I have had one of those weeks that you remember for the rest of your life. On Tuesday, I won a congressional election. On Thursday, I was sworn in by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and got to cast the first vote of my congressional career: a resolution honoring female veterans and military personnel. Yesterday, I had the opportunity to cast the most important vote of my 34 years in public service.
The health care reform bill that cleared the House yesterday, if approved by the Senate, will transform this country’s health care delivery system. Denial of treatment for pre-existing conditions will be a thing of the past. None of us will have to worry that if we fail to report the chicken pox, we’ll be denied treatment from our insurers for cancer. Out-of-pocket expenses will be capped and subsidies and tax breaks will be made available to consumers and small businesses. This combined with the reduction in administrative overhead costs, the savings associated with an emphasis on preventative medicine, and other measures will provide us as individual consumers and as a nation with substantial long term cost savings. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the health care reform bill will cut the deficit by over $30 billion over the next decade and will continue to create a surplus over the next 20 years.
Yesterday’s plan also includes a public option that, while not as expansive I would have liked, is still very worthy of support. And as most of you are well aware, we had an unfortunate setback for women’s health in yesterday’s voting. But on the whole, this is change we can believe in.
When I was California’s Insurance Commissioner, my staff fielded thousands of calls from California residents who fell victim to the insurance industry shenanigans. When large fires hit San Diego, Oakland, and elsewhere, hundreds of consumers were victimized a second time by their insurance companies. My capable staff was successful at coming to a consumer-friendly resolution for almost all cases, but at times, I had to personally ring up high ranking industry executives to use all forms of persuasion available to my office to make sure my constituents were treated fairly.
When one’s business model depends on collecting monthly payments from people in the hope that you’ll never have to provide them with the services they are paying you for, it’s disappointing but not shocking that the insurance industry looks for loopholes to maximize its profits.
It is from this motivation that we get babies denied health insurance because they’re "too fat" and women kicked off their insurance after requesting payment for emergency gallbladder surgery because their husbands failed to report high cholesterol. That’s why government intervention is sometimes necessary, to make sure the invisible hand of the market doesn’t become a closed fist.
In my run for Congress, I told anyone who asked that I was ecstatic to have the opportunity to return to Washington, DC to cast one of my first votes for comprehensive health care reform that includes the public option.
This week, I’m traveling to Livermore for my first town hall as a Congressman, and I will have four more through the month of December (at least one will be virtual, stay tuned). Given the rise in the unemployed and uninsured in my district, I expect many grateful supporters, but I also expect some naysayers. I am prepared to defend my vote, because I know it is best for my constituents and will help save lives. I also know most of my constituents have my back. After all, most of us know a friend or family member who has been on the wrong end of insurance industry malfeasance. Listen to my floor speech here to hear about what one friend of mine is going through.
We still have a big fight ahead of us in the Senate, and I encourage all of you to call your Senators and demand they pass a good comprehensive health care reform bill that includes the public option. With helpful endorsements from the AARP and American Medical Association, and with two different congressional districts affirming their support for comprehensive health care reform in elections last week, momentum is on our side.
So thanks again for all you’ve done to make this bill a reality; believe me, it’s noticed. After the health care debate, we will move on to other big issues facing the nation: transportation, job creation, No Child Left Behind, troop placements, and the list goes on. If we pass comprehensive health care reform this year, it will mark the end of an important chapter in our nation’s history: the 40+ years between the passage of Medicare and the subsequent years we failed to live up to our country’s promise, letting millions of Americans live and die without adequate coverage. It will also mark the beginning of a new chapter: the years it will take us to lower the age of Medicare eligibility from 65 to 0. I’m hopeful we can beat four decades.
Congressman John Garamendi represents Northern California’s 10th Congressional District, which includes portions of Contra Costa, Solano, Alameda, and Sacramento counties. Prior to his election to Congress on November 3rd, 2009, Garamendi served as California’s Lieutenant Governor, where he fought to keep college affordable for students, developed innovative strategies to create green jobs, and kept California’s coastline pristine by preventing oil companies from drilling off California’s coast. With more than three decades of public service experience, Garamendi has been an Insurance Commissioner, Senate Majority Leader, Deputy Interior Secretary under President Bill Clinton, University of California Regent, California State University Trustee, and Peace Corps volunteer. To learn more, please follow Garamendi on Facebook and Twitter.



