
The eerie blue glow of Cherenkov radiation given off as charged particles moving faster than the speed of light are slowed in water, in a light analogy to the sonic boom. (photo: Oak Ridge National Laboratory via Wikimedia Commons)
With reports mid-day Tuesday Japan time that high levels of radioactivity were being observed and that spent fuel rods could possibly be on fire, the prospect of complete loss of containment from one or more of the nuclear reactors and/or dispersal of much of the radioactivity from large numbers of spent fuel rods at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant moved closer to being realized. Because radioactivity and the effects of radiation on people are likely to be in the news for some time to come, now seems to be a good time to present a basic introduction to radiation and the effects of the large doses that could be delivered to people within the immediate zone of the disaster.
Radioactivity and Radiation
To understand radioactivity, it is most useful to consider the planetary model of atoms, where the large, dense nucleus of the atom is analogous to the sun and the small, quickly moving electrons are in orbit far away, just as is seen for planets. The nuclei of atoms have protons, which have a positive charge, and neutrons, which have no charge, in them. For chemists, the number of protons in an atomic nucleus is the atomic number. The periodic chart of the elements arranges chemical elements by atomic number, starting with hydrogen with atomic number one (one proton in the nucleus), helium at two (two protons in the nucleus), carbon at six, etc.
While a chemical element is defined by the number of protons, for each element there can be multiple numbers of neutrons. For example, there are three forms of hydrogen, with zero, one or two neutrons accompanying the single proton. Hydrogen as we usually think of it has one proton and no neutrons in the nucleus. When there is one proton and one neutron in the nucleus this form of hydrogen is called deuterium. If you have ever heard of “heavy water”, that is water where the hydrogen is enriched for deuterium. Atomic weight roughly correlates to the sum of protons and neutrons in the nucleus, so normal hydrogen is also called hydrogen 1 and deuterium can be called hydrogen 2. The multiple versions of one element differing in their atomic weights are called isotopes. Normal hydrogen and deuterium are called stable isotopes because they do not change over time. However, hydrogen with one proton and two neutrons in the nucleus, tritium, is unstable. Tritium can reach a stable state by radioactive decay. When a tritium nucleus decays, one of the neutrons suddenly becomes a proton by ejecting an electron. The half life of a radioactive element is the amount of time it takes for half the nuclei in a given sample to decay.
If we had an extremely small balance and could weigh both the tritium nucleus before it decayed and the resulting helium nucleus (since we now have two protons and one neutron in the nucleus) plus the electron that has been ejected, we would find that a small portion of the original mass is missing. It was Albert Einstein who taught us how to bring this equation back into balance by finding that the missing mass can be accounted for as energy imparted to the electron as it departed the nucleus. Einstein’s famous equation tells us that the energy imparted to the electron is equal to the “missing” mass multiplied by the speed of light squared: E = mc2, where “E” is energy, “m” is mass and “c” is the speed of light.
Electrons ejected in radioactive decay are one of the three basic forms of radiation, and are called beta particles. Alpha particles are essentially helium nuclei, with two protons and two neutrons, and come from more complex forms of decay of unstable isotopes of much higher atomic weight, such as uranium 235. The third basic form of radiation does not have an associated particle, but is instead a high energy X-ray, called gamma radiation. Gamma rays are ejected during radioactive decay of isotopes such as cobalt 60, cesium 137 and iodine 131.
Radiation Absorption in Biological Tissue
Another term sometimes used for radiation is ionizing radiation. That is because when high energy alpha particles, beta particles or gamma rays collide with matter, they impart their energy to the target they have hit. These collisions are of high enough energy that they break atomic or chemical bonds, creating ions. Biological damage from radiation in living tissue is found as “broken” molecules. Biological functions of important molecules can no longer be carried out when they are broken. Accumulation of sufficient damage in structural molecules such as the cell membrane can lead directly to cell death. Some forms of damage to DNA can lead to mutations, or changes in the information encoded in the DNA. In some cases, these DNA changes can result in cancer or birth defects in the next generation.
When describing radiation doses to biological material, we have to think in terms of how much energy is absorbed per unit mass of the material. Current standards of dose include the gray and the sievert.
One grey is an absorbed dose of one joule per kilogram. A joule is a watt second. You pay for electrical power to your home by the kilowatt (thousand watt) hour, which is 3600 watt seconds or 3600 joules 3.6 million watt seconds or 3.6 megajoules. However, the different forms of radiation have different effects on biological tissue when they interact with them. When doses are reported in sieverts, those different effects have been taken into account. The dose is sieverts is the dose in grays multiplied by the “quality factor” of the radiation. For beta and gamma radiation, the quality factor is one and the doses are the same. For alpha radiation, however, the quality factor is 20, meaning that alpha particles do twenty times as much damage for absorption of the same amount of energy. Alpha radiation is not a risk when outside the body since it cannot penetrate the dead layer of the skin. It is only a risk when alpha-emitters have been ingested or inhaled.
