This past week Maria Shriver and the Center for American Progress released a seminal report on the emergence of women as primary wage earners for millions of families. The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Changes Everything, marks a promising step forward in the evolution of a society that for too long has failed to adjust policies and practices to women’s growing presence in the workplace.
Left in the shadows of this otherwise comprehensive report, however, were the unique obstacles faced by those struggling most to make ends meet—low-income single mothers trying to support their families on paltry wages in jobs that offer no prospects for a better future. Any serious national discussion on the obstacles confronting women in the workforce must include a special focus on the growing numbers of women toiling at the bottom of the economic ladder.
Consider these facts:
• Ninety percent of working-age adults who work full-time but earn less than $15,000 a year are women.
• In 2008, 37.2 percent of female-headed families with children were living in poverty compared with just 8 percent of families with both parents in the home and 14 percent of male-headed families.
• Adult women and teenage girls make up two-thirds of minimum wage employees in the U.S.
The recession has taken a significant toll on low-income single mothers. In September, 11.6 percent of this population were unemployed, compared with 11 percent of men overall and 7.4 percent of married men. Providing low-income single women with the resources to train for and stay employed in jobs with good wages and benefits is the clearest path to a brighter future for millions of families. Since women now make up half the workforce, it is also a vital component of lasting economic recovery for our nation.
As founding members of a new collaborative of women’s foundations — the Women’s Economic Security Campaign — we have seen up close how programs that train women for better paying jobs with the possibility of advancement can make all the difference for families and communities. With the emergence of a green jobs sector, we have an opportunity to advance women’s economic security in a bigger and better way than ever before, providing low-income women with a rare chance to get in on the ground floor of a growth industry and learn the skills to compete for stable, higher-paying jobs.
Unfortunately most green jobs, from weatherizing homes and buildings to constructing wind turbines, are in fields that have typically been dominated by men. As a society we have a terrible track record of training and placing women in these non-traditional careers. For example, 0.5 percent of roofers and 1.4 percent of plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters are women, according to a new report from the Women’s Economic Security Campaign—Creating Opportunity for Low-Income Women in the Green Economy (PDF). Even at the higher end, women make up just 10.6 percent of civil engineers. The median hourly wage for roofers, at the low-end of the non-traditional job spectrum, is $16.17 an hour— enough to cover the basic needs of a small family. By contrast, preschool teachers, 98 percent of whom are women, earn just $11.48 an hour. At that wage, a preschool teacher would need to work over 25 hours more per week then a roofer to support a similar living standard.
Fortunately, our country is in a good position to change this pattern. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided states with millions of dollars to train workers for new green sector jobs. We need to ensure that a significant portion of those funds goes to programs that prepare low-income women to successfully compete in the green economy.
Once they are on the job we need to provide women with the supports necessary to stay employed. For low-income single mothers that means child care, flexible hours and accessible transportation. It also means enforcing anti-discrimination and sexual harassment laws that for too long have made non-traditional workplaces inhospitable to women.
As Congress debates climate change legislation, our representatives in Washington, D.C. should stand up for the needs of low-income women when considering provisions aimed at training and placing workers in green jobs. We have the chance to do it right this time and shape a more promising future for the growing number of women and children in poverty. In the process we can help our nation move toward a long-term economic recovery that will benefit us all.
Shelley A. Davis is vice-president of programs and advocacy for the Chicago Foundation for Women; Judy Patrick is president and CEO of the Women’s Foundation of California. Both our founding members of the Women’s Economic Security Campaign, which aims to elevate the voices of women’s foundations to dismantle poverty.



5 Comments







I don’t understand. We should train more women to be roofers and construction workers so they get paid more? Or should we just pay more for preschool or childcare. I know my fiance would not want to do construction and never roofing so then if we decide to pay more for preschool and childcare, many women will indeed get a raise but I believe many will get it internally by saving the family money by being a home school teacher for their children or being a stay at home mom. Yes it is nice to have 2 incomes coming in but the economic value of a stay at home parent and home maker is also great, much greater than many give themselves or others credit for, even many time feminist groups
I am an activist for low income women in WA State. Yesterday I sent a comment to the Ways and Means Committee as an activist.