27 Comments




Too bad FDL doesn’t have a thumbs down anti-recommend option for diaries. This hack boilerplate on behalf of this reactionary bill is the first time I would’ve used it.
Thank you Congressman Garamendi and congratulations on your election to the House.
You and boner would fit well in the same closet.
Thank you for the vote Rep Garamendi.
Now your next task is to go to work and fix all the things wrong in the bill (not least of which is the Stupak amendment)
I like to give the new guy at least a week before giving him grief.
Why me? You’re evidently the one who got yourself turned around to the point of supporting a right wing bill.
And how the Reps are laughing at you right now…
Yes, thank you Mr. Garamendi. I’m glad you could help put us over the top last night, and here’s looking towards your reliable progressive vote in the future!
The only right I ever supported was my right arm and the right turn signal on my car, Right and left are so confusing do You know which is which.
Representative Garamendi,
Rather than point out what I think are obvious problems in this legislation (i.e. take issue with some of your characterization of what we’re actually getting with H R 3962, particularly as it was already far too weak to begin with and then was last night greatly diminished by the Stupak Amendment), I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your “nay” vote on the Stupak Amendment and for your “aye” vote on H R 3962.
Please continue to work hard to make this legislation as strong as you can before it gets to the President’s desk.
Thank you for your vote against the Stupak Amendment and for doing your best for improving health care. What a week for starting!
I am still amazed that so many progressives have talked themselves into supporting this turd of a bill. At least Kucinich kept his promise to vote NO on any bill without a robust public option. He’s the only one that I’m aware of.
Yes, how “unfortunate”. But, fortunes never favor women.
Great first week, Congressman!
Wow, I am impressed you diaried. Thank you, Rep. Garamendi.
I have family out in Calif. Congratulations and good luck. Glad you are reading the FDL/Seminal site. A lot of honest and great thinking on here.
I wanted Single Payer Medicare for All.
I see you have experience monitoring insurance companies and I am hoping you will do all you can to rein them in. I think vendors that are so out of control in terms of profiteering should have been fired.
I am VERY bitter about the pro-choice denial of this bill. My respect for Congress is circling the bowl. I was also dismayed about the censoring of the Goldstone Report. I think our codependency with Israel and our own warmongering is WRONG.
Anyway, this is from one of your websites:
But you get points for engaging with us “progressives.” Feeling VERY disenfranchised from my government … for a very long time.
Thanks for this report on your first week at work. It sounds more memorable than any of mine at any number of jobs.
Many of us are disappointed that the House leadership allowed the Stupak amendment to the floor only after both Dennis Kucinich and Anthony Weiner agreed not to pursue their single-payer amendments on the floor. I understood that their reason for doing so was to avoid a floor showdown on abortion, but then — there was one anyway!
Thanks for your vote against Stupak; it’s shameful we’ve gone backwards on this issue in a Democratic House with a female Speaker. We Californians will make every effort to ensure our female Senators work to exclude similar language in the Senate version.
I very much appreciate your diaries here, and would like to know if you would schedule an actual chat sometime; no one expects a Congressman to be in comments on a ‘drop-in’ diary, but I’m sure we could set up a convenient time for a ninety-minute livechat with you.
Thanks again.
Representative Garamendi, Congratulations again on your election.
It was the most important vote you’ve taken, and I believe you voted wrong. You and other progressives should have joined together to block this bill, and then you should have held firm and required the leadership to organize itself for a much better bill. I’ve done a number of recent diaries criticizing this bill, beginning with this one, even before the Stupak Amendment betraying a core Democratic Party principle was passed. Perhaps you could have one of your stuff look at them, and then reconsider your vote when it comes time to vote for the conference bill.
