
US Army photo of General Stanley McChrystal speaking to the press after Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s shura on June 13.
As evidence continues to accumulate that the US-led NATO counterinsurgency plan (COIN) in Afghanistan is an abject failure, we now see panic setting in on several fronts. In stories out today, we see in the Washington Post a continued effort to rehabilitate the image of detention operations in Afghanistan. In the Post story, General Mark Martins, Deputy Commander of Joint Task Force 435 claims "You can’t kill or detain your way out of an insurgency", even though General Stanley McChrystal’s historical record is precisely an attempt to kill or detain our way out of counterinsurgencies in both Iraq and Afghanistan. That story gets coupled with the revelation by Reuters that the NATO command structure in southern Afghanistan, where the operation in Kandahar has been changing daily between being "on" and "off", is being restructured:
In a radical restructuring of its military command in southern Afghanistan, NATO said on Monday it had split the country’s most violent region in half in a bid to improve security by focusing on smaller geographical areas.
Although the shake-up had been planned for many months, Monday’s announcement marked the official start of a new Regional Command Southwest (RC-SW), reflecting the influx of thousands of new U.S. troops into the region.
The move comes as more than 20,000 foreign and Afghan troops prepare to push the Taliban out of their spiritual heartland in southern Kandahar province in a series of operations expected to last several months.
But perhaps the biggest signal of panic at the highest US levels about Afghanistan is the revelation in the New York Times that vast mineral reserves have been found in Afghanistan.
Clearly, with a trillion dollars worth of minerals now waiting to be "harvested", it is only a matter of time until the rationale for remaining in Afghanistan becomes the need for us to see that there is no corruption in how Afghanistan doles out leases for those minerals rights. Oh yes, MMS is certainly the model we should impose on Afghanistan, isn’t it?
In fact, in reporting this development, James Risen was able to get a direct quote from General David Petraeus:
“There is stunning potential here,” Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the United States Central Command, said in an interview on Saturday. “There are a lot of ifs, of course, but I think potentially it is hugely significant.”
If Petraeus says this has the potential to be "hugely significant", look for it very soon to be the primary reason for keeping troops in Afghanistan. No other reason for remaining there has any credibility at this point.



44 Comments







Maybe the minerals will even be able to pay for the war, the way Wolfowitz promised Iraqi oil would pay for that war. Oh, wait…
Yeah, folks who haven’t read it yet should take a look at the MMS scandal story I linked. That tells us what the minerals fees will really pay for…
Well said.
….Why do you think there is a story about Afghanistan & minerals making the rounds.
This is another scam being played on Americans.
We fight foreign wars for only two reasons:
1. To secure unfettered access to steal valuable natural resources that do not belong to us, and
2. To create more terrorists to justify more unjustifiable foreign wars and thereby conceal our real purpose.
Let me correct that for you:
1. To secure unfettered access for MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS (without HQ in the US) to steal valuable natural resources that do not belong to us, and
2. To create more terrorists to justify more unjustifiable foreign wars and thereby conceal our real purpose which is to perpetuate the cycle of the rich getting richer and the poor get to suffer and die.
My concern is that you somehow seem to indicate that “we” as a global-Western view benefit from things such as natural resources in Afghanistan or the like. _WE_ don’t get anything from it. It only is for the rich to benefit from. Not you or me… EVER.
You’re right, of course.
Don’t get anything from it? Oh yes we do. THE BILL! Our taxes pay for these marauding armies.
I think that is the clearest post I have ever seen. Can you tell us why we have a drug war?
and 3. to benefit the military industrial complex.
The corporate benediction.
Praise them from whom all blessings flow,
Praise them all peons there below,
Praise them above ye budgets of woes,
Praise MIC and hold your nose,
Amen.
LIHOP. Looks like the taliban just got a whole bunch of new friends.
I suggest that NATO and UN Peace Keeping forces come in and aid in the development of the vast natural resources.
I’m not so sure about NATO involvement; that’s the guise we’re using now for McChrystal doing his thing. I’d like to see UN multinational forces, though, with independent oversight making sure the proceeds go back to the Afghan people rather than to shock doctrine vultures.
It’s all about keeping the Chinese from getting Afghanistan’s lithium. Screw gold — lithium is what the batteries of our all-electric future will be made of, as they’re better in just about every way than lead-acid units.
I think that the Chinese are finding a fair bit of lithium already w/o Afghanistan.
http://www.lithiumsite.com/Lithium_Mining_1JX3.html
Like we couldn’t just make some products they want and then just buy it? What is wrong with trade instead of war?
Batteries? We don’t need no stinkin’ batteries!
Glass half empty, glass half full.
No news is good news… this news is?
Had these facts been known some years back might the contractors had more success in training the Afghans to administer their own country?
Ah…one of those “American interests” we’re fighting for in Afghanistan…
Jim, let me point out the obvious that doesn’t seem to be entering the discussion; mining takes a LOT of water.
And Afghanistan doesn’t have it.
That’s a very interesting point.
Just like the shale mining in the Western U.S. doesn’t discuss the water implications.
