“Ugly Flash Mob Empties La. Mall”, ABC News reported this morning. Details remain sketchy, but the Mall of Louisiana in Baton Rouge was evacuated on Saturday night when a flash mob turned violent. One mall patron said that someone had a gun, but no weapons or injuries were reported.
The phenomenon of flash mobs and, in general, the heavy emphasis on dancing in popular culture in recent years is interesting. Not interesting on its own artistic terms, of course; in that respect it is thoroughly uninteresting, bland and shallow, like nearly all of popular culture. To me it’s fascinating because people seem to equate dancing with freedom, or at least to regard dancing as an expression of the desire for freedom. Clearly it bears the media’s (and, therefore, the government’s) seal of approval, because not a day goes by that television doesn’t drub viewers with some absurd, intended-to-be-humorous-yet-painfully-unfunny depiction of a flash mob or an uncoordinated geek letting loose on the dance floor because the music just moves him so profoundly, baby. Look at those people in the Applebee’s commercial! The food tastes so good that they’re breaking into a dance, now ain’t that funny? Or the little girls in school uniforms, dancing around with their MacBooks (or whatever they are) and looking all frowny and serious for the camera. Goodness, but I get a big ol’ belly laugh from that! Don’t you?
Well, too bad, because this kind of silliness is as close as you’ll get to officially sanctioned self-expression in the United States of 2013. Want to be part of the political process? Then by all means, vote for one of the two major parties. But don’t you dare point out that their agendas are virtually identical, or tell anyone that you’ve considered casting your vote for a third party candidate: you’ll be mercilessly criticized, laughed at and consigned to the lunatic fringe by your friends and obnoxious, gap-toothed talk show hosts alike. And don’t even think about organizing or attending a protest! That’s downright dangerous, and most assuredly does not meet with the approval of government, law enforcement, the media or your peers. But dancing your fool feet off at the mall? Go ahead, knock yourself out. (Bearing in mind, of course, that if even one or two similarly violent incidents follow this one, there will soon be a crackdown on flash mobs, too.)
No, my point–if I seem to be making it in a roundabout fashion–doesn’t have much to do with the “ugly” flash mob in Baton Rouge. My point is that oppression is not meted out only with guns and nightsticks and tear gas. It seeps into the culture in a hundred small ways…subtly, gradually, until we demonstrate tacit acceptance of the limitations that have been imposed on us without even consciously realizing it. You might say that the media has always encouraged conformity, and you’d be right, but it’s worse now than it’s been in a long time. In the 1980s, Pepsi was “the choice of a new generation” and, yes, it was a pretty dreary decade, but at least we still spoke and wrote in complete sentences. Today, verbal communication has been reduced to a few TV catchphrases and terse abbreviations, and if we want to convey our coolness, our only option is to dance, dance, dance with a fixed, dull-eyed expression…an expression that, no matter how fervently we hope to transcend (if only temporarily) the frightening world in which we live by moving our bodies, betrays resignation and despair.



6 Comments

I don’t know much about Flash Mobs but i do know that it is illegal to dance on the Nationall Mall so i wouldn’t be too down on sone people trying to express themselves by dancing. Hell what do we have left since the PTB has made most everything else either futile, like voting, or terrorism.
I love flashmobs, and have since they were invented in England. Now…the Idle No More: One Heartbeat indigenous are fighting for their sovereignty and cultures using them to dissent against Stephen Harper’s Tory government. Their voices and hand drums are being heard all over the world, and folks, especially indigenous women and anglo supporters…are heeding the call, and doing Round Dances everywhere in solidarity.
I’m not knockin’ ‘em for dancing…I just find it grotesquely horrible that dancing is all that’s left for people to do.
I’ll happily agree to disagree with you about flash mobs
I don’t think there’s anything objectionable about dancing itself; as I said, I find it fascinating that people seem to equate dancing with freedom, or at least to regard dancing as an expression of the desire for freedom. What rankles me is the inherent faddiness, the fact that the vast majority of people wouldn’t be doing it unless they’d seen it on TV or YouTube (in other words, unless it had been deemed acceptable by the culture). Regarding Idle No More, what they’re doing is great as far as I’m concerned: not solely or even primarily because of my own Native American lineage, but because it falls squarely within the realm of protest. Entirely different animal than an Applebee’s commercial or kids dancing around to “Gangnam Style” at the mall.
But it isn’t enough. What will constitute “enough”? I don’t know, and I freely admit that. I don’t believe that violence is the answer, but we’re being hammered and abused and pushed to the edge, and we’ll certainly go over if we don’t do something more–or other–than what we’re doing already.
There’s some confusion about the concept of ‘flash mob.’ On the one hand, it’s a bunch of people dancing in a mall to Gangnam Style. It’s also a Idle No More or Occupy short-lived mass political gathering. Finally, it has also been applied to criminal enterprises, where a flood of malicious teens show up at a store (or mall) to rob or cause criminal chaos en masse.
Without a link to the story you are referring to its hard to tell what really went on there. Maybe we need a better term to refer to the third kind of incident.
Flash mobs (the first two kinds) are an outgrowth of new technology. We’re still adapting to its presence & its possibility. Of course, many of the uses of it at first may seem frivolous. 15 years from now, flash mobs will be on a ‘I love the 2000s/2010s’ type TV show and thought of as embarrassing. We’ll be using wireless technologies to mobilize people in new ways we can barely dream of now, which will have grown out of silly things like flash mobs and serious actions like Idle No More.
Kit OConnell said: “There’s some confusion about the concept of ‘flash mob’.”
Yes, it appears so. I was referring to the popular phenomenon that Wikipedia defines as “a group of people who assemble suddenly in a public place, perform an unusual and seemingly pointless act for a brief time, then quickly disperse”. I was going to link to the story, but it was so skimpy that I was able to encapsulate it in the first paragraph. This morning, the Daily Mail’s website calls it a “massive 200-person brawl” and says that up to ten people will face criminal charges: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2258022/Baton-Rouge-Mall-Flash-mob-goes-horribly-wrong-massive-200-person-brawl-breaks-instead.html
It’s not hard to understand the potential for violence at these gatherings, of course; it reminds me of the punk shows I attended–and eventually performed at–when I was younger. We never had anything on this scale, but fights did break out and and after a while it seemed like fighting was the only reason people showed up. I became disillusioned and walked away from it. At any rate, I agree that there’s a lot of potential for good, too, in the technology which makes flash mobs possible. It just strikes me as sad, if not surprising, that hordes of people will show up for something like this while protest is still characterized as icky and crazy and marginal.