Protection From Radiation: Time, Distance and Shielding
Physicists tasked with the responsibility to devise systems to protect people from harmful effects of high doses of radiation rely on the three concepts of time, distance and shielding.
For time, the idea is to minimize the amount of time that someone is exposed to a high dose rate. As conditions deteriorate around the Fukushima Daiichi facility, look for workers to be limited in the amount of time they can spend in the immediate area. In fact, some workers were evacuated from the area Tuesday because of those considerations.
Radioactive material that is not moving acts as a point source emitting radiation in all directions. That means that as distance from the source increases, the dose of absorbed radiation would go down as the cube square of the distance. For example, the dose rate two miles from the source would only be one eighth fourth the rate at one mile (two to the third power is eight squared is four), provided that the radioactive material is not being dispersed at the time.
Shielding allows radiation to be absorbed in material other than the biological tissue being protected. That is why you are given a lead apron to wear when your teeth are X-rayed at the dentist’s office. The apron is of sufficient thickness to stop the low energy X-rays that bounce off your teeth or jaw bone back toward your body. Shielding is described in half value layers based on the energy of the radiation hitting it. In this table, you see that it takes a little over two inches of concrete or a half inch of lead to stop half the gamma radiation emitted by cobalt 60. A concrete bunker was erected over the remains of the Chernobyl reactor that failed in 1986 and a new concrete structure is now being built to replace the older crumbling one for further shielding from the remains of the radioactivity there.
Acute Effects of High Doses
Although any increased radiation dose has harmful effects on the population exposed, causing delayed effects such as cancer or birth defects, short term acute effects of radiation appear at higher doses. There are three major syndromes of radiation sickness leading to death. The lowest lethal doses destroy the bone marrow, leading to death in weeks to months from infection or internal bleeding. At a higher level, the lining of the gastrointestinal system is destroyed, leading to death within about two weeks. At the very highest doses, cardiovascular and/or neurological damage leads to death within hours to a few days. Here are the descriptions and associated dose levels from the CDC:
- Bone marrow syndrome (sometimes referred to as hematopoietic syndrome) the full syndrome will usually occur with a dose between 0.7 and 10 Gy (70 – 1000 rads) though mild symptoms may occur as low as 0.3 Gy or 30 rads4.
- The survival rate of patients with this syndrome decreases with increasing dose. The primary cause of death is the destruction of the bone marrow, resulting in infection and hemorrhage.
- Gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome: the full syndrome will usually occur with a dose greater than approximately 10 Gy (1000 rads) although some symptoms may occur as low as 6 Gy or 600 rads.
- Survival is extremely unlikely with this syndrome. Destructive and irreparable changes in the GI tract and bone marrow usually cause infection, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Death usually occurs within 2 weeks.
- Cardiovascular (CV)/ Central Nervous System (CNS) syndrome: the full syndrome will usually occur with a dose greater than approximately 50 Gy (5000 rads) although some symptoms may occur as low as 20 Gy or 2000 rads.
- Death occurs within 3 days. Death likely is due to collapse of the circulatory system as well as increased pressure in the confining cranial vault as the result of increased fluid content caused by edema, vasculitis, and meningitis.
For external radiation, the doses reported above in grays convert directly to the same numbers in sieverts and would only change if there are inhaled or injested alpha-emitters.
Potential Fukushima Fallout
It is beyond my training to describe or predict the composition of the potential fallout should the bulk of the fuel from one or more Fukushima Daiichi reactors or their spent fuel become airborne in the current crisis. Similarly, I am not qualified to estimate how much material could eventually find its way to the US. I would, however, point interested parties to this description from the Health Physics Society of potassium iodide tablets and the current wave of buying now being seen on the US west coast:
Potassium iodide can provide important protection for one organ from radiation due to one radionuclide. It can only provide protection for the thyroid gland from an intake of radioiodine. It doesn’t have any value in protecting other organs of the body or in providing protection from radiation from other radioactive nuclides. For example, potassium iodide has no protective value from a “dirty bomb” or a dispersion of spent nuclear fuel. Here’s why.
