George McGovern was right on all the issues that mattered most, then and now, and he should have become president. He campaigned on ending the Vietnam War right away, believed that everyone should have the basics in life, and fought for equal rights for women and racial minorities.
Instead, McGovern lost the 1972 presidential election to Richard Nixon, perhaps the most corrupt and loathsome man to ever occupy the Oval Office, 61 to 37 percent, one of the biggest landslides in history. I can’t help but think how the world might be better if Americans had instead elected McGovern, a hero in World War II who sought to end war.
Yet, in many ways, McGovern won because his beliefs prevailed. The Vietnam War finally ended three years later. Nixon enacted the basic structure of McGovern’s anti-poverty program. And fate was exceedingly kind in letting McGovern witness the election of a man of African ancestry to the office denied to him, while those who blocked the way, George Wallace, Strom Thurmond and others, died without seeing what true American equality looked like. And history, the final actuary, will remember McGovern as a principled man while the guy who got the most votes that year is justly reviled.
Some of the most decent human beings to have ever populated the halls of our Congress – Hubert Humphrey, Eugene McCarthy and Robert F. Kennedy – admired McGovern as their moral beacon. His contemporaries, of course, are all long gone. McGovern during his 90 incredible years outlived his friends and adversaries, leaving none of his peers to mourn or eulogize him. So it’s up to the rest of us to honor this true American hero.
The first vote I ever cast for president was for McGovern in the primary. I’m ashamed to say that before the general election I wavered under the influence of the right-wing propaganda machine that McGovern somehow stood against America’s best interests. In the end, I cast my vote for McGovern. Some might call it an act of futility since he was swept 49 states to one by Nixon. Nonetheless, I am proud of that vote.
When the Watergate scandal broke loose, many liberals like myself pasted bumper stickers on their cars saying, “DON’T BLAME ME. I VOTED FOR MCGOVERN.” Twenty-nine million Americans could proudly declare that we had refused to vote for the man who shamed his office and our great nation, that we instead had supported an honorable man never touched by scandal.
In the intervening years, I learned to recognize and despise the right-wing propaganda machine that echoed through my head and made me doubt my support for McGovern. Later, I saw the same smears and accusations of lack of patriotism lobbed against Michael Dukakis and Bill Clinton. Then I saw a return to Nixon’s mendacity when George W. Bush and Dick Cheney took our country to war based on cleverly assembled lies. After that, I felt ashamed of millions of my fellow Americans who made unfounded attacks against Barack Obama. I wrote a book, The Obama Haters: Behind the Right-Wing Campaign of Lies, Innuendo & Racism, to expose their methods, but even the truth won’t change the minds of those who tragically are willing to be manipulated by extremists.
On the verge of the 2012 election, the same forces are at play now as 40 years ago when I voted for the first time. By taking the oath of office, Obama has fulfilled many of McGovern’s dreams. As president, Obama has carried out programs that befit McGovern, such as access to health care and student loans for the poor, ending misguided overseas wars, and treating all Americans with respect and dignity. Obama was a child when McGovern sought the presidency. His opponent, Mitt Romney, was old enough to vote in 1972, but he supported Nixon. Romney protested against the anti-Vietnam War demonstrators, but he did not have the courage of his convictions – like John McCain, John Kerry, and Al Gore – to wear his country’s uniform in Vietnam. Romney thought Bush’s war in Iraq was just dandy, but did not send any of his five sons to combat.
Obama, like McGovern before him, devotes his efforts toward an America with opportunity for all Americans. Romney’s life, by contrast, is a running narrative of others doing all the work and making all the sacrifices with Romney getting all the money. Romney’s taped confession showing disdain for 47 percent of Americans is a throwback to the Nixon tapes which demonstrated similar contempt for everyone who disagreed with him.
Obama, like McGovern, wants an America with opportunity for all Americans. By contrast, Romney’s taped confession about disdain for 47 percent of Americans is a throwback to the Nixon tapes which showed similar contempt for everyone who disagreed with him.
