
"Strategery 1" by John O Dyer on flickr
You really can’t make this shit up:
First, Plouffe suggested, Obama has an opportunity to improve his standing among independent voters — many of whom deserted the Democrats in the 2010 midterm election — by working with Republicans toward bipartisan deficit-reduction measures.
Second, Obama has managed to move toward the center without losing significant support among core Democratic voters. The president’s job approval rating among Democrats, Plouffe said, is in the 80% to 90% range in many states. (Nationally, it’s about 77%, still respectable.)
Third, demographics help the Democrats. One of the keys to Obama’s victory in 2008, Plouffe noted, was high turnout among young, black and Latino voters, all groups that heavily supported the Democrat. Next year’s electorate should include even more minority voters than last time.
Fourth, Obama is a seasoned campaigner who ran a long, tough election campaign in 2008, and he still has the team that helped him to victory in place .
First: The “bipartisan” debt deal was an absolute failure, leading to a downgrade anyway, and resulted in all kinds of economic shenanignans, including today’s 400 point drop in the Dow.
Second: The idea that Plouffe could try to spin the notion that the base is willing to eat this shit sandwich would be laughable, if it weren’t so insulting.
Third: Are you kidding me? He mentions 2008, but did he forget 2010? Hello? Also, I’m not sure how he’s going to get more Latinos to vote if he’s spending so much time and energy kicking them all out. This is just basic math.
Fourth: Dave, I hate to break it to you guys, but you & Axelrod are not Karl Rove. At least Rove understood the importance of sticking to principles, and going on the offensive. Not only that, Plouffe does not seem to understand that the most important team for Obama’s reelection is not the campaign team, it’s the economic team. As bad as Orzag, Summers and crew were, compared to the idiots who are remaining, anyone with half a brain should be scared out of their minds considering who is running economic policy at the White House.
I’ll save the best for last:
Unemployment Rate Won’t Hobble Re-Election, David Plouffe Says
While history has shown the unemployment rate to be a leading indicator of an incumbent’s success, Plouffe said Americans won’t base their votes on it.
“The average American does not view the economy through the prism of GDP or unemployment rates or even monthly jobs numbers,” Plouffe said. “People won’t vote based on the unemployment rate, they’re going to vote based on: ‘How do I feel about my own situation? Do I believe the president makes decisions based on me and my family?’”
…
Since World War II, no U.S. president has won re-election with a jobless rate above 6 percent, with the exception of Ronald Reagan, who faced 7.2 percent unemployment on Election Day in 1984.
“Their decision next year will be based upon two things,” Plouffe said. “How do I feel about things right now and then, ultimately, campaigns are always much more about the future and who do I think has got the best idea, the best vision for where to take the country?”
Plouffe said he’s confident in Obama’s ability to replicate the grassroots enthusiasm of 2008 by re-engaging the party’s base as well as new and young voters.
This has got to be one of the most stunningly idiotic things I have ever read.
The election will be about more than two things, I can assure you that, and they are neither “feelings,” or “winning the future.”
It’s about jobs.
It’s about knowing one’s home won’t be taken away from them.
It’s about restoring at least the facade that our system of government is functional, or even bothers to appear to be fair.
We are sick of being ripped off by Comcast, lied to by BP, raped by Goldman Sachs, evicted by Bank of America, poisoned by Monsanto, murdered by United Health, and exploited by our own tax system, all in a vain effort to appease the Job Creators™ and the gods of “market confidence” who were going to downgrade & outsource us all anyway, regardless.
Not only that, this so-called “vision” of the future is not even their own, it was ripped off the Republicans. It’s bad enough they’re stealing ideas, but it is absolutely “fucking retarded” to steal ideas that are, at best, stupid.
Considering these people have tried to rip-off, then double down, on the Clintonian agenda, they couldn’t even steal one of the few simple, basic, and most effective things Clinton got right:
And though their economic plan has turned into a horror show, they naturally have decided to do more of it, and harder.
As for jobs?
