Earlier this month, the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for the arrest of Omar Bashir, President of Sudan, for his role in genocide and other war crimes in Darfur. An editorial in the New York Times written shortly after the warrant was issued concluded with this paragraph:
And he [Mr. Obama] should urge all of America’s allies to comply with the arrest order if Mr. Bashir decides to leave Sudan — there is talk that he may try to attend an Arab summit in Qatar later this month. Any country that continues to enable Mr. Bashir should be branded as an accomplice to his many horrors.
There are now reports that Bashir is traveling freely. He visited Eritrea on Monday and is in Egypt today (Wednesday).
So much for the US and Obama following the advice of the Times’ editorial staff and urging our allies to honor the arrest warrant.
It would be truly ironic if Obama did urge Egypt to arrest Bashir, since both the US and Obama are openly defying the ICC themselves. As described in the New York Times in May, 2002, the Bush Administration repudiated President Clinton’s last minute signing of the treaty establishing the ICC:
In a letter to Kofi Annan, the secretary general of the United Nations, the Bush administration said that the signature of the Clinton administration on the treaty creating the court was no longer legally binding.
"The United States does not intend to become a party to the treaty," John R. Bolton, an undersecretary of state, wrote to Mr. Annan in a one-paragraph letter. "Accordingly, the United States has no legal obligations from its signature on Dec. 31, 2000."
Finally, Jonathan Turley pointed out on Rachel Maddow’s show this week that Obama is now risking becoming an accomplice to torture because he is refusing to prosecute those who ordered and carried out torture despite irrefutable evidence that the US committed this war crime:
By refusing to prosecute those who ordered and carried out torture, Obama is ignoring the requirements of US law and international law. With his lack of action against Bush and Bashir, Obama is joining them in defying the ICC. That is not very good company for our president to be keeping, in my opinion. As the Times feared, Obama now has become an accomplice to Bashir’s crimes, just as Turley points out he is an accomplice to Bush’s crimes.



8 Comments







Turley rips it up. What is up with Obama? We know why Bush Co would not honor International decisions. He never did. Plus if he did they would be looking for Cheney,Bush and team.
Thanks for this
Exactly, Bush erased the signature on the treaty because he knew what he and Cheney were planning/doing and that they would be subject to prosecution.
I really can’t tell what Obama wants. I still think that deep in his heart he knows how terrible all of this is, but he just seems to be triangulating far too much and winding up not doing anything of substance. I think the Turley approach of applying pressure by calling Obama an accomplice after the fact is the best route to force his hand.
Africa is counting on Obama to turn things around I hope he doesn’t let them down.
Well said Jim, and I’m glad you’re keeping an eye on Sudan.
It appears that issues of Rule-of-Law are afterthoughts to this administration. The only way to push them up the agenda is to make noise–be it shrill or not.
Aaaarghh! AFP now has a story on the Egypt visit and it includes this tidbit;
If he approved this statement, Obama now has crossed the line into actively helping Bashir to get away with his crimes, just as he is assisting Bush.
So we have yet another presidential unindicted co-conspirator. I’m disappointed but actually not all that surprised.
President Obama is no war criminal so why isn’t aggressively pursuing (or at least allowing) Bush – war crimes? As per Jonathan Turley, the illegality couldn’t be clearer.
I don’t know. Political? He inherited a mess and has an enormous budget that has the best chance of passing in the early days of his presidency. If it doesn’t, we may not get “change you can believe in.”
Could taking on the politically sensitive effort of pursuing Bush – war crimes complicate is initially ambitious plans?
Since Egypt and Eritrea have not ratified the ICC and Qatar is not a member of the ICC (voted against in 1998) they are not legally bound by their own laws to arrest Beshir.
Just sayin’.