/snip/
KI has been erroneously represented as a “magic bullet” of radiation protection. KI, if taken properly, only protects against internal radiation from radioiodine taken into the body. It will NOT protect against external radiation or internal radiation from radionuclides other than radioiodine. This salt, if taken either before or very soon after a radioiodine intake and if taken in the proper dose, will block the uptake of radioiodine by the thyroid. KI can be in the form of a pill or a supersaturated solution. The recommended daily dosage for an adult is 130 milligrams. If the thyroid absorbs all the iodine that it needs from the nonradioactive KI, then the radioactive iodine will not be absorbed and will be eliminated from the body mostly by way of the urine. Reducing the amount of radioiodine absorbed in the thyroid will reduce the dose received by the thyroid, thereby reducing the risks of thyroid cancer. Even though there have been minimal side effects (e.g., gastrointestinal effects or rashes) from the use of KI, this substance should only be taken on the advice of health care providers. Again, KI will only help reduce the effects of radioiodine taken into the body and not from other radionuclides.
The only possible sources of large radioiodine releases are from a nuclear weapons denotation and a catastrophic accident in an operating nuclear reactor. Therefore, KI has no protective value from a “dirty bomb” or a dispersion of spent nuclear fuel.
My thoughts and prayers are with the people of Japan as they face difficulties on a scale that was unimaginable only a few days ago.
Author note: My undergraduate degree was in Radiation Biophysics and my first year of graduate school was in Medical Physics before I transferred to Molecular Biology. I took courses in these subject areas in the late 1970′s through 1980, so I take full responsibility for any errors I may have made in going back over topics I studied so long ago and for any errors in converting to the new terminology now used in describing radiation doses. Please point out any errors in comments and I will note corrections the post.



63 Comments

wonderful to have this – thank you
tweet
RT A Layman’s Guide to #Radiation and Human #Health http://tinyurl.com/45zh64m from @JimWhiteGNV #Japan #nuclear
This is enormously helpful, Jim.
Can you explain what happens with medical radiation? Obviously, it’s a much lower dose. But do you know what kind of radiation it is?
Hi, Jim!
Many thanks for the information!
Here are some links I wanted to bring to your attention-in case you hadn’t seen them, and I apologize for doing this so early in the thread…
Will General Electric Get Whacked for the Catastrophic Failure of Its Nuke Plants in Fukushima?; Dave Lindorff; 3/14/11
http://www.truth-out.org/will-general-electric-get-whacked-catastrophic-failure-its-nuke-plants-fukushima68465
Spy Games; Scott Horton; 3/14/11
http://harpers.org/archive/2011/03/hbc-90008019
Tokyo Electric to Build US Nuclear Plants: The No BS Info on Japan’s Disastrous Nuclear Operators; Greg Palast; 3/14/11
http://www.truth-out.org/tokyo-electric-build-us-nuclear-plants-the-no-bs-info-japans-disastrous-nuclear-operators68457
PS: how do you do the embedded links?
Medical radiation for X-rays or CT’s are artificially produced gamma rays. Depending on the application, the energy of the X-ray is adjusted to provide the information needed. The image is produced by having film (well, these days it’s a solid state detector acting like film)receive the radiation that passes through the body. Because different tissue types absorb the X-rays differently, bones can be “seen” as areas that absorbed more of the X-rays passing through.
Medical radiation used in radiation therapy uses higher doses depending on the outcome needed. For example, Hodgkin’s disease can be cured by delivering a dose of radiation to bone marrow that would otherwise result in death from the hematopoieitic syndrome followed by a stem cell transplant. (Full disclosure: for my second round of postdoctoral research, I was in the research group of Henry Kaplan that had extended his grants beyond his death. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A00E2D9143BF935A35751C0A962948260&pagewanted=all)
Nice post!
Here is some supplemental info on units that people may see over the coming days. For the following, I assume that the radiation in question is either electromagnetic (gamma, X-ray) or beta (electrons). This is a good and reasonable assumption for the current situation.
1 Gy = 1 Sv (or) 1 Gray = 1 Sievert
1 Sv = 1 Sievert = 1,000 milli-Sv = 1,000 mSv
1,000 micro-Sievert = 1 uSv = 1,000 milli-Sievert = 1,000 mSv
100 rem = 1 Sv
1,000 mrem = 1,000 milli-rem = 1 rem
1,000 urem = 1,000 micro-rem = 1 mrem = 1 milli-rem
1 mrem = 1 milli-rem = 0.01 mSv = 10 uSv
Examples:
These are all the same:
“Radiation reading is 10 micro-Sievert per hour.”
“Radiation reading is 1 milli-rem per hour.”
“Radiation reading is 0.01 milli-Sieverts per hour.”
So yesterday’s report of 8,000 micro-Sieverts per hour might be reported as 8 milli-Sieverts per hour or 800 milli-rem per hour or 0.8 rem per hour.
Yesterday’s report of 400 mSv (milli-Sieverts) per hour might be reported in the US as 0.4 Gray per hour or 40 rem per hour.
