Watching the fallout after the attempted Christmas terrorist attack, I couldn’t help but think of one of my childhood hobbies: building dams. I loved going down to the creek behind my best friend’s house and backing up the water with whatever rocks, sticks, and mud I could find.
Once it was finished and a modest lake had formed above it, the backside of the dam would inevitably begin to spring leaks. It started as just a trickle here and a trickle there, but before long the leaks would grow and would begin to threaten the dam’s structural integrity. Immediate repairs would be necessary if I wanted to prevent a total collapse that would flood the streambed below.
My first instinct was to throw mud on the backside, where the leaks were emerging. All this accomplished, however, was moving the leak. The water just emerged somewhere else from the dam, usually with a more potent flow. It didn’t take long for me to realize that if I wanted to stop the collapse, I would need to plug the leaks from the frontside of the dam. The key was understanding how water was penetrating the dam in the first place, not in slapping mud on every place it was emerging in a vain attempt to push it back up into the lake.
The same basic concept applies to the effort to prevent more terrorist attacks against the United States. Ever since 9-11, we have seen countless measures analogous to plugging the backside of the dam. From bombing the bejesus out of Afghanistan, to invading and occupying Iraq, to creating two-hour waits at airport security checks, to instituting a ridiculous system of color-coded terror alerts - the entire "War on Terror" has been focused on plugging leaks that will only emerge more potently somewhere else.
And the reason these efforts, even if completely successful, will fail to prevent terrorism is because they don’t repair the frontside of the dam. They don’t address the reasons terrorists want to attack us in the first place. It’s not because "they hate our freedom." They don’t care what we do inside our own borders. They reason they attack, for right or for worng, is because of the way we behave in their part of the world. Here are a few excerpts of a 2002 letter attributed to Osama bin Laden:
Why are we fighting and opposing you? The answer is very simple: Because you attacked us and continue to attack us. You attacked us in Palestine… The creation and continuation of Israel is one of the greatest crimes, and you are the leaders of its criminals…
… You attacked us in Somalia; you supported the Russian atrocities against us in Chechnya, the Indian oppression against us in Kashmir, and the Jewish aggression against us in Lebanon…
… You steal our wealth and oil at paltry prices because of you international influence and military threats. This theft is indeed the biggest theft ever witnessed by mankind in the history of the world…
… Your forces occupy our countries; you spread your military bases throughout them; you corrupt our lands, and you besiege our sanctities, to protect the security of the Jews and to ensure the continuity of your pillage of our treasures…
… You have starved the Muslims of Iraq, where children die every day. It is a wonder that more than 1.5 million Iraqi children have died as a result of your sanctions, and you did not show concern…
… These tragedies and calamities are only a few examples of your oppression and aggression against us. It is commanded by our religion and intellect that the oppressed have a right to return the aggression. Do not await anything from us but Jihad, resistance and revenge. Is it in any way rational to expect that after America has attacked us for more than half a century, that we will then leave her to live in security and peace?!!
The point is not whether these grievances are accurate or justified. The point is that they are the basis for the intense anger that is felt toward the United States, and that this anger will continue to breed acts of violence against us no matter how committed we are to the "War on Terror."
Just as no amount of mud slapped on the backside of one of my childhood dams could stop the leaks – neither can the best military efforts, the best intelligence, nor the best homeland security measures stop this desire to disrupt the peace and security of our nation.
The only way we can remedy the situation is by taking action on the frontside of the dam – by understanding how our foreign policy has engendered such abject hatred, and by taking a new direction in the way we use our military and economic power in the world.



32 Comments




All of this is because we allow complete imbeciles to funtion in our Government and Military.
We as a people are responsible for those in our Government, and what they do.
To continue to allow such people to be part of our Government, is to continue making the ememies we say we so must defeat.
We make little old ladies in this country take off their shoes to fly, but give terrorists visa’s and and allow them to enter our Country.
We offten blame the elected leaders for our problems, but the incompetents are spread through out every portion of our Government, and are praised for the work they do.
yep, well said.
Well, where’s the profit in what you propose?
How can giant corporations reap money from “plugging the front of the dam”?
Who gains monetarily if we understand why “they” attacked us?
I’m afraid your diary doesn’t go far enough.
Although it’s wonderfully written and reasoned.
yeah, what art45 said.
There’s no money in it.
imagine if we just bombed the house of the guy that robbed a bank. killed all occupants. and let him get away. and said we are doing a heckuva job. just need more bombing, and we’ll have him.
In fact, didn’t they do that in Philadelphia in the last ten years or so? drop a huge bomb on a “terrorist” home? killing a bunch of kids etc?
yeah:
1985 firebombing
Subsequently, MOVE relocated to a row house at 6221 Osage Avenue in 1985. On May 13, 1985, responding to months of complaints by neighbors that MOVE members broadcast political messages by bullhorn at all hours and also about the health hazards posed by of the piles of compost. The police department attempted to clear the building.[6] After a standoff, police lobbed tear gas canisters at the building and the fire department battered the roof of the house with two water cannons. A burst of gunfire came from the house, touching off a return volley of thousands of rounds from police lasting 90 minutes. The police tried to remove two wood-and-steel rooftop structures, called bunkers by the police, by dropping a four-pound bomb made of C-4 plastic explosive and Tovex, a dynamite substitute, onto the roof.[7] The resulting explosion caused the house to catch fire, igniting a massive blaze which eventually consumed almost an entire city block.[8] Eleven people, including John Africa, five other adults and five children, died in the resulting fire.[9] The resulting fire was then allowed to burn. Ramona Africa and one child, Birdie Africa, were the only survivors.
