As I reported very early on Friday, ISAF claimed that they an arms smuggler they captured last Saturday in southern Afghanistan was a member of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard al-Quds force. Less than twenty-four hours after making that claim, ISAF now is backing down on the claim that the arms smuggler is al-Quds. That’s an awfully short time from announcement to correction, especially since the prisoner had been held for several days before ISAF made the claim.
Here is how AFP described the original ISAF claim:
A member of the elite al-Quds force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has been captured in southern Afghanistan accused of cross-border weapons smuggling, international forces said Friday.
The man, described as a “key Taliban weapons facilitator”, was captured Saturday in Zhari district, Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan, a volatile district targeted in recent coalition offensives.
He was targeted “for facilitating the movement of weapons between Iran and Kandahar through Nimroz province,” a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said.
As they said back in the Nixon era, that story is no longer operational. Here is the ISAF press release “clarifying” the situation:
CORRECTION: ISAF Clarifies Status of Cross-border Weapons Facilitator
The International Security Assistance Force has determined a cross-border weapons facilitator detained Dec. 18 is not a member of the Iranian Qods force, as was originally reported.
Initial intelligence reports led ISAF to believe he was a member of the force, but after gathering more information, it was determined that while the individual may be affiliated with several insurgent-related organizations, he is not a member of the Qods group.
A joint security team specifically targeted the individual for facilitating the movement of weapons between Iran and Kandahar through Nimroz province. The detained man was considered a Kandahar-based weapons facilitator with direct ties to other Taliban leaders in the province.
Adding more detail to the retraction, Dawn (via AFP) gives us this discussion:
Relations between Afghanistan, Iran and the United States, whose troops make up roughly two-thirds of the coalition force, are highly complex and sensitive.
Kabul insists that Iran, as a neighbouring country, has a legitimate concern in helping the reconstruction and development of Afghanistan.
But some [sic] the US are concerned that Tehran could be funding insurgents or trying to play on anti-Western sentiment in Karzai’s government.
BBC provides more information on the arms smuggler from an Afghan security source:
A senior Afghan security official in Kandahar said coalition forces had been monitoring the man for some time.
He told the BBC: “Iranian intelligence officers are helping the Taliban and drug dealers in the south. We deal with it every day. This is a known fact now.
“It was the international forces who arrested him. They had been listening to him for some time and monitoring his electronic communications.”
Adding further interest to the general story of interactions among Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the US (as I discussed in the earlier post), the same BBC article also points out that on Thursday Iran blocked fuel supplies from crossing into Afghanistan and that earlier in the week, a number of Afghan border guards had been jailed in Iran after crossing the border “apparently by mistake”. Afghanistan traded previously jailed Iranian intelligence officers for the border guards.
Given these rapid recent developments, it will be very interesting to see what the next few days have in store for us regarding Iran’s role in Afghanistan.




11 Comments

I don’t buy that the Iranians are helping drug dealers, Iran doesn’t put up alcohol or drug abuse/trafficking at all. Sounds like psyops.
Indeed. There is a very strong flavor of information operations here. And as you point out, the drug trafficking claim does sound weak.
We know that AIPAC and the Obama Neocons (see: Bushco/Cheney Neocons) are itching to attack Iran. Why the retraction? Any idea what was the catalyst for the 180 on the intentionally false report?
See…they just make this shit up. They are all boneheads.
Yup. Good question.
To paraphrase Captain Renault: I’m shocked, shocked to find that disinformation is going on here!
There is absolutely no way that Iran, a Shiite theocracy, would ever support the Taliban, a thoroughly Sunni organization. Or Al-Qaeda, for that matter. In fact, Iran actually provided intelligence to the American Empire before the initial invasion of Afghanistan on the principle that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
What absolute hogwash. Though this could be a new harmonic for the beating of the war drums against Iran. Maybe Obama feels he needs a new war to get re-elected and is floating a pathetic trial balloon? Or maybe the ISAF people are just idiots. Occam’s Razor says the latter. We shall see.
Our neocon MIC has such a hard on for Iran, remember the call, ‘real men go to Tehran’…! *gah*
Btw, are ya’ll comfortable with 1 million+ individuals in our entire Amurikan Intel Apparatchik…?
I know I sleep better at nite…!
in a comment in jw’s earlier thread on this topic, i queried the source of the original isaf account that their intelligence on this so called iranian quds operator was pakistan isi – it made no sense then and turns out to be another of those ‘misspoken’ spins and people are right, there is no love lost between the iranians and the taliban but as for the drugs issue, it’s not necessarily that clear cut
it’s true that both iran and the taliban, when in power, cracked down hard on the drugs trade but opium and heroin are useful money spinners and the taliban are not the only players of terror in the badlands
think the isaf spin is more to do with ensuring under the radar russian support who are genuinely concerned about drugs and taliban and not at all enthusiastic with the western push to isolate iran
the msm pundits never question such ‘hoqwash’, as you put it, so there’s a never a brake on that spin machine misspeaks
I found a really good blog on the inside baseball that is taking place in Pakistan, the Dec 18 post about a Vikileak(sic) is interesting. Should General Kayani step down?
The Pakistan military commander is apparently is an american puppet and will overthrow the civilian government on command.
This diaryis excellent historical review on the politics in War on Terra in Af/Pak with some new insights, at least to me.
Apparently Musharraf airlifted a bunch of Taliban/AQ out of Afghanistan before 2004 with Cheney’s approval so AQ is not as big of a problem as Pak’s nukes.