, win workers’ rights and beat back climate change. We’re fed up. We want the change we voted for and we want it now! Because if the insurance companies and big corporations win, we lose. HealthcareforAmerica
Only some…..there are also non-profit hospice organizations.
What poll are you talking about?
“the employer-based system is what our health care system is based on.”
___
And utterly contradicts candidate Obama’s assertion (McCain debate) of health care as a “right.”
If the health care market truly operated on free market principles, then it should have flat or no growth in profits as most industries do right now.
You’ll notice that Finance and Healthcare Insurance appear to be exempt from this.
The reason is basically racketeering. Both industries need more regulation and reform to keep them from ripping YOU off, not to mention all the rest of us.
Unless of course you smile and are happy when your credit card interest rates go up, much like your insurance premiums continue to rise, and both of them far faster than the nonexistent inflation we’ve had in the last two years.
AHIP CEO Karen bin al Ignagni and the executive cohort she shills for are economic terrorists.
Funny– just under this article on the FDL home page is a Google ad for “Free individual health plan quote from Aetna, Blue Cross, Anthem, etc…”
Wow– a free quote. How generous. Does FDL have any control over this ad content?
I’m glad to know that, the ones I run into are for profit, and can be a horrible experience.
Ok that made me laugh out loud.
“…set new industry profit records in 2009, a feat accomplished by leaving behind 2.7 million americans who had been in private health plans.”
___
At this rate, how long before they start running out of people to exclude? I’ve said it before: the for-profit actuarial-based health “insurance” model contains the seeds of its own demise. All other comparable industrial nations already know this, and have acted accordingly.
Contact the irony department.
Yeah, the irony there was not lost on me.
I am very sorry…safe to say there is a different emphasis.
No, Google admonitor does this.
Based on the text on high traffic sites, a “spider” will report back to the Google mothership that “Hey this topic is on this page – hurry and put client X’s ad in that ad space.”
The ad agglomerator has paid Google for this service, and takes a cut of the click rate.
You’ll often see ads like “Obama. Socialist?” on Eschaton, which always cracks me up.
and I get Farouk Shami for TX governor ads all the time.
My theory is that reform will come when there are five people in America who can afford the premiums at $1B a year. Let’s see, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah, they only need a couple more. How about Rush? He’s loaded!
Otherwise, nothing will change and the middle class will be, as usual, out in the cold.
Copy that.
Count me in as increasing Cigna’s profits: I needed some healthcare for a year, so at the end of that year, they raised the rate of my individual policy to $1,000 a month.
Let me repeat: $1,000 a month for little ole me alone. Their previous premium raises hadn’t driven me out, although give ‘em credit they tried, with nearly 100% rise in premium price over several years.
But that thou a month finally got me out of their hair. Of course, I make just over the limit of the amount to qualify for Medical, so I’m healthcare free and just keep ignoring the bills from that trip to the Emergency Room last year, which means both the hospital and ambulance company are out the dough.
But not Cigna! They’re making a big, fat profit now that they’re rid of my sickly ass.
Corporate greed run amuck (sic). Time to nationalize all of the “health insurance” corporations, once and for all. I guess that Anthem/Blue Cross can see this coming, so they are launching a last-minute money grab with their 39% increase in insurance premiums…
O/T: The Daily Kos has a great article on California Republican Senate candidate Carly F. and her latest stupidity. Funny, Republicans just can’t suggest raising income taxes on greedy corporations and the absurdly-rich ruling class, can they? That would solve the State of California’s budget problems in a New York minute. Don’t Fiorinicate California.
It has been obvious for some time now that the health insurance companies must be destroyed. Its them or us. Its Medicare for everybody or its just B.S.
Which is why spending so much political time and energy during 2009 on so called HCR which is actually better described as health insurance reform(HIR) was truly a waste of both political time and energy.
AHIP,PhRMA and Wall Street surely want the money flows kept at current or growing rates and velocity. Barack Obama sold out early to AHIP and PhRMA and he did Americans no favors by taking any consideration of a single payer plan off the table.
So we see as the story above relates that AHIP members are going to keep doing hit and runs on Americans because for them it is not about health care but about profit care.
Barack Obama is described as being intelligent. Does he have the required courage to do the right thing here and not just go with the expedient?
Handing over Americans to AHIP members under force of law to join and then giving AHIP members federal subsidies independent of what care is being gained to justify junk health insurance having been put in place is a fraud.
Whatever the D Party and Barack Obama are selling as and calling HCR is junk reform much more about shoveling AHIP members big subsidies while they continue to do what is described above.
What’s the point? Barack Obama and his D Party are not going for real solutions. AHIP needs to be taken down and out. Do single payer plan.