In the US, it will likely be the case that the government reports come out in units of Grays per hour (same as Sieverts per hour for present applications) if they are from the CDC and in units of rem per hour, milli-rem per hour or micro-rem per hour (see above) if the report is coming from other agencies (where the manuals may all still be in non-metric units).
Finally, for present purposes (electromagnetic and beta radiation), you can substitute “rad” for “rem”.
—————————————————
You can cross reference this information to see that the report of an observation of 40 rem per hour or 400 milli-Sieverts per hour onsite (btw units 3 and 4) yesterday was quite serious.
Rats, I see errors (moderator repair?):
Line 3 of the different units should read:
1,000 micro-Sievert = 1,000 uSv = 1 milli-Sievert = 1 mSv
Thanks, those are very helpful conversion factors that really help to put yesterday into perspective.
Nice post!
Here is some supplemental info on units that people may see over the coming days. For the following, I assume that the radiation in question is either electromagnetic (gamma, X-ray) or beta (electrons). This is a good and reasonable assumption for the current situation.
1 Gy = 1 Sv (or) 1 Gray = 1 Sievert
1 Sv = 1 Sievert = 1,000 milli-Sv = 1,000 mSv
1,000 micro-Sievert = 1,000 uSv = 1 milli-Sievert = 1 mSv
100 rem = 1 Sv
1,000 mrem = 1,000 milli-rem = 1 rem
1,000 urem = 1,000 micro-rem = 1 mrem = 1 milli-rem
1 mrem = 1 milli-rem = 0.01 mSv = 10 uSv
Examples:
These are all the same:
“Radiation reading is 10 micro-Sievert per hour.”
“Radiation reading is 1 milli-rem per hour.”
“Radiation reading is 0.01 milli-Sieverts per hour.”
So yesterday’s report of 8,000 micro-Sieverts per hour might be reported as 8 milli-Sieverts per hour or 800 milli-rem per hour or 0.8 rem per hour.
Yesterday’s report of 400 mSv (milli-Sieverts) per hour might be reported in the US as 0.4 Gray per hour or 40 rem per hour.
In the US, it will likely be the case that the government reports come out in units of Grays per hour (same as Sieverts per hour for present applications) if they are from the CDC and in units of rem per hour, milli-rem per hour or micro-rem per hour (see above) if the report is coming from other agencies (where the manuals may all still be in non-metric units).
Finally, for present purposes (electromagnetic and beta radiation), you can substitute “rad” for “rem” (and “rad” is the more correct usage, as it refers to the biological effect).
—————————————————
You can cross reference this information to see that the report of an observation of 40 rad per hour or 400 milli-Sieverts per hour onsite (btw units 3 and 4) yesterday was quite serious.
[Moderator: Please replace above post with this one. I wish there were an edit feature!]
Hmmm, although I’m not drinking (I’m at work), these typographical errors remind of the adage, “Don’t drink and derive.”
Are we now doomed to have a whole thread in boldface font? Help, mods!
I’ve alerted the proper authorities. The cavalry should arrive shortly.
(Commentor note:)
I have a PhD in physics. I take full responsibility for the errors I made in the last few posts.
In particular, I got the rad/rem usage backwards. Rad is for physical dose and rem takes into account the biological effects. That only means that the parenthetical comment about rad being the more correct usage is not correct.
Thankfully, the differences between Grays and Sieverts on the one (metric) hand and rads and rems in the other set of units do not matter for the kinds of radiation we are dealing with.
So you can use Grays and Sieverts interchangeably or you can use rems and rads interchangeably, but you cannot interchange either of (Gray, Sievert) for either of (rad, rem).
And now, I’m going to stop typing.
Thank goodness — and thank you. Please note the second error in the comment below. Because this is a common error (in my experience) it is fine with me to leave the comment below in the chain. Or, if you think people will come back to this and want to use it quickly without checking for corrections, feel free to go back to the wording in the original in the final example.
Sigh.
Dylan Ratigan reporting 4 REM an hour exposure at the reactors, doesn’t cite source. Says 5 REM per year limit for US nuclear workers.
Great post. But I think you need to dumb it down some more. I still have some questions:
1. What is the radiation that is being emitted in the steam?
2. Does the crippled plant emit gamma radiation?
3. The workers can wear suits to protect from one type of radiation but not gamma? or another type?
4. If the fuel rods melt from the reactors and burn up, would they emit the same type of radiation as if the spent fuel pools burn up their water and explode or catch fire?
5. The workers are all getting exposed to who knows how high levels. How do they get more workers to keep the pumps running, etc.? What happens when they run out of workers? Who will keep it cooled?
6. I read the US military has put out one reactor fire. Anyone know about this? We have military firefighters, I know, but military nuclear firefighters? Is there such a specialty?
7. The evacuated from a 20 mile radius. That’s a huge area. Is that due to the radioactive steam or because of radiation being “emitted” directly outward from the plant?