Image courtesy of correntewire




30 Comments

Yes, it was disheartening to hear on the news that when the POTUS returns from vacation he will propose a plan that uses a scalpel to fix social security, cut $4 trillion from the deficit, blah blah blah.
So stupid. Already a repub (Upton) of the super congress has stood up to save social security! That’s exactly what the repubs did in 2010 when Obamacare(s) would have shaved off $600B from the Medicare plus plans: “Obama is screwing social security, again, only the repubs can save it!”
Leave social security alone, fergawdsakes, or face the wrath of seniors everywhere. Fix it later if you get re-elected, but to open it up now is to expose it to contagion.
Nice post. Tanks!
“We are sick of being ripped off by Comcast, lied to by BP, raped by Goldman Sachs, evicted by Bank of America, poisoned by Monsanto, murdered by United Health, and exploited by our own tax system, all in a vain effort to appease the Job Creators™ and the gods of “market confidence” who were going to downgrade & outsource us all anyway, regardless.”
Wow, nailed it. We’re all living this reality, and it’s not going to get Democrats to go into a dark booth to pull a lever for nothing but more of the same. Not . . . this. . . time!
WORD!
I was just about to paste that quote here.
They really have “jumped the shark” more than a couple of times, now. And there’s new horrors everyday. But at least some real truth is coming out, … oozing out, finally.
Cancel this TV show, already!
Plouffe is a fucking idiot.
Not only is he an apologist for the right wing,
but his “strategy” is a blueprint for losing.
Recommended
Delusion, desperation, or eleven dimensional shock doctrine, it is so tough to decide. I am thinking that this is all about voter suppression and maybe more Diebold Computer vote stealing mischief.
So, in Bizarro Conspiracy World, the “pragmatic progressives” such as Peter Peterson and poodle Obama are deliberately sabotaging the economy. Bernanke is an expert on economic Depressions and everything he does leads us further into a Depression. Phlouffe tells us War is Peace while robbing Americans of Social Security to increase poverty. That is a plan that the Dee Cee Village People can all agree with.
Right on right on!
Well if he came right out and told you “we do not seek a second term” it wouldn’t be a secret any more. And you probably wouldn’t believe it anyway.
I would like to believe that you’re right. I personally am going to write in Bernie Sanders, but I think that the average Democrat is most likely going to pull the Democratic lever. Or not vote. The Republicans will be out in force and I suspect the result will be a really close election. At this point Obama will probably win by a hair. I don’t know which is worse, Obama or a Republican.
First, Plouffe suggested, Obama has an opportunity to improve his standing among independent voters — many of whom deserted the Democrats in the 2010 midterm election — by working with Republicans toward bipartisan deficit-reduction measures.
Right cutting SS and Medicare to reduce the deficit will win Obama votes the GOP may have forced Obama to do it but Obama surrendered real quick.
I don’t think anyone can say America wants another bipartisan deficit-reduction measures.
End Both wars, Tax the Rich more is what they want not another compromise the GOP likes!
David really needs to be drug tested.
Take a look at the polling on cutting SS and Medicare David then tell me with a straight face that any deal that Obama can make with the GOP will be popular with Americans.
To add to the list of things to be distressed about under Obama is his reviving the nuclear power industry. So we can all be thrilled about raising the potential for being irradiated as a result of his administration relicensing aging reactors that are already leaking. He’s also happily wanting to hand out taxpayer backed loan guarantees for building new reactors.
For us in Texas in our severe drought and with the amount of water, nuclear reactors use, that is truly evil. We need that water for drinking and for the production of our food. That’s even before we deal with the issues of accidents and leaks and what to do with nuclear waste that stays radioactive for thousands and thousands of years.
How much do you have to not care about people to encourage the revival of nuclear power plant building when Fukushima is still melting down?
Second, Obama has managed to move toward the center without losing significant support among core Democratic voters. The president’s job approval rating among Democrats, Plouffe said, is in the 80% to 90% range in many states. (Nationally, it’s about 77%, still respectable.)
