An op-ed appeared in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal bearing the title “A Fifth Star for David Petraeus“. The byline for the op-ed lists Pete Hegseth and Wade Zirkle and the Journal provides this “description” of their association at the bottom of the piece: “Messrs. Hegseth and Zirkle are directors at Vets for Freedom. Mr. Hegseth served in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division and will deploy to Afghanistan in 2011. Mr. Zirkle served two deployments to Iraq as a Marine infantry officer and is a recipient of the Purple Heart.” The Journal provides no further information on Vets for Freedom. Thursday night, Pouting Baby gave us the description of Vets for Freedom off their website:
Vets for Freedom is a nonpartisan organization established by combat veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Our mission is to educate the American public about the importance of achieving success in these conflicts by applying our first-hand knowledge to issues of American strategy and tactics in Iraq and Afghanistan.
/snip/
Vets for Freedom PAC is a Political Action Committee whose mission is to help candidates-mostly combat veterans-who believe in achieving success in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the overall War on Terrorism, get elected to the United States Congress and other Federal positions.
Digging a little further, I note that Vets for Freedom places Republican Allen West at the top of their list of candidates they supported in the 2010 elections. Bragging about getting such a deranged person elected to Congress tells me a lot about where this group is coming from.
But there is much more. SourceWatch has a very long, highly documented portrait of Vets for Freedom, which includes this pithy, one-sentence summation:
It was, in essence, a Republican front group managed by Republican-affiliated public relations[8], media[9], legal[10], and political consultants, including former White House spokesman Taylor Gross, to defeat candidates who advocate an end to the US occupation of Iraq.
When he provided testimony against confirmation of Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, Mother Jones provided this description of Hegseth:
Finally, there’s Pete Hegseth, the former Bear Stearns banker and head of the Republican-friendly political action committee Vets for Freedom, whose way through Princeton was paid by the anti-gay Family Research Council. While a student, he started the Princeton Tory, a conservative school paper funded with thousands of dollars from national right-wing groups, including the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Leadership Institute, and YAF. Hegseth used the Tory’s pages to attack “atheist public schools” while advocating spanking and “a return of the acceptability of the ‘homemaker’ vocation.” He also called the National Organization for Women “a radical, leftist, feminist organization” and, for a would-be Army civil affairs officer, did a really poor job of predicting success in Iraq in late 2002:
I believe, if done correctly, eliminating Saddam and liberating Iraq could be the ‘Normandy Invasion’ or ‘fall of the Berlin Wall’ of our generation…the Iraqi people are eager to be rid of Saddam, and there is equally encouraging evidence that republican principles could thrive there.
In 2008, Hegseth pulled down a $100,000 base salary as the head of Vets for Freedom. Tax filings from that election year also show his “nonpartisan” group has deep GOP ties, paying out hundreds of thousands of dollars to right-wing consultants, including one lobby group connected to former Republican senator Bill Frist, the Bush-Cheney campaigns, and Frank Donatelli, the treasurer of Youngblood’s YAF.
In a glowing profile of him at Power Line, we learn more about Hegseth when they quote a newspaper column by Katherine Kersten:
At Princeton, Hegseth joined ROTC and the National Guard. But the opportunity to serve came sooner than he expected. In March 2004, three days after he started at Bear Stearns — and three weeks after he married Meredith Schwarz, his high school sweetheart — he was called up.
Hegseth was sent to the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
The SourceWatch article also contained the White House photo you see above, where Pete Hegseth is closest to George W. Bush. The photo was taken on July 20, 2007. In a very interesting coincidence, that is also the date that George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13440, which provided a “new” interpretation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and has been described as allowing “harsh” interrogations.
Isn’t that interesting? On the day a former Guantanamo guard (who later would go on to help a elect a former torturer to Congress) visits him, Bush signs an Executive Order that re-starts torture.
To see a little bit of Hegseth in action catapulting the propaganda on Iraq, here is a very low resolution YouTube posted by Vets for Freedom of Hegseth appearing with Glenn Beck during the 2008 “National Heroes Tour” that Vets for Freedom organized to gin up support for the Iraq War:
As for Wade Zirkle, he doesn’t appear much better. Here’s a happy picture of him with Gordon Liddy.
Is Vets for Freedom preparing to support David Petraeus as a candidate for President? Shouldn’t the Wall Street Journal have mentioned that Vets for Freedom supports candidates for office who are veterans and support “victory” in Iraq and Afghanistan?




51 Comments

I think Pete Hegseth has a personal stake in this he does not want to go to cocktail wennie parties and be called a torturer by Jane.
He wants to justify what he has done sure he might not have tortured people but he worked at a place where everyone knows torture happened.
He realizes the GOP has to win the war on torture and wants to use vets serving as political cover.
However not many Vets I don’t think are proud of torture and if torture did work then why couldn’t Bush ever find Ossama bin Forgotten?
This guy sees Petraeus as a symbol that can be used to justify the war the bigger Petraeus gets the more accepted socially Pete Hegseth will feel. Petraeus gets another star Petraeus becomes President its like Pete Hegseth feels he will have won also.