8. Does the plant emit radiation like a lightbulb emits light and/or is the radiation part of the steam and particles from the fire/core problems or is it a combination of both?
I really appreciate your post.
Some information I’ve gathered about the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, as 6 a.m. approaches in Japan, on Wednesday morning, March 16:
I’ve only seen the information in one place, but this Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) PDF report, which apparently summarizes facts that were given during the Tuesday, March 15, early evening (Japan time) television news broadcast, indicates that the Unit 4 fire at F. Daiichi actually burned itself out by 11:00 a.m. Tuesday.
The fire apparently began (or was confirmed) at 9:38 a.m. Tuesday morning, after a definite explosion took place earlier (at 6:10 a.m. or 6:14 a.m. or 6:20 a.m., reports are conflicting) atop the Unit 4 reactor building – an explosion which apparently created two 8 meter by 8 meter holes in the walls of the building.
That Unit 4 explosion may have done more than create holes in the building though, based on the subsequently very high levels of radiation at the plant site, that are apparently coming primarily from one specific location, according to this recent reporting by Kyodo News:
That high 400 millisievert reading (measured at 10:22 a.m. Tuesday morning) was apparently still present Tuesday afternoon, near Unit 3, according to a 4:00 or 4:30 p.m. news conference (Japan time) held by Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano (while a measurement at the main entrance of the plant was much lower).
So some portion of the spent fuel rods (or other radioactive material) stored, outside any containment vessel, in Unit 4 may have been blown out of Unit 4 onto the ground, when the (presumed) hydrogen explosion occurred atop that reactor building early Tuesday.
A report from an observer at a university in Toyko, who’s tracking the local news, says that TEPCo is using fire engines to help pump water into Units 1-3, and that they dug a trench to store seawater to help in that process. They’re now running low on diesel fuel for the trucks and the portable generators they’re using to keep the pumps operating, and are having difficulty getting water up to the third floor of Unit 4 to replenish the spent fuel pool there.
I’ve heard no reporting on when off-site electrical service is expected to be restored to the plant site at F. Daiichi.
Another JAIF report – based on informed speculation in part – seems to indicate, and is the first precise reporting of this I’ve seen, that both the cylindrical steel reactor vessel actually holding the fuel/control rods, and the surrounding concrete “Primary Containment Vessel” (PCV) structure can be directly accessed by the fire pumps for the insertion of seawater. [NHK TV had a professor and graphic indicating, for a whole day after the seawater plan was announced, that seawater was being pumped into the concrete containment vessel structure, rather than directly into the reactor core itself.] As of 7 p.m., Japan time, Tuesday, 3/15, JAIF estimates that Unit 1 has had seawater inserted into both vessels (the reactor vessel core and the concrete containment vessel surrounding the steel reactor vessel), while Units 2 and 3 have had seawater injected only into their steel reactor vessels (with further injection into the surrounding PCVs still under consideration), as far as JAIF knows.
This latter information bears directly (and positively, as to larger radiation releases) on the impact of the questionable integrity of the concrete containment vessel (PCV) in Unit 2 – which may have cracked in some way at about 6:30 a.m. Tuesday, Japan time. Specifically, access to the outside environment may have somehow been created through the PCV’s lower “wet well” circular “torus” portion, which is designed to suppress excess steam released from the reactor core, during an emergency, to keep pressure at manageable levels in the larger, “dry well” concrete containment vessel above it (which surrounds the smaller steel reactor core vessel). [I don't know how much interconnection exists between the PCV's torus pressure suppression chamber/room/pool and the larger dry well above it, or whether the two can be manually segregated, if need be.]
Thanks all for helping those of us who are physics challenged to understand this terminology!
I assume that the HTML coding for embedded links works in this section of FDL, harpie, but when I want to post a formatted comment in a “MyFDL” thread, I go over to an emptywheel thread to do my formatting (using the shortcut icons and/or HTML code) and previewing there, and then, when ready, just copy and paste the comment from there to here before hitting “Submit.”
This is a diary I wrote way back when on how to write the HTML code to embed links
damn Jim White – you are a bad mammah jammah ! thanks so much
fyi – firedogs – commenters and non commenters, please don’t hesitate to ask questions, even if you think they are “dumb” – some of us learn as much from the questions as we do the course material itself – that is all
powwow — you’re really good at finding high quality, detailed info. Thank you.
I am going to have to re-read, re-read and re-read in an attempt to absorb some of this. Why? Because I want to, that’s why! I just wish it weren’t so hard for my tiny mind. Thank you, physics genii! I am grateful for and awed by your knowledge. At the point I understand this, you will know you have reached the lowest common denominator!! I am so not kidding.