While working for a livable wage is important the stance and training is woefully absent, here is the stancemany of us make:
CARE GIVING IS WORK. Women lose almost $1/2 MILLION DOLLARS in a work life because they are care giving. First it is the kids, then the parents, then the spouse. The Personsl Responsiblilty Act codified into law in 1996 that care giving is “doing nothing”.
Care giving, weaving communities and family has been the predominant woman’s role in almos all societies since time immemorial. It is suspicious as to why this law was enacted except to puposefully denigrate women. Our communities would be in bad shape without this work. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation wrote this law …give you a hint?
If we support single mothers to BE parents instead of telling them their baby is less important than going out and saying, “Do you want fries with that?” is the problem.
I am not saying force all women back home, what I am saying is that when women have to be home she is supported by her community.
1. Do not make her vulnerable to a spouse financially with laws that refuse to recognize she is working ~ perhaps even harder than wage earners as she is never allowed vacation, sick leave of time off unless someone helps for free.
2. women who are 24 hour spousal caregivers and under 62 have no income ad are not eligible for Social Security. They could not work if they wanted to work.
3. Address age discrimination. Women who already have lost that $1/2 million dollars and incidentaly who have pioneered the workforce for new generations are facing this rampant occurance. You would be stunned to see how many well educated older middle aged women are in transitional housing after working a life time with family and on the job.
This discrimination is what younger women face in their futures as ell. Remember:
CARE GIVING IS WORK
And bill clinton signed the bill saying we will end welfare as we know it. Single mothers who are high lighted here do not have to work a fast food job and now more than ever there are stay at home jobs.
The bills main goals are…
* Ending welfare as an entitlement program;
* Requiring recipients to begin working after two years of receiving benefits;
* Placing a lifetime limit of five years on benefits paid by federal funds;
* Aiming to encourage two-parent families and discouraging out-of-wedlock births.
These are still decent benefits and 2 years is a good amount of time to prepare to hit the ground running when it is necessary. As I said in my first message I agree care giving is work but it also needs to be understood with a realistic look at a ll the possibilities.
Dear, I know you mean well, but take it from someone who has ben advocating for low income women for almost 20 years and who has been one myself I can tell you the benefits are FAR from adequate. These benefits will not even pay the rent much less anything else such as energy costs, houshold needs.
This paltry assistance leaves kids to starve and does not even cover basics. Contracted entities (hate to say it but many of them are large non-profits) bilk millions from the Feds and spend it on themselves instead of their clients. href=”http://www.welfarewarriors.org/MWV_Archive%5Cs01%5Cs01–bwe–bus_tour.htm”>. The link provided is just one state, but nothing has been studied in other states and if it were, we would know Wisconsin is not the only state with these issues as hints have been given but nobody WANTS to know the truth. This fear is because since people detest care givers so much, if these non-profits and others wre exposed, then activists fear there won’t be anything for even the few they actually serve. But it all should be exposed and taken to the wood shed. Then re-vamp the System. And this time LISTEN TO THE ONES LIVING IT, not just some ivory towered “expert” who secretely thinks they “work harder” than the poor. Believe me, there are few people who work harder than the poor as the scramble for survival is one of the scariest, dangerous and riskiest work there is ~ paid or unpaid.
Not only are these contracted entities reject more than they serve and are horribly castigating to their clients, then they force these people into life long poverty with their sad “jobs” programs treating their clients as if they are lazy and not worth their time. After all what are their clients but mere “do nothing” care givers??? Worse while a welfare mom faces felony chrages and prison at the whim of anyone who wants to accuse them, even after these contracted entities have been caught for fraud, they are still kept on the dole and contracted.
I won’t even go into the stats of the 70% TANG applicants who fled domestic violence that two years is far from adequate after what a mother and kids have been through, but who now face homelessness, and destitution.
I won’t mention the refusal to allow low income women to go to school to get even a GED and the one year of training IF allowed with the 30 hours of required employemnt on their heads as well as their family needs, which will never get them a livable wage or even employment, especially when we know that a Bachelor’s Degree is our new High School Degree just to get an entry level position.
