This diary will, in the words of Emptywheel, go very far into the "weeds", but it should help to bring together several themes that have been percolating through recent diaries I have written on US handling of prisoners and night raids in Afghanistan. Please bear with me, as my weed-whacker blades tend to dull a lot faster than Marcy’s.
In this diary on Friday, I noted an AFP report (which I inadvertently failed to link) which explained that General Stanley McChrystal has been given expanded powers in Afghanistan. Here is the sentence of that report on which I now wish to focus:
As the NATO commander, the only forces not under McChrystal’s control will be a special US task force that handles detainees, the small number of special operations forces and some support troops from other nations, the official said.
Note the key exceptions of US forces that McChrystal will not command: the US task force in charge of detainees and special operations forces. Both of those groups were addressed in this diary, where I quoted extensively from a piece by Spencer Ackerman. That diary was addressing the question of whether the US still maintains secret prisons in Afghanistan and the appointment of former McChrystal associate Vice Admiral Robert Harward to head Joint Task Force 435, which is in charge of prisoner operations in Afghanistan. The diary also addressed the activities of Joint Task Force 714, now under the command of another McChrystal former associate, Vice Admiral William McRaven, who now heads the Joint Special Operations Command, as did McChrystal.
In that diary, I speculated that because Harward had been adamant about no secret prisons under his command and with the known history of McChrystal’s hiding of prisons when he headed JTF-714, that it was likely that JTF-435 handled only the publicly known prisons and JTF-714 still was in charge of the secret sites. There is now more information to support this hypothesis, and it comes from looking at the command structure of US forces in light of the exceptions to McChrystal’s command noted above.
The current org chart for the Department of Defense, at its highest levels, looks like this:
I have taken that chart from Wikimedia Commons, but it is an accurate simplification of this org chart (pdf) from the Department of Defense (although DoD does not show the NSC involvement).
Note that operations occur under the direct command of the President’s Secretary of Defense through the Unified Commands. The Unified Commands can be found here, where there is a map (click on it to expand it) that shows the geographic areas covered by five of the commands. As can be seen on the map, Afghanistan falls under US Central Command (CENTCOM). The other two commands that will be of interest for discussion here are US Joint Forces Command (JFCOM) and US Special Operations Command (SOCOM), two of the four non-geographic commands.
McChrystal’s current appointment is as the Commander of ISAF (Interantional Security Assistance Force), a "NATO" operation that falls under CENTCOM. That means McChrystal reports directly to General David Petraeus, who heads CENTCOM. Keeping in mind the exceptions to McChrystal’s command noted above for prison operations and special operations, it is very interesting to discover just where JTF-435, Harward’s prisoner operation, is housed. From this news release dated Friday, it is clear that JTF-435 falls under JFCOM. As a part of JFCOM, then, JTF-435, and the prisoner operations under Harward, are well outside McChrystal’s official sphere of command within CENTCOM. Note also that the Ackerman article linked above clearly places JTF-714 within SOCOM, which is the Unified Command to which McRaven, as head of the Joint Special Operations Command, reports. This accounts for the "special operations" exception to McChrystal’s command within Afghanistan.
But note how this sets up yet another shell game with what the US is doing in Afghanistan. My diary on secret prisons noted how it was most likely that Harward was placed in charge of the prisons we acknowledge, while keeping the secret prisons under the control of special operations, most likely under JTF-714. Now, with Friday’s announcement that McChrystal was clamping down on night raids, the same shell game is playing out. Also from my diary Friday is this quote from Reuters:
U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan will be permitted to carry out raids at night only when there are Afghan security forces present, their commander, U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, ordered on Friday.
But, since we know that the worst of the night raids are special operations (also almost certainly by JTF-714, following the playbook McChrsytal wrote when he ran it), McChrystal’s order would not apply to special operations forces answering to SOCOM.
Oh, and lest you get the impression that Harward is somehow in a better place by being in JFCOM rather than SOCOM, I took a look to see who is now commander of JFCOM. It is General James Mattis, who was in the news in 2005, when he uttered these amazing words:
Lt. Gen. James Mattis, who commanded Marine expeditions in Afghanistan and Iraq, made the comments Tuesday during a panel discussion in San Diego, California.
"Actually it’s quite fun to fight them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot," Mattis said, prompting laughter from some military members in the audience. "It’s fun to shoot some people. I’ll be right up there with you. I like brawling.
"You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil," Mattis said. "You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway. So it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
What a poor choice of leaders.
It is also interesting to note in passing that JFCOM is home to the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, which houses the old SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) unit, where trainees were waterboarded as training to resist torture if captured. Note that the crafting of the torture memos relied heavily on claims that practices we used on our own troops in training them could not amount to torture. Is JFCOM using input from JPRA in crafting its prisoner treatment policies in Afghanistan?
In summary, then, McChrystal can "order" that Afghan personnel be present for night raids, but the night raids that cause the most damage are not under his command. Harward can claim no secret prisons exist under his command, but there is a separate command where they are very likely to exist. JTF-714, following the plans McChrystal developed when he ran it, still seems free to operate in its known free-wheeling way, breaking into homes in the dead of night, striking terror into families, and removing citizens who are held secretly and without access to hearings on whether there is sufficient cause to imprison them.