The war must go on until we win Pete must prove his working at a torture camp was justified by results!
Of course Bear Sterns and Pete personally might also be invested heavily in the war. You note Pete was close to Bush the Bush family rewards friends with inside information on stocks and corporate board jobs look at Dick CEO of Hal with a Master’s degree no business experience kept his job even though he bought an asbestos company with tons of legal liability?
Good think Dick brought in the government pork. GOPers hate government but get rich off of inside deals and government pork but remember they are ALL SELF MADE MEN. BWAHAHAHA!
Who never took a government hand out! They just whored themselves to riches look at Jesse Kelly the guy who ran against Gabby he hates government spending but the family construction firm does most of its work on government projects.
Hal under Dick well they owned the Iraq war contracts.
What fools those mortals be. Don’t they realize that the military’s sole function is to protect the vested interests of the American aristocracy?
Just how many members do they have no wait all GOP groups lie about their numbers a better gauge would be just how big are their prowar protests assuming they have any at all?
Jim, hanks for picking up on this and bringing the fascinating background info to our attention.
And thanks to Things, for your supplemental comments and info.
Slessings,
Aloha, Jim…! Great job…! A real bunch of Repugnant sleazebags…!
Was Hegseth in a MI/MP NJ-ARNG unit…? And hand-picked to go to Gitmo…?
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Jim White:
And now it begins…the first two years of this administration are lookin more and more like 1860-62 and the first two years of the Civil War. In fact, Obama’s concilliatory politics is becoming more and more understandable especially his Super Glue attachment to the banksters since the only folks that can take on the military and the oiligarchy are the banksters who control the treasury AND the Congress. The last time we saw a fracture like this in our ruling oligarchy was in 1973-74 when the Yankee banks took on the Southern and Southwestern oil cowboys. What we must hope for is that, when forced to choose between goin’ down with the oil barons or standin’ behind our elected executive, the military chooses as it did then and sides with the banks. I think that in the end, the military will know which side its bread is buttered.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, DEMOCRACY MEANS NEVER HAVIN TA SAY SIEG HEIL TO ANYONE!!
OT: W is the cover pic of current AARP magaz. Is he really the image we want of successful retirement? Maybe there will be a lot of blow back. Let him stay quietly in Dallas behind his wall, please.
I don’t think “non-partisan” means what they think it means.
I just saw this over at Common Dreams. We gotta get crankin’. 2012 is right around the corner.
“Storytelling as Organizing: How to Rescue the Left from its Crisis of Imagination”
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/01/14-6
Damn I miss the old editing tools.
Citizen CTuttle:
Yo you Anceint Mariner of Yankee Polynesia, how are they hangin’? I think that the rupture in the oligarchy is duplicated inside the ruling class of the military and the Air Force is lined up with the oil and nuclear robber barons with the Army and Navy are still playin with the banksters and the treasury. Petraeus is playin against his own higher command structure both civilian and military and it is a very dangerous game BOTH Obama and Little David are playin here. And I don’t trust either one of the bastards.
Your welcome:)
Wee Petey should get a “star” .. we can name a constellation after him when we fire him off in the first lunar capsule to explore where no man, or woman, has gone before
Indeed. And I’m sure these guys never discussed this with Petraeus before they wrote the piece. That just wouldn’t be proper now, would it? And what a coincidence it will be when they launch his presidential campaign!
is the same general from planet of the apes, General Ursus?
Sleazy bunch of characters, all incestuously related.
Ruppert will get this off the editorial page into its news in 5….4….3….
These people obviously want to run Patraeus but they need a way to compare him to Eisenhower. Not being a good general, all they have is that fifth star, (if he gets it). Hey Davey, those stars are reserved for (A) generals in declared wars and (B) generals who win declared wars.
GREAT thread, Jim! And I owe Barack Obama an apology. I said in your other thread that I thought he’d cave to a push to elevate Petraeus to the military purple. After reading all the info that you gave us, I think it’s likely that with this much of an agenda for “Warbots for Freedom”, Obama can get away with leaving Petraeus
with only four stars.
(Caveat: I wouldn’t put $20 on this…)
WTH does DAVID PETREUS NEED WITH ANOTHER STAR? Is this another example of the US wanting to believe it can be a ww2 hero all over again? something like, if petreus has 5 stars, then he must be Macarthur? Then what? blakcwater nurderes are audi murphy and obama can be Truman and the economy is wonderful la la la la la la
If the GOP wants Petraeus to run I assume on a pro war ticket then the GOP is backing someone who can run below Sarah’s poll numbers.
I didn’t think that was possible.
HUGE caveat. Leaving him with four stars will soon be viewed as “not bi-partisany at all”….
Simply astonishing. What an unlikely and totally random chain of events!
I wonder what Nate Silver and MyDD think of Obama’s chances against Petraeus or any GOPer who runs as the prowar candidate.
I thought for sure the GOP would run as Nixon did the Peace with Honor thing?
The GOP I think thinks the lesson of Viet Nam is never give up? If so even Obama can win.
But a third party candidate running on peace can win if both the Dems and the GOP go prowar.
