(Driven to Destruction is a series outlining how America became so dependent on the personal automobile, and how we must break this dependency if we want to create a sustainable way of life for future generations.)
The second installment of Driven to Destruction outlined how advertising trends have created a mystique-based car culture that is very difficult to transform. For 100 years, commercials from auto and oil companies have helped create a national ethos in which the automobile is king. But clever advertising is far from being the only culprit. Our love affair with our cars has also been fueled by the devious actions of a few major corporations – most notably General Motors.
The PBS documentary “Taken For a Ride” describes how the once ubiquitous electric streetcar was driven into the ground by the automobile. It wasn’t a fair fight:
When you’re talking about public transportation in America, for the first part of this century, you’re talking about streetcars. Trolleys ran on most major avenues every few minutes.
In 1922, only one American in ten owned an automobile. Everyone else used rail. At that time Alfred P. Sloan (President, General Motors) said, ‘Wait a minute, this is a great opportunity. We’ve got 90 percent of the market out there that we can somehow turn into automobile users. If we can eliminate the rail alternatives, we will create a new market for our cars. And if we don’t, then General Motors’ sales are just going to remain level.’
Sloan had the idea that he wanted to somehow motorize all the major cities in the country. (GM bought) the largest bus-operating company in the country and the largest bus-production company. And using that as a foothold, GM moved into Manhattan. They acquired interests in the New York railways and between 1926 and ‘36 they methodically destroyed the rails.
When they finally motorized New York, GM worked hard to create the impression of a nationwide trend away from rail. But there was no trend. Buses were a tough sell. They jolted. They smelled. They inched through traffic. City by city, it took the hidden hand of General Motors to replace streetcars with Yellow Coach buses.
The piece-by-piece destruction of the streetcar industry didn’t stop with General Motors. A number of corporations in the auto and oil industries realized that it was in their best interests to work together:
In 1936, a company was founded that would grow to dominate American city transportation. National City Lines had no visible connection to General Motors. In fact, the director of operations came from a GM subsidiary, Yellow Coach, and members of the Board of Directors came from Greyhound, which was founded and controlled by General Motors.
The money to start this new company also came from Greyhound and Yellow Coach. Over the next few years, Standard Oil of California, Mack Truck, Phillips Petroleum and Firestone Tire would join GM in backing this venture. National City Lines grew quickly. By 1946 it controlled public-transit systems in over 83 cities. From Baltimore to St. Louis, Salt Lake City to L.A., the company had grown into an empire.
And this empire was created for one reason – to absorb as much of the streetcar industry as possible, and then to shut it down. Since this conspiracy of corporations was methodically destroying a very efficient and beneficial industry, there was antitrust action taken – but all that came of the proceedings were fines of $5000 for each company involved and $1 for the treasurer of GM who oversaw much of National City Lines’ operations.
The opening words of “Taken For a Ride” tell us why this tragic bit of history is so important for us today:
This is a story about how things got the way they are. Why sitting in traffic seems natural. Why our public transportation is the worst in the industrialized world. And why superhighways cut right through the hearts of our cities.
We might add, “And why when gas hits $4 a gallon, politicians on both sides of the aisle start chanting ‘drill, baby, drill".” We are addicted to oil because we are addicted to driving. And we are addicted to driving in large part because of the profit lust of a handful of men who ran a handful of corporations back in the 1930’s and 40’s.
This profit lust still exists today. The historical parallels are eerie. When the streetcars were shut down and GM conspired its way to soaring sales, many people who could not afford cars were left with few transportation options. Meanwhile, the government could do no better than laughably small fines.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Big Oil And Big Auto continue to rule the American transportation scene. These days, Standard Oil (ExxonMobil) is raking in record profits and GM is receiving huge government bailouts because it is now "too big to fail."
Looking back at the lessons of the streetcar’s demise, it is clear that breaking our dependency on the automobile will not be easy. There are many powerful forces working dilligently to maintain the status quo. How can we keep corporate interests from dominating the energy policy of the 21st century?