At a later date, it is probably worth some digging to look into that third category not commanded by McChrystal, the "some support troops from other nations". What do they do?
UPDATE: Please see this diary for an explanation from CENTCOM that McChrystal does in fact have command authority over JTF-435.



26 Comments




For further confirmation of the shell games, contrast McChrystal’s apologies for civilian deaths in an airstrike in southern Afghanistan, where, again, McChrystal can only control targeting by troops under CENTCOM command, with Jeremy Scahill’s reporting that JSOC and Blackwater control choice of targets for many drone attacks in Pakistan which result in higher rates of civilian killings.
Rut roh. It looks like McChrystal’s government in a box for Marjeh may need a bit of adjusting, since the hand-picked leader appears to have spent time in jail in Germany for attempted manslaughter–of his own son.
Not weeds, Jim. A very important clarification and examination of the lines of command responsibility (that once was and must be again) and authority leading to the actions of American/NATO (is there a difference anymore?) Armed Forces engaged in conflict(s) abroad. Something that every reporter covering topics touching on this subject, and every Member of Congress, should know about and keep handy. Well done.
Thanks. And the sad word for the state of what M$M reporters do these days is that it only took four or five hours to bring all this information together. Any of them parroting the official line from McChrystal could have put the information together, had they shown just a little curiosity and initiative. Imagine if someone put questions to McChrystal about the current role of JTF-714 as opposed to the forces he commands. Imagine if those questions then were posed to SOCOM.
powwow brought up what was immediately on my mind, the role of the NATO Command side of this authority puzzle. Jim, as you know, I was with US Central Command when it was created in 1983 and the chain of command and authority lines were complicated back then, but nothing like what exists today. I don’t know if it is possible even for a genius scientific detective like you to solve this puzzle.
I also don’t believe it is possible to classify command and authority lines. If we had an M$M that were journalists, it would be possible to ask the questions you are asking and get some answers. I’m sure you are right that especially since the Afghanistan invasion, DoD organizations have taken advantage of these lines to cover up terrible torture and killing operations. Then you have organizations outside of the DoD, like the CIA, who only have to answer to the President. As much as you have thought this out, you are probably only just below the tip of the iceberg.
Thanks, RMP. I was hoping to get your read on the situation. I think the most disgusting part of the way the shell game is set up now is the presence of former McChrystal associates running the aspects that we are all supposed to believe are just unfortunate things, rather than a carefully crafted deception. McChrystal has to know that what he is spouting are lies, because he literally wrote the book on the practices that are skirting his public-relations minded “commands”.
Don’t forget the role of aspiring national politician Gen. Petraeus. He and his associates have to be as deep or deeper than McChrystal in this conspiracy hypocrisy to play both sides of public relations and secret operations.
There would be no reason to play shell games unless something is being covered up.
Sure looks to me like McChrystal is trying hard to wash off a lot of caked blood from his JSOC days in hopes of legitimizing himself for some public purpose.
Any chance Petraeus and McChrystal hope to run for President and Vice President in 2012?
And also to Mason.
It’s clear Petraeus plans to run for office. I’d like to think that since there is so much documentation of McChrystal being associated with really bad things that he won’t be able to run. But then again, I didn’t think he’d be a credible candidate to head ISAF…
But those ones are the ones that are most in need of being controlled.
Stanley McChrystal shouldn’t be leading American troops anywhere on the planet. He should be meeting regularly with his criminal defense attorneys to prepare his defense to war crimes charges.
There’s a guy they call the Commander in Chief, or some such, but the buck just gets funneled upstream into the coffers of ‘savvy businessmen’.
Here’s a radical idea: Let’s get the hell out of there and stop bombing the shit out of them. They will probably feel better about us and we could spend that money on something unnecessary oh say like single payer health insurance…
Oh, I agree. Just the other day in a discussion here criticizing the msm and I said pretty near the same thing. I said probably more time is put into researching for diaries at The Lake than all the anchors and reporters together. Something like that.
Dirty Hippie!
Even dirtier now that I’m back from the porch. ;-)
Isn’t she cute?
If these wars ever end — and they won’t — but if they did, do you really think there would be a Peace Dividend? I don’t. Look how quickly al-Qaida got invented to sop up the Peave Dividend we were expecting after the Cold War ended.
Phoenix Woman is upstairs!
Our Wonderful Traditional Mainstream Media In Action
I hadn’t seen it like that before. Thank you.
Do you really have so little respect for me that you think I’m delusional? I mean you seem to be talking to me as one would a child. No, I’m not expecting a “peace dividend”. At least not one that would improve life for the poor or middle class.
Excellent post Jim.
Thanks. Dang, I missed the front page time picking my wife up at the airport. Great to have her back, though.
I bet we are creating more Taliban and al-Qaida leaders than we are eliminating:
One in three killed by US drone strikes is a civilian
http://rawstory.com/2010/03/drone-kills-pakistan-civilian/
Isn’t creating more enemies the objective?
They was a saying from Vietnam “This isn’t the war we want, but it’s the one we’ve got”.
From an AP report this morning describing a meeting that Karzai and McChrystal held with locals in Marjeh:
Emphasis added.
It will be interesting to see if we hear more reports of innocent civilians being taken. It also will be interesting to see if they can be accounted for any time in the next few weeks.