Any bets the intensity of that support is fading and that after the SS and Medicare deal details get more widely known those numbers will go down?
Any bets the GOP will attack Obama on the deal and claim they had nothing to do with it?
Sure any such claim would be a lie but the GOP lies all the time.
Forgot to say: Recommended!
recommended and tweeted
the only explanation that I can think of is that Plouffe has a bad case of ” Beltway insider delusionalitis”
If this is the best spin he can put on it, he better head on out to the pasture with the rest of the failed political strategists.
Is Obama still going ahead with new Nuclear Power plants before the Presidential election? After Japan well even Obamabots if they are trying to sell their home won’t vote for him if he does that a nuclear power plant within 100 miles of your home should lower property values.
Among smart home buyers make that 300-500 miles.
Numbers of how many people after Japan are leery of nuclear power would be interesting.
Obama not congress runs the NRC.
Third, demographics help the Democrats. One of the keys to Obama’s victory in 2008, Plouffe noted, was high turnout among young, black and Latino voters, all groups that heavily supported the Democrat. Next year’s electorate should include even more minority voters than last time.
Hispanic voters are not happy with 1 million deportations or if they forget their drivers license and get a speeding ticket have to worry about finding their drivers license fast or risk being deported.
A Puerto Rican in Chicago was held by INS for days almost got deported and they did not believe his mom that he was legal.
Its not only Mexicans who are pissed about this!
Oh, I remember that astonishing Plouffe quote about “people don’t vote based on the metrics” VIVIDLY from when it came out, as an example par excellence of eye-crossing incomprehensibility. True enough that people don’t vote based upon calculated metrics, they vote based upon the reality they live and the prospects they see. And, uh — that is actually a lot WORSE than the massaged (if not outright fraudulent) metrics report. Mr. Plouffe’s apparent interests would be better served if he were PRAYING that people believe those fake ginned-up “keep a happy face” numbers.
I believe you nailed it!
smart diary post. The strategery map doesn’t match the environment. it’s delusional- the PR has been turned inward and they’re believing their own b.s.
We need a write in campaign.
Plouffe and the Obama team put together a good campaign building grassroots support in 2008. Who replaced them with these pod people (that would include the one playing Obama)? They show no evidence of appreciating or understanding what people are facing or thinking.
Frankly [and it's taken me a while to come to this], I think Obama is worse.
At least with the Republicans you have a chance of opposition, and maybe some in actuality.
With Obama, you get not only the bad policy, but the cursing at anyone who criticizes it and the wide range of actions to shut it up.
Thanks for this, jest. Needed the concise lucidity to face the overwhelming insanity.
As I watch this campaign circle the toilet, I’m wonder if what we’re hearing is Obama’s reasoning [sic], with Pfouffe et al. just sent out to attempt to dress it up.
No serious “campaign strategist” could believe this crap.
Remember the Kathy Hochul victory?
Remember all the blather from Pelosi and Maddow about how they have a rallying cry for 2012, and it was “Medicare, Medicare, Medicare?”
All they did was throw this out the window, knowing full well most, if not all of us, know someone on Medicare or SS.
The gall of this hypocrisy is stunning.
And at the same time, Panetta is going around telling the country “we’re all gonna die” if they cut military spending.
The whole reason Obama had any credibility as a candidate was precisely because of his views on the wars and spending.
Again, the priorities & hypocrisy on display here is stunning.
I think I am starting to agree. Ron Paul is a better option at this point than Obama.
At least Dems in Congress would not have an excuse to rubber stamp neoliberal policies.
Paul would propose a lot of crazy right-wing programs, but realistically, they would never pass.
Thanks!
The sad thing is those paid political strategists cost a shit-ton of money.
He is better off getting free policy advice from FDL, but that’ll never happen…
We can expect more attacks on Professional Leftists from those script kiddies at TPV. They will tell us that modest modifications to Social Security is a winner. They want a fight with “faux progressives” will put millions into poverty if they do not support the President using Social Security for more wars.
And Keith Olbermann is now a Firebagger.