In the next installment of Driven to Destruction, we will look at how the development of the Interstate highway system deepened the impact of the car culture, and how its story can give us clues as to how to develop new attitudes about transportation in the future.





65 Comments

Excellent. EXCELLENT! Thank you for posting this. By the way, when you hear talk of high speed rail you might ask “whats the hurry”? Slow speed rail could soon be every where at a tiny fraction of the cost.
Wow! Where I live the local public transport is all buses. They only run every 30 minutes and the bus routes only interconnect at the hub, which often means travelling far out of your way and burning 15+ minutes waiting for a transfer.
Thanks for the info. We really do need to return to a rail based public transport system in our cities and suburbs.
I completely agree. I spent a summer in New Orleans (pre-Katrina) and lived two blocks off St. Charles Avenue, which has one of only two active trolley lines in the US – the other is in San Francisco. I loved it, and wish they criss-crossed every metropolitan area.
Yep, we need both. Fast rail for medium hop travel and light rail for local public transport.
And I agree with your comment regarding it being cheap. If it’s a good enough system to replace the automobile, think about how much money per person could be redirected toward public transport.
BTW, the “Take for a Ride” documentary is on google video.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2486235784907931000#
Sounds like Minneapolis/St. Paul, the public transportation there is notorious.
I spent my early childhood in Chicago where buses ran every few minutes and it was unnecessary to consult a schedule, you would just go down to the corner and wait for the bus. I was surprised when I moved to Minneapolis that a person could be in danger of freezing to death if they missed the bus, and more importantly, it was nearly impossible to get back and forth to work reliably if you had to use the bus.
Over time I came to understand that the city fathers maintained the public transportation system in this manner, in part at least to limit the mobility of the poor who would obviously spread out through the metropolitan area if they were provided with reliable public transportation, and thus access to jobs in the suburbs.
The Twin Cities once had the reputation of being one of the most segregated urban areas in the nation and one subtle but effective component of maintaining that segregation was/is limiting access to public transporation.
For an example of street cars and urban rail abused by city and regional governments, see Seattle’s SLUT (aka: “The Street Car to Nowhere”).
I am all for implementing modern and environmentally good transit solutions, unfortunately, lots of government officials at all levels who claim to be pursuing such ends are really lying about their motivations and the actual rail systems that emerge show it!
One reason that better public transportation is needed is for people with disabilities. I am blind, but luckily I found an apartment that is in walking distance from where I work. Otherwise, I would have to spend a lot of time waiting for the bus. If Trolleys ran on all of the major avenues every few minutes, people who can’t drive would do a lot less waiting.
Yeah. A Single light rail line isn’t worth much. You need an integrated system which gets you pretty much everywhere in the city limits and inner suburbs.
I rode the Minneapolis Light Rail last Monday. It was easy to use and very smooth. All the stops listed the connecting bus routes.
I haven’t riden the Phoenix one yet but the rideship is much higher than was predicted and it looks to expand.
My grandfather was a conductor on the Pacific Electric streetcars. Back in the day those would go everywhere in LA. To see the cars go to Perris, CA for the Orange Empire Trolley Museum as they have a great collection of PE Ry and LA Ry equipment. In Rio Vista, CA is a collection of trolleys that ran in and around the Bay area, Sacramento, and northern California.
Watt4Bob: The Twin Cities used to have one of the best streetcar systems in the country. We made our own cars, custom-built for Northern winters, and they worked exceedingly well — and were taken apart down to the axles and rebuilt every two years. Then Fred Osanna came along, and ruined them. The bus system that followed was and is vastly inferior.