Do the right thing. For a change.
Show some honesty and integrity.
I wonder what would happen if all those with individual insurance stopped paying their health insurance premiums and all started showing up their local hospitals demanding health care. It would be risky, but it could bring fast change.
regulations, yeah, that is the ticket. Since no one has ever heard of a Govt agency being captured by the industry it is set up to regulate.
I sure hope lots of people show up to shiver in the cold with the paid HCAN staffers and demand an impossible plan, that won’t work anyway. not looking very pwagmatic, the list of changes needed to the atrocious bills before Congress at the moment.
but, if the vast, authentic Public Option constituency shows up, your massive demonstration will surely make the news!
and this, I’m afraid, is a telltale slipup, revealing some magical thinking on the part of status quo preserving folks like HCAN:
ofgs, one main reason health insurance differs from car insurance is that demand for health care is inelastic, it is needed at some point, by almost everyone who has a body!
an industry is forced to lower prices when it’s customers exercise the choice the choice to refrain from purchasing the product – and with health insurance most people at some point have to capitulate and buy a policy at whatever rate it will be offered to them, even despite the industries odious recision and denial practices.
the individual mandate, which I notice is not mentioned in your post, is a huge gift to the parasites, forcing payments out of young, healthy folks who might be tempted to opt out of the terrible deals on offer.
but we know how some folks feel about anyone opting out of bad deals.
and Mr. Moderator, sir, have some courage as to the strength of your own point of view and allow this comment to appear, ok? censorship inhibits your own ability to adapt your arguments and perspectives based on countervailing arguments and perspectives, and overly censorious sites and movements hasten their own irrelevance.
No matter how much we may plead and beg nothing is ever going to change. Rich people don’t have to worry about health insurance, and I doubt they worry to much about poor people who may have to suffer and die. The employer based system is never going to change. Rich people believe that only people who are working are deserving of medical care, and if they are working and yet are not rich, surely they are simply not working hard enough. As a last resort, rumors have arisen recently, that anytime Congress can repeal Medicare and Social Security, thereby saving the entire country from ruin. They can use this stick to beat those poor (middle class) people who might still retain any belief that even the majority of citizens in this country might deserve any degree of dignity. I have begun looking at yurts to erect in my daughter’s backyard, and hoping they might have some table scraps available from time to time.
bust them up
short answer: no.
Anthem/BC is claiming that ‘rising health care costs’ are forcing them to raise premiums as much as 39 percent in CA this year.
I keep wondering how much of those ‘rising health care costs’ are due to rising health insurance premiums. Not that the companies are ever going to answer that – but it’s one reason to pull their anti-trust exemptions.
Ruth,
you do realize that this story is about HEALTH insurance right and not property insurance? You’re comparing apples and oranges and honestly it makes you look really foolish to anyone that’s not a driveling fool that lives on this site.
Jason,
again I find you here having not a clue as to what you’re talking about. Wait, I take that back, you do know a little bit about this but again you fail to speak on the true problem. Personal responsibility. Because CA doesn’t have an individual mandate the only ones that keep their healthcare there are the sick so they continue the cost spiral. Notice that rates in MA as much more stable because they have EVERYONE basically covered. If you bothered or cared to read the facts you’d find that Anthem in CA lost money last year in its individual market. Companies are only in the individual markets (that are not profitable to them) because they’re REQUIRED to be there by the states. This is a good thing but don’t let that be assumed that they’ll lose money forever. And they can’t cherry pick the sick people to cancel. I’m 100% certain that’s against the law and a state like CA would rightfully hammer them for that. The moment and insurer defaults by not being able to pay claims you all would be rightfully jumping down their throats and I’d be right there with you. Google “MEWA’s” and then come talk to me and act like you have an idea what you’re talking about.
At least Jon Walker has an idea what he speaks about.
Criminal and not uncommon.
If health care is affordable with real competition, then yes, everyone should be required to carry it. If not, well…
http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/
This is a blog that posts rightwing forwarded emails that make the rounds. A lot of the emails are eye-opening; most originate in rightwing think tanks (KO has highlighted this from time to time) and many just spew forth typical teabagger talking points. And yes, many are horribly racist.
One common theme that emerges from rightists is the myth that if you’re poor, it’s all & only your fault, and whatever befalls you is merely what you deserve. Believe me, the rightists are happy to lap this notion up with a big old spoon. Cuz I know many rightists and they blithely barf out similar crap at the drop of a hat. The rightists I know are mostly struggling to stay at the bottom of edge of what passes for “upper middle class” these days, and even that is getting harder for these people to stay there.