Earlier in the day ET, midday and evening in central Europe, German radio reported on the work underway. As some of you longer-term commenters might know, I listen to their radio – better news coverage (and it helps me keep my German current). They reported the following:
1. The radiation level in (at least) one of the control roms ath Fukushima got so high, the technicians had to evacuate the control room. I have not heard any change to that report.
2. Early today, the Japanese were asking for help in rigging helicopters to help with the cooling. (The report did not specify why they needed helicopters to help with the cooling, but I deduce they were going to hook large buckets of water under thechoopers to get it wherever they needed to get it.) The people trying to cool the plants were reported specifically to have been asking the Japanese and US militaries for the helicopter assistance. Later in the day, the report changed to say that the Japanese were putting the helicopter mission(s) on hold for the time being, for two reasons: fear of excess radiation (to the helicopters) and (more seriously) fear of further damaging the stored spent fuel rods.
3. The German government decided early today to have the seven oldest nuke plants in German shut down for a bottom-up inspection (they’re calling them “stress tests”) and, by a couple hours ago, the first one was already shut down (and into cooling-off mode).
4. 40 rem/hour or 40 rad or whatever is frickin’ wicked serious. That’s nuclear battlefield level stuff.
If you want to really get into the matter deeply, here is a table of units relating to many factors:
http://www.stevequayle.com/ARAN/rad.conversion.html
1. What is the radiation that is being emitted in the steam?
The radiation being emitted in the steam is radiation from impurities in the water that makes up the steam. If the water/steam is carrying dissolved in it (for example) iodine 131 ions, then the radiation will be coming from the iodine 131, and that radiation will be the type (alpha, beta, gamma), quantity and ferocity (energy) iodine 131 emits. Each radioactive isotope has a distinctive mix of radiation type, quantity and ferocity – that’s how they can be identified without resort to a high-end chem lab.
2. Does the crippled plant emit gamma radiation?
Yes. Some of the isotopes in the plant emit gamma radiation, so gamma radiation will be present.
3. The workers can wear suits to protect from one type of radiation but not gamma? or another type?
As Jim noted above, alpha radiation is really a particle – the nucleus of a helium atom (2 protons and 2 neutrons) without any electrons. Alpha radiation can be stopped by a sheet of paper because it is big (on an atomic scale), slow-moving, and electrically charged. Beta radiation is an electron, in essence an electric charge moving through space. Beta, too, can be stopped by relatively light shielding. Gamma radiation, OTOH, is a very high energy radio/light-type ray and will penetrate a substantial amount of shielding, even concrete or lead. So, you can wear suits which will shield you against all alpha and some beta, but only a tiny bit of gamma.
4. If the fuel rods melt from the reactors and burn up, would they emit the same type of radiation as if the spent fuel pools burn up their water and explode or catch fire?
Yes. It’s the various elements’ radioactive isotopes in the fuel rods that emit the radiation, and burning them does not change the elements they are. Burning them merely recombines them with oxygen.
5. The workers are all getting exposed to who knows how high levels. How do they get more workers to keep the pumps running, etc.? What happens when they run out of workers? Who will keep it cooled?
Well, in ‘murca they’d be having to hand out bonuses or turkeys. I don’t know what they do in Japan. But, to be less facetious, these workers are dedicated to their profession and knew the risks going in. And, remember, this is the nation which had literally thousands of guys clamoring for the chance to fly their planes into American warships. Japan is still Japan.
6. I read the US military has put out one reactor fire. Anyone know about this? We have military firefighters, I know, but military nuclear firefighters? Is there such a specialty?
There used to be, I’m told.
7. The evacuated from a 20 mile radius. That’s a huge area. Is that due to the radioactive steam or because of radiation being “emitted” directly outward from the plant?
I think it’s more a precaution, so they don’t wind up with (a) massive traffic jams if/when something really blows and (b) massive radioactive poisoning ofpeople who should have left and didn’t. You see what just happened up the coast a piece, where people couldn’t get out in time ahead of the water – they want to avoid a repeat of that here.
8. Does the plant emit radiation like a lightbulb emits light and/or is the radiation part of the steam and particles from the fire/core problems or is it a combination of both?
Normally, the plant only emits a relatively small amount of radiation – that which passes through all the feet of shielding. In the current situation – yes to the lightbulb (gamma rays) and yes to the others, too.
For those who might want more talk on this topic, the Tom Hartman show today discussed it for one of its sessions. I thought it was informative.
http://www.thomhartmann.com/
No one has as far as I know discussed where nuclear waste in the USA goes. Did that site if Nevada open? I think it was Nevada? I believe nuclear waste (spent fuel) is sitting around USA plants?
In the US, essentially all spent fuel is stored onsite, with the reactor that produced it. None was ever stored in the Yucca Mountain waste repository, which (under current law) will not be built.