Interestingly enough, when Jesse Ventura pushed for light rail to return to the Twin Cities, some of the most strenuous opposition to it (aside from suburban and exurban white-flight Republicans like Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty) came from the suburb of Bloomington and the Mall of America, which is located in Bloomington. Why? Because they didn’t want poor black kids in North and South Minneapolis to come into their nice, relatively safe, relatively white areas. Nearly six years later, the Mall is more than happy to see Hiawatha Line traffic as it means the need to build a new parking ramp has been lessened if not eliminated, and Bloomington is very happy with the nice effect the line has had on property values of the real estate near it. A similar effect obtains in Minneapolis: The neighborhoods nearest the Hiawatha Line are among the ones whose home values have best weathered the recession.
Target Field and the Hiawatha Line. Coolness.
Here in NYC, they could put light rail trolleys/trams/streetcars onto, for example, Second Avenue at a fraction of the cost of the useless subway they’ve been trying to build for 40 years. If I wasn’t a lazy shit, I’d actually do some research into how quickly and cost-efficiently it could be done.
I remember see the old Keystone light rail cars stacked up at the entrance of the Bay Bridge on the Oakland side. There some rail in the bay now but nothing like this.
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&rlz=1T4ADBF_enUS284US287&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=old+keystone+transportation+in+S.F.&fb=1&gl=us&hq=old+keystone+transportation&hnear=S.F.&view=text&ei=ngzLS_n-CpP2NaGLha4F&sa=X&oi=local_group&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CBAQtQMwAA
One of the big arguments used against light rail is in fact its best feature: The fact that, unlike a bus, its path can’t be changed in a flash at whim. This means that housing developments and neighborhoods can be created around them the way they can’t be around bus lines.
Guns and cars, that’s the American way. although I don’t see how the “normal” people will be able to keep doing it.
It’ll wind up being more like the Politboro in the USSR where the middle of the highway was strictly designated for top government officials while the peasants walked or rode bicycles and horses.
I live in a suburb of a major midwestern city. The only bus line is a 1/2 mile walk with limited service. The grocery store is 1/2 mile away at an intersection, but you would take your life in your hands to walk or bike there because the sidewalk ends before you get to the grocery store and unless you go all the way to the intersection, there is no safe crossing across a 5-lane street.
but I digress, my real point was going to be a new phenomenon I have noticed in the last couple years – the remote starter. Each one of my neighbors has a 2 car garage, but the garages are so full of stuff, they park on the driveway. On winter mornings, up and down the street, you see cars running in the driveway with no driver inside. Then after some number of minutes, when the car is toasty warm, the driver hops in and drives off. However, the “some number of minutes” can be anywhere from 15-30 minutes!!! 30 minutes of cars running in the driveway!! This habit absolutely sickens me. The waste and the air pollution is just unacceptable and I think this practice should be banned. The neighbors? Typical midwestern suburban attitude – “It’s my money to waste if I want. Phhht to air pollution, I don’t give a cr@p.”
A lot of the streetcar lines were privately built, with great fortunes made. Speculators would buy up tracts of land, build a streetcar line to access it, then sell the land for homebuilding. I’m not that familiar with how it worked (picked it up from reading Dreiser and it’s been awhile), but iirc, had to get a charter from the local govt, so pols got rich as the developers paid them off. The usual developer scheme, but with streetcars thrown in the mix.
That is true in the larger urban areas. In rural America, and there was still a considerable population in rural America in 1922, horses were still common personal transportation.
I’m thinking that the Love Affair was a natural as Automobiles didn’t replace street cars, they replaced the horse for personal transportation.
On Main St. in New Paltz, today a town of 15,000, you can still see the rail lines when the pavement gets worn out. Don’t know what the pop was when the streetcar was put in, but a lot smaller than now.
See my comment at 19. New Paltz is still pretty rural, but it was completely so when the streetcar was put in on Main St. Sure, the farmers couldn’t use it, but I’ll bet everyone in town did.
It’s still ok for us normies to buy the guns tho, even if the elite have their own unimpeded special freeway lanes. :)
This story is pretty much America in a nutshell. A public good is destroyed for private gain. The less well-off are screwed over by the rich and powerful. Greed trumps common sense.