Oh F*ck…
Palin to deliver address at gun convention
Tin ear…?
Konichi wa, CT
That’s a given but since her reality show’s been canceled she’s gotta go back on the rubber chicken circuit. Not qualified to do anything else.
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is ready: The America of David Brooks’ Imagination
Aloha, SD…! Ye,p she’ll fit in nicely with Larry the Cable Guy…! ;-)
Who Are Those Guys Who Want Petraeus to Get His Fifth Star?
the pullers of levers in the land of false choices no longer see Palin as viable and are in the process of picking someone else for us to choose from ???
I read that piece earlier. A real hoot. Don’t I remember Larry the Cable Guy from the late 80s?
Where else could she give a speech? I means there ARE Guns and site and scopes and ammunition and and and.. Oh Barbie couldn’t resist with so many goodies near by…..
No shit, Margaret! :o)
And, am I the only one who thinks that Obama’s main accomplishment is to keep so many of the bushCo plates spinning?
And that there is no way that he can keep them spinning long to do the time-honored thing of getting out of office (being run out of office by democrats who want some vetigial chance to hang onto their seats?) and handing the flaming bag of shit to the next preznint?
Konichi wa SD. Ogenki desu ka?
Let’s see how many repubs in the Senate jump on this “Hail Caesar!” bandwagon.
No. You’re not.
BTW, what happened to the numbers on the threads?
Torture is not intended for getting information from people. It’s intended to get them to say what you want them to say. Look at the history of torture, for instance, the Spanish Inquisition. They tortured people until those people “admitted” that which would allow the inquisitors to put them to death and seize their property. The other effect of torture is that it begins to make your enemies or would-be enemies think twice about opposing you, because you also may be a candidate for the same treatment.
On another note, I am almost 62 years old. I never thought that we would be having to have this discussion about torture. Claiming that we in the US have moral high ground is total balderdash.
Thanks, I feel better this afternoon. :o)
I dunno, ‘Undone: I think Petraeus looks a lot better than Palin to the kingmakers in the GOP. Their problem is that Obama is likely to have accrued so much blame for the state of things in 2012, that people will be coming out of the woodwork to take a run at him, so they’ll have to deal with that.
And I sure hope that those numbers include some democrats, too.
I think it’s going to look like one of those clown cars, where people just keep piling out of it. :o)
There are two different comment formats at FDL now. This is the diary/blogger format (and probably the least popular one)
Thanks, Margaret. I vote for the old way, too.
Question: In Afghanistan does the federal government have enough money left to underwrite another (and much bigger) bribe system like the one Petraeus used in Iraq to get the Sunnis to (temporarily, I expect) lay down their arms and “join” the government?
I mean, it’s like we’re trying to purchase the fucking world.
There has to be a limit somewhere, especially with our economy the shape it’s in, and with people losing their jobs and their homes, etc.
Yup, Obama’s been a wonderful asset to the BushCo operation.
Shrub was the Decider. Obama is the Enabler, the right wing is currently looking for the “Finisher”. Petraeus would fit in nicely for this because of his faux celebrity of being such an “awesome” general goes hand in glove with the increasing militarized right wing. He would be an easy sell because all they have to do is tout his “awesome” leading abilities in Iraq and now Afghanistan and pawn that crap off as being bi-partisan or apolitical. Even though this douchebag has been working the same problem going on 10 years now and yet have no real coherent strategy in either country.
I have a hard time believing in any veteran trying to sell me more war. The guys on the photo look pretty green, maybe they did most of their service in the tent, or under a CO’s desk somewhere.
They look like Dan Quayle “vets”. :o)
In deference to Messrs. Hegseth and Zirkle from Vets for Freedom, Gen Petraeus is a 4 star general which has been the highest rank during peacetime with the exception of those already promoted.
Unlike WW I and WWII we are really not at war as none has been declared. A 5-star general (usually from the Army but some have been from the Navy)is “General of The Armies” meaning they are the head of all the services. Petraeus is not only NOT at war, he is not the head of any of the services. He is in Afghanistan head of whatever we claim to be going there.
Petraeus deserves no 5th star. Moreover, his job requirements certainly do not demand one.
A Vietnam Vet, 1st Brigade (detached) 101st Airborne
“Wars can be prevented as surely as they can be provoked, and we who fail to prevent them must share the quilt for the dead” Omar Bradley, General of the Armies (5 star) 1893-1981
Great piece Jim – thank you.
danw5 – thanks for fleshing out the the requirements and just as much for the Bradley quote. It’s a guilt that punches me pretty hard some days.
Why has the word “freedom” become somewhat distasteful ?
“Freedom fries” started it. Bush was desperate to defame the French. Their GIGN elite corps had aborted a suicide hijacking in 1994. That was the Air France Flight 8969 action by al-Qaeda members aimed at knocking down the Eiffel Tower.
Now their militaristic fantasies all get “Freedom” in the titles.
BTW: if Gen. Petraeus manages to pacify Afghanistan and return our DoD budget to pre-9/11 levels — $600-billion a year — then i will personally craft his fifth star. Out of gold.
Good luck with that.