Not to mention a semi-decent infrastructure. Have you ever been to that part of the world and seen the roads? I haven’t been to Afghanistan, but I’ve spent a fair bit of time in India. Esp with this war going on, I cannot imagine the state of the roads, not to mention other infrastructure needs. But hey: that’s what we serfs are here for: to pay for Afgani infrastructure… right?
Plus, it takes people to do the work and with our use of uranium munitions, they are going to disappear entirely. We are turning the region into a barren wasteland.
I keep wondering and have been able to get on several national shows asking what happens to any Taliban who decide to surrender? Never a clear or specific answer. Folks may not be aware about what happened to Taliban who had surrendered to Afghani and U.S. forces soon after the U.S. invaded after 9/11
If you have never watched “The Convoy of Death Afghan massacre” This sure would discourage folks from surrendering.
MSM outlets did not touch this massacre
Video clip
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3267.htm
Maybe we could arrange for Don Blankenship to do three or four years of community service in Afghanistan. He could lead the way in harvesting those mineral resources while killing off a bunch of Afghani’s in the process.
OT, but can we have more ads with the corporate image of ConsumerTipsDigest.org and fewer of the ones for teeth whitening. What company decided those images would spur sales? Yuk.
Screw it, the time has come to admit the obvious, let’s make it a colony and take the damn stuff for ourselves. Pax United States of Americana right?
Betrayus and McChrystal thought they could ignore the lessons of history and it has come back to bite them in the ass.
NATO and the US would need all their ground forces to protect any mining operation in Afghanistan and that would prove to be so costly as to be prohibitive. Using lithium as an example, could Afghanistan compete with Brasil, who is increasing its ability to mine its substantial deposits of the mineral?
a TRILLION dollars worth of ANYTHING is enough for the US to stay, fight, occupy, control, administer, share (?), apportion, indenture, enslave, threaten, lie, cheat, steal, kidnap, torture, and justify in the name of democracy and capitalism. It doesn’t have to be oil, and it has never been about truth or freedom. We just got the very best goshdarn and I betyouacollar reason to try at least six other counterinsurgency strategies. Afghanistan is no longer the graveyard of empires, it is the land of OPPORTUNITY!
a TRILLION dollars? that’s all? chump change to Morgan Stanley (or BP for that matter).
Friedman Unit-ed Beyond All Reliability
Yep, most definitely FUBAR.
As the AP (natch!), is pointing out, the intended target of Risen’s piece; the VSP’s and Think Tankers have taken notice…!
But… But…
Who were they working for, Mexico?
It’s old news dredged up at a time when the government is busily drilling the depths to fuel a distraction from the Gulf of Tarballs, and need some proverbial sweet crude to grease the gears of war and cap off any insubordination in the ranks.
There are known knowns.
What’s so hilarious about this is the FACT that it was proven to be a LIE less than 3 hours after it was printed.. That NYT research staff… best in the biz, hey??
So let’s see, if I can dig up the facts about the Soviets re-finding these mineral deposits in Afghanistan back in the 80′s while THEY were occupying Afghanistan, and the Soviets actually left EXTRAORDINARILY DETAILED MAPS of the location of most all of these deposits, one would think that the NYT could do that level of research??? Huummm…Gotta wonder…
The NYT story sounded like a total propaganda feed from the 1st sentence.
Now we have to stay to make sure FREEDOM ( the freedom of the Int’l Corp looters ) is preserved and that the mineral wealth of Afghanistan gets to the RIGHT folks ( the top 1% of usual suspects).
because of course it is purely coincidental that Afghanistan is the world’s #1 producer of opium.
Well, you see, Osama bin Laden ostensibly walked thru there on his way to Pakistan,where he’d left his dialysis unit in a cave, so that’s why we’re there and the Taliban, who live there, don’t want us there, so they are “insurgents”…in their own country….which we attacked.
See?
Jim, excellent thread!
But, as the reality chickens keep coming in for landings, let’s watch the rest of the coalition of the rented. I’m thinking they won’t be as interested in stay-the-course fantasies.
At some point, surely the attraction of admitting the truth and then acting upon it, will be more attractive than continuing their part in this bloody, long-running, bullshit opera.
Are we SURE that some incompetent at MMS didn’t make this up (about “finding” the maps) to save their asses?
Although, I still think it would be far more pleasant in oil-baked Biloxi than Kandihar.
The US military has been terrorizing the third world, here and there, off since 1898, for one hundred and twelve years. The point of our imperial interference is to obtain control of vast natural resources, minerals, metals, oil natural gas and sometimes even agricultural products (see history of US and banana production in Central America, for example). Americans need to bone up on the history of American imperialism. A quick read can be done with a simple internet search for “US imperialism.”
Cheers.
Thanks! Good read.
Ya know, they should get a real pro to run development funds for Afghanistan. Maybe the guy who did funding oversite in Iraq. What’s his name.. Cheney’s friend. Phillip Merrill. Oh wait, damn. He was found in the Chesapeake with an anchor tied to his legs and a shotgun blast to the head. Clear case of suicide according to the police.
Whatever they do in Afghanistan, it’ll continue to be dirty as all hell. We need to get the troops out of that hellhole. ASAP.