Damn good piece! And when public transportation became vogue again, it was the petroleum consuming bus that was the overwhelming transportation of choice, rather than streetcars. Too often light rail in modern cities is aimed not at the poor but at the more well off, environmentally conscious professionals. Our cities have been designed for the personal automobile due to the same pressures from big oil that you described and until that changes, we’re going to need some kind of personal vehicle.
yep, I agree, 15,000 is quite urban tho compared to small rural agricultural based villages. We didn’t see the decline of the agricultural based economy until a decade or so after 1922.
I live a mile from the new ‘Northstar Line’. The new Highspeed Rail into downtown Minneapolis from the Northwest Suburbs. We had passenger rail service up until the late 60′s. When the Railroads shutdown the passenger service and started pulling up the extra sidings and tracks I questioned it. Thinking that it might be short sighted. Then all (or most) of the Depots were torn down in the smaller villages on the lines.
The justification for taking up the extra tracks and sidings was a Taxation issue, that the railroads are taxed on the miles of tracks they own, not on the miles of track they use. Sounded like there could have been a simple fix for that. But instead we tore up tens of thousands of miles of rail line (some where the construction had been taxpayer financed).
But rail cannot replace the need for personal transportation, but agree that it’s certainly one piece of the puzzle in urban areas. (our new Northstar line can only handle a very small percentage of the current work force, a very small percentage)
I remember the state road system was marketed as a national security program, what are the facts regarding?
are there reliable links to find out about that, the reality of the justification and the althernatives and counter points to their point of view
Let me agree with what you really said (or what I think you really said).
Much of the infrastructure for good-old-fashioned rail is already in place
(although in deplorable condition)and totally devoted to the profit of the
freight-running owners, who, with the connivance of congress and the
totally owned and operated state legislatures, victimize the few paltry
passenger services that lease their rails.
Anybody who has to be there right now can pick up the damn phone.
Ike created the initial ‘Interstate Highway System’ and part of the justification was National Security, the ability to move the troops and equipment rapidly without relying on the Railroads.
I believe it’s personal transportation that turned the local economy into a global econoomy
if not for personal transportation there would be no way no how home depots and walmarts could exist, the local hardware store, grocery mart, candy store, clothing stores male and female, barber on every corner economy I grew up with would still exist
Another observation about rail.. Freight rail is being replaced by trucks. I live 2 miles from one of the largest railroad switching yards in the country and it has been nearly completely idle for almost 2 years. Perhaps a part of this is the slower economy. There are thousands of rail cars and hundreds of engines parked in this yard and the only section that is active is a small area of intermodal transport, containers that go from train to truck, or truck trailers on flat rail cars. I think it is for the same reason as passenger transport – a truck can go from door to door. If you put your merchandise on a train, you have to take it to the railroad, then have facility to unload railcars and distribute on trucks.
off for some topp down, sports car, personal transpiring/transporation on this glorious sunday morn
sigh, I love my personal transportation
have good sunday but most important, give good sunday all
tee hee
I just invented that and will use it from hence and forward
anyway, everyone, give good sunday and see all later
New Orleans is rebuilding its streetcar lines. The city is in the midst of reclaiming its heritage, and the Streetcars are an integral part of it. It is adding one from Canal to the bus / train station, and more to come. Google for streetcar maps in the city, and you’ll see how the town was filled with streetcars.
and read: “New Orleans: The Canal Streetcar Line”, by Branley
New Orleans is a town that can work with public transportation, due to its layout and relative compactness, plus its wide main streets, a lot that allow a streetcar line to exist in the middle of the street, like Canal and St. Charles. Now if the tourists who drive into the city will just learn to look when making left turns on St. Charles and Canal (across the Streetcar paths), it would work great.
One of the premises of “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” was a retelling of the GM story.
And totally OT- make sure you watch the series “Treme”. It is spot on accurate about life in the city, and the rebuilding of the city after the Flood.