Mayor Wilson Goode soon appointed an investigative commission called the PSIC or MOVE commission. It issued its report on March 6, 1986. The report denounced the actions of the city government, stating that “Dropping a bomb on an occupied row house was unconscionable.”[10]
Anyway, as far as mud dams go, we should have asked a beaver.
(kidding you )
why isn’t there a “recommend” button for your articles?
It’s on the front page, can’t recommend front page posts.
Terrorism is not what people who are miserably oppressed do.
Terrorism is state sponsored, by moles, by plants, by intell to use as EXCUSES / raison d’etre for hegomic policies.
Al Qaeda was and is a branch of the intelligence services.
Think of false flag whenever you hear the term Al Qaeda.
Oh silly you to think that anyone could possibly have grievances against the all holy USG. /s
And when I was growing up in Buffalo, NY as a littlun before global warming, my March obsession was constructing canals for the spring melt runoff. Forget dams. I wanted the stuff to disappear asap.
I believe Bush said we have two options. We can fight them here at home or we can fight them in their backyard. Having grown up during the Cold War, I’d much prefer the Bush Doctrine.
I understand there is a peice floating around today quoting a State Dept whistleblower of sorts saying the Obama Admin is not honest telling the country they are simply using the system put in place by Bush. Under Obama, they have been mandated not to profile so as not to offend the Muslin community. I guess this is kinda sorta like looking for grizzly bears when you know sharks are the killers?
And then Chris Dodd steals funds from the airline security screening budget to pay off the firemen’s union for helping him during his presidential campaign.
I wish I could be like you guys and just ‘wish’ the world into living in peace. May my God help us all.
SanderO, would you give me an opinion on my latest Seminal entry…? ;-)
“.. bombing the bejesus out of Afghanistan, to invading and occupying Iraq…”
These were not really attempts at preventing Terrorism, they were totally about something altogether different.
I saw a bumper sticker earlier… “War is Terrorism… With a bigger Budget”…! ;-)
Like showing that the U.S. can kick ass. Yeah us.
I would be interested in your following up with you view of what such a foreign policy would look like concretely in terms of recommendations for dealing with various nations and other groups in the region in order to accomplish an orderly disengagement.
Gawd, that would be sweet if we could just ‘wish’ the world into whirled peas…!
Dood, peace is not found at the end of a bayonet…! I served 20 yrs and never saw that happen…!
Not to short-circuit Jim Moss, but I’d like to advance “talk therapy” as one alternative to bomb them into the dark ages. (Or killing wedding parties.)
(Or killing wedding parties.)
Yeppers, a sure-fire means of winning the ‘hearts and minds’…! ;-)
wedding parties are precursors to terrorist incubators, there’s always reason to support our madness.
Eli is upstairs!
Hard Is The New Evil
I cannot help but wonder how the people of the US would respond if a few of the Middle East countries had military bases here in the US. I suspect I would be doing exactly what they are doing, fighting back with anything at my disposal.
Nice article Mr. Moss. Very nice.
“We have about 50 percent of the world’s wealth, but only 6.3 percent of its population…. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity…. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction…. We should cease to talk about vague and…, unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards, and democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.”
http://www.chomsky.info/talks/19850319.htm
This formulation of ‘our’ relationship to the rest of the world is still current, no matter the Obama pronouncements.
Would appreciate a link to that ‘piece’ and the Dodd story… I couldn’t find either. Meanwhile here’s a link for you:
http://www.rethinkafghanistan.com Watch the whole thing for free. Let’s hope God helps those who are harmed by the US also..
good work!
We need to get this entire terrorism thing and 9/11 looked at.
The public is being driven by false flags and manufactured consent.
The government is controlled by , driven by NeoCon and Wall street agendas.
The world has shown us what they think of Obama’s peace offerings during his apology tour.
We were greatest when we were our own identity and unencumbered by government control and political correctness.
Great Post!
The current NEOCON or NEODUMB leaders in DC and NYC, have not been schooled in the ART OF WAR.
Any harm you do to a man or woman should be done in such a way that you need not fear his or her revenge. MACHIAVELLI.
lucky,
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Sen-Dodd-D-Conn-slashed-aviation-security-funding-for-pet-constituency-80209967.html
Yeah, I know war is hell…I had friends at Kent State.
http://wizbangblog.com/
Currently, the first post: “Why didn’t Abulmutallab Get Flagged by the State?”
Sorry about the previous reply, I am new here – just peaking – and didn’t know how to properly Reply.
What can actually plug the dam?
Educating women, having fewer children, taking good care of the ones we do have.
“Terrorism” has a distinctly Islamic flavor to it today because muslims are at the bleeding edge of overpopulation. Yet it will come to all cultures.
But just to keep you balanced: look at Iran, they are showing that it only takes 25% of the population to despotically crush the other 75%. The neocons have that 25% in the form of the dittoheads. If we were to go down to the neocon-dittohead police state, wouldn’t you want somebody to bail us out? I would!
We’d be in a much better position to out-culture the Muslim world if the Right hadn’t let our educational system crumble, our infrastructure collapse, our manufacturing base emigrate and our healthcare turn into a for-profit mess. The things we used to brag about when we were “better” than the USSR are now quietly ignored by the same chest-beaters, because there’s nothing to brag about anymore. When a defense contractor CEO gets $100 million bonus and their product doesn’t work, HOW exactly does that make America stronger *or* inviting to the potential assimilee?