They all love to listen to the siren call of RushBilloSeanGlenn who soothes them with the notion all the ills of this planet can be laid solely & only at the feet of greedy, lazy, good-for-nothing, commiepinko liberals and teh poors and esp teh dirty messican minorities. If any of us has a financial downfall, it is solely & only because we leftists are ALL lazy, drug addicted party animals who never, ever work & sit around in large houses with flat screen tvs while waiting for our welfare checks & food stamps (I am almost quoting verbatim here bc so many of these emails make the rounds).
It’s quite amazing that anyone with any integrity or intelligence could “buy” this bullshit, but buy they do… because they simply wish to stay cocooned in their smug, self-righteous, selfish narcissim. And somehow cloak themselves in the belief that if they blame it all on liberals and teh poors then it will never happen to them. Talk about denial not being just a river in Egypt.
And so on.
Digusting but unsurprising news about big Health Ins. My rightwing friends, if they even learn about this, will come up with the usual bromide that the Big Ins fat-cats “work so hard” and therefore “need” more money. It’s like these people – the rightists – never got out of kindergarten or something. Unreal. And my friends are very well educated, too (just completely self-centered).
And so on….
I’m truly sorry that I don’t have the time to Google every one of your points.
It would be much appreciated if you would link to the sites that support the points you are trying to make.
Let the State continue to acheive real health care reform -and the FUCK the insurance racket. In California we have a third attempt at real reform in SB 810 Leno. It’s not employer based. It covers all residents. It allows individuals to choose their doctor. For all the details, check out onecarenow.
1. you are conflating healthcare with health insurance. not the same thing.
2. competition, contra neoliberal doctrine, in weakly regulated health insurance markets leads to a race to the bottom.
jason,
my apologies. I was too over the top. my point is I know you’re trying to get readership and comments up but by doing it by putting knowingly false information up just puts you in the wrong light. You can be better than that.
sorry. here you go.
http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/Publications/mewas.html
Note the specific point in case you don’t want to link to it:
By avoiding state insurance reserve, contribution and other requirements applicable to insurance companies, MEWAs are often able to market insurance coverage at rates substantially below those of regulated insurance companies, thus, in concept, making the MEWA an attractive alternative for those small businesses finding it difficult to obtain affordable health care coverage for their employees. In practice, however, a number of MEWAs have been unable to pay claims as a result of insufficient funding and inadequate reserves. Or in the worst situations, they were operated by individuals who drained the MEWA’s assets through excessive administrative fees and outright embezzlement.
I would not dare to speak for Jason, but I have never seen him put up false information.
More links please
no links, just explanation.
He stated that:
“Report: Insurers enjoy record-breaking profits as they cut 2.7 million people from their rolls”
They didn’t “CUT” 2.7 million people. They raised rates due to cost. Cost that rise due to the death spiral of healthcare without an individual mandate. The healthy don’t or can’t afford to pay so they drop off and the sick stay on because their costs without health insurance would be greater than the cost of their premium. The sick don’t have anyone to counterbalance their low (relative) premium to their high claims costs.
He states a “fact”….you state a “fact”.
Sorry, but some of us who may be more weak brained than others just can’t tell fact from fiction without some links to outside source.
Thanks for the trip to Alice in Wonderland. I stand amazed. Fascinating.
Jason,
This report shows why insurance reform will always fail. It will always be a cat and mouse game with these corporations. We have unlimited examples of regulations being circumvented or quietly removed by corporate America. But health care is a human need. We can’t just give it up like we could give up a cell phone.
PA Blue Cross just changed 29,000 of us to junk insurance as of 3/1. The insurance reform of the corporate congress wouldn’t engage any of the new regulations for years, causing more deaths, suffering, and bankruptcy. The industry will always have their strategies ready before any regulations would take effect. Until we have single payer, the people are like cattle waiting outside the slaughter house.
Hundreds of millions of Americans face unreasonable stress over health care while our leaders are only concerned with protecting obscene profits for a few fat cats. The immediate attack on the people from these companies demonstrates that single payer is the only solution. The fat cats and major shareholders should be tried for murder instead of protected.
I don’t functionally understand the difference between asking sick people to pay rates that they can’t afford and cutting them.
As for the healthy dropping off, sure, rates are rising all across the board, so there are some healthy people dropping. But it’s no secret that insurers charge multiple times more if you’re sick. That’s who most of these 39% increases are levied on – individuals buying their own insurance who have chronic conditions and the like.
So yes, mandate is fine if insurance is affordable and competitive. That’s why we need health reform.
Sure they cut those people off. They raised their rates to the point that those people could not afford to pay and so–voila!–they’re gone, no longer covered.
In the meantime, here’s a bit of health care humor at Repugs’ expense for your Friday morning. (Scroll down to video.)