Indeed. Look at George Lucas’ ode to the car in American Graffiti. It was how he and his buddies grew up — the East Coast people he originally had working on the film with him didn’t understand growing up with cars because they used bikes or subways or feet.
hey azureblue1
response to your OT. What’s the plan for if/when another cat 7 hits, and if sea level rises, will that affect it also?
Thanks PW.
I think that if more cities would devote energy into personal transportation we would receive a dual benefit. (the challenge that obesity is/will create is going to be mammoth)
Biking is so much of a win win win.
Kids and I used to do much of it for our personal transportation, then we moved and the darn hills are just too challenging, takes my knees out.
Electric cars coupled with solar and wind generation hopefully will correct much for us that currently need what rail can’t provide.
The same happened here in Detroit, except here the street car tracks were not removed until the 1950′s. By destroying a cheap and efficient means of transportation that ran not only within Detroit but also out to its suburbs, a ridgid form of segregation was established which acted to effectively keep blacks isolated within the borders of the city.
Outside of Lansing, MI, a business once had a large sign over it’s establishment advertising it’s wares, “Guns and Cars.”
They will soon start construction of a light rail line on Woodward Ave.. The hope is to eventually extend it to the northern suburbs. Here’s a link to a documentary on Detroit and the project.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/blueprintamerica/reports/beyond-the-motor-city/video-preview/861/
Just remembered, we I was in boot camp, there were two areas of the country the boys had come from. MN, IA, WI and New York. It was amazing how many of the boys from NY didn’t have a car, didn’t drive. I couldn’t relate (I had grown up on a farm) but did remember being taught that in school, the difference in transportation systems.
Well, you make a bunch of assumptions.
First off, K was a K3 when it hit the city. K was at best a 5 when it approached New Orleans, and it quickly lost energy
2nd, it wasn’t K that caused the flooding- it was Bush that caused it, by stealing the levee repair money, that in turn, stopped repair / rebuild work being done on the levees, as per the SELA project, so Bush could give tax breaks to his rich buddies. The levees should have held a Cat3, but, because maintainance had been stopped or greatly reduced, due to lack of funding, the levees gave way. The ACOE is the whipping boy, but they couldn’t do anythign with out money, and Bush, in three years budgets, cut the funding to as little as 1/4 needed.
3rd, the Dutch are now working to share their expertise on levees with the city, now that we have a reasonable president. Google and see what they have constructed in the Netherlands and its strength for withstanding storms and tides. When K hit, the Dutch offered manpower, engineering and supplies, but Bush told them to go away. The ACOE is in the process of restarting the levee rebuilding process. Concerns about rising water levels due to global warming are the same concerns as shared by any coastal city, especially those cities who do not have a flood protection system in place- for instance, Miami and the rest of FL (they get hit with a hurricane about every year) , Los Angeles, NYC, the Carolina and VA coastline.
Now back to topic……..
Detroit’s street cars were sent to Mexico City. The last I heard, they were still being used there.
Didn’t make any assumptions. I was stationed on the gulf shortly after Camille and witnessed the destruction, even inland.
Too bad there’s still so much blaming going on, refusal to accept responsibility and I’m a victim of George.
My personal belief is that the big easy is going to be toast when it gets hit with the next 5, 6 or 7. Doesn’t matter what is done with the levees.
The Dutch have very little concern for Hurricanes in their levee design and construction, not a good contrast.
…..not to mention that there are no overhead cables so that aircraft, even large commercial ones and military, could land on them in a pinch or in case of national emergency…..
except as we approach Illinois, they have Toll Booths :-(
The history of the Streetcar in Portland and the Willamette Valley
Fascinating. My Grandfather rode the Oregon Electric from Tualatin to Portland back then, took 20 minutes.
I think the crisis of airline transportation this week has opened a lot of eyes to the vulnerability of the global economy and what we take for granted. It is rather stunning, and it certainly is a concrete example of other effects of global climate issues.
you got that right!! Lucky for Europe they do have a well developed rail system.
