I made several comments on various posts yesterday re the scheduled appearance for sentencing of Gov Siegelman after his 9 year struggle against trumped up charges brought at the instigation of karl rove. onitgoes suggested
Perhaps you could write about that on MyFDL? I think it would be very helpful if you did. I know a little about Mr. Sielgelman’s situation, but it would be helpful to have more information about it.
I found some interesting articles online but this one is very thorough and illuminating covering the 9 year struggle that ended yesterday with a 6.5 year prison sentence:
*** best summary posted April 12, 2010:
Andrew Kreig: Siegelman Judge Asked To Recuse As Kagan, Rove Oppose Reviews:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-kreig/siegelman-judge-asked-to_b_534628.html
Two short quotes from the very lengthy article that describes the connections with judge, prosecutor, rove, etc.:
Siegelman was Alabama’s governor from 1999 to 2003, but lost reelection in 2002 when 6,000 of his votes mysteriously shifted from voting machines in Baldwin County after polls closed. “Keep in mind,” Siegelman wrote last week, “the head of Alabama’s Business Council after my election was stolen was, and is, Bill Canary.”
Siegelman argues that Rove worked with Alabama prosecutors in an office run by U.S. Attorney Leura Canary. Her husband is Rove’s longtime friend and political ally Canary, who managed the 2002 campaign of Siegelman’s Republican rival Bob Riley, Alabama’s current governor.
and quote:
A bipartisan group of 91 former state attorneys general from more than 40 states formed an unprecedented coalition to file a friend-of-the-court brief to the Supreme Court arguing it should hear Siegelman’s case because his actions did not constitute a crime.
But Kagan, now widely reported as a leading candidate to ascend from her post as Justice Department solicitor general to become her friend Obama’s nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy, urged the high court in November to deny Siegelman a hearing. Kagan used technical legal arguments devised with the assistance of DOJ’s trial prosecutors.
And two articles that illustrate the trumped up charges against Governor Siegelman and the corrupt DOJ:
Legal Schnauzer: Siegelman Resentencing Serves as a Grim Reminder That His Prosecution Was Bogus from the Outset:
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2012/08/siegelman-resentencing-serves-as-grim.html
Legal Schnauzer: Justice Department Lawyer Has Conflict of Interest In SCOTUS Review of Siegelman Convictions:
http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2012/05/justice-department-lawyer-has-conflict.html



10 Comments

Recommended.
Out of all of the horrors we have witnessed, this one makes me the saddest. Don Siegelman is a good person and his life has been ruined to suit the needs and salve the frustration of psychopaths. We are so fucked.
very good post, but your comment at #15 at the first link should be included to clarify. I wasnt’ sure if he died or was going back to prison.
There isn’t much difference that I see when comparing Don Siegleman to Gov. Richardson but Eric Holder’s DoJ decided to not investigate –
Is it that Don was willing to pull back the curtain? Maybe elections are all fixed and in the upper chambers they are in on it. Siegelman crossed the line.
I recently did some reading about Carl Rove’s history, he had a CIA agent who did some dirty work for him beginning in Texas. He has no compunction against repurposing an agency to achieve partisan goals and will stop at nothing.
Nancy Pelosi should have taken him out she could have. Last moth she said ‘I Could Have Arrested Karl Rove … But We Didn’t’ when and
Does she think that by letting Republicans off for everything, including contempt they would play nice later?
She said she learned “owning her power” from her mother who worked to get her father elected – Boston Mayor Alessandro. Her method is to do favors, and call in her own later.
She decided for the rest of us to take an investigation that would lead to impeachment off the table, she said, because it didn’t further the Party electorally. She said it was a distraction and she wanted to get on with the business of the people.. bills like Telecom immunity, doing away with FISA, or the bank bailout.
Was this political naiveté, do they know something really bad about some Democrats, or it was simply treasonous behavior- to increase her own power. Is she just content with her seat on top and too lazy to pursue justice?
But this is just one piece of a larger puzzle.
We have a selective unwillingness to look back but they did with AK. sen Ted Stevens.
The WH obsessively targets whistle-blowers, even fabricated evidence like in the Thomas Drake case.
They are willing to fire on their own- like unions, Acorn or Sherry Sherrod.
Why?
Outrageous!!! Rec’d.
The judge is an ‘interesting’ guy, as well as the venue. Wayne Madsen – the former NSA investigative reporter who never (or almost never) gives his sources (thus introducing legitimate doubt into his body of work) has pointed out a connection of the judge with the 911 attacks, as well as (he says) to the 911 coverup.:
(emphasis mine)
While tantalyzing, and worth noting in connection to the question of whether Fuller might be a “player” (i.e., corrupt), I don’t see how the persecution of Siegleman can be considered part of a 911 coverup. What would make this argument stick is if Siegelman was somehow pursuing 911 accountability. But, no mention is made of such an pursuit.
Your title should also include “complicit, corrupt Dems”. Dems are very complicit in all Repub frauds:
voter suppression :did they protest the stolen presidential elections of 2000 & 2004? And what was Eric Holder doing until now while Repubs were going on the offensive on voter suppression since 2011?
Attacks on unions: Wisconsin and Obama. Need I say any more?
Attack on democracy : MI financial emergency manager law. What did we hear from top Dems? Crickets.
And firedogs could add more…..
More like farewell to the illusion we hold of truth and justice, the American way.
Greed, fraud, treachery, murder and pleasure in others demise is the mindset of the owners.
karl, grover and the rest of the scum pull our levers of power.
Enterprise, Alabama, adjacent to Fort Rucker, as I understand it, is the base for the criminal business enterprise out of which the Karl Rove/Tom Donohue ongoing pattern of corrupting and stealing elections emerged. Control of the Alabama office of Governor, as well as federal prosecutorial discretion in Alabama, is essential for the protection of the major organized crime enterprise based there, and all of its criminal activities.
The reelection of Don Siegelman as Governor in 2002 was stolen. (This is the same election cycle in which the Max Cleland U.S. Senate and the Georgia Governor offices were stolen by margins so large that the national media consortium exit polls had to be suspended altogether.)
Then federal prosecutions were instigated by Rove, Donohue and Bill Canary to block the attempt by Siegelman to regain office in 2006.
Senatorial holds were placed upon all of Obama appointments as leverage with which to continue Rove picks for the strategic Alabama Middle District U.S. Attorney appointment through the Obama Administration. Obama appointee George Beck had helped set up the key witness against Siegelman by allowing prosecutors to improperly craft his testimony. Beck also served as hatchet man for Rove in lodging a completely bogus and incredibly vicious ethics complaint against the courageous Alabama lawyer who had blown the whistle upon the instigation by Rove of the federal prosecution against Siegelman.
Wow, metamars, the connections to 9-11 are curious as well as more evidence of how wide-spread the ongoing corruption in the u.s. is.
Thank you, metamars, and all above for your thoughtful comments.
Thanks, shekissesfrogs, for the clarifying link to my friday comment #15
How could I have forgotten the outrageous end of Max Cleland and Georgia Governor election thefts?! And the end of exit polls?! I guess we’ve been thrown in the sewer so long that all the $hit has run together.
Thanks, Cliff, for not forgetting the most egregious crimes in the 2002 election that have become commonplace and unremarkable today.