This:
Thank you Jim. This is exactly what my wife was furious about last night when she came home after people calling her pharmacy all day asking for KI. It doesn’t do you much good to protect your thyroid from I-131 if you’re inhaling Cs-137.
Thanks for the summary, Jim. One minor “nit”. Where you say
“The third basic form of radiation does not have an associated particle, but is instead a high energy X-ray, called gamma radiation.”
it is more accurate to say that the particle is a photon, an elementary particle, although massless.
Jim…thank you for your excellent post!
Some readers might be interested in a chart that helps explain radiation exposure:
This is from the guardian/UK…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/mar/15/radiation-exposure-levels-guide#zoomed-picture
But some of it keeps getting shipped around (I’ve heard this Waste in Motion described as “mobile Chernobyl”… Like to states where the Governor is more scared of the gray wolf than he is of radioactivity … Some of it leaks into aquifers …
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/01/19/v-print/1493589/bipartisan-unity-on-nuke-waste.html
Tweet: Per US Geological survey, last night’s 6.2 was actually a separate quake, not an aftershock. Hit Shizuoka, 55 miles south of Tokyo.
You’ve secretly been stealing my HTML shortcuts!?!?!
BREAKING NEWS: Fire breaks out again at 5:45 a.m. at Fukushima’s No. 4 reactor: NHK (06:45)
Kyodo News Ticker
Humble thanks from a longtime lurker for this and the previous threads building the knowledge base here at FDL–I love the multiplicity of sources of information, and the immediacy of it–you’re kicking the NY Times’ a** in many ways here today. (Of course, I’m only able to trust your expertise, whereas at the Times, I can be certain they only call on responsible, first-tier, highly credentialed….oh, never mind.)
Again, humble thanks to one and all.
So it sounds like the hope here is to keep the reactors cooled, and the spent fuel pools too, and it sounds like that’s getting more, not less, difficult. And, there’s limited time left to cobble together a way to do that, before something goes critical. Sound about right?
Not going to link to AP, but ” … in the outer housing of the reactor’s containment vessel. Fire fighters are trying to put out the flames.”
Kyodo
A kilowatt hour is 3.6MJ (not 3600 Joules).
A point source’s intensity drops off as the square of distance (not cube).
400mSv per hour is serious, particularly with prolonged exposure, but before people freak out, keep in mind that:
1. this was in the immediate vicinity of the reactor. I don’t have an exact distance, but if it were out to 250m, then at 5km (3 miles) you experienced on the order of 1mSv per hour. If you are a worker at this facility, you have reason to be concerned. If you are a nearby resident, stay indoors.
2. the level has since been reported dropped down to 0.6mSv per hour (this may vary depending upon your source).
Most importantly, though, people need to keep some perspective. The worst earthquake ever recorded in Japan was followed by a massive tsunami, the combination of which may have killed 10,000 people. This is a very small part of a much, much larger tragedy. Disease, lack of clean water, food, power and medicine, as well as mental trauma are FAR bigger problems in Japan right now.
Unfortunately, people in the media have an angle that catches peoples’ attention and politicians have something to scream about. Hopefully this won’t lead to public fear of nuclear power (which is far safer than exploitation of fossil fuels, for example) but when people are scared they make bad decisions.
from latimes:
“California Department of Public Health officials have opened a phone hot line to address concerns about local radiation exposure in the aftermath of a crisis at a Japanese nuclear power complex damaged in last week’s earthquake and tsunami.
Anyone with concerns may contact the department’s hotline in English and Spanish at (916) 341-3947. The Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention in Atlanta also has made a line available to anyone with questions at (800) CDC-INFO.”
Jim, very nice addition to the Fukushima discussion here at FDL. Many thanks.
Thanks Jim and fellow commenters for the info.
Sure did help clear some of the cobwebs from the brain,haven’t studied any of this stuff in over 30 years.
Thanks again folks!
LOL! That’s something even I can do easily! Thanks very much, powwow!
Jim, thanks so much for the Chem refresher. It’s been a while since I’ve delved into the subject but you brought it all back with crystal clarity. Very helpful and much appreciated.
That’s really helpful, too, dakine01. Thanks!
It was a little more then a year ago we were all dealing with the OIL well from hell and now this man made fiasco. What next? Something tells me as a Civilization we can’t go on forever this way, but it appears that the forces of Corp. greed coupled with “human need” are overwhelming reason and science and are increasingly throwing caution to the wind.
Thanks to Jim and all commenters for this post and thread. As some other’s have said, I’ll probably have to read it several more times, but it’s very well done! Kudos!
Yup, ‘fraid so… ‘thatvisionthing’ originally gave me the idea, which I happily swiped and put into action.
ooops! Oh well, back to the drawing board–I will master it yet.