I won’t talk about the horrible expense already for childcare billed to states who are so prejudice against care givers, they would rather force a newborn into expensive daycare and the mother into a McJob that would never begin to pay for it than realize that it is far cheaper to BE a mother bonding with her baby.
Do you know CA as bad off as it is, finally did the math and saw these expenses where “The Terminator,” who also happens to be Shriver’s's husband, even signed into law this year that parenting is work to allow parents in school to count their time at home care giving as “work?” I wonder why …since our “Democratic” governor vetoed such a bill that passed both houses and both political parties who have also done the math. She was afraid it would “look bad” because people hate care givers so much.
Just who are these child care costs, and other services REALLY supporting? They actually support low wage employers like WalMart who lock their workers into their stores after hours and make them work for free. Meanwhile low wage store owners are the richest people in the world working off these women’s backs, not only here in the U.S. but in the world. Meanwhile they do not pay near the taxes of their workers who are paying upwards of 15% of their incomes (in my state it is 19% and in FLA 20%). Meanwhile the Waltons pay little or nothing out of their hundreds of billions. http://www.itepnet.org/wp2000/text.pdf
According to labor statistics, women lose on the aveage of $1/2 MILLION DOLLARS doing lifelong caregiving and Welfare DEformed codified it into law as “doing nothing.”
It is an outrage and does not begin to address the problems being exaserbated by this attitude that women’s work is “doing nothing” as if the requirted 24/7 of parenting and cleaning up Mom’s waste is all fun and games and a hobby. And forcing them into any workforce that even pays a livable wage does not begin to answer the family needs without sick leave, medical coverage, dencent transportation (public and private), child care, disabilities for both the parents and kids, lack of jobs that have a livable wage, or ANY jobs in these days, and other barriers.
I am sorry if I sound angry, but I have a right to be since for years and years I’ve been seeing stuff like this all the time about how great things are for those who turn to the System for help when in truth they only get a terribly broken System to navigate. And this is just one of the DSHS CPS/Foster Care System is about the most dysfunctional entity there is, they devastate families and children’s lives every day, when in fact they are often more abusive than the actual allegations they make. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48YF1uEuCUA . It is a myth and while maybe some will say, “well nothing is perfect …” it is more than sad when DSHS refuses to listen to their own clients and does not even have an idea how their policies are affecting them, and then insists on STAYING exactly the way they are in order to support their illnesses that hurt people.
Please know I see you mean well, but perhaps it is time to actually listen to women who have lived these things. While it is admirable to help single moms to get jobs with livable wages, with the barriers so many of these women have, a great deal of them will not be able to take advantage of them when they already HAVE one full time job that is about all they can handle that isn’t even considered “work.” I have lots more stories to tell and they would make your hair curl! I wish I knew how to write a book though the tragedies I know would be hard for most readers to take!
Just sayin’ …
Cat
I understand you have heard many horror stories and that there are thousands that would even still shock you. I just can’t see how a government program can actually help anybody in the long term. Their are so many extenuating circumstances that cannot possibly be covered in legislation. People running these programs are really going to work everyday. While some may truly pour their heart and soul into help many seem to lose that passion and instead go in to get their paycheck. I know people need help but I think even more importantly people need to be given the tools to help themselves, because they can do it.
I was talking to my neighbor last night about this and he told me some of what he went through. His wife had left him and he had a 5-6 year old daughter. He ended up losing his job to layoff. Lost his apartment and couldn’t find work for over 8 months. He lived with a friend in his unheated basement ( we live in wisconsin). He barely lived off of ramen noodles that entire time. He feed his daughter much better but that was where all his extra money went. He refused to get government assistance which might not have been the best idea but it was a pride issue for him and his daughter was taken care of feed, and sheltered with clothes on her back. After about 8 months he finally got a crappy job and worked as much as he could for the year or so until he finally landed something a little better and has made one step up since then and had been with that company for 3-4 years now. He personally still makes only around $30,000 a year but got remarried a year and a half ago, now owns a house for the last 3 years has “made it”. It took a lot of hard work and yes some things went his way but I believe there could be a lot more stories like this with the right mindset and coaching. This was in a span of 7-8 years. That is quite a turnaround and it is in all of us to do it.