From Wikipedia:
Randal O’Toole of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, argues that streetcars faded away at the invention of the internal combustion engine and rise of the private automobile and then the bus. At one time, nearly every city in the U.S. with population over 10,000 had at least one streetcar company. 95% of all streetcar systems were at one time privately owned.
Robert C. Post wrote that “nationwide, the ultimate reach of the alleged conspirators extended to only about 10 percent of all transit systems—sixty-odd out of some six hundred—and yet virtually all the other 90 percent also got rid of trolleys (as happened with all the tramcar systems in the British Isles and France).”
Cliff Slater conducted research on U.S. transit history, and concluded, “GM or not, under a less onerous regulatory environment, buses would have replaced streetcars even earlier than they actually did.”
yep, assumptions, and you just confirmed them. I lost friends of family in Camille, and was in NO when it hit. I was on the MS coast after C helping my Uncle (who lived in Biloxi) put his life back together, and saw the whole disaster with my own eyes. You were stationed there, I would guess at the air base. I was born, grew up, and lived there. I had dozens of my friends lose their existences, their belongings, mementos, musical instruments, houses, pets, family history, cars, in the K flood, and some are still trying to put their lives together this very day. Do not even attempt to diminish the suffering of the people of New Orleans, nor the city, over your arm chair theorizing. You patently refuse to acknowledge that states like FL are hit far more times than New Orleans, are far more vulnerable, but you make not one mention of that fact. You weren’t there after K. And I can bet you were not at the post K Jazz Fest, much less performed at it, and saw the faces of NO people who were desperately searching for some sort of something that would give them a sense of normalcy. Hugs held too long and way too tight. Crying on your shoulder for way too long. Friends thought dead in the flood, foudn again. Anything to diminish the horror of what they went through. You did not walk in St. Bernard, Lakeview, the Ninth Ward, as I did, and see the misery and ruin of thousand of lives- rows of destroyed houses empty, with doors and windows left open, people who came in, grabbed what they could (if they had anything left at all), and left homes they grew up in open to the elements. I know plenty of people, family members, too, who are NO natives, who could not watch Treme without crying.
The Flooding of the city was a Bush debacle from beginning to end. The flooding of New Orleans, as John Goodman’s character puts it so well in the beginning of Treme, Was a preventable manmade disaster. Camille was not. And you are incorrect about the Dutch- their levee system is superlative.
Now stay on topic. And get lost, you know nothing of which you speak.
[modnote: "get lost" is a bit harsh. you made good points, no need to get personal]
This is an old story that needs retelling. Giant corporations continue to employ similar strategies to move their products or services under the guise of “following” a nationwide or global trend.
In some cases, companies do follow a trend, often because corporate leaders are as prone to following the consultant-led management mantra of the day as any other lemming. In large measure, though, as with the demise of public transportation, the telecoms’ campaigns against city-wide internet hubs, and the movement to allow restricted internet access – and the movement to deem personal privacy old hat, out of date and impossible to retain – these “trends” are developed, promoted and assiduously manipulated by large corporations.
GM wasn’t the first, either. Rockefeller beat them by a generation, and the railroads a generation before him. J.D. built the world’s biggest company before autos, trucks, buses, and diesel-driven ships and locomotives (replacing coal) became the order of the day.
“Progress”, like the fictional invisible hand of capitalism, usually has a steeled, politically oiled hand driving its “inevitability”.
GM’s drive to ruin public transportation is not fiction or a conspiracy theory. It’s fact. Individual claims may be wrong or exaggerated, but Detroit’s efforts to displace all public transport with their own products were ceaseless.
In the late Seventies or early Eighties (I think) 60 Minutes had a feature on the demise of inner-city rail systems and the role of GM. I recall it followed pretty much the same trajectory as Jim s commentary here. It seems like this story gets renewed periodically. It has its critics as well. 60 Minutes made it seem almost like a conspiracy, earning this sort of rebuttal:
http://www.erha.org/plot.htm
It was certainly concerted, energetically pursued policy. GM was the biggest player, then controlling over half the market.