That photo caption is misleading and not really correct. Cherenkov radiation occurs because the charged particles (most often electrons), when first emitted, are moving faster than the phase velocity of light in water.
Those particles interact with the water molecules, causing ionization and photons to be emitted — and it so happens that the photons emitted are in the blue part of the spectrum.
At no point are the charged particles actually traveling faster than C.
Sounds about right to me. Water, water, water is needed, ASAP, inside the appropriate containers, to soothe the radioactive beast, and then needs to be replaced/maintained there, without interruption. Even as radiation levels mount from (apparently) damage to the spent/temporary fuel pool located outside the containment vessels on the fourth floor of Unit 4′s reactor building, and the entire plant site remains off the electrical grid.
Uh uh–the rem is a rad multiplied by a factor to do with the relative damage to a particular type of tissue for a given dose. For example 1 rad dose to skin is about 1 rem, but is about 5 rem to the eyes.
BTW, 1 Gray = 100 rads, just a change in units from cgs to mks, and recently (last 25 years!) renamed. I learned my radiation physics back in the early 70′s and still think in rads. In my field, radiation dose is to minerals and I don’t get much into health effects.
Thanks for that.
Jim, the info is just perfectly explained for my abilities and previous knowledge. I really appreciate it.
And thanks for the tables, lobster and the others who provided them in the comments.
I think they also store it onsite at Fukushima- in retrospect, maybe not such a good idea.
…or plutonium. Japan Times 22 Aug 2010 said MOX (mixed oxides of plutonium and uranium) was being used in at least one of the Fukushima reactors.
Thanks, Jim. That is a greatly informative post. Thanks Lobster and powwow as well.
For some basic animation demonstrating the alpha, beta and gamma particles, I found this website furryelephant.com
http://www.furryelephant.com/content/radioactivity/alpha-beta-gamma-radiation/
I’m now looking for a website that might describe how many inches (in common househouse materials) one would need to block certain levels of radiation. If the people are just protecting themselves from fast decaying alpha radiation that one might see with detonation of a conventional nuclear warhead (like radioactive iodine) then building a bomb shelter makes since outside the blast radius. It may take a week or more of staying indoors, but if properly shielded the people could survive indoors until the radiation levels outdoors subsided to safe levels.
However this nuclear reactor partial meltdown is releasing different types of radioactive particles and radiation–more like a diry bomb. These particles like cesium and who knows what others, have half lives of 30 years. If 5 half lives is needed to reach a safe level of radioactivity, that requires remaining indoors for 150 years (and properly shielded the whole time!).
Better to leave the area instead of staying put. In the case of a dirty bomb, there is a better chance of surviving by leaving the area, despite the radiation one would receive being outdoors, unprotected.
While there is the risk of getting caught in a traffic jamb of similarly fleeing people, and ending up receiving a lethal dose of radiation trying to flee, staying put (when dealing with a dirty bomb that is not going to decay for the rest of your lifetime) could mean certain death too.
I question the safety of the people staying in their homes at the 12 mile radius. Seems too close to me, especially if the reactors explode or continue to produce cesium and other radioactive particles.
As mentioned before, cesium is rare in nature but to the body looks like potassium. Since potassium is essential for life, there is no way to block the body’s potassium channels and keep cesium out of the body–unlike potassium iodide tablets preventing the thyroid from absorbing radioactive iodine.
Prussian blue prescribed by physicians will help the body get rid of cesium through the stool. Not sure how fast this occurs, and I assume the stool will remain radioactive/contaminated.
This just addresses the radiation that might be absorbed through breathing/ingesting the radioactive particles. It does not even take into account the lethal radiation one would receive from the environment in the form of gamma rays.
since should be “sense”. Sorry, no edit feature. :-(
From the Canada Emergency Measures Organization as quoted by KI4U. I’ll see if I cannot find another more scientific website. (note: the fact that this website KI4U touts its products have been seen on such media outlets as Fox and Glenn Beck may make you want to take this info with a grain of potassium iodide salt:
http://www.ki4u.com/survive/index.htm#step02
Here is a way to decrease radiation. Uses in a bomb shelter that is outside the blast radius–for people who have survived the initial explosion. This may be a waste of time after a dirty bomb explosion, because the radioactive components of a dirty bomb may take hundreds of years to fall to “safe” levels.
Get away from the area.
Great post, Jim… already tweeted and now I’m going to facebook it.
Recommended, too.
Thanks for those two corrections, you are right and I will correct the post.
Long as we’re going into it, can somebody refresh on the MeVs for dimerizing and non-dimerizing radiation and the 100:1 ratio for water bearing cells and all that stuff? It’s been a while. I took radiation physics back in the late 70s.