Lobbyists for big cable and phone companies like AT&T and Comcast are circulating a letter in Congress, targeting Blue Dogs and the Congressional Black Caucus, asking them to sign on in opposition to net neutrality and the FCC’s recent announcement that they’ll reclassify broadband services to they can protect the Internet.
The letter, which I’ve obtained [pdf], contains the usual telecom lies that protecting net neutrality - a policy that is current tradition in this country and is just recently being violated by the telecom companies – would somehow cost us jobs or investment in Internet infrastructure. It then tries to convince the FCC that Internet services are more appropriate as "information services" as opposed to "telecommunications services," which the FCC is going to classify them as.
The letter skirts the core issue – if Internet services are left classified as "information services" then the FCC has no power to protect consumers according to the recent court ruling that started this round of lobbying. Any member of Congress that signs the letter is essentially saying it’s ok to leave the Internet completely in the hands of Comcast and AT&T and the other big telecoms, with no recourse for consumers if those companies, say, decide to start blocking access to blogs that are critical of their policies.
It’s likely that the lobbyists are targeting the members of Congress who signed onto a letter last fall against net neutrality for this letter, including 72 Democrats. The full whip list from the last letter is available here. After signifigant netroots pressure, some of the past signers dropped off that last letter.
To counter, Representative Jay Inslee (D-WA) is circulating his own letter [pdf] supporting the FCC strong decision and busting some of the telecom myths surrounding reclassifcation. In the coming weeks, pressure will need to be applied to Congress to get signers to this letter and support the FCC’s position.
And this all comes within a huge, crazy, astroturf/tea-bagger push against net neutrality. Members of Congress should know everyone on the Internet is watching their moves. If they sign on to the lobbyist letter against net neutrality, they’ll be showing us who’s side they’re on.



4 Comments







Well, I’m glad to land on this diary!
Inslee is my Congressman, and I hold him in high regard. He’s on Energy & Commerce (some may have seen him in the BP Hearings in the House earlier this week).
The district encompasses Redmond, WA. One of Google’s offices may be included in this Congressional district, as are a lot of information-related companies.
I have a lot of gratitude and respect for Inslee’s efforts on behalf of NN, so am glad to see this post.
Any BlueDog who votes against what FCC is proposing is likely to get themselves sidewise of their own local educators (K-20), who rely increasingly on the Internet to provide additional educational resources, as well as online and distance learning.
In addition, Google and other software interests have made a very convincing case that Net Neutrality (NN) is an economic engine. So if the BlueDogs vote to restrict NN, they’re actually doing a great deal of long-term harm to innovation and economic opportunity.
I think Inslee’s letter is going to get some real support in the coming weeks, good to see him taking a great stand.
can i blame the MSM for confusing the issue? It would only take 1 interview to find out what the FCC is doing.
Are blue dogs trying to get a lower approval rating than Bush? Get single digit support?