I find this credible myself,
and then there is GE and the long lasting lightbulb – not to mention any efforts to encourage solar and anything else that would ween us off the grid.
1.) Libertarian agenda opposes government social services (eg: public transportation) supported by taxes.
2.) It is a fact that GM, Firestone and Standard Oil made a concerted effort to successfully sabotage cable car operations wherever they existed.
Tucson’s old trolley exists in a small section of line left from the old days and they have a couple of cars. The city and the university want to expand the system.
Sacramento’s early system was run by what is now Pacific Gas & Electric as a way to make money off the electricity they generated.
At one time you could go from the SF Bay area on the Northern Electric to Sacramento, then Chico and Hamilton City up in the Sacramento Valley. They also operated electric freight motor to move boxcars and such. The Pacific Electric moved the freight around Los Angeles that way too.
Thanks so much for the lecture. You know nothing of me.
You choose to live on a delta of organic material, that is decaying and sinking. That is your right but my right is to emphatically resist any and all future efforts to figuratively and physically bail you out again.
The other cities and areas you mentioned, they are not on a sinking Delta.
Time to take some personal responsibility for the choices you make.
Where the rubber (and fuel) meets the road.
The farm tractor manufacturers did the same thing with farmer’s teams of horses.
bought them all, and killed them, to prevent any farmer who did not like the tractor from going back to horses.
since it is not easy to train a team, that method of working the fields was gone.
look at what they use now to till etc. grotesque.
There a few, admitted not many, but a few good signs.
Logging with horse teams is making a resurgence.
I just placed my name on a 1/4 of a buffalo that will be harvested in June. The Bison herd it’s coming from is raised purely on grass, and the vast majority of the grass is non-machinery maintained.
Change will be slow, but there are promising signs.
Great (if short) piece in the current AARP Bulletin about the resurgence of streetcars. (I’m over 50, what can I say??)
I live in a fast-growing college town with dire traffic issues, and am at work on smart planning initiatives. They include resident-builder charettes, zoning reform, greenbelts, and a halt to forced annexation in order to foster regional cooperation and eventually, regional planning. A couple of strategically placed light rail lines inside the city limits are integral to our long-range vision.
As you note, Jim, it’s not a new idea. Check out the second diagram down, here. Note the intermunicipal railway.
Well, I live a block off a main Avenue where beginning this summer they will begin to rebuild light rail that once tied Mpls together with St. Paul (That is if all the environmental law suits are settled.) Over the last several years of planning, private developers have had a hay day on the Avenue, putting in apartments and condo’s. (I just wish they would build a decent grocery store. I have to drive 8 miles into the suburbs for quality food shopping.)
Finance had a great deal to do with the demise of old Street Car Lines. During the 1920′s banks and Wall Street had little interest in private infrastructure investment, meaning there was little finance available for application of newer technologies to Street Car Systems. Systems could not expand quickly into new neighborhoods. During the 30′s, revenue declined as employment did, bankrupting some systems. Again new investment was near impossible. During WWII, systems still in place were overworked with little investment — not because of lack of revenue, but because of non-availability of critical materials such as steel. This set the stage for decisions in the Post WWII era when franchise owners either had to make heavy investments in new equipment and track — or scrap the system. In the late 40′s and 50′s, virtually all systems were privately owned. It would not be till the 60′s that conversion to some form of public ownership became common, and by that time most systems had converted over to the bus. Street Car systems also had relatively high labor costs, as most cars were designed for two person operation — the driver and the fare taker.
General Motors killed the streetcar.
General Motors killed the electric car.
General Motors killed my dog.
To think that streetcars will come back and play a part in making things better is naive. The link at #52 pretty much says it all. Just quit it, please.
Pesky environmentalists …, please list if you can, any environmental lawsuits which are holding up the project?
Links?
The link I provide is to an enviornmental impact study for the project.