Finally, there’s no doubt in my mind that Democrats will pay heavily at the polls in 2010. The Party can spin it all it wants to, but with insurance prices due to rise by between 40 and 50% between now and 2013, and with people beginning to experience those increases by the time November 2010 comes around, and with the Republicans scaring everyone about mandates and enforcement of them by the IRS beginning in 2013, and promising to save Americans from that, the Democratic majority in the House may well be gone very quickly, especially since the Democrats won’t be getting any support from their base until the health care mess you folks just made gets cleaned up. If you’re wise, you’ll quit supporting your gutless leadership and start working for HR 676 as soon as you can.
Well said, lets. Thank you.
http://www.singlepayeraction.org/blog/?p=1691
Isn’t it amazing how the glib ‘unfortunate’ is used to describe a calamity? does anyone REALLY think that a final bill without the Stupak amendment would pass in the House?
This legislation is what occurs when a candidate speaks of something on the campaign trail but then lacks the courage to take the risks necessary to fulfill the promises of what was said on the campaign trail.
Somebody ought to quizzing Michele Obama about this event.
http://www.healthcare-now.org/statement-on-the-withdrawal-of-rep-weiners-single-payer-amendment-to-house-bill/
Can we rally behind Sanders’ S 703?
Yeah. I wanted a real reform bill, not an extorted giveaway to the insurance racket. I wanted single-payer, which everyone knows damn well is the only solution here.
Failing that I could have lived with a real public option as the first step toward single-payer. I first came to FDL because I was attracted by the “progressive block” concept. The pledgers made a promise that they’d vote against anything without a real public option. (I was actually under the misimpression that that was the formal agenda of FDL.)
The “strong public option” concept was then defined down to Medicare+5%. If they had still insisted on that, and the bill had included the Kucinich amendment, the result would have been a normally crappy bill.
Instead the “block” (and everybody who had talked it up so much) caved in completely, the “public option” was gutted to nothing but an empty term, the Kucinich amendment was stripped, and the Stupak added.
So the progressive block was just another despicable lie, another scam. The second bait and switch of this odious play.
So we’re left with that, the mandate, and a bogus bag of “regulations” which anybody who’s been paying attention to our corporatist system knows will never be effectively enforced.
So the bill has passed from the realm of a normal bad bill to an absolutely vile one.
So yes, I’m absolutely clear as to what Left principles, good policy sense, as well as good politics, call for here – rejecting the bill.
With that background, you should know the shenanigans will continue on and on, with how skilled and ruthless the health insurance industry is at extracting exorbitant profits from the public. Nothing in the bill will stop them, with enforcement of the bill’s nice provisions depending on the will to do so, which record-breaking campaign contributions to all the right people effectively kills.
So political imagination trumped moral imagination, sadly (many of us did not want the dangerous po incremental path). So Sanders is bringing S703 up for a vote, making some HR676 adjustments, so now will the progressives do it the moral way having seen the vileness of the “compromise” way? Or will they once again let Sanders and single payers go it alone because they are just so naive and unsophisticated and righteous and yada yada yada. The Obama way … don’t dare ask for CHANGE worth believing in.
I was begging FDL to help out with their incredible networking skills long ago. What is wrong with keep it simple? What is wrong with asking for what we as citizens deserve from a Congress that needs to be assailed for its betrayal and held accountable, if not by a chicken shit Obama administration, at least by the 20% of us in this country who are awake and nauseous enough to see what has gone down?
I certainly hope so. It would be wonderful if FDL as a whole could rally behind Medicare for All, rather than continuing to follow their PO idol, “The God that failed.”
I agree, Russ. I’ll just also point out that the second bait-and-switch” is enabled by the first one. That is the continual lying about the POs that were actually on the table in Congress, has now given way to continual lying on how this terrible bill will result in “universal, affordable, comprehensive” health care for all Americans.
Nothing lib. That’s what should have been done. Obama and the veal pen, and FDL too, have turned “Yes, We Can, into No We Can’t.”
thanks, lets. so grateful your voice … and analytical ability … and emotional and intuitive sensibility are here!