Have we learned anything in the 40 years since the Nixon-McGovern race? Which of those two legacies will we honor on November 6, 2012?



10 Comments

Sheer bovine excrement. Perhaps you mean he’s working to ending opportunity for all, except those born with a silver spoon in their mouths, and exceptionally talented individuals who will rise into the ranks of an ever more elusive Mandarin class? Obama is helping exterminate the middle class, so whatever opportunities he helps create will mostly be in the “working poor” category. Food stamp use has doubled under Obama – if the “opportunities” you get excited about don’t even allow Americans to feed themselves, without extra help from the government, maybe those “opportunities” are not worth bragging about.
Here’s a good reference to how good Obama has been for America: http://obamascandalslist.blogspot.com/
Graph of food stamp growth. Before Obama, food stamp use doubled under Bush.
Yet another example of how Obama is an extension of Bush.
McGovern: Fox New’s go-to guy for anti-union punditry and paid shill for Walmart’ union busting activities.
“Don’t Blame me. I voted for McGovern.” I remember the excitement of finally having a candidate who would represent my interest in ending the Vietnam War. I did not realize how entrenched the MIC was and I failed to understand the powerful meaning of the deaths of Malcolm X, MLKing, and Bobby Kennedy. But even in defeat McGovern was classy and gracious. Reminding me of Vaclav Havel, the writer, poet, protestor. Wishing McGovern a recovery and peace.
I don’t get the comparison to Obama, but I appreciate your acknowledgement of McGovern’s legacy.
I appreciate the walk down memory lane about McGovern. I remember him as a very principled man as well.
Here’s where I diverge from you, John. I don’t experience Obama as being principled at all. That’s why he can undermine traditional Democratic values, programs, and policies such as Medicare and Social Security.
Just this morning when I awoke, I had the thought that the reason Obama couldn’t refute Rmoney with Bain’s Sensata currently moving jobs and hardware to China, was because both of them support that warped kind of trade. It’s money over people for both of them.
Obama defines himself as a “New Democrat”, and it shows, miserably, in his unprincipledness. I can’t think of any traditional Democratic values for which he’s drawn a line in the sand.
I will continue to miss McGovern’s way of being in the world, and will act with integrity accordingly, even when it doesn’t “win” (externally).
I recommend _The Wild Blue_, by Stephen E. Ambrose. It’s a good read, and you learn all about McGovern’s war record. He was an outstanding Army Air Force officer who flew 35 combat missions over Italy, France and Germany in WWII in B24s. He won the Distinguished Flying Cross. I don’t remember any political use being made of his war record during the campaign for President against Nixon. McGovern (90 years-old!) is a great man. Neither Obama nor Romney are anywhere near the caliber of George McGovern.
McGovern on Obama’s Afghanistan War surge:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/11/AR2009121102596.html
Thank you, John Wright, for remembering so fondly a great American. I don’t know if you ever had a chance to read McGovern’s blueprint for us to get out of Iraq which was published in Oct., 2006, and was co-authored with William R. Polk, entitled Out of Iraq. A marvelous read! Little did we know at the time that Bush was contemplating the infamous surge. I recommended that little book to a number of Congressional folks in Dec., of 2006. Amazingly enough, even though the book is somewhat dated now, much of what McGovern recommended is still applicable today: reparations to the Iraqis for turning their country into an open air sewer and an apology. I dearly love McGovern.
This tribute is appreciated, leaders of his caliber have largely vanished. As another first time voter for McGovern, I recall that it seemed difficult to find many Nixon voters by the mid 70s.
However, McGovern, who has stood unabashedly for a succession of progressive positions, can only be insulted by a comparison to Obama, who stands for — what was that again? Obama is a cipher, occasionally visible through his rhetorical fogbank. He may prevail over the shapeshifting weasel representing the main opposition; if so, we may be screwed more slowly.
I actually met Sen. McGovern. I was a student journalist w/ the high school newspaper. I agree with him a lot more now than I did then! He was a good and decent man, a respected politician and a true war hero.
Ahh, back when Democrats were democrats. Before they all turned into Bob Dole.