Pesky developers …, please explain your position on development of housing in the central corridor, specifically, what are you implying by use of the phrase “…private developers have had a hay day…”
If you ask me, it sounds like the public sector investment in a long awaited improvement in local transportation infrastructure has spurred private investors to put their own money into neighborhood development.
Are you against private real-estate development/developers?
Total BS, no matter where you live within the Central corridor, you’re never more than a mile from a good grocery, probably three, and in many different cultural flavors.
If you care to give your approximate location, I promise to tell you exactly where to find at least one premium quality grocer less than 2 miles from your home.
The following quotes, offered to rebut your misinformation, are available here; Twin City Rapid Transit Company
“The company had a long-standing policy of reinvestment in the rail system. When profits appeared, they were usually used to pay off loans and improve the rails, streetcars, and other hardware the company owned. It was rare for the company to pay out dividends.
In 1948, a Wall Street speculator named Charles Green bought 6000 shares of TCRT stock. He expected to quickly gain profit, but found he had purchased stock just as the company decided to set forth on some major construction.
Knowing this would demolish his anticipated dividends, Green contacted other shareholders and urged them to vote out the company’s president, D.J. Strouse, and put him in charge instead.
Green took control of the company in 1949 and quickly started dismantling the railway system, announcing that the company would completely switch to buses by 1958. Many of the system’s trolleys were sold to other cities around the continent.
It was soon discovered that Green had connections to organized crime, and his actions were alienating the public. He sold his shares in 1950 to be briefly replaced by Emil B. Anderson before local lawyer Fred Ossanna ascended to head the company the next year.
Ossanna held off on the teardown for a short while, but soon announced that the process would be accelerated. Lines would be removed and replaced by buses in two years.”
“When the transportation system peaked in 1922, it had nearly 530 miles (850 km) of track and 1021 streetcars. Rail extended a distance of about 50 miles (80 km) from Stillwater on the bank of the St. Croix River in the east to Lake Minnetonka in the west. For a time, TCRT was the largest employer in the area.”
We’re talking about the Twin Cities and the Twin City Rapid Transit Company, which was never near bankruptcy, in fact, at the time it was purchased it was on the verge of major new construction…
See the above quote, the system was poised to start a major reinvestment of it’s own profits at the time it was purchased.
“Before the dismantling began, TCRT had purchased a significant number of PCC streetcars. These were sold off in 1952 and 1953, still in very good operating condition. The cars ended up in Mexico City (91 cars), Newark, New Jersey (30), and Shaker Heights, Ohio (20).”
“Many have alleged that the teardown of TCRT’s rail system was associated with actions General Motors took in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, arguably with the express purpose of destroying streetcar systems to promote bus and automobile travel. GM, along with Firestone and Standard Oil, formed National City Lines, a holding company that engaged in hostile takeovers of many streetcar lines.
In 45 cities, this resulted in “bustitution,” the full conversion from steel-wheel to rubber-tire transit.
National City Lines did not engage directly with Twin City Rapid Transit, although Fred Ossanna had previously worked for NCL. He came to work at TCRT as a lawyer for Charles Green in the 1949 takeover of the company. However, General Motors did apparently offer some deep discounts on buses. Reportedly, Ossanna once went to ask for 25 buses—and was offered 525. The vast majority of buses in TCRT’s eventual bus fleet were built by GM. …
… Most of the activity was geared toward stripping TCRT of its assets to fill the pockets of owners and investors. Ossanna was convicted in 1960 of illegally taking personal profit from the company during the transition period. He was imprisoned along with other accomplices. “
W4B; The picture at the bottom of the page, (scroll down) shows Fred Ossanna looking exactly like what he was, a man who made a lot of money as he destroyed the Twin City Rapid Transit Company.
“In 1932, most of the system’s streetcars were converted to “one-man operation” where, rather than requiring both a motorman to drive in front and a conductor to take fares in the rear, the motorman took over both operations.”
So tell me if you will, who’s advocating the return of the street car?
Sounds like a